Effective Load Balancing for ATCA Platforms

1,439 views

Published on

Presentation from James Radley at ATCA Summit 2009.

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,439
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
26
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Effective Load Balancing for ATCA Platforms

  1. 1. IP Load Balancing A critical part of system integration James.Radley@ccpu.com www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary
  2. 2. The Need for Load Balancing Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) applications are expected to handle bi-directional traffic on up to 4 x 10GbE links “Bump-in-the-wire” traffic for shaping Bi-directional wire taps for traffic profiling & legal intercept No one packet blade can handle all the traffic Load must be shared across numerous packet blades Traffic from an individual user or flow (in either direction) will typically need to always pass through the same packet (DPI) blade Load must be symmetrically handled www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 2
  3. 3. Load Balancing within an ATCA Service Platform Packets can be forwarded out of the identified backplane port or can be VLAN tagged for more precise targeting. Packet Packet Packet Packet Packet Packet FMx0 FMx0 Proc Proc Proc Proc Proc Proc The ATCA switch is able to parse L3/L4 fields to load balance traffic. Incoming traffic is delivered into the ATCA switch. www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 3
  4. 4. Service Platform: Critical Attributes for LB’ing Service reliability Additional capacity available within the platform can be rapidly switched in to handle traffic displaced from a failed service blade N+1 Active / Standby Spare blade ready to take over if another fails N+M Active / Active Spare capacity maintained on all blades can be called upon to share load if a service blade fails Failover must not affect existing traffic affinity across surviving blades Service scalability Ability to add more service blades and redistribute traffic to new resource www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 4
  5. 5. Bucket-based LB’ing Seamless Redistribution on Failover www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 5
  6. 6. Load Balancing: Common Methods (1 of 2) Direct Association (forwarding table) New flow is consciously assigned to a specific target New flows can be assigned to least-loaded server blade Choice of target can be based upon current spare capacity and existing level of commitments DPI packet blade is used to make service-related targeting decision Software can dig deep into packet to find key attributes Issues Compute-intensive – requires additional packet blades for LB’ing Low density: roughly 1 packet blade per 10GbE link Introduces latency – packet stored & analyzed then forwarded Despite carefully targeting each new flow, server blades may still become unfairly overloaded due to future traffic patterns www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 6
  7. 7. Load Balancing: Common Methods (2 of 2) Statistical A flow is predictably (but arbitrarily) always sent to a particular blade Choice of target typically based upon a hash of IP header Fair distribution relies on statistical fairness across a large population set LB’ing function provided as an intrinsic feature of the switch No additional components (system needs a switch anyway) Algorithm implemented in switch silicon low latency Capable of supporting 8 x 10GbE links with 64Byte packets at wireline speeds* *FlexCore ATCA-FM40 with Fulcrum FM4224 silicon Issues Fair distribution relies upon statistical variance in flow attributes Difficult to locate ‘user’ IP header from deeply encapsulated packets www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 7
  8. 8. Load Balancing: Flows vs. Subscribers Most LB’ing solutions use ‘flows’ to determine target 3-tuple: source IP, destination IP, protocol ID 5-tuple: 3-tuple, source L4 port, destination L4 port Increases degree of statistical variance between flows Often done for convenience (re-use of LAG logic) However, most applications need to track a subscriber All traffic relating to a particular subscriber (of all types and for all services) needs to be targeted through the same packet blade www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 8
  9. 9. Load Balancing by User IP Address User Network Service Network User Address Service Type User Address Service Type (Source IP) (Dst PortNum) (Destination IP) (Src PortNum) ffic In tra bo er Ou un us du nd fic tb se ou raf ou nd r tr tb c et Se aff ic Ou rv i rv i d Se ce un tra ffic bo In www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 9
  10. 10. FlexCore ATCA-FM40: Load Balancing Advantages Leverages Fulcrum’s FM4224 10GbE switch Frame Forwarding Unit (FFU) allows identification of user in both user- and network-originating packets FFU can also detect and drop (filter) packets of no interest i.e., only forward http traffic to packet blades Based upon L4 src/dst port number FFU can manipulate an added VLAN tag to fine tune the target to receive the packet VID defines target node_blade:processor:thread www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary 10
  11. 11. Thank You James.Radley@ccpu.com www.ccpu.com Confidential and Proprietary

×