Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Siyag unfccc methods ws oct 2011

519 views

Published on

Presentation for CCAFS - FAO workshop
Smallholder Mitigation: Whole Farm and Landscape Accounting

27 - 28 October 2011


Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Siyag unfccc methods ws oct 2011

  1. 1. Standards Setting Unit, SDM Programme Panna Siyag Accounting approach in A/R CDM project activities FAO, Rome 27 October 2011
  2. 2. A/R CDM standards: Overview of features  Ex ante (approx) vs. ex post estimation  Project emissions (limited to use of fire)  Leakage (limited to clearance of forested areas)  Uncertainties (“precise or conservative” approach) – 90/10 precision in sampling  Monitoring costs (“orders of magnitude” approach – pools/ components)  herbaceous << shrubs << tree  Change estimation approach – indirect (gain-loss method) vs direct (stock change method)  Overall basis – IPCC (plus other published literature)
  3. 3. Changes in carbon pools: Estimation approaches Pool Estim. in BSL Estim. in PROJ Aboveground biomass (excl. herbaceous b.) -indirect (ratio) -sample measurement -sample measurement Belowground biomass -indirect (ratio) -indirect (ratio) Dead wood -insignificant -indirect (ratio) -sample measurement Litter -insignificant -indirect (ratio) -sample measurement Soil organic carbon (SOC) -default value (IPCC) -indirect (IPCC factors)
  4. 4. A/R CDM standards: Research needs  Accurate/cost-effective tree allometric (biomass) equations – or other methods  More precise factors / ratios  e.g. shrub/forest biomass ratio; DW/AGB, LT/AGB ratios  Significance, and methods of cost-effective estimation, of (i) project emissions (ii) C stocks in herbaceous biomass  Significance of upstream / downstream effects  e.g. manufacture of fertilizers used (negative, upstream); biomass harvested replaces more emission-intensive materials (positive, downstream)  Approaches to addressing leakage  e.g. intangible shift of demand to TOF; or, TOF increases in competition with project
  5. 5. Thank you!

×