Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Presentation: The Low Emissions Livestock Workshop(20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Advertisement

Presentation: The Low Emissions Livestock Workshop

  1. The Low Emissions Livestock Workshop Getachew Tegegn natanim5102003@gmail.com July, 2018 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK RESOURCES
  2. Outline • Trends of livestock production and production systems • climate change mitigation, National Determined Contributions (NDCs) and role of agriculture and livestock • In agriculture, GHG emissions are attributable to livestock and crops
  3. Trends of livestock production and production systems • Livestock farming is one of the major agricultural activities in the country that is contributing towards achieving development goals of the National Growth and Reduction of Poverty. • Ethiopia is recognized as one of the poorest and most food-insecure countries in the world. • It is primarily a net exporter of agricultural products, with 85 percent of its population employed in agriculture. • The estimated production of livestock products and per capita consumption of the product such as meat, milk, and eggs increased between the year 2015/16 and 2017/2018
  4. Cont’d • Livestock sub-sector creates livelihood for 65% of the rural population (Ayele et al., 2003 (World Institute for Sustainable Pastoralism, 2008); and accounts for about 12– 15% of the national export earnings (MEDaC, 1998; FAO, 1999; EEA, 2005). • Livestock production also employs about one-third of the country’s rural population (EARO 2000). • While additional benefit, accumulation of wealth and socio- cultural functions are among others (Ayalew et al., 2003; Udo et al., 2011). • For Ethiopia’s rural poor, livestock remain an important safety net, a living bank, and a hedge against hard times for those with few other assets. • Livestock in Ethiopia represent more than half the average wealth of rural households (World Development Report, 2008).
  5. Cont’d • For many families, net worth is measured by how many livestock they own, with cattle at the top of the valuation It has been widely acknowledged that the livestock sub sector has the potential to drive the country’s economic development,  a reduction in poverty  increase the food security of its people  contribute to national income growth (GDP),  to exports and foreign exchange earnings (GTP2 objectives).  They had potential to reduce GHG emission (abatement, CRGE).
  6. Livestock production trend; • Ethiopian farmers have had a long tradition of animal husbandry. • It is estimated that Ethiopia possesses the largest number of livestock in Africa. It is composed of 59.5 million cattle, 30.4 million sheep and 30.2 million goats (CSA, 2016/17).  The cattle population in Ethiopia has historically grown in line with the expansion of the population. The CSA projects a population growth rate of 2.62% annually, which will add 54 million people to Ethiopia’s population by 2030.  current practices, the cattle population is likely to increase from around 55 million (CSA, 2013) to more than 90 million in 2030 (CRGE, 2011), thereby almost reaching the cattle carrying capacity of the country and more doubling GHG emissions from the livestock sector.  The population of other species of livestock in Ethiopia is also growing rapidly. The combined population of other livestock is expected to grow from 11 million tropical livestock units in 2010 to 24 million tropical livestock units in 2030.
  7. Production system. • The predominant livestock production system in Ethiopia is extensive where indigenous animal is kept under low input/output husbandry practices. • The mixed crop-livestock production system found in the mid- and high altitude agro-ecologies favor the cereals and cash crops (MRS and MRD). In addition to milk and meat, livestock play vital role in providing draught power for crop production. • The low altitude areas are mainly suited to pastoral and agro-pastoral activities based on animal production. • Commercial production system found around urban and peri-urban areas based on dairy, feedlot and poultry production
  8. production • Cattle was found to be the dominant species in 70% to 90% of livestock producing households, depending upon production zone, and thus cattle dominate smallholder income generation and meat/milk production in all production zones lowland and highland (MRS, MRD and LG), as well as in specialized commercial scale production systems. • Moreover, cattle were found to account for about 72% of the meat and 77% of the milk produced annually. • Cattle thus play a dominant role in producing smallholder income and in meeting domestic meat and milk consumption requirements. • the current average beef yield per animal of 108.4 kg is by far less than 130 kg for eastern Africa, 146 kg for Africa, and 200 kg for the whole world (FAO STAT, 2004). • The national average cow milk yield per animal for Ethiopia is estimated to be 198.6 kg compared to 320.7kg for eastern Africa, and 2199 kg for the world (FAO STAT, 2004).
  9. climate change mitigation, National Determined Contributions (NDCs) and role of agriculture and livestock • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)'s Working Group 1 report (IPCC, 2007) reinforced the scientific consensus that man-made greenhouse gas emissions are likely to have made a significant contribution to the recent climate changes and on further changes in the future (Falloon et al., 2010). • Objectives of climate change mitigation is reduced amount of GHG emission through implementation of measures that reduce the amount of emissions (abatement) or enhance absorption capacity of greenhouse gases (sequestration) while maintaining or improving productivity and adaptation. Kropp and Scholze (2009) describe mitigation as ‘avoiding the unmanageable’ • Role of agriculture; the agricultural sector having considerable potential for short to medium term climate mitigation and adaptation options (Falloon et al., 2010). • The livestock production system contributes to global climate change directly through the production of methane from enteric fermentation and manure management and Nitrous Oxide (NO2) from manure production (CRGE, 2011; Dourmad et. al., 2008).
  10. Cont’d • Ethiopia’s contribution to GHG emissions is very low on a global scale. If current practices prevail, GHG emissions in Ethiopia will more than double from 150 Mt CO2e to 400 Mt CO2e in 2030. On a per capita basis, emissions are set to increase by more than 50% to 3.0 tCO2e – and will thus exceed the global target to keep per capita emissions between 1 t and 2 t per capita in order to limit the negative effects on climate change • Of the 150 Mt CO2e in 2010, more than 85% of GHG emissions came from the agricultural and forestry sectors. They are followed by power, transport, industry and buildings, which contributed 3% – Agriculture current = 75 MtCO2e under BAU by 2030= 180 and mitigation potential 90 – Livestock current = 65 MtCO2e, under BAU by 2030 =124 Mtco2e and mitigation potential= 58
  11. National /sectoral Response • Response to overcome the intensifying impacts of CC is developing a holistic sectoral strategy to enhance mitigation & adaptation capacity against CC to ensure sustained development. • The sector have SRAP,GHG measurement & manual Agricultural protocol • The sector has initiated Mitigation and Adaptation strategy in 2015/2016:  To protect the Livestock from the adverse impacts of CC;  To realize vision of attaining a middle income by 2025; 7/16/2018 11
  12. In agriculture, GHG emissions are attributable to livestock and crops • Livestock emissions are estimated to amount to 65 Mt CO2e in 2010 – more than 40% of total emissions today. The cultivation of crops contributes to the concentration of greenhouse gases mainly by requiring the use of fertiliser (~10 Mt CO2e) as well as by emitting N2O from crop residues reintroduced into the ground (~3 Mt CO2e).
  13. Ethiopia’s GHG emissions profile in 2010 (Figures in Mt CO2e). Livestock, 65 Crop, 13 Forest, 55 Transport, 3 Electric Power, 5 Industry, 3 Building, 5 Livestock Crop Forest Transport Electric Power Industry Building
  14. Overview of CRGE strategy Implementing CRGE strategy could ensure low carbon economic development 7/16/2018 14 BA U Sce nari o CRGE Scenario Agriculture SectorShare
  15. National mitigation contribution • contributing to reaching economic and social development targets, the potential to contribute to the global effort by abating around 250 Mt CO2e in 2030 as compared to conventional development practices • This equals a decrease in GHG emissions of up to 64% compared to BAU in 2030. Given the projected population growth, emissions on a per capita basis would decrease from 1.8 t of CO2e to 1.1 – a decrease of around 35% – while multiplying GDP per capita from USD 380 to more than USD 1,800.
  16. Cont’d • Agriculture and forestry received particular attention: they contribute around 45% and 25% respectively to projected GHG emission levels under business-as-usual assumptions and together account for around 80% of the total abatement potential • Livestock are a significant contributor to the GDP of Ethiopia and are the main source of income for a large part of the society). Simultaneously, a large share of GHG emissions originates in the Livestock sector, and the sector is expected to expand even faster than population growth. • To prevent the projected doubling of livestock-related emissions from 65 Mt CO2e in 2010 to 124 Mt CO2e by 2030, the potential targets identified by the GE Strategy that offer an abatement potential of 45 Mt CO2e are enhancing and intensifying animal mix diversification, improving value-chain, mechanization
  17. How do livestock development objectives and environmental objectives come together? livestock development and environmental objectives • systematically integrates climate change into the planning and development of sustainable agricultural systems/sustainable intensification • integrates multiple goals and manages trade- offs: multiple goal that produces triple-win outcomes: reduced emissions, at the same time increased productivity and enhanced resilience. This requires to identify synergies and weigh the costs and benefits of different options based on stakeholder objectives identified • Risk management strategies, such as choosing adapted animal types and breeds, may decrease greenhouse gas emissions rates because of a smaller proportion of non-productive animals in the herd.
  18. Interventions contributed to reduction of environmental impacts of Ethiopian • Improving productivity of dairy herds in terms of milk and meat, both at animal and herd level. Interventions include improvements in feeding, breeding, herd composition, health and housing; • The post farm-gate dairy value chain and other Livestock product to reduce milk and meat… losses; • Improving nutrient use efficiency for sustaining dairy production in the long term(Intervention dairy value chain,2-29% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions per kg milk; improvements in feed quality were most effective,2-39% reduction in land use per kg milk and 0-72% reduction in energy use per kg milk).
  19. Cont’d • Agroforestry is a diversification option providing improved feed from (often leguminous) trees or shrubs, while at the same time sequestering carbon (Mbow et al. 2014). • Better feeding increases production and lowers the greenhouse gas production per kg of animal produce (Gerber et al. 2013). • Most feed management practices contribute to sustainable intensification, which is seen as key strategy for mitigation in African livestock systems (Hristov et al. 2013). • Similarly, improving animal husbandry, though, for example, veterinary care, improved breeding, and stall feeding can lead to a lower ‘‘herd overhead’’ and hence less emissions per unit of product (Gerber et al. 2013).
  20. Cont’d • engages women and marginalized groups • the mitigation approaches must involve the poorest and most vulnerable groups. These groups often live on marginal lands which are most vulnerable to climate events like drought and floods. • maintains ecosystems services
  21. Thanks E-mail natanim5102003@gmail.com

Editor's Notes

  1. source of revenue /livelihood
  2. Many of the GHG reduction measures that can be implemented on farms have other, positive impacts on the productivity and environmental status of farming systems. These benefits can include (Table 2): Increased productivity Reduced erosion and land degradation Reduced phosphorous (P) and nitrogen (N) runoff Improved water quality and retention Control of air pollutants (e.g, ammonia and hydrogen sulphide) Increased soil fertility Reduced energy costs
  3. Intervention dairy value chain 2-29% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions per kg milk; this study showed that improvements in feed quality were most effective; 2-39% reduction in land use per kg milk; 0-72% reduction in energy use per kg milk.
Advertisement