Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

WBCSD CSA Workshop - Integrating Climate Resilience in Value Chains: practical examples

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 19 Ad

WBCSD CSA Workshop - Integrating Climate Resilience in Value Chains: practical examples

Download to read offline

The presentation Operationalizing Resilience Climate Smart Agriculture Metrics is by Stephanie Daniels from the Sustainable Food Lab.
Presented at the WBCSD Climate Smart Agriculture workshop at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT on 27 March 2018.

The presentation Operationalizing Resilience Climate Smart Agriculture Metrics is by Stephanie Daniels from the Sustainable Food Lab.
Presented at the WBCSD Climate Smart Agriculture workshop at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT on 27 March 2018.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to WBCSD CSA Workshop - Integrating Climate Resilience in Value Chains: practical examples (20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

WBCSD CSA Workshop - Integrating Climate Resilience in Value Chains: practical examples

  1. 1. Integrating Climate Resilience in Value Chains: practical examples WBCSD Smarter Metrics Workshop March 27-28, 2018
  2. 2. Case 1: Assessing Climate Resilience in Smallholder Barley & Sorghum, Uganda
  3. 3. ‘Guide to Assessing Climate Resilience in Smallholder Supply Chains’ Know your risk Know your farmers Know your resilience Know how to build resilience Know your progress Identify threats to farmers in sorghum and barley in Uganda Understand how these threats impact farmers in different regions Understand farmer vulnerability to risk based on resilience capacity Design strategy to build resilience of farmers facing these risks Design performance measurement plan WHY? Climate change is felt now in Uganda. NBL wants a strategy to help farmers adapt to meet SUPPLY and increase farmers’ RESILIENCE.
  4. 4. Significant increases in temperature and rainfall across Uganda Projected changes in temperature and rainfall in Uganda by 2050 Annual average temperature (Celsius) Total annual rainfall (percent) Source: CIAT; BFS USAID 2107. Climate Smart Agriculture in Uganda Know your risk: Identify threats to Ugandan sorghum and barley
  5. 5. Know your risk: barley example Climate Risk Timing Where Potential Impacts on Barley Potential Impacts on the Barley Supply Chain Warmer temperatures Gradually rising All barley regions •  Lower and more erratic yield •  Physiological effects, resulting in declining productivity/quality •  Change in suitability zones such as Agoro, SW region based on altitude •  Lower and more erratic yield •  Harder for NBL to plan right price and expected volume •  Declining quality of grain for brewing •  Supply chain disruptions from severe weather events – roads in Mount Elgon and Southwest regions Erratic rainfall Already present All barley regions. •  ”Lottery” for farmers deciding when to plant to maximize harvest •  Declining quality of grain especially through increased moisture content (rains at harvest) Increased rainfall, hail storms and winds Already present All, especially Eastern •  Crop damage •  Lower yields Stronger dry season Already present. Worsened over past ten years All barley regions •  Weaker crop •  Low yield Increased landslides Soil erosion Already present and frequent All, particularly in Southwest (Kabale) •  Crop damage •  Supply chain disruptions from severe weather events – roads in Mount Elgon region
  6. 6. Key characteristics of each supply chain & its farmers v  Procurement trends by region v  Total land size, focus crop size, yrs. experience, altitude v  Chain map – buyers, input suppliers, technical assistance Know your farmers: Understand how the risks impact farmers in different regions
  7. 7. TechnoServe | 7 Understand farmer vulnerability to risk based on resilience capacity Know your resilience
  8. 8. Reference: capacity levels for each capital type – farmer level TechnoServe | 8 Human capital Financial capital Natural capital Physical capital Social capital Absorptive capacity Food security and nutrition Net income/ poverty level On-farm soil health Access to early- warning systems Access to informal safety nets Adaptive capacity Use of relevant climate smart agricultural practices Use of credit Access to “climate- ready” varieties of focus crop Access to climate change projections Access to knowledge- sharing groups re: climate change Transformative capacity Innovation potential Saving sufficient for on-farm investment Access to quality planting material for alternative, climate ready crops Access to alternative, climate-ready value chains Quality of enabling environment Know your resilience: Understand farmer vulnerability to risk based on resilience capacity
  9. 9. Summary resilience capacities TechnoServe | 9 Barley farmers Human capital Natural capital Physical capitalSocial capital Financial capital Human capital Natural capital Physical capitalSocial capital Financial capital Sorghum farmers
  10. 10. TechnoServe | 10 Design strategy to build resilience of farmers facing these risks Know how to build resilience
  11. 11. Examples of the prioritized strategies mapped to risk TechnoServe | 11 Risks Resilience amplifier Recommendations Erratic rainfall •  Lack of physical weather station infrastructure •  Lack of service interpreting and communicating information to farmers •  Liaise with Uganda Met and potentially commercial suppliers to install additional weather stations particularly in Mount Elgon region •  Pursue partnerships with providers of forecasting and information dissemination providers •  Support development of enabling environment e.g. set up co- investment committee with other interested parties such as coffee growers in Mount Elgon area to develop weather station and communication infrastructure Prolonged dry season •  Access to hybrid seed but low usage •  Invest in further extension activities to help farmers understand need, best use, and see benefit from improved seed •  Explore partnerships for input-credit model to reach farmers directly or via aggregators Proliferation of pests •  Low understanding around pest management •  Low availability of service providers for pest management •  Lack of financial capital for pesticide or pest services •  Focus extension on integrated pest management systems •  Support development of spraying service providers •  Explore partnerships for input-credit model to reach farmers directly or via aggregators
  12. 12. TechnoServe | 12 ABI will design performance measurement plan according to the investment program Know your progress Know your risk Know your farmers Know your resilience Know how to build resilience Know your progress
  13. 13. Case 2: Mars Petcare Australia Wheat Pilot Resilience. Mitigation. Sequestration
  14. 14. From Mixed Farms to Continuous Cropping •  Over the last 25 years Australia’s rainfed wheat- growing regions have doubled crop acres and reduced livestock numbers by half. Dramatic changes in the economics and risk of grain farming •  Despite widespread adoption of precision ag and small gains in productivity, farm income to cost ratios have decreased significantly Declining soil carbons and long term moisture and fertility challenges •  The organic matter content of soils has steadily declined on farms no longer including hay or pasture in rotations. Australian broadacre farming
  15. 15. Farming is vulnerable In New South Wales climate conditions post 2000–01 lowered productivity by an average of 6.5 percent Farms are profitable in years with favorable weather, but they are vulnerable to rising temperatures and volatile rainfall because: •  soils are erosion prone •  structurally unstable •  low in soil organic matter •  mostly acidic and in some cases saline.
  16. 16. Without much more rapid adoption of soil- building practices, future climate shocks and longer gaps between good and bad years put farms at an increased risk.
  17. 17. Baseline •  In partnership with regional soil scientist input 10 GrainCorp farmers in the CFT and 1 Lawson’s Aggregation farm •  Established baseline GHG footprint for wheat in the region and reviewed CFT data with farmers Identify opportunities •  Benchmarked GHG reduction opportunities against best management practices and tested assumptions with farmers in the pilot Develop 5-Yr Plan •  Set GHG reduction targets for the region using baseline data from pilot •  Designed 5-Yr Implementation plan in partnership with regional farming groups, GrainCorp, and agronomist
  18. 18. Agronomic trends Best Management practices - Include a pasture phase if possible - Retain stubble (no burning) - Use lime to maintain/increase soil pH above pHCa 5.0 (or at least 4.8) - Increase (or at least maintain) soil C levels - If continuous cropping, include a pulse in rotation - GPS guidance/Controlled Traffic - Variable rate (VR) inputs (lime/gypsum/ nitrogen) Contributing farmers (n=7) - 4 farmers are mixed farming - 6 farmers always retain stubble - 6 farmers applied lime (1 didn’t need to) - 1 farmer has increased soil C, 1 farmer has decreased soil C, 5 farmers report no long- term change. - 4 farmers grow a pulse crop - All use some means of GPS precision guidance - 4 farmers use VR for lime addition - No farmers used VR nitrogen Top issues: Herbicide resistant weeds, high risk pricing of pulses, difficulty in building soil C under continuous cropping, weather-related risks (flooding/frost)
  19. 19. Thank you! www.sustainablefood.org www.coolfarmtool.org/

×