Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Conservation agriculture based practices and soil carbon: Between myth and farmer reality(15)

Advertisement

More from CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Conservation agriculture based practices and soil carbon: Between myth and farmer reality

  1. CIMMYT- Conservation agriculture- based practices and soil C: Between myth and farmer reality Clare Stirling
  2. CA comprises three basic components: § Reduced tillage. § Retention of crop residues on soil surface. § Crop diversification (rotation, intercropping). What do we mean by Conservation Agriculture?
  3. • 125 on-farm trials established between 2004 and 2009 across 23 sites in Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Paired plot comparison of conventional agricultural practice and conservation agriculture. • CA had no consistent effect on soil C stocks. • ‘Limited potential for CA to significantly increase soil C stocks after up to 7 years of CA practices’.
  4. Meta-analysis of SOC changes under CA practices in two tropical regions, the Indo- Gangetic Plains (IGP) and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), show modest increases in SOC stock: • IGP annual increases in SOC stock compared to conventional practice were between 0.16 - 0.49 Mg C ha-1 yr-1. • SSA increases between 0.28 - 0.96 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 , but with much greater variation and a significant number of cases with no measurable increase.
  5. • Potential to sequester SOC due to higher carbon input rather than from the effect of reduced soil tillage. • ZT + residues increased SOC by 0.67 t ha-1 yr-1 (i.e. total 4.7 t ha-1 over 7 years in 0-0.6m soil depth).
  6. Burning crop stubble burning in India: • India accounts for 1/3 of total crop residues burned globally each year. • ~ 90 million tonnes of surplus cereal residues in NW India alone (~ 85% from rice and wheat. • Retention of crop residues in these systems offers a genuine opportunity for C sequestration. Satellite photo: NASA
  7. Will an increase in SOC from crop residues contribute to long-term build of soil C stocks and CC mitigation? • How much of the additional C enters more recalcitrant SOC pools? • What are the impacts on other GHGs e.g. N2O emissions from crop residues? • How does it compare with alternative use options e.g. biomass energy, animal fodder, paper and cardboard industry, anaerobic digestion etc?
  8. Summary • Evidence that CA-based practices can increase the SOC concentration in the surface layers of soil but increases in SOC stock are generally small and probably insignificant in terms of CC mitigation. • However, where residue burning is an issue (e.g. IGP) retention of crop residues offer a genuine, and potentially substantial, means of sequestering soil C. Based on C:N ratios implementing the 4p1000 initiative on all agricultural soils would require 100 Tg N yr-1 = an increase of ~75% of current global N-fertilizer production or extra symbiotic N2 fixation rates twice the current amount.
  9. Thank you for your interest!
Advertisement