Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Costa, Ciniro Jr - Climate Food and Farming CLIFF Network annual workshop November 2017(20)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Costa, Ciniro Jr - Climate Food and Farming CLIFF Network annual workshop November 2017

  1. Soil C Stocks: from climate importance to field assessment Ciniro Costa JuniorBonn, November 10, 2017 Climate Food and Farming (CLIFF) Network Annual Workshop
  2. Soil C Stocks: 1) Climate importance 2) Land use effects 3) Potentials 4) Soil sampling, measuring and calculations 5) Final remarks
  3. CO2 Carbon Cycle Soil Organic Matter Organic Compounds (photosynthesis)
  4. Atmosphere = 760 Gt Terrestrial Carbon Pools Soil = 2500 Gt 62% organic (1500 Gt) Biotic = 560 Gt EROSION (1.5 Gt)Aquatic Systems CO2CO2 CO2
  5. Soil = 2500 Gt 62% organic (1500 Gt) Figure source: http://www.tulsamastergardeners.org/lawngarden/lg_soil.html
  6. Figure source: https://www.slideshare.net/chrislake/sol-biology-andsom Soil = 2500 Gt 62% organic (1500 Gt)
  7. 19 to 95 tCO2e ha-1 (IPCC, 2006) LivestockAgriculture ± 0 to 2.0 t C ha-1 y-1 (IPCC, 2006) Chapter 2: Generic Methodologies Applicable to Multiple Land-Use Categories (t Ha-1 IN 0-30 CM DEPTH) ()
  8. Conventional Tillage No tillage - + Foto: Claudia S. da C. Ribeiro Foto: Gessi Ceccon Maia et al., 2009
  9. Scopel et al., 2006 Replacing Tillage by No-Tillage - and Crop Succession (Brazil and Europe)
  10. Sugihara et al., 2012 Tillage, fertilization, residues management and soil type (Africa)
  11. Burning Without Burning Sugarcane harvesting Cerri, 2010- + Galdos, et al., 2009
  12. Degraded Pasture Improved pasture - +Foto: AJ Agropecuária Maia et al., 2009
  13. Sanderman et al., 2017 World Soil Carbon Stock
  14. “Agricultural land uses have resulted in the loss of 133 Pg C from the soil.” Sanderman et al., 2017 Soil = 2500 Gt 62% organic (1500 Gt) - 9% ~ 3,5 Billion ha pastagem ~ 1,5 Billion ha pastagem Land use has lost 9% of the global soil organic C stock
  15. Pasture under degradation - Pará State Brazil Photo: Ciniro Costa Junior Global GHG emissions (2016) (including LUC) = 51.9 Gt CO2 “…with adoption of best management practices, two thirds of lost SOC can be recovered…, then SOC sequestration has the potential to offset 88 Pg C (322 Gt CO2) of emissions.” Sanderman et al., 2017 Lal, 2004 UNEP THE SOIL C STOCK OFFSET POTENTIAL IS BIG! Agriculture contributes ~5.0–5.8 GtCO2e yr1 Agricultural non-CO2 emissions mitigation by 2030 to stay within the 2 °C limit is about 1 GtCO2e yr-1 ~50 Gt CO2e in 10 years (2020-2030) (Wollenberg et al., 2016). Agricultural technologies = 40% (without soil C sequestration) Soil Carbon (and other C sequestration) = 60% (30 GtCO2)
  16. SOIL CARBON STOCK – WHAT IS THAT? Amount of C in a given soil layer Figure source: http://ufrr.br/museusolos/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=63
  17. Est C = (SC x SD x SL) where: Est C = soil C stock (Mg ha-1) SC = soil carbon content (%) SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) SL = soil layer (cm) (VELDKAMP, 1994) SOIL CARBON STOCK – CALCULATION
  18. Est C = (SC x SD x SL) SC = soil carbon content (%) = 2 SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) = 1.0 SL = soil layer (cm) = 10 Est C = 20 t C ha-1 (at the 0-10 cm soil layer) SOIL CARBON STOCK – CALCULATION
  19. Est C = (SC x SD x SL) where: Est C = soil C stock (Mg ha-1) SC = soil carbon content (%) SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) SL = soil layer (cm) (VELDKAMP, 1994) SOIL CARBON STOCK – CALCULATION
  20. SOIL BULK DENSITY – SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS Figure source: http://ufrr.br/museus olos/index.php?optio n=com_content&view =article&id=63 Figures source - https://pt.slideshare.net/RomuloViniciusTioRominho /06-propriedades-fisicas-ligadas-a-mecanizao Sato, 2013
  21. Est C = (SC x SD x SL) where: Est C = soil C stock (Mg ha-1) SC = soil carbon content (%) SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) SL = soil layer (cm) (VELDKAMP, 1994) SOIL CARBON STOCK – CALCULATION
  22. Soil is burned at 975°C and C content is given as a % SOIL CARBON CONTENT – SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 0.2 mm ~10 mg Sato, 2013 Gitirana Jr., (2007) Figure source: http://ufrr.br/museusolos/index.php?option =com_content&view=article&id=63
  23. ∆ Est C = (SC x SD x SL) (t2, situation 1,…) - (SC x SD x SL) (t2, situation 1) / y SC = soil carbon content (%) SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) SL = soil layer (cm) y = years SOIL CARBON ASSESSMENT – SOIL C STOCK RATE CALCULATION
  24. ∆ Est C = (SC x SD x SL) (t2, situation 1,…) - (SC x SD x SL) (t2, situation 1) / y SC = soil carbon content (%) = 2 (t1) | 2.5 (t2) SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) = 1.0 (t1) | 2.0 (t2) SL = soil layer (cm) = 10 y = years = 10 ∆ Est C = [50.0 (t2) – 20 (t1)] / (10) = 3 t C ha-1 y-1 (at the 0-10 cm soil layer) SOIL CARBON ASSESSMENT – SOIL C STOCK RATE CALCULATION
  25. Approaches For Assessing Soil Carbon Stock Change Diachronic Synchronic (chronossequence)
  26. Year 1 Diachronic Approach Year 2 At least 2 Soil Samples Overtime at the same area
  27. Corbeels et al, 2016 Diachronic approach – C stock variation rate
  28. Year 1 Chronosequence Approach
  29. Year 1Year 2 Chronosequence Approach
  30. Year 3Year 2Year 1 Chronosequence Approach Soil SampleSoil SampleSoil Sample 1 Soil Sample batch at the same moment
  31. Year 3Year 2Year 1 Chronosequence Approach (additionality) Soil SampleSoil SampleSoil Sample 1 Soil Sample batch at the same moment
  32. Corbeels et al, 2016 Chronosequence (synchronic) approach – C stock variation rate
  33. Corbeels et al, 2016 Chronosequence x Diachronic Approaches
  34. Costa Junior et al., 2013 Chronosequence x Diachronic Approaches
  35. If soil bulk density is diffenrent, fixed soil layer compare different soil masses! May lead to wrong interpretation about the soil management effect on Soil C Stocks Situation 1 Soil Density (0-10 cm) = 1.5 g cm-3 Soil Mass (0-10 cm) = 1.500 Mg.ha-1 Situation 2 Soil Density (0-10 cm) = 2.0 g cm-3 Soil Mass (0-10 cm) = 1.600 Mg.ha-1. 0-10 cm 0-10 cm Soil C = 2 % Soil C = 1.5 % Soil C Stock = 30 Mg ha-1 Soil C Stock = 30 Mg ha-1 SOIL CARBON STOCK CALCULATION – MASS CORRECTION
  36. Est C = (SC x SD [(SDref / SD) x SL)]) where: Est C = soil C stock (Mg ha-1) SC = soil carbon content (%) SD = soil bulk density (g cm-3) SL = soil layer (cm) SDref = soil bulk density (g cm-3) SOIL CARBON STOCK CALCULATION – MASS CORRECTION
  37. SOIL CARBON STOCK CALCULATION – MASS CORRECTION Fernandes & Fernandes, 2013
  38. SOIL CARBON STOCK CALCULATION – MASS CORRECTION Fernandes & Fernandes, 2013
  39. SOIL CARBON STOCK CALCULATION – MASS CORRECTION Fernandes & Fernandes, 2013
  40. “Stratifying the area in terms of factors that influence carbon stocks will normally reduce errors associated with project-scale estimates of carbon stocks” Aynekulu et al., 2011 SOIL CARBON STOCK – SAMPLING DESIGN
  41. Aynekulu et al., 2011 SOIL CARBON STOCK – SAMPLE SIZE
  42. No sistema plantio direto, o revolvimento do solo a cada quatro anos não ocasionou mudanças no teor de carbono orgânico total em relação ao plantio direto contínuo por mais tempo (Figura 6), indicando que um eventual revolvimento, seguido de um retorno ao sistema plantio direto, não ocasionaria grande prejuízo à matéria orgânica. Marcolan & Anghinoni, 2006 Permanence “O revolvimento do solo a cada quatro anos não ocasionou mudanças no teor de C em relação ao plantio direto contínuo, indicando que um eventual revolvimento não ocasionaria grande prejuízo à matéria orgânica”
  43. degraded pasture Well managed (0–20 cm depth) Time-dependence
  44. 0 50 100 150 200 250 -1000 1000 3000 5000 7000 1 2 3 4 5 kg CO2e ha-1 (+ soil C sequestration) kg CO2e ha-1 tCO2 kg carcaça produzida Soil carbon sequestration impact on GHG balance of pasture restoration and intensification Based on Cardoso et al. (2016) and Maia et al. (2009) Extensive degraded pasture Increasing levels of pasture restoration and intensification GHG emissions (t CO2e ha-1 y-1) Beef production (kg carcass ha-1 y-1) kg carcass ha-1 Net Emissions
  45. Final Remarks - Soil C stocks is the biggest terrestrial C pool - Soil management affects soil C stocks, but there is many dependences - Soil mass correction is a good practice in calculating soil C stock variation - Recovering degraded land can significantly offset GHG emissions - Checking soil C stocks diachronically is desirable and may be pursued
  46. Ciniro Costa Junior ciniro@imaflora.org CLIFF Network
Advertisement