Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Crop modelling approach

983 views

Published on

From 6 to 8 December, CCAFS theme 1 organized a workshop staged on the Addis Ababa campus of the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). The workshop titled 'Developing climate-smart crops for 2030 world' involved over 40 participants from 16 countries, broadly divided along either side of the breeding / modeling continuum.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Crop modelling approach

  1. 1. Modeling ApproachScenario source selection – Quality check: simulations with hindcasts vs historical climate – Present, 2030 pessimistic, 2030 optimistic? => Establishment of operational scenario databaseGlobal study – Simple model (GLAM) – Spatialized gridded approach – No detail of varietal differences => Global mapping of crop response to CCZoom-ins: virtual experiments – GxExM model (SAMARA, RIDEV, CROPGRO…) – Model calibration for key varietal types – Identification of trait (crop parameter) ranges – Zooming in on TPEs for each crop (Total of 10-12?) – Sensitivity analyses: trait variation vs environment Ideotype composition for adapted crops
  2. 2. Need 3 types of crop modelsConsensus tools to translate environment scenarios– Accurate impact prediction to guide policy– Seasonal forecasting, robust standards for yield insurance– Set rational long-term priorities in researchGxExM models to assist in technology generation– TPE characterization– Ideotype concepts for breeding strategies– Extrapolation of technologiesHeuristic model application in phenotyping– Intelligent phenotyping: Extract G from GxExMxN(oise)– Extract « hidden traits » from simple plant observations– Genotypic reaction norms (behavioural traits)
  3. 3. Crop Type RIDEV ORYZA EcoMeristem SAMARA Rice Flooded-irrigated Rainfed-lowlandCrop Sorghum Upland Grainmodel Feature Bio-EtOH (FF) Traitskills Phenology Photoperiodism Thermal response Microclimate resp. Architecture Phyllochron Organ size & NbGreen = available TilleringOrange = coming Yield GY GYC Stem sugar Biomass Water stresses Drought Water logging Submergence Thermal stresses Cold sterility Heat sterility Avoidance: TC Avoidance: TOF Salinity Salt tolerance CO2 response TE, Amax Canopy heating Resource use WUE NUE RUE
  4. 4. Environmental challenges (1) Irrigated rice cropping calendars in the SahelMigration of agro-climatic zones Saint-Louis• Latitudinal & altitudinal migration• Cropping calendars, crop phenology – Change in comparative advantage of Rosso crop/system – Change in comparative advantage of different land uses – Change in pressure on agro-ecologies and Matam natural resource base => Trust in adaptation capacity of markets and stake holders => Anticipate, inform, assist Tillaberi Let policies ease the transition Sorghum varietal Zoning for W Africa
  5. 5. 15 High yielding, dwarf, early, sweet type2 Plant Height 2.0 m LAI Virtual varieties (sorghum): 10 Impact of trait modification Tillers1 Ic 5 GY Sugars 7 2 traits changed: plant height &0 06 photoperiodism 20 90d increased 5 (4.8 m, + 40 d) 15 Effect of tallness + lateness 4 • Biomass + 44% 3 10 • Grain yield – 45% • more tillers, more mortality 2 • LAI 3 => 7 5 • Sugar reserves much smaller 1 0 0 130d
  6. 6. SAMARA: Short phyllochron improves vigor but not GY 50 60 50 70 Culms/hill 60 70 GY 70 60 50 50 60 LAI 70 S PI F M Internode SAHEL108 in WS 2010 at AfricaRice, NSC Senegal (source limited situation) 70 Phyllochron 50 °Cd: fast-DR Phyllochron 60 °Cd: ‘normal’ 60 Phyllochron 70 °Cd: slow-DR 50
  7. 7. Merci

×