Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Gitonga, Jane - Climate Food and Farming CLIFF Network annual workshop November 2017(20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Advertisement

Gitonga, Jane - Climate Food and Farming CLIFF Network annual workshop November 2017

  1. Greenhouse gas emissions from rice production in two soils under two water management regimes in Central Kenya Jane Gitonga, Lutz Merbold, David Pelster, Hunja Murage CLIFF Network Workshop 2017- Cologne, Germany
  2. Background § Rice is the most important cereal crop for more than half of the world’s population(GRiSP,2013); § An important staple crop throughout Africa (FAO, 2013); third after maize and wheat; § Critical for global food security (McLean, 2002); § 90% harvested rice globallyis grown in flooded conditions; § Water scarcity increasinglychallenge global rice production; § Rice emits approximately four times the GHG emissions per ton of product than maize or wheat (Linquist,2012)
  3. Background § CH4 is the dominantGHG produced and emitted; § Alternate wetting and drying (AWD): reduce CH4, irrigation water, maintaining/improvingyields § Inadequate research on how rice cultivation in Kenya as well as in other SSA countries contribute to GHG emissions; § Neither it is clear, whether AWD is a feasible method that can be used to not onlyconserve water but also mitigate GHG emissions; § Studies are needed to overcome this knowledge gap.
  4. Research Objectives § Quantify GHG emissions from rice production in vertisols and nitosols under two water management regimes (alternate wetting and drying- AWD and continuous flooding-CF) in Mwea irrigation scheme (MIS), Kenya. § Assess the effect of rice production in vertisols and nitosols on GHG emissions; § Assess the effect of rice production under AWD& CF on GHG emissions; § Test whether there is an interaction between the two water management regimes and soil type on GHG emissions; § Assess yield from the two water management regimes and soil type; Specific Objectives Main Objective
  5. Hypotheses § Under rigorous and careful management of the AWD, GHG emissions (CH4 and N2O) and water use will be lower than under continuous flooding, while maintainingyields irrespective ofthe soil type
  6. Site Description Base map of the Mwea Irrigation scheme, Kenya. § MIS is the largest scheme in Kenya (5 sections) § 86% of rice produced is from MIS § Soils: ü Vertisols (impervious heavy - black cotton) ü Humic Nitosols (free draining - reddish brown lateritic clay loamy soils) KALRO - Mwea Kirogo Research Farm- (000 38’S; 37022E; elevation 1159m.a.s.l - Tebere section)
  7. Methods § Split plots in completely randomized design, four replicates in each plot; § Observation will cover one growing season (June 2017-Dec2017) § Variety-Basmati 370; § Gas sampling: ü Before seedlingtransplanting(1 month) ü After transplanting- every week during the entire growing season & twice a week after fertilizer application ü Once after harvest ü Between 0900h to 0100h;
  8. Methods
  9. Methods § Using 60 ml plastic syringes at four equal time intervals of ten minutes (T0, T10, T20 and T30); § Samples were immediately transferred into 20 ml pre-evacuated glass vials - analyzed within 2days from dayof sampling; § GHG concentrations (CH4, N2O and CO2) were derived by gas chromatography § Within the Mazingira Centre at the International Livestock and Research Institute (ILRI);
  10. Methods 𝐹 = 𝑏 × 𝑀𝑤 × 𝑉 × 60 × 106 𝐴 × 𝑉𝑚 × 109 (Butterbach-Bahl et al., 2011) § GHG fluxes were calculated from rate of concentrationin headspace over time § Irrigation Water Management: ü Field water tubes were used to monitor the water level at AWD plots; ü Irrigation water was supplied when water level was 15cm below soil surface; ü Plots were re-flooded up-to 10cm in AWD plots; ü Approximately 10cm in the continuously flooded plots;
  11. Methods § Soil analyses Soil parameters to be measured include: i. Total soil extractable N (NH4+ - N and NO3 – N ii. Soil PH iii. Soil Texture Analysis iv. CN Analysis
  12. Preliminary Results i. CH4 emissions are higher in Vertisols as compared to Nitosols in both water management regimes; ii. CH4 emissions are higher under CF plots as compared to the AWD; iii. CH4 emissions increase with the increase in number of tillers;
  13. Preliminary Results i. N2O emissions are higher in Nitosols as compared to Vertisols in both water management regimes ii. N2O emissions are higher in the AWD water management regime than CF
  14. Preliminary Results i. Negative CO2 fluxes were observed due to photosynthesis process since chambers were allowing light to go through ii. Patterns of CO2 emissions were similar between the two soils
  15. Conclusions, Future work & Research application i. CH4 emissions are higher in Vertisols while N2O emissions are higher in Nitosols, hence soil texture affects GHG emissions; ii. Inverse relationship between CH4 and N2O, such that during draining cycle, CH4 emissions are reduced while on the other hand N2O emissions increase iii. N2O emissions increase with fertilizer application v Future Work – More research is required to quantify GHG emissions from rice production in Kenya. This study was carried out for one cropping season hence it is important to collect data over more than one season and also quantify GHG under different fertilizer application v Research application – The study will give an estimate of GHG emissions from rice production in Kenya
  16. Acknowledgements The CGIAR research program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), through SAMPLES program and CLIFF Network, and Mazingira Centre- ILRI Kenya, contributed to this research
Advertisement