Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Marking GuideforInstructional Materials
Name: Sem/SY
Date:
Direction: Check the box below that corresponds to each item.
L...
Appendix C: Pre-Service Teacher’s Actual Teaching Rating
Name: Sem/SY:
Date: Subject Taught::
Cooperating School:
Note: Th...
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects
that tend to disturb th...
Marking guide for instructional materials
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Marking guide for instructional materials

182 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Marking guide for instructional materials

  1. 1. Marking GuideforInstructional Materials Name: Sem/SY Date: Direction: Check the box below that corresponds to each item. Legend: 3 – Definitely (90 – 100) 2 – Moderately (51 – 89) 1 – Not at all (0 – 50) Comments/Suggestions: (Strengths and suggestions for improvement) Rating: Rated by: Designation: ITEMS TO RATE 3 Definitely 2 Moderately 1 Not at all 1. It is big enough that can be seen by the farthest learner. 2. Colors for the material are realistic and pleasant. 3. It facilitates learning. 4. It can stand several uses. 5. It is economical to produce 6. It is light and easy to manipulate. 7. It is up to date. 8. It is related to the specific needs, problems and experiences of the target learners. 9. It has originality. 10. It develops curiosity and a sense of discovery in the learners.
  2. 2. Appendix C: Pre-Service Teacher’s Actual Teaching Rating Name: Sem/SY: Date: Subject Taught:: Cooperating School: Note: This will serve as a guide to the Cooperating Teachers and TEI Practicum Supervisor in assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-service Teachers. Check the box below that corresponds to each item. Legend: 100-95 - Excellent 88-83 - Satisfactory 77-72 - Unsatisfactory 94-89 - Very Satisfactory 82-78 - Fair ITEMS TO RATE E VS S F U I. LESSON PLAN A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms B. There was congruence between 1. Objective and subject matter 2. Objective and materials used 3. Objective and teaching procedure / Strategies of Teaching 4. Objective and formative test / Evaluation 5. Objective and assignment II. TEACHING METHODS A. Method/s used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the students B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the students’ capabilities C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson. D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking: 1. Attendance 2. Assignment/Homework 3. Practice exercise 4. Group Work/Project 5. Passing in and out of the room 6. Correcting, distributing, and collecting paper B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom C. Visual aids were within easy reach of the teacher during his/her teaching IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS A. The teacher spoke clearly with a well-modulated voice B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teacher’s skillful questioning. D. He/She observed correct pronunciation E. The board work of the teacher was free from errors in grammar and spelling F. The teacher’s handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was legible enough to be read and understood V. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
  3. 3. A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed. B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tend to disturb the student’s attention. C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and attention. The pre-service teacher’s strengths are: Comments/Suggestions for Improvement: Final Rating (Tick one) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Rated by: Designation: Cooperating Teacher----------------------------------------------------------

×