Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to SOC MRV Finance Hackathon Day 1 Deep Dives: Soil Organic Carbon - Finance Community Needs(20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

SOC MRV Finance Hackathon Day 1 Deep Dives: Soil Organic Carbon - Finance Community Needs

  1. Welcome! Day One: Deep Dives 17 September 2020 10 AM - 12 PM EDT (4 PM - 6 PM CEST)
  2. 10:00 – 10:05 Welcome and introduction – Nkulumo Zinyengere, World Bank 10:05 – 10:15 Summary of web seminar results – Ciniro Costa Jr, CCAFS Facilitator plan for “virtual table” deep dive discussions – Tim Mealey, Meridian Institute 10:15 – 10:25 Finance community needs – Chandra Shekhar Sinha, World Bank 10:25 – 11:10 Deep dives into soil carbon accounting for investment needs Tables discuss and present emerging best accounting practices for each topic area and what is needed to make these useable by finance for carbon accounting: low cost, low uncertainty and reliable SOC accounting. Output: notes taken within this platform 1. Summary of state-of-the-art practice; 2. Applicability of methods to finance sector or adjustments needed; 3. Recommendations to address issues. Table 1 – Measurement Table 2 – Accounting Design 11:10 – 11:25 Break 11:25 – 11:35 Tables present their outputs (up to 5 minutes per table) 11:35 – 11:55 Discussion 11:55 – 12:00 Closing remarks – Lini Wollenberg, CCAFS Day One: Deep Dives Agenda
  3. Summary of webinar seminar results Session 1 - The need for soil carbon accounting Session 2 – Soil carbon accounting frontiers
  4. ACTIONS To make it more practical and viable: • Integrated approaches for measurement-modeling-activity data • Focus on a few high quality direct measurements • Reduce uncertainty of models • Enhance capability to incorporate farm-level activity data Summary of webinar seminar results Financial community need: • Standardized, accurate and low-cost approach to soil C accounting: • “Low-cost estimates with low bias and ‘moderate’ uncertainty at ‘project’ scale” To ensure integrity: • Accounting infrastructure and program • verification processes • discounts, buffers, blockchain • risk of permanence
  5. Enhancing investment in soil health and carbon storage: Frontiers for linking finance and carbon accounting September 17, 2020 Soil Organic Carbon: Finance Community Needs Chandra Shekhar Sinha Adviser, Climate Change Group World Bank. csinha@worldbank.org
  6. As of April 1, 2020, 110 countries are considering a net zero climate target, of which… Carbon pricing is necessary but not sufficient to achieve the net zero climate goals… Source: World Bank, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing, 2020
  7. CDM Source: World Bank, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing, 2020
  8. Cumulative carbon offset issuances, sectors and regions
  9. 9 Voluntary offset market buyers have expectations and concerns Positive story with great case studies, photos and videos Innovation and uniqueness Best practice projects with robust results Value for money Buyer Wants Reputational risks Lack of delivery Accusation of greenwash Stakeholder criticism Buyer Fears
  10. 10 Investors interest in Soil Organic Carbon as Offsets/ Insets Buyers/ investors in the carbon markets are looking for: • Credibility of reductions/ removals • Contribution to the level of ambition of the Paris Agreement goals • Consistency with long-term climate strategy • Clear economic impact at the local level and contribution to sustainable development • Level of ambition in the mechanism or project • Independent assessment Communications on community-level impact and the economic and environmental co- benefits Emphasis on soil and contribution to zero” goals of the Paris Agreement Robust accounting, recognized standards and methodologies, measured and social outcomes Independent endorsement, positive co-benefits of soil enhancement particularly economic impact to rural poor Positioning Offsets from Soil Carbon
  11. Methodology MRV Quality Institutions 11 Internationally peer- reviewed methodologies applied and adapted to be fit for purpose. Build on independent standards (Verra, GS, CAR, etc.) Standardized and scalable MRV framework using best available technologies (remote sensing, sensors, IoT, etc.) Independent third party assessment of the methodology, design and the results (carbon offsets) Defining clear institutional approval processes and documentation for participation in climate markets CREATINGCARBONOFFSETS Move towards standardization of the process of creating carbon assets (for offsets and compliance requirements)
  12. Methodology and MRV development should be fit-for-purpose and evolve Fit-for-purpose methodology and MRV should could start with the purpose of encouraging investment, result based finance and evolve to “market grade” methodologies with increasing data, modeling and sophistication of MRV systems: • Scalable and designed to catalyze and drive systemic change • Landscape level design, validation and verification • Stratification and innovative sampling will reduce cost and complexity • Accurate for capturing the results impact • Sampling and modeling utilized to identify impacts (sequestered carbon) at manageable costs and reasonable accuracy • Methodology and MRV should evolve in accuracy • With iteration, data and model accuracy should improve • Sampling can become better designed at lower costs with more reliable results
  13. Summary and conclusions • Growing interest in natural climate (nature based) solutions to meet the global goal a net zero planet by 2050 • Soil organic carbon removals can play a very important role in being part of the measures for sequestration/ removal of greenhouse gasses • For this to happen, soil organic measures need to gain the visibility of the global community though credible accounting methodologies and MRV systems that is implementable in a cost-effective manner:  Scalable and designed to catalyze and drive systemic change  Accurate for capturing the results impact  Methodology and MRV should evolve in accuracy • Fit-for-purpose methodologies and MRV systems should could start with the purpose of encouraging investment, result based finance and evolve to “market grade” accounting methodologies and associated MRV systems. • There is a need to consider a sequenced approach for result based payments to evolve into carbon market linked incentives
  14. Break 11:10 – 11:25 AM EDT 15 minutes

Editor's Notes

  1. Last week we had the pleasure of listening to 11 talks, including 3 keynotes and 8 on state-of-the-art initiatives. On session one, participants were really good at setting the scene by showing: 1 - the necessity of a low-cost and reliable soil C accounting system for leveraging public and private finance towards soil C projects; 2 - real ground level interventions leading to soil C sequestration and; 3 – how MRV should look like for meeting these project and financial demands. State-of-the-art initiatives covered actions across private and public sectors at local and global levels. For example, last week we heard about: 1 - partnerships with farmers on activity data collection (Bayer), which were coupled with soil measurements and modeling as well as payments linked to soil C sequestration (Indigo and Nori), 2 - MRV components improvements for land aggregation (VERRA), 3 - remote sensing applications and market place platform developments (Dagan and Ecosystem Marketplace), 4 - an entire MRV and C market established by the Australian Gov., and; 5 - global engagement through the FAO - RECSOIL.
  2. Accurate and low-cost approach, that can provide a significant rationale for the use of public and private funds From the financial sectors perspective the message was around “it does not need to be perfect, but reliable”. To make it more practical and viable: Need: integrated platform for measurement-modeling-activity data. In order to make such an approach practical and viable 3 actions could be taken. 1 – setting up measurement campaigns on major edaphoclimatic and management conditions for better understanding processes and management effects on soil carbon. 2 – data could be used for calibrate models for scale 3 – strengthen ability for farmers/practitioners to provide data and test management options using decision support systems (i.e. platforms) Finally, we should take into consideration aspects of accounting designs for ensuring integrity of the accounting system. It means look at components that sit beyond the measurement itself.
Advertisement