Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Regional participation to meet climate targets: Managing trade-offs with food security(20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Advertisement

Regional participation to meet climate targets: Managing trade-offs with food security

  1. Regional participation to meet climate targets: Managing trade-offs with food security Stefan Frank, Petr Havlík, Nicklas Forsell, Hugo Valin, Antoine Levesque, Ulrich Kleinwechter, Oliver Fricko, Michael Obersteiner…
  2. Reaching the 2 C target 2 AFOLU emissions Mitigation Reduction of direct emissions Carbon sequestration in soil and biomass ~ 2 GtCO2eq Bioenergy demand Provision of biomass for fossil fuel substitution
  3. Reaching the 2 C target Potential impact on food security! 3 Calorie consumptionFood price index -4% by 2050+12% by 2050
  4. Climate mitigation targets/policy assumptions – Reference • business as usual, no climate mitigation – RCP6.0 • Carbon tax 2 USD/tCO2eq in 2050 – RCP4.5 • Carbon tax 13 USD/tCO2eq in 2050 – RCP3.7 • Carbon tax 34 USD/tCO2eq in 2050 – RCP2.6 • Carbon tax 124 USD/tCO2eq in 2050 • à 2 C target 5
  5. Participation in mitigation policies Should there be any exemptions for particular countries/regions to avoid conflict with food? – Global actions vs. – Annex I only – Annex I + Brazil – Annex I + Congo Basin countries – Annex I + India – Annex I + China – Annex I + BRICS – …. 6
  6. Regional climate change mitigation 7 Annex I only Annex I + China Annex I + Brazil 2 C target
  7. Enabling SOC sequestration 8 No SOC sequestration SOC sequestration SOC sequestration + yield effect
  8. Impact on calorie availability 9 RCP 2.6 RCP 3.7
  9. Conclusions 10 Cost-effective mitigation hot-spots i.e. regions with large LUC emissions can provide major mitigation with little conflict with food. Substantial contributions from the agricultural sector expected to attain ambitious targets.
  10. Conclusions 11 Some mitigation options seem win-win options i.e. soil carbon sequestration or adaptation to climate change which relax trade-offs with food security. These activities should be promoted and would justify compensation of farmers further contributing to their income.
  11. www.iiasa.ac.at www.globiom.org 12
  12. GLOBIOM • Spatial detail • Productivities • Carbon stocks • Land markets • Environmental & economic impacts • Intensification vs. area expansion • Mitigation technologies Assessment of policies impacting the land use sector • Major land use sectors • Commodity markets • Substitution & knock-on effects across markets • International trade • Tracingof direct and indirect effects Land heterogeneity Global coverage Production systems Regional markets
Advertisement