Advertisement
The state of packaged web apps
Sep. 3, 2013•0 likes•1,005 views
1 likes
Be the first to like this
Show More
views
Total views
0
On Slideshare
0
From embeds
0
Number of embeds
0
Download to read offline
Report
Technology
Cristiano BettaFollow
Developer Advocate Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recommended
Evolution of Applications & WebHimanshu Jindal
Windows Server 2008 R2 Dev Session 03Clint Edmonson
Adobe is from Mars, Microsoft is from Uranus. A look at two competing web st...Eric Fickes
A Bit of RESTColdFusionConference
Server-side Java ProgrammingChris Schalk
Php IntroTenth Planet Technologies
The state of packaged web apps
- Developer evangelist
- Hacker advocate
- Developer emberads!
- Extensions for Paypal, EMberads, Minutebox
- Chrome extensions developer.chrome.com/extensions Firefox addons developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Extensions
- Chrome packaged apps developer.chrome.com/apps/ FF OS priviliged apps Bit.ly/priviliged_apps
- Opera/safari extensions phonegap
- Pros • Native experience • Deeper integration with os • Works offline • Always there cons • Differences in apis • Approval processes • Js mvcs
- h"p://developer.chrome.com/apps/app_architecture.html
- client network server Server side code data resources Regular web apps
- web app transport server Server side code data data resources resources Regular web appscons • High bandwidth transfer • Won’t work offline • Limited apis pros • No JS required • Deploy once
- “One of the many super outcomes of the HTML5 evolution is that browser vendors are striving towards interoperability – even Microsoft is talking of “same markup” Bruce lawson, 2011
- client web app tcp/ip server Server side code data storage resources app cache Installable web apps
- client web app tcp/ip server Server side code data storage resources app cache Installable web apps
- Installable web apps Chrome hosted apps developers.google.com/chrome/apps firefox os apps developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Mozilla/Firefox_OS
- web app transport server Server side code data data resources resources Regular web apps cons • Caching expiry is a pita • Limited apis Pros • Lower bandwith requirements • can work offline
- zip client web app transport server Server side code data storage resources Packaged web apps
- zip client web app transport server Server side code data storage resources Packaged web apps
- Packaged web apps Chrome extensions developer.chrome.com/extensions Firefox addons developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Extensions
- Packaged web apps Opera extensions phonegap
- Packaged web apps Chrome packaged apps developer.chrome.com/apps/ FF OS priviliged apps Bit.ly/priviliged_apps
- web app transport server Server side code data data resources resources Regular web appscons • Requires install • Requires js • syncing Pros • Low bandwith requirements • Works offline • Advanced apis
- Painless Payments for Droids Tim Messerschmidt
- manifests
- Chrome extensions
- Chrome packaged apps
- Firefox open web apps
- Firefox mini manifest
- Standards?
- W3c widgets
- Opera extensions Before they moved to using chrome
- packages
- .crx 7-Zip file with a json manifest
- .xpi Zip file with a json manifest And the entire SDK
- Chrome extensions ui
- Chrome extensions ui
- Chrome extensions ui
- Firefox addons ui
- Chrome packaged apps
- Chrome packaged apps
- Chrome packaged apps
- storage
- Html5 local storage + indexeddb
- Chrome storage api
- Other api differences
- Message passing
- Disk access
- Bluetooth/usb access
- Zip + upload == live
- Zip + upload == approval process
- Minimized JS
- Custom jquery version
- Sign on credentials
- Early days
- Standards are to evolved
- Client side JS MVCs are still young
- Benefits are tempting
- Mobile?
- chrome developer.chrome.com firefox Developer.mozilla.org
- Try making your own and tell me
Advertisement