AngularJS Security: defend your Single Page Application

@carlobonamico#angularconf15
ANGULARJS SECURITY:
defend your Single Page Application
Carlo Bonamico
@carlobonamico
carlo.bonamico@nispro.it
http://www.nispro.it
Turin, 22/10/2015

About me
Speaker Bio
– passionate software developer since the C128 era
– PhD and research at the University of Genova / CNIT National TLC
Research Consortium
– exciting time at startup Eptamedia
– now a Solution Architect and Senior Trainer at NIS s.r.l.

between Italy and new London office
Current projects & interests
– training/mentoring teams on AngularJS, Web Security, Continuous
Integration & Delivery
– creating component-based Angular applications
– security reviews and assessments

Abstract
Securing an html5 Single Page Application is not the same as protecting a typical
JEE/Rails/PHP/.NET webapp.
The industry-wide move towards HTML5 and Single Page Applications, motivated by the
opportunity for more sophisticated interaction and UX, is again upsetting the balance
between Hackers and Developers. A wave of new-generation front-end technologies,
including Angularjs, is attracting Developers with their combination of productivity and
innovative UX, but at the same time opens the door to new vulnerabilities and security
challenges.
This talk will summarize the main principles of Secure Coding, and will discuss their
application to a typical angular HTML5 application with REST backend to prevent major
risks (including OWASP Top Ten).
A concrete example will demonstrate the use of tools and libraries, from RBAC to JWT,
from Spring Security to AngularJS directives for implementing secure HTML5/JS apps.

Evolution of Application Security
When I taught my first Web Application Security training
– most participants had never heard of SQL Injection and XSS
Thanks to many industry and community players (especially OWASP),
– not to mention many high-profile incidents,
things have started to change... Application Security
Ensuring Application
guarantees
•Confidentiality
•Integrity
•Availability
•Accountability
of the Information
it processes

Are we doing better?
It's 2015... we were promised flying cars... and what we got is...
See also
– http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabilities-by-types.php
– https://www.whitehatsec.com/resource/stats.html

HTML5 Single Page Applications
Somewhat ill-defined term, but you know what I mean
– HTML templates, statically served
– client retrieves data from REST services / websockets
– views dynamically rendered on the client side
Definitely more powerful, interactive and mobile-friendly
that traditional request-response webapps
also more secure?

First problem
Spiderman's Uncle Ben version:
With great power comes great responsibility...
The Web Application Security version:
With great power come more holes and greater risks!
– increased Surface of Attack

Websockets, storage, apis...
– https://html5sec.org/
– http://html5security.org/
– and once you penetrate the browser, you can do basically everything

and I mean it: calling APIs, install keyloggers, redirect user behaviour,
capture private data
–http://xenotix.in/
“most attack were already possible...
but they are more powerful now”
http://w3af.org/understanding-html5-security

Second problem
We are undergoing a wide architectural shift from
To
So many security assumptions do not hold true anymore!
ServerPOST params
HTML
Browser
Form-based
input
HTML rendering
HTML templating
Controllers,
Interaction
Logic
Business Logic
Server
POST JSON
JSON
Browser
HTML rendering
HTML templating
Business Logic
Interaction
Logic
REST
endpoints

The good side
The typical modern HTML5 application architecture has a single/main
advantage:
it forces at the very least a basic degree of separation between UI
and business logic
– even more so with Angular, Ember, React
In our consulting/project/problem solving experience,
the single biggest cause of
– quality
– performance
– security
problems is....

The good side
The typical modern HTML5 application architecture has a single/main
advantage:
it forces at the very least a basic degree of separation between UI
and business logic
– even more so with Angular, Ember, React
In our consulting/project/problem solving experience,
the single biggest cause of
– quality
– performance
– security
problems is.... the mixing & coupling of UI and business logic

There's hope...
If we properly understand the
new architectural paradigm,
we can turn it into an
advantage
Follow the principles
of secure coding
– Do not trust inputs
– Minimize attack surface area
(and window of opportunity)
– Establish secure defaults
– Principle of Least privilege
– Principle of Defense in depth
– Fail securely
– Don’t trust services
– Separation of duties (vs
configuration)
– Avoid security by obscurity
– Keep security simple
– Fix security issues correctly

Top Ten Web Application Risks
– A1-Injection
– A2-Broken Authentication and Session Management
– A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
– A4-Insecure Direct Object References
– A5-Security Misconfiguration
– A6-Sensitive Data Exposure
– A7-Missing Function Level Access Control
– A8-Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
– A9-Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities
– A10-Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
What's different between Request/Response apps and HTML5/SPAs?

What changes with HTML5/SPAs?
RED → more critical ORANGE → different solution GREEN → easier
– A1-Injection → same problem, same solution

What changes with HTML5/SPAs?
RED → more critical ORANGE → different solution GREEN → easier
– A1-Injection → same problem, same solution
Today, we will focus on those!

A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

A3 - XSS
Cross-Site-Scripting means that attacker can insert custom js code
which is then displayed in the user browser
– stored (input js in a field → DB → sent back to the page)
– reflected (input js in the url, send the url to a user, js executed)
– DOM-based (input triggers js logic that manipulates the DOM and
insert custom js)
Remember: any external input is UNTRUSTED!
– so we must avoid mixing user input with js code

A3 – Preventing XSS
Looks easy: but HTML allows for multiple mixed execution contexts:
– JS within CSS within HTML within a frame of another HTML …
The proper solution is ESCAPING: encoding the data so that the
browser properly interprets it as plain text (and not js)
– https://www.owasp.org/index.php/XSS_(Cross_Site_Scripting)_Prevention_Che
at_Sheet
In a well designed SPA,
– clear inputs paths

REST service responses, user inputs, url bar, ...
– HTML generation through the framework templating engine
– so it is easier to intercept and escape outputs

A3 – Preventing XSS with Angular
Since 1.3, the HTML compiler will escape all {{}} & ngbind by default
– https://www.ng-book.com/p/Security
– http://java.dzone.com/articles/angularjs-how-handle-xss
Be careful if you must include user-generated HTML (e.g. in rich text editors)
– take advantage of the services and directives
– ngbindhtml (from angular-sanitize)

print as is removing “script” tags (beware of img tags)

fully customizable with
–$sceProvider & $SanitizeProvider
– https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/security
Please note:
– escaping in the REST services is not always feasible/useful
– they can be consumed by mobile Apps and other clients

Remember
Most vulnerabilities are not so serious by themselves
– but became terrible if mixed

think Pepsi + Mentos
XSS is an enabler for
– phishing
– browser-based MITM
– session / auth token stealing
– sensitive data extraction
– img courtesy of http://www.delawaretoday.com/

A5-Security Misconfiguration

A5 – Security misconfiguration
A single MITM (Man in the Middle) and your “done”
– as the attacker can put arbitrary code in your browser
– so,

https://www.eff.org/Https-everywhere
Be careful with CORS
– Avoid AllowOrigin “*” unless you have very strong authentication
and authorization
Remember to tell the browser to enable stronger protection
– typically through headers such as CSP
– https://www.owasp.org/index.php/List_of_useful_HTTP_headers

Securing Headers
Node
– https://www.npmjs.com/package/helmet
Java (Spring Security)
– http://docs.spring.io/autorepo/docs/spring-security/current/reference/html/headers.
html
Test tools
– security headers online

https://securityheaders.com/
– OWASP ZAP

https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Zed_Attack_Proxy_Project

A2-Broken Authentication & Session Management

What is Authentication
Verifying the user identity
– independently from his profile / authorizations
Several elements:
– where valid users are listed (Realm)

internal, file, DB, LDAP, Active Directory, SSO Server
– what info is used to establish user identity

one or more “factors”: username, password, OTP, certificate...
– how identity is checked the first time

login → credentials validation
– how identity is checked on subsequent requests

validation

Traditional Request-Response Applications
e.g. JSP / ASP / PHP
– login page
– successful login creates a session
– protected pages accessed within the session
– data and access control filtered on the server side

often within views or controllers
Browser
Server
POST Login Data
GET secured page
SESSIONID = 5
SESSIONID = 5 auth
=
true?
crede
ntials
valid?
Realm
filtered
HTML
page
SID AUTH DATA
5 true carlo,admi
n

Issues with Cookie + Session Authentication
Authentication requires
– checking credentials against a realm
– keeping auth in session state on the server
– sessionid sent in a cookie
Issues
– state replication in clustered servers vs sticky sessions

Single-Sign-On across servers?
– More complex scenarios are possible

e.g. SSO Server, like CAS
– typically cookie based →
all server must be in same domain
Remember:
Cookies are sent
with ANY request
to the same domain
(including images)

Cookie-based authentication in Single Page
Applications
Can't SPA just do the same?
– login form POSTs to login service
– successful login creates a session and sets a cookie
– protected Pages & REST services accessed within the session

data and access control filtered … where ?
Browser
Server
POST Login Data
GET secured JSON
SESSIONID = 5
SID AUTH DATA
5 true carlo,admi
nSESSIONID = 5 auth
=
true?{
...
}
crede
ntials
valid?
Realm

Authentication vs Session Management
Cookie-based sessions are simple to implement
But
– not suited to stateless nature of REST services
Authentication vs Sessions
– They are two different things, although often used together
– REST services
tend to
be stateless
Unauthenticated Authenticated
Stateless Plain HTTP
e.g. Wikipedia
REST
e.g. Google APIs
With Session Session cookies
e.g. Amazon
JSP/ASP/PHP
e.g. Intranet Apps

How to do stateless authentication?

Token-based Authentication
Login establishes a valid token
– each request must be presented with the token
– the server can check token validity at each request
– https://auth0.com/blog/2014/01/07/angularjs-authentication-with-
cookies-vs-token/
Browser
Server
POST Login Data
GET secured JSON
TOKEN = 5
TOKEN = 5 token
valid?
crede
ntials
valid?
Realm
no session!

Issues
Given a token
– how do you know which is the current user?
On the server
– how expensive it is to check the token at each request?
Can you share a token across services?
– can you validate it without connecting to a DB / SSO Server?

How do you create & validate Tokens?

Creating and Validating Tokens
Simplest way: checking them against a list of valid tokens
– in memory → similar to session-based auth

replication problems
– on a DB

easier clustering, must consider performance
– on an external server

SSO for free, must evaluate performance & complexity

JWT - http://jwt.io
JWT = encoded & signed Json object containing
– Access token
– Claims (custom: session, domain, username...)
– Expiration
– and Digital Signature! → verifiable with just the public key
Returned by login REST service
Sent as header at each request
–Authentication: bearer eyJhbGciO
.eyJzdWIiOWV9.eoaDV
Checked by REST backed at each request
– can also be used with websockets
{
“user”:”carlo”,
“domain”:”NIS”,
“expiry”: ..
}

JWT in angular
Angular Library
– https://github.com/auth0/angular-jwt
Extensible hooks for
– storing and retrieving tokens on the client
Interceptors for
– retrieving tokens from server Response Headers
– optionally refresh tokens
– automatically sending tokens at each request
Robust and simple to use
bower install angularjwt

Token-based Auth in AngularJs
Ingredients
REST endpoints
– /auth/login

Input parameters: credentials

Response: token
– /auth/logout

Input parameters: token
$http or $resource based Client Service
AuthenticationService
– login() logout() methods wrapping the above
– plus isAuthenticated() and possibly currentUser()

Token-based Auth in AngularJs
Ingredients
– Controller(s)
– LoginController

bound to Login form, calls service
– LogoutController
– AuthenticationController

IsAuthenticated, currentUser
Possibly, Directives
<authenticateduser>
showWhenAuthenticated
<menu showWhenAuthenticated=”true”>

Saving the token
In both cases, register a then() on the promise
$http(...).then(function(response) {
currentToken.jwt =
response.data.access_token;
}
Store the token locally
If you need, parse it
tokenPayload = jwtHelper.decodeToken(jwt);
date = jwtHelper.getTokenExpirationDate(jwt);
bool = jwtHelper.isTokenExpired(jwt);

Sending the token at each request
Specify Token retrieval function
angular.module('myApp')
.config(
     function
Config($httpProvider,jwtInterceptorProvider) {
     jwtInterceptorProvider.tokenGetter =
['currentToken',   function(currentToken) {
return currentToken.jwt;
    //or return localStorage.getItem('id_token');
}];
Register interceptor
  $httpProvider.interceptors.push('jwtInterceptor');
});

Back-end
Login endpoint
– validates credentials
– generates JWT
REST Service endpoints (or better interceptor)
– extract Token from Authentication: header
– validate it
– proceed with request processing

or return error 401
Full example
– http://thejackalofjavascript.com/architecting-a-restful-node-js-app/

JWT in...
Plain Node: Auth0 library
– https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken
Express: Express JWT
– https://github.com/auth0/express-jwt
Passport - Modular Auth Framework for node.js
– http://passportjs.org/
.NET - OWIN.Identity
– http://bitoftech.net/2014/10/27/json-web-token-asp-net-web-api-2-
jwt-owin-authorization-server/
Java - Spring Security
– https://spring.io/guides/tutorials/spring-security-and-angular-
js/Integrating OAUTH with JWT

Were can we store / send the token?
in a cookie?
in a header?

Sending Tokens - Cookies vs Headers
Cookies
Pros
– sent automatically
– no code required on the client
Cons
– sent automatically
– even when do not want

e.g. <IMG src= in email
– less control on validity
– stored on client disk
Headers
Pros
– sent only explicitely
– not stored on disk
– unless you want to
– more control
– also prevents CSRF
Cons
– require code on the client side
– but this is normal in SPAs
https://auth0.com/blog/2014/01/27/
ten-things-you-should-know-about-
tokens-and-cookies/

Token Storage vs Session Duration
In memory or sessionStorage
– works only on current tab
– automatically closed
In localStorage
– persistent
– work across multiple tabs
– requires explicit expiration
https://stormpath.com/blog/where-to-store-your-jwts-cookies-vs-
html5-web-storage/

What else would we need?
what happens when the user is not logged in?
how to improve usability?

Routing support for Authentication &
Authorization
Need to configure Routing for
– redirect to login if not authenticated
– redirect to login if token expired
– optionally, redirect back to original URL
– redirect to error page if route not authorized in the current profile
Difficult to do in the default ngRoute
– Possible in ui-router
Way easier in angular-new-router
– https://medium.com/angularjs-meetup-south-london/angular-ng-
conf-2015-media-25dbe6250154

A7-Missing Function Level Access Control

Typical Server side application
Authorization is verified
– in controllers
if (user.hasRole(“admin”) == true)
– through filters / interceptors
– in views
<hasRole role=”admin”> or <if (...)>
confidential info
</hasRole>
Client Browser only receives content it has rights to
– (roughly) works even if security checks are “spaghetti code” in the
JSP/ASP/PHP templates

And in a SPA?
Would this be secure?
In users-view.html
<button ngif=”authCtrl.isAdmin”
ngclick=”userCtrl.deleteUser()”>
or this?
<section ngif=”authCtrl.isAdmin” >
{{userCtrl.user.confidentialData}}
</section>

No!
Just press F12
and modify the HTML / JS
or even the DOM in the developer tools
or just send HTTP requests directly to the backend

Security is up to the server
Even in SPAs, Authorization is still up to the server:
Security controls
– checking authentication state
– checking profile and inferring permissions
– enabling privileged actions
– filtering confidential data
MUST be performed on the server
– in the REST / websocket endpoints
– locally in each service, or via filters/interceptors
Also, the same rule applies to input validation

Usability is up to the client
But letting the user click on the button, invoking the service, and
only then displaying an error is not user friendly
UX is up to the client
– Front-End should have enough info to disable/hide the button

if the user is not authorized to click it

retrieve the permissions list from a REST service at logon
E.g. Permission check directives for Angular
<button ngclick=”postCtrl.delete()”
haspermission=”deletePost”>
permissions for Role-Based Access Control

Server-side authorization checks
So, in each server endpoint, you should check
– valid authentication
– valid authorization profile which includes privileges for the
currently requested action / data
Example Blog application
if (subject.hasRole(“admin”))
//enable delete post
if (subject.hasRole(“editor”))
//enable modification of post
else
//only read data
What are
the problems
with this code?

What if the rules change?
What if an auditor asks about
what an “editor” can do?
Real-world cases tend to be more complex!

Role Based Access Control
Separating Role definition from Permission check
– In each service / action, code checks that the user has the relevant
permission
if (subject.hasPermission(“deletePost”))
– Role Definition lists all the permissions

e.g.
–Admin detelePost, updatePost, readPost→
–anonymous readPost→
Authorization system maps user/groups to list of roles
– and computes the “merged” set of permissions active for the valid user

user is both Admin & Editor

Permissions are
–changeSettings, deleteUser, addUser, deletePost,
modifyPost

Hierarchical permission system
2-level: User → Role → Permissions
3-level: User → Groups → Roles → Permissions
Wildcard Permissions
– blog:deletePost
– blog:readPost
– blog:* means both

blog:readPost:12 → entity level permission

blog:readPost:* on all entities
see Apache Shiro

Advantages
Permission check is
– focused, readable
– easy to implement
– easy to test
– rarely changes
Role definition is
– centralized
– easy to review
– easy to change
– as it tends to change often
Secure Design Principle
all parts of the system
need to perform security
checks
but
security check
implementation
should be centralized and
not “spread” in the system

RBAC in a Single Page Application
Server-side Ingredients:
– Profile definition mapping Roles to Permissions

static file

db table

possibly cached

Identity server (e.g. OpenAM)
– API for checking permissions
Normally, some of this information is cached to ensure minimal
performance penalty

Usable Secure UI in AngularJS
Ingredients:
– /authorization/profile/current REST endpoint

returns a Json

current user roles

merged list of all active permissions
On the Client
– Client Service wrapping the above
– Authorization/ProfileService storing the permission list

hasPermission(p) method
Call the service from
– Controller methods
– Routing callbacks

A9-Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities

Component Security
The code we write
The code which actually runs in our application
– libraries and components

Checking dependecies for vulns
On the client side
– http://retirejs.github.io/retire.js/
npm install g retire ; retire –path src
– also available as ZAP & mvn plugin
mvn com.h3xstream.retirejs:retirejsmaven
plugin:scan
On the server side
– OWASP Dependency Check

https://github.com/jeremylong/DependencyCheck
dependencycheck.sh app Testing out . scan
[path to jar files to be scanned]
mvn org.owasp:dependencycheckmaven

@YourTwitterHandle#DVXFR14{session hashtag} @carlobonamico#angularconf15
A
f
nal
w
ord
...
But isn't all that unnecessary complexity
slowing down development of my critical project?

A final word
People tend to view Security as “overhead”, not adding value to the project
The reality:
– if you know what to pay attention to, minimal additional costs
– also, in most cases, adding security just means following good design principles
if you separate well concerns, adding security is easy
– favor clarity of intent and code readability
– favor composition over inheritance
– test, test, test!

incorporate security checks in your tests
This lets software adapt more easily to both requirements & security changes
– easier to evolve incrementally & validating each step → see Continuous
Delivery

References

References
Owasp Secure Coding Principles
– https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Secure_Coding_Principles
OWASP Testing Guide
– https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Guide_v4_Table_
of_Contents
SOLID Design Principles
– http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.UncleBob.PrinciplesOfOod

HTML5 Security
Attack Vectors & Vulnerabilities
– https://media.blackhat.com/bh-eu-12/shah/bh-eu-12-Shah_HTML5_
Top_10-WP.pdf
OWASP Guidelines
– https://www.owasp.org/index.php/HTML5_Security_Cheat_Sheet
JS Frameworks Security
– http://www.slideshare.net/x00mario/jsmvcomfg-to-sternly-look-at-
javascript-mvc-and-templating-frameworks

Thank You for your attention
Interested?
– attend our Web Application Security / Angular trainings
– engage us for Design/Code Reviews, Vulnerability Assessments &
team mentoring
Read more on
– http://www.nispro.it
– http://www.slideshare.net/carlo.bonamico
Follow us on twitter
– @nis_srl @carlobonamico

updates on Security, AngularJS, Continuous Delivery
Contact me
– carlo.bonamico@gmail.com / carlo.bonamico@nispro.it

AngularJS Security: defend your Single Page Application

AngularJS Security: defend your Single Page Application

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot(20)

Similar to AngularJS Security: defend your Single Page Application

Similar to AngularJS Security: defend your Single Page Application (20)

More from Carlo Bonamico

More from Carlo Bonamico(15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded(20)

AngularJS Security: defend your Single Page Application