Winning the War for Talent in Malaysia 2.0 in HR Matters Magazine.Issue No. 24.(October 2013)


Published on

For more articles and presentation slides on Leadership Development related themes, please visit our new CEE Global Website at & also Visit and “Like” our Facebook Page for Inspirational Quotes and Leadership & Personal Effectiveness Articles: .

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Winning the War for Talent in Malaysia 2.0 in HR Matters Magazine.Issue No. 24.(October 2013)

  1. 1. W Talent | HR Matters inning the war for talent 2.0 in Malaysia By Professor Sattar Bawany Introduction In 1997, a groundbreaking McKinsey study exposed the ‘war for talent’ as a strategic business challenge and a critical driver of corporate performance. Then, when the dotcom bubble burst and the economy cooled, many assumed the war for talent was over. It’s not. Subsequently in 2001, the authors of the original study revealed that, because of enduring economic and social forces, the war for talent will persist for the next two decades. McKinsey & Company consultants to talent management. They describe how to: create a winning EVP (employee value proposition) that will make your company uniquely attractive to talent; move beyond recruiting hype to build a long-term recruiting strategy; use job experiences, coaching and mentoring to cultivate the potential in managers; and strengthen your talent pool by investing in A-players, developing B-players and acting decisively on C-players. Central to this approach is a pervasive talent mindset - a deep conviction shared vital for achievement of business growth and to build organisational competencies, which represent a competitive advantage. The loss of needed talent is costly because of the resultant bidding up of market salaries for experienced hires to replace them, the costs of recruiting and assimilating new talent, the lost investment in talent development, and the hidden costs of lost productivity, lost sales opportunities and strained customer relationships. Can companies win the ‘war for talent’? Will we be able to define and implement a The increasing trend of growing leaders from within is based on a dawning realisation that a popular alternative for acquiring talent— poaching key people from competitors—ultimately leads to frustration. Ed Michaels, Helen Handfield-Jones and Beth Axelrod argued that winning the war for leadership talent is about much more than frenzied recruiting tactics. It’s about the timeless principles of attracting, developing and retaining highly talented managers - applied in bold new ways. And it’s about recognising the strategic importance of human capital because of the enormous value that better talent creates. The outcome of the study is applicable to Malaysian companies as it was fortified by five years of in-depth research on how companies manage leadership talent including surveys of 13,000 executives at more than 120 companies and case studies of 27 leading companies - the authors propose a fundamentally new approach 46 | October 2013 HR Matters The Malaysian Context retention strategy that will give us the stable, committed, capable workforce required to achieve a competitive business advantage? Consulting firm and research organisation reports, published books and articles and internal company retention studies suggest that everyone is following the same overall plan. How will this approach give a company an edge? Few, if any, organisations today have an adequate supply of talent. Gaps exist at the top of the organisation, in the first to midlevel leadership ranks and at the front lines. In today’s tight labour market in Malaysia, companies are facing intense competition for talent – and are giving increased attention to ways to retain talent rather than rely on costly replacement and retraining. Retention of talent with critical skill sets is Talent is an increasingly scarce resource, so it must be managed to the fullest effect. During the current economic downturn we may experience a short ceasefire in the war for talent, but we’re all seeing new pressures by leaders throughout the company that competitive advantage comes from having better talent at all levels. Using practical examples from companies such as GE, The Home Depot, PerkinElmer, Amgen, and Enron, the authors outline five imperatives that every leader - from CEO to unit manager - must act on to build a stronger talent pool. Written by recognised authorities on the topic, this is the definitive strategic guide on how to win the war for talent.
  2. 2. Talent | HR Matters put on the talent running our organisations. Are today’s leaders able to do more with less? The A-players can, and there should be a strategic emphasis on keeping those leaders—and developing their successors. Many organisations are reducing their workforces, but let’s be careful not to cut so deep that talent is scarce when the economy rebounds. The supply of leadership talent is critical to any organisation’s prosperity and is, therefore, a central element of talent management. The increasing trend of growing leaders from within is based on a dawning realisation that a popular alternative for acquiring talent—poaching key people from competitors—ultimately leads to frustration. Outstanding leaders who can ‘ramp up’ quickly are hard to find, increasingly expensive, and even when successfully recruited, tend to move from company to company. So the best approach, usually, is to develop systems and processes to identify available leadership talent. Many studies have shown that an important factor for commitment and retention is the effectiveness of immediate management. Employees say it is an important element of the work environment; research shows it highly correlated with commitment and retention scores, and employees cite poor management as a key reason for leaving a company. Accordingly, there have been many books focused on manager effectiveness. One big seller was First, Break All The Rules, reporting on the Gallup Organisation’s findings and recommendations for better management of people. Integrated Talent Management System So, what do we mean by talent management? In the broadest possible terms, it is the strategic and tactical management of the flow of talent through an organisation. Its purpose is to assure that the supply of talent is available to align the right people with the right jobs at the right time based on strategic business objectives. The term ‘talent management’ is often used to denote e-recruitment and automated applicant tracking systems. This emphasis on staffing and recruiting is more appropriately called the talent acquisition phase of the talent management cycle (see Figure 1), an important but preliminary step in the overall process. The Talent Management Cycle includes the proactive analysis and planning to assure long-term strategic development and deployment of critical leadership and other resources through systematic identification, assessment, planning and developmental action. The Talent Management Cycle is composed of several essential elements: 1. Talent Acquisition: Proactively recruiting world-class, diverse leadership talent and providing on-boarding support for them to accelerate their assimilation into their roles; 2. Talent Development: Developing and executing learning and development programmes, processes & assessment tools to grow current and future leaders; 3. Performance Management: The process of creating a work environment in which people can perform to the best of their 48 | October 2013 HR Matters Talent Management Strategy Competency Framework Performance Management Talent Acquisition Organisational Results Talent Management Succession Planning Figure 1: CEE Talent Management Cycle Vision, Mission, Strategy and Values abilities; 4. Succession Planning: This is critical towards developing a leadership pipeline or assuring near-term leadership continuity by thoughtful consideration of the availability, readiness, and development of internal talent (including High Potentials) to assume critical ‘priority’ leadership roles; and 5. Organisational Results: Achieving favourable and desired results is obviously the ultimate outcome expected out of any effective integrated talent management system. However, it is a lagging indicator and business leaders will have to focus on the organisational climate which will have an impact on the other elements of the Talent Management Cycle as explained earlier. The flow of effective communication and the systems of recognition and rewards are integral parts of the climate which influence the talent’s performance effecting productivity, creativity and in driving results with the right impact. The climate is impacted by a values-driven leadership team. Conclusion Your organisation can create a new product and it is easily copied. Lower your prices and competitors will follow. Go after a lucrative market and someone is there right after you, careful to avoid making your initial mistakes. But replicating a high-quality, highly engaged workforce is nearly impossible. The ability to effectively hire, retain, deploy and engage talent—at all levels—is really the only true competitive advantage an organisation possesses. Professor Sattar Bawany is the CEO of the Centre for Executive Education (CEE) and Strategic Advisor of IPMA (International Professional Managers Association). For more details, visit