Negotiating Wisely for a Positive Outcome

                                   By Chelse Benham

“Character may almost be c...
Yield to pressure.                                Apply pressure.

Needless to say, soft and hard bargaining can be detri...
expectations than men. This pervasive social psychological phenomenon is
called the “entitlement effect.” The entitlement ...
Not being willing to say no. Women often have difficulty saying no
      particularly when they're dealing with someone th...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5

Negotiating wisely for a positive outcome


Published on

Published in: Career
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Negotiating wisely for a positive outcome

  1. 1. Negotiating Wisely for a Positive Outcome By Chelse Benham “Character may almost be called the most effective means of persuasion.” – Aristotle Learning to negotiate is an empowering ability. Decisive and expedient exchanges between people can be elevated to an art form when you acquire persuasive negotiating skills. Effective negotiating enables you to shape situations to ensure that your needs are satisfied. Once you master the art of negotiating, you soon recognize that the only real limits to what you can achieve are those you place on yourself. “Power to persuade comes from coolly, dispassionately and methodically looking at both sides. However, people who come across as too cold don’t persuade. The key ingredient to good communicating is being sincere. Believe in what you are saying and others will listen. Control how you say it and you’ll be able to influence others,” said Theresa Norman, lecturer in the Department of History and Philosophy at The University of Texas-Pan American. “Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In” by Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce Patton advance a negotiating method that creates a win- win situation. The authors identify three strategies of negotiating, however these strategies are not all equal and some provoke unwise agreements in their wake. According to the authors, there is “positional bargaining” that comes in two flavors: soft or hard. These first two are very different from one another and often lead to a “win-loose” situation where parties may feel unsatisfied upon the closing of an agreement reached. This is especially true if one party approaches the situation from a soft position whilst the other comes from it using hard positioning techniques. The following items illustrate the differences between the two: Soft Hard Participants are friends. Participants are adversaries. The goal is agreement. The goal is victory. Participants make concessions to cultivate Participants demand concessions as the relationship. a condition of the relationship. The philosophy is to be soft on the people. The philosophy is to be hard on the people. Trust others. Distrust others. Change your position easily. Dig into your position. Make offers. Make threats. Disclose your bottom line. Mislead as to your bottom line. Accept one-sided losses to reach Demand one-sided gains as the agreement. price of agreement. Insist on agreement. Insist on your position.
  2. 2. Yield to pressure. Apply pressure. Needless to say, soft and hard bargaining can be detrimental. Fisher, Ury and Patton advise the use of “principled negotiating” as a productive means of reaching a win-win solution in any negotiating situation. The principled negotiating method was developed at the Harvard Negotiating Project by Fisher and Ury. In essence, the method calls for negotiators to be problem-solvers with a goal of reaching a wise agreement efficiently and amicably. It has four basic points: 1. People: separate the people from the problem. 2. Interests: focus on interests, not positions. 3. Options: generate a variety of possibilities before deciding what to do. 4. Criteria: insist that the result be based on some objective standard. Helpful explanations of these four foundations are found at The first point recognizes that positions become identified with egos. The negotiators need to work side-by-side and resolve issues together, attacking the problem rather than each other. The second point is meant to avoid focusing on stated positions. Looking at the interests of the parties and their overall objectives, rather than at a series of positions makes it easier to reach compromises. The third point is aimed at avoiding decisions made under pressure or in the presence of an adversarial negotiator. Such conditions tend to narrow vision. Instead, negotiators from both sides should take time together to think up a wide range of solutions that advance shared interests and/or reconcile differing interests and then, later, jointly choose one. The forth point has to do with situations in which the interests are directly opposed to each other. In such situations, the parties should try to reach results based on standards independent of each party. Some fair standard and objective criteria such as market value, a national pay scale, custom, law or expert opinion will serve this purpose. Following the thought that not all negotiating styles are created equal, the same can be said of the people negotiating. Specifically, women on average are less adroit at negotiating than men. According to Juliet Nierenberg, president of the Negotiation Institute in New York and co-author of “Women and the Art of Negotiating,” in an interview on women are at a disadvantage because they have less experience in the negotiating process. Riley Bowles, author of “Negotiating Challenges for Women Leaders” at believes women walk into a negotiation with lower
  3. 3. expectations than men. This pervasive social psychological phenomenon is called the “entitlement effect.” The entitlement effect is linked to perceived “deservedness.” The effect postulates that women perceive that they deserve less than men. According to Bowles, women don’t want to be viewed as too aggressive. This is seen as a negative quality. However, Bowles contends that a negative perception is generated if you don't negotiate. If you don't negotiate for your salary, writes Bowles, they walk away happy that they paid you less but wonder why they hired you. “Four Negotiating Mistakes That Women Often Make” by Lee and Jessica Miller found at identify problems women face when negotiating. They are: Adopting a negotiating style that doesn't reflect who you are. For many women, they avoid negotiating or think they don't have an aptitude for it. How you negotiate needs to reflect who you are. You must be authentic or you'll lose all credibility. People see through you if you try to be something you aren't. Don’t walk in tough, if in reality, you are gentle. Being mild mannered and negotiating effectively are not mutually exclusive. Not seeing a situation as an opportunity to negotiate. Women typically don't recognize that opportunities to negotiate exist in almost every interaction. They look at situations in terms of decisions that have to be made, rather than opportunities to negotiate. Often this is because women fail to realize that they don't have to simply accept or reject what's being offered. Rather they have the option of asking for something different. If you assume everything is negotiable, you'll find that it's true. Successful women recognize that almost everything is negotiable. You decide what's worth negotiating. Furthermore, one of the strengths women bring to negotiating is their ability to develop relationships. Used properly, relationships can facilitate effective negotiating. It's always harder for someone to say no if they know and like you. By the same token, women sometimes don't ask for things they want, out of fear of damaging the relationship. This fear can hold women back and keep them from getting what they would like. We call this the "empathy trap." To avoid it, realize it never hurts to ask. While you may not get everything you ask for, you'll be amazed at how often you get most of what you want. Remember, you can't get something if you don't ask for it.
  4. 4. Not being willing to say no. Women often have difficulty saying no particularly when they're dealing with someone they care about. Because women place a high value on relationships, they're more hesitant about saying no. They want to keep everyone happy. Interestingly, “no” is the most powerful word in negotiating. Sometimes it's necessary to say no before you can get to yes. Successful negotiators have learned when and how to say no. You don't have to say no loudly or aggressively. If, however, an offer is less than you think it should be, you need to point that out politely but firmly. If the other party can't or won't improve the offer, you need to be willing to walk away. Knowing your bottom line and being willing to say no to something that doesn't meet your needs often results in the other party finding a way to satisfy your needs. Not negotiating well when it's for you. Both men and women find it difficult to negotiate for themselves, but women often have a harder time. Many women were raised to believe that it's selfish to ask for things for themselves. If you do your homework, you'll know what's fair and reasonable to request. Don't settle for less. “Research is the most important piece of advice I can tell someone about the salary process. They can find out what to expect to be paid by a number of sources like the Census Bureau,” Lourdes Servantes, placement specialist in the Career Placement Services Office at UTPA, said. “Interested people can log onto and go to the personnel site and find classification and pay scale for just about any job that they are interested in.” Empower yourself by learning, understanding and becoming familiar with the negotiating process. Remember to focus on the merits of an issue set forth by objective standards. Remain calm, collected and alert. Use sincerity and play to your strengths. Self-control and relaxed composure are not diametrically opposed to one another. You don’t have to appear severe to be believed. Remember, “It's easier to catch flies with honey than with vinegar.”