Sondaggio smart meter


Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Sondaggio smart meter

  1. 1. Smart Grid SecuritynCircle, the leader in information risk and security performance management solutions, partnered withEnergySec, a DOE-funded public-private partnership that works to enhance the cyber security of theelectric infrastructure, to sponsor a smart grid security survey of over 104 energy security professionals.The online survey was conducted between March 16 and March 31, 2012.Key smart grid security findings:  64% said smart meters are vulnerable to false data injection  75% said security has not been adequately addressed in smart grid deployment  90% believe we need smart grid security standards  64% believe smart grid deployment should slow down until we have better security controls  Only 50% said their organization has a security program and security policies for smart grid deployment  66% say for smart grid projects funded by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grants have not adequately addressed security The complete results of the survey, including commentary from Patrick Miller, CEO of EnergySec, and Elizabeth Ireland, vice president of marketing for nCircle are below: Has the hype around privacy issues Has security been adequately associated with smart meter addressed in smart grid deployment? consumer data been overblown? 75% 53% 47% 25% Yes No Yes No "Smart Grid meter privacy is still a new area," said Patrick Miller. "State regulations are inconsistent and sensitive customer details in smart grid data vary from utility to utility. I expect the smart grid industry to struggle with several challenges around who ultimately owns customer data. There are several grey areas that impact how smart grid customer data will be used as the industry attempts to maximize revenue potential. Even seemingly innocuous customer data has significant value -- just ask Facebook or Google.”
  2. 2. Patrick Miller noted, "Smart meters vary widely in Do smart meter installations have sufficient security controls to capability and many older meters were not designed to protect against false data injection? adequately protect against false data injection. It doesnt help that some communication protocols used by the 61% smart meter infrastructure dont offer much protection against false data injection either. Together, these facts 39% highlight a much larger potential problem with data integrity across the smart grid infrastructure. Because our nation relies on the smart grid to deliver robust and reliable power, we need to make sure that all systems that process usage data, especially those that make autonomous, self-correcting, self-healing decisions, assure Yes No data integrity.""A false data injection attack is another example of technology advancing faster than security controls,”said Elizabeth Ireland. “This is a problem that has been endemic in the evolution of security and its a keyreason for the significant cyber security risks we face across many facets of critical infrastructure.Installing technology without sufficient security controls presents serious risks to our powerinfrastructure and to every power user in the U.S.""Security has been addressed to varying degrees in manysmart grid deployments, however it is going to be a Are smart grid security standards moving fast enough to keep pacechallenge to keep pace with the constantly changing with smart grid deployment?security landscape," said Patrick Miller. "The analog andmechanical devices installed in most utilities were designedfor a very different maintenance model than newer digital 72%equipment being designed and installed today."Elizabeth Ireland noted, "Its pretty clear that informationsecurity professionals in the energy industry are 28%uncomfortable with standards currently available for smartgrid technology. Defining and implementing meaningfulsecurity standards is always a challenge but withoutstandards, adoption of critical security controls across the Yes Nosmart grid industry is likely to be uneven at best."
  3. 3. Do you think we need smart grid Does your organization have a specific security standards and security program and security policies 89% policies? for smart grid deployment? 49% 51% 11% Yes No Yes No What part of smart grid infrastructure is most vulnerable to cyber attack? 41% 29% 20% 10% Smart meters Metering infrastructure including transport networks Utility energy management systems Energy management, such as phasor measurement unitsAccording to Patrick Miller, CEO of EnergySec, "The enormous range of technology in the smart gridpresents many points of potential vulnerability, and we are moving at the speed of light to insert evenmore technology shims into the existing network structures of the smart grid. This ever-increasing rateof complexity and hyper-embedded technology will be very difficult to secure.""The complexity of SCADA technology combined with the range of results from survey respondents onthis issue indicates that we dont have any single section of the smart grid fully secured," said ElizabethIreland, vice president of marketing for nCircle. "Its not surprising that energy industry securityprofessionals deem metering infrastructure as the highest area of risk. Individual partners in anycomplex supply chain often have very limited visibility into the security for the entire process."
  4. 4. How should the security risks associated with the smart grid affect deployment plans? 64% 33% 4% No change from current plans; full steam ahead Deployment should slow down until we have better security controls We don’t need a smart grid at all Should regulatory oversight for smart Have the American Recovery and grid distribution be transitioned to Reinvestment Act of 2009 grants the Federal government? awarded to smart grid projects adequately addressed security? 60% 66% 40% 34% Yes No Yes No"The modernized grid encompasses new digital components all the way from the toaster to theturbine,” noted Patrick Miller. “It spans local, state and federal regulatory lines. In an environmentwhere innovation is paramount, a federal one-size-fits-all approach may significantly slow downprogress. On the other hand, potential inconsistencies in regulatory approaches may introducecomplexity and risk smart grid landscape. Either model, whether state or federally regulated, comeswith pros and cons. I see the regulatory oversight of the smart grid as one of our biggest smart gridchallenges with the least obvious solution."“It’s likely that the division of opinion on regulatory oversight reflects, at least to some degree,fundamental political beliefs” said Elizabeth Ireland. “Some security professionals probably seegovernment regulation in industry as beneficial, and some feel we should minimize the role ofgovernment in industry as much as possible. The majority of energy security professionals surveyedbelieve the energy industry will police itself.”