Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Nhs cuts and pfi.full

435 views

Published on

Critiche al project financing: l'attuale dibattito nel BMJ

Published in: Health & Medicine, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Nhs cuts and pfi.full

  1. 1. BMJ 2011;343:d6681 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6681 Page 1 of 1Letters LETTERSPFI CAUSING FINANCIAL PROBLEMSNHS cuts and PFIMark Hellowell lecturerGlobal Public Health Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UKLansley suggests that the private finance initiative (PFI) is the who, as leader of the opposition, claimed the Tories would avoidmain cause of financial problems among 22 NHS trusts, which such “cuts” once in government. He made the claim in Chaseare “on the brink of collapse.”1 The media have largely reflected Farm Hospital, where the maternity services he pledged tothe line that Lansley is faced with the task of cleaning up protect are shortly due to close.Labour’s “mess,” and that any hospital closures he sanctions Blaming PFI for this looks strange when private finance is acan be blamed on them. central part of coalition policy. Since May 2010, ministers haveThis account is misleading. The destabilising influence of PFI approved six new hospital PFIs with a combined capital valuewithin the context of payment by results has long been of £1.4bn (€1.6bn; $2.2bn). It was John Major who introducedunderstood. Because payment by results allocates resources to PFI for the NHS in the early 1990s, and successive governmentstrusts on the basis of average treatment costs across the NHS, have used it to provide investments above what formal budgetstrusts with PFI projects in place (and therefore much higher would allow.than average fixed costs) will often run deficits. Such deficits Given the priority afforded to the deficit, it is no surprise thataccumulate over time and can become unmanageable. the current government has embraced this form of off-balanceThe question is what we should do about this. It serves no sheet financing. But it should clearly state that it has done soefficiency purpose to penalise trusts for having high fixed costs, and stop playing politics.which are ultimately traceable to decisions taken in Whitehall.It is obvious that these costs should be borne centrally. The Competing interests: None declared.payment by results tariff should be adjusted so that trusts arefully funded for their fixed capital costs. 1 O’Dowd A. Trusts deny health secretary’s claims that private finance initiatives have caused major financial problems. BMJ 2011;343:d6133. (26 September.)Instead, ministers are using PFI as a means of explaining awayhospital closures. Service rationalisation may in some cases be Cite this as: BMJ 2011;343:d6681necessary. But it is highly embarrassing for David Cameron, © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2011mark.hellowell@ed.ac.ukFor personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe

×