Js teacher-section-1-notes-and-resources


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Js teacher-section-1-notes-and-resources

  1. 1. Section 1: The Irish Jewish Communities and the Jewish Home Websites Jewish Ireland: Information on the history, development, beliefs and practices of the Jewish community in Ireland with links to the Jewish communities in Ireland http://www.jewishireland.org/ Website of the Jewish Community, Belfast http://www.jewishbelfast.com/ Website of the Jewish Community, Cork http://www.corkhebrewcongregation.com Website of Liberal Judaism in England, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland http://www.liberaljudaism.org/communities-rabbis.html Jewish Communities and Records of Jews in Ireland (has not been updated since 2006/2007 but gives some contacts and details of synagogues either extant or non- functioning in Ireland. http://www.jewishgen.org/jcr-uk/ireland/dublin.htm Jewish Links Page which gives information on contemporary events, online magazines, and newspapers of some Jewish communities internationally. This could be a useful resource for the first section of the syllabus. www.jewishlink.net/news papers.html Ireland’s Other Diaspora: Jewish-Irish Within/Irish-Jewish Without from the European Jewish Magazine Golem The author, Ronit Lentin, is the Head of the Sociology Department and course coordinator of the M Phil in Race, Ethnicity and Conflict in Trinity College, Dublin. She was coordinator of the Global Networks project in the Institute for International Integration Studies (IIIS), and member of the Trinity Immigration Initiative research programme, where she focused on migrant-led activism. She was born in Haifa, Palestine, and grew up in Israel, moved to Ireland in 1969. http://www.hagalil.com/golem/diaspora/irland-e.htm Stuart Rosenblatt’s work on Jews in Irish history http://www.jewishireland.org/genealogy.html Online Documentary on the Jewish Community in Ireland A one-hour documentary is available online which gives some insights into the Jewish community in Ireland and how they contributed to the development of Ireland and Israel: http://www.shalomireland.com/
  2. 2. Jewish Community, Limerick Different documents about the Jewish community during their time in Limerick, held by the Library at the following address: http://www.limerickcity.ie/Library/LocalStudies/LocalStudiesFiles/J/JewsofLimerick/ Jewish Community, Limerick If you are seeking further information on this topic, look at this website from Limerick City Council: http://www.limerickcity.ie/media/jews%20of%20limerick%2038.pdf A Stroll Through Jewish Dublin Online documentary on Jewish Dublin available at the following web address: http://www.theirishstory.com/2012/02/27/a-stroll-through-jewish- dublin/#.UMRh6Y5hra4 Jewish Community, Belfast BBC Documentary (1983) in four parts about the Jewish community in Belfast: Odd Men In: A Personal Portrait by Harry Towb, and a YouTube tour of the Jewish cemetery in Belfast http://www.youtube.com/user/JewishBelfast Interview with Adrian Levy, member of the Jewish Community in Belfast: <http://www.jewishbelfast.com/index.php?cmd=viewsong&viid=12> The Jews of Ireland, Robert Tracy http://www.ucc.ie/icms/irishmigrationpolicy/Judaism%20The%20Jews%20of%20Irela nd.htm Ireland’s Jews: A Fading Tribe on the Emerald Isle http://www.isjm.org/jhr/IInos1-2/ireland.htm Louis Lentin (Film Producer and Member of Aosdana) Aosdana: http://aosdana.artscouncil.ie/Members/Literature/Lentin.aspx?Cnuas=1 [accessed 23 November 2011] Grandpa… speak to me in Russian, Louis Lentin http://www.imrstr.dcu.ie/currentissue/Vol_3_Issue_1_Louis_Lentin.pdf Lentin’s works as director, producer and writer http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2310417/
  3. 3. Alan Shatter (Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence, and member of Fine Gael) Political Profile http://www.oireachtas.ie/members- hist/default.asp?housetype=0&HouseNum=30&MemberID=1028&ConstID=90 Some important issues which the Minister has to deal with on any day http://www.kildarestreet.com/search/?pid=6&s=section%3Awrans&pop=1 David Marcus (Author, broadcaster, life-long supporter of Irish language fiction) David Marcus dies, RTE news http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0509/marcusd.html Obituary from The Guardian newspaper http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/jun/12/obituary-david-marcus Information from the Munster Literature Centre http://www.munsterlit.ie/Writer%20pages/Marcus,%20David.html Women and the Jewish Home A reader asked: What are the most significant Jewish rituals for women? Here, Rebbetzin Feige Twersi explores three: baking bread and separating the dough; lighting Shabbat candles; and ritual immersion in a mikvah (ritual bath). http://www.aish.com/f/rf/48931682.html The role of women in Judaism Women’s Mitzvot (commandments), women’s holiday, women in the synagogue, Lillith (character in Talmud and rabbinical folklore) http://www.jewfaq.org/women.htm#Mitzvot Kashrut A section on keeping the laws of Kashrut from the New South Wales Board of Jewish Education in Australia. Simple classifications of foods with links to other websites included http://www.bje.org.au/learning/judaism/kids/kosher.html Podcast Stuart Rosenblatt: Keeper of the Faith produced by Clare Cronin and funded by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland's Sound and Vision funding Scheme. First broadcast Saturday 9th October 2010. It is an Irish radio documentary from RTÉ Radio 1, Ireland - Documentary on One. This recounts Stuart Rosenblatt’s genealogical research into Jewish communities in Ireland which is contained in 16 volumes, tracing 44,000 people under 95 headings. Fascinating account into the origins of Jewish communities in Ireland and their present challenges.
  4. 4. http://www.rte.ie/radio1/doconone/radio-documentary-stuart-rosenblatt-series-jewish- genealogy-ireland.html Books Benson, Asher, Portraits of Life by the Liffey (Dublin: A&A Farmar Ltd., 2007) Eliash, Shulamit, The Harp and the Shield of David: Ireland, Zionism and the State of Israel (Abington and New York: Routledge, 2007) Hyman, Louis, The Jews of Ireland: From Earliest Years until 1910 (Irish University Press, 1972) Keogh, Dermot, Jews in Twentieth Century Ireland: Refugees, Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust (Cork: Cork University Press, 1998) Miller, Frederic P. , Vandome, Agnes F., McBrewster, John, History of the Jews in Ireland (Germany: VDM Publishing House, 2010) Ó Gráda, Cormac, Jewish Ireland in the Age of Joyce: A Socioeconomic History (Oxfordshire and New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006) Rivlin, Ray, Jewish Ireland: A Social History (Dublin: The History Press Ireland, 2011; updated version of Shalom Ireland published in 2003) Excellent historical resource tracing the arrival of immigrants from Tsarist Russia in the 1880s, their early years in Ireland; the educational, social, political, cultural, artistic, sporting and professional contributions of Jews to Irish life, right up to the present day. Taylor, Marilyn, 17 Martin Street (Dublin: O’Brien Press, 2011) Novel about a Jewish family in Dublin at the time of the Emergency. There are accompanying teaching Guides and opportunities for engagement are on the O’Brien Press website at http://www.obrien.ie/author.cfm?authorid=58 Taylor, Marilyn, Faraway Home (Dublin: O’Brien Press, 1999) Fact-based novel based on the lives of two Jewish children sent on a kindertransport from Austria to Millisle refugee Farm on the Ards Peninsula in Co. Down) DVD Katrina Goldstone and Louis Lentin, No more Blooms: Ireland's Attitude to the Jewish Refugee Problem 1933-46, a Crescendo Concepts documentary for RTE, broadcast 10 December 1997. Origins of the Irish Jewish Communities
  5. 5. Sources: Stuart Rosenblatt interview on RTE, Radio One, 2010, and the following website, Akmian, from the Encylopaedia of Jewish Communities of Lithuania, written by Dov Levin and it was published in Yad Vashem 1996. http://www.jewishgen.org/Yizkor/pinkas_lita/lit_00155.html) Stuart Rosenblatt took the country and assembled the information beginning with the family tree in Lithuania. If Jewish and Irish, your ancestors could have come from Ackmene in Lithuania. Ackmene is located in the north-west of Lithuania. Ackmene (pronounced Akmian) The town was established in the 16th century. It was burnt in 1705 in a war with the Swedes. In 1792, Ackmene received the Magdeburg Rights which were granted by the nobility to Jews and a few other minorities for commerce, trade and money- lending. Jewish settlement in Ackmene began in the beginning of the 18th century. In the first half of the 19th century, Jews numbered approximately two-thirds of the population. The mass immigrations of Jews began after the so-called May Laws were instigated in Tsarist Russia in 1881. These laws were meant to be temporary measures but lasted over thirty years. The types of laws are as follows: ‘As a temporary measure, and until a general revision is made of their legal status, it is decreed that the Jews be forbidden to settle anew outside of towns and boroughs, exceptions being admitted only in the case of existing Jewish agricultural colonies.’ ‘Temporarily forbidden are the issuing of mortgages and other deeds to Jews, as well as the registration of Jews as lessees of real property situated outside of towns and boroughs; and also the issuing to Jews of powers of attorney to manage and dispose of such real property.’ ‘Jews are forbidden to transact business on Sundays and on the principal Christian holy days; the existing regulations concerning the closing of places of business belonging to Christians on such days to apply to Jews also.’ Stuart Rosenblatt FGSI (Fellow of the Genealogical Society of Ireland) He has spent years and endless hours of his time recording the origins of Jews in Ireland. His corpus of works thus far comprises 16 volumes!
  6. 6. ‘The measures laid down in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 shall apply only to the governments within the Pale of Jewish Settlement’ (the term given to Jews’ areas of residency within Imperial Russia). In 1893, a fire broke out in Akmenė which caused great damage to the property of the Jews. According to the notice which was published in amelitz the local Rabbi, Rav Aharon Eliyahu Kahane wrote, ‘A fire broke out in the middle of the town and its environs and more than forty houses, many buildings and stores were destroyed and sixty Jewish families were left destitute’. People abroad who were from the town were asked to send donations to help rehabilitate the families who suffered from the fire. At the same time the Jews were approximately one-third of the general population. Many of them emigrated and this continued until World War One. Many of the Jews from Akmenė who were expelled in 1915 to central Russia never returned. With the declaration on giving the Jews autonomy in independent Lithuania, a community council consisting of five people was elected in Akmenė. For a number of years the council took care of most of the activities of the Jews of the town. The emigration of the Jews from the town continued in the period of Lithuanian independence, mainly because of the difficult economic conditions. According to a survey taken by the Lithuanian government in 1931 there were 14 stores in Akmenė of which 11 were owned by Jews (79%): 4 textile stores, 3 butchers, a grocery store, a grains store, a shoe store and a store for repairing sewing machines. In Akmenė there was also a flour mill owned by Jews. In 1937 in Akmenė there were 7 Jewish craftsmen, a baker, a carpenter, a tinsmith, a butcher, a watchmaker and 2 others. In 1925 in the town there was a Jewish woman doctor (Rebecca Gurvitz). Many were helped by loans they received from the Jewish folk bank (Folksbank) which had a branch in Akmenė. In 1927 the branch had 94 clients and in 1929 there were 108 and it was considered one of the smaller branches .in Lithuania. Client loans that year added up to 45,000 Lit (approximately $4,500). In 1939, there were 36 telephone subscribers, 6 of them were Jews. Despite the constant decrease in the number of members of the Jewish community the activities of the major organizations and institutions continued, such as the synagogue, the “Yavne” School network and others. The local rabbi was Rabbi Nachum-Mordechai, son of Rabbi Yehuda Leib Werebovski, who from 1907 served as the Rabbi of Akmenė. He was also the last rabbi of the Jewish community and was murdered by the Lithuanians. Many of the Jews of Akmenė were members of the Zionist camp. Witness to this is the participation of Jewish voters in Akmenė in the elections to the first Seim in 1922. The Zionist list received 66 votes, the religious list “Achdut” 31 and the Democratic list 1 vote. The Zionist youth movements in active in Akmenė were Hashomer Hatzair and Betar. In this period relations between Jews and their Lithuanian neighbors were generally proper. But in the second half of the 1930s thing began to change for the worst. In March 1939 Lithuanians attacked a group of Jews. The Jews demonstrated opposition and drove off the attackers. During World War II and Afterwards Great changes occurred in the condition of the Jews during the Soviet regime in 1940-
  7. 7. 1941, and especially on the economic and social political levels. Among others, Zionist activities of any type were forbidden. In the end of June 1941, a short time after the German invasion of the Soviet Union, nationalistic Lithuanians organized in Akmenė and arrested all Jewish men. In cooperation with the few Germans that came to Akmenė, the Lithuanians shot and killed a Jew named Shmit who, in the past, owned a fabric store, and Yosef and Feibush Yoselevitz. On August 4, 1941 all the remaining prisoners were transferred to three silos on the bank of the river Venta, near Mazhaik. The men were taken immediately to dig pits and the women were attached to the Jewish women who had been imprisoned in Mazhaik prior to all of this. All of them were murdered together with the Jews of Mazhaik and the surroundings on August 9, 1941 (Shabbat, Av 16, 5701). A few years after the war the place where they were murdered was fenced in and a black marble monument was set up. After the war some Jews settled in the village. In 1979 there were 3 Jews there. By 1989 not a single Jew remained. The Ackmene Jews arrive in Ireland Stuart Rosenblatt’s father came to Ireland in the 1940s from Poland. His mother was a Dubliner, born and bred, and when he married her he married into the heart of Jewish Ireland. His mother, whose surname was Jackson, had family roots in Ackmene. Rosenblatt conducted extensive research compiling information on the history of Irish Jews: 44,000 people under 95 headings, all pulled together and cross- references. He found that many of the Irish Jews originally came from Ackmene in Lithuania. Children as young as 12 were conscripted into the army for 25 years. Such legislation made it very difficult for the Jewish communities who were anxious to preserve their traditions. After the May laws were enforced in the 1880s many of the Jews living in Ackmene were facing increased Tsarist persecution and fled to Ireland, to Cork and Dublin. According to Rosenblatt, the first wave of immigrants might not have been able to afford the long trip to the United States and were forced to disembark at Cork; others took the first vessel to anywhere and arrived in Ireland; some were too sea-sick to continue their onward journeys; some ran out of kosher food; some just disembarked at the first stop which was Cork thinking that they had arrived in America. They wanted freedom to practice their religion. As they began to arrive in Ireland, they sometimes found new neighbours but who were from their hometown of Ackmene. Now, 2011, there is nothing of the Jewish communities left in Ackmene. There is a burial ground with no mark in an area adjoining the town. Many of the Irish Jewish ancestors who left Russia just wanted to divest themselves of the antisemitism they experienced, educated their children, and never spoke about their homeland. Jews, who came to Ireland and settled here, saw Ireland as place of relative peace and tranquility even in spite of antisemitism and pro Nazism. Irish Government Immigration Policies between 1933-1945 Leo McAuley of the Irish legation in Berlin reported that from 1933 there was a marked increase in inquiries and applications from Jews of Polish or Eastern European nationality and discouraged such people from going to Ireland as ‘they are really only refugees’.
  8. 8. 1933-1939 Charles Bewley, Ireland’s representative in Berlin was aware of what was happening to the Jews of Europe at the time and chose to do nothing. He described the Nuremburg Laws as ‘certain inconveniences’. His attitudes to Jews were very clear: they were the ‘chief supporters of communism’; they created ‘grave moral scandals’ and were a ‘form of corruption; they practised ‘fraud’ and ‘usury’. In his estimation, it was ‘beyond any degree of reason that they could be treated like ordinary citizens’. After the Anschluss, the Nazi annexing of Austria in 1938, the Irish government made entry into Ireland for holders of German or Austrian passports dependent on a valid visa which was available only to applicants ‘not of Jewish or partly Jewish origin’ and ‘without non-Aryan affiliations.’ Eamon de Valera, leader of the Irish Government from 1932-1948, was privately and personally warm towards Jews. However, in practice his attitude was different. It took a personal visit from Rabbi Herzog, then Chief Rabbi of Palestine, to persuade Gerry Boland to let the Clonyn Castle children enter Ireland and even then their stay was limited to a year. As Taoiseach and Minister for External Affairs, De Valera sanctioned Charles Bewley’s post during the critical pre-Nazi years. Delegates from 32 countries and representatives from relief organizations meet in Evian-les-Bains, a spa town in France, to discuss the German-Jewish refugees. The Evian Conference which took place from 6-15 July 1938 sought solutions to the Jewish refugee problem. Ireland’s overcrowded professions and the need for Irish citizens to emigrate for employment were cited as reasons for refusing asylum. The fact remains that there were many Jewish refugees who had the commercial and manufacturing skills required in Ireland at that time. In 2003, at the first official Holocaust commemoration, Michael McDowell, then Minister for Justice, apologized for the Republic’s exclusion policy which was inspired by ‘a culture of muted antisemitism in Ireland’ and that ‘at an official level the Irish state was at best coldly polite and behind closed doors antipathetic, hostile and unfeeling toward the Jews’. In October 1938, Chief Rabbi Herzog asked de Valera for permission to admit six or seven refugee doctors and dentists to Ireland but permission was not granted. No refugees were allowed into Cork. Robert Briscoe was refused a temporary visa for his own aunt resulting in her death in an extermination camp. Robert Tracy in an article about the Jews of Ireland cited that ‘In 1942 Rabbi Herzog warned de Valera that Jews were being systematically exterminated in German prison camps. The Taoiseach and his government made efforts to rescue various groups, especially groups including children, and bring them to Ireland. These included a large group of German Jews held at Vittel in Vichy France, who already possessed visas for various South American countries. De Valera, together with the Irish ministers in Berlin, Vichy, and at the Vatican worked to rescue the Vittel Jews, and later groups of Italian, Dutch, Hungarian, and Slovakian Jews, but without success. In no case were the Nazis willing to let such groups depart for Ireland or leave Europe under Irish auspices. There was also a mistaken belief that Jews with Irish visas might be imprisoned, but would not be sent to the death camps, a belief the Vittel episode destroyed.’
  9. 9. De Valera expressed condolences on behalf of the Irish government after Hitler had taken his own life. His rationale for this gesture, ostensibly, was based on his understanding of the protocols of diplomacy. Political antisemitism culminated in genocide, and it is worth remembering that neutral Ireland allowed in only some 65 Jewish refugees between 1933 and 1946 as Europe burned (Ronit Lentin). The situation in Northern Ireland was different. They had a Christian multi- denominational Belfast Committee of German Refugees and the Jewish Refugee Aid Committee. The latter established a home in Clifton Park Avenue, Belfast, which provided care for some of the 10,000 children of the Kindertransport from Germany and Austria in 1939. Adult refugees who did not have work permits to practice their own professions were given employment as maids, cooks and chauffeurs. From 1939-1946, more than 100 refugee children and adults were accommodated on the Millisle farm in Co. Down. The main cost of war to Irish Jews was the loss of extended and immediate family through persecution and the death camps. Joe Briscoe lost 156 relatives. By 1946 the Jewish population had peaked at more than 5,000. Newspaper Article from The Irish Times Saturday, 31 December 2011 De Valera's expression of sympathy to diplomat condemned DEAGLÁN de BRÉADÚN, Political Correspondent HITLER'S DEATH: ÉAMON DE Valera was told that by expressing condolences to the German ambassador on the death of Adolf Hitler, he had “shown allegiance to a devil”, newly declassified papers reveal. The files also disclose that it was decided not to fly the Irish flag at half-mast at Áras an Uachtaráin in the Phoenix Park, even though a similar gesture had been made on the death of US president Roosevelt three weeks previously. The Nazi leader shot himself at his bunker in Berlin on April 30th, 1945. Two days later de Valera, who was taoiseach and minister for external affairs, called on ambassador Eduard Hempel to express his condolences. The gesture aroused immediate controversy. The file in the National Archives contains a number of strident letters sent in the immediate aftermath. Angela D Walsh, with an address at East 44th Street, New York, writes to de Valera the day after: “I am horrified, ashamed, humiliated . . . You, who are the head of a Catholic country, have now shown allegiance to a devil.” The writer concludes by saying a copy of the letter was being sent to President
  10. 10. Douglas Hyde. On the day the letter was written, Michael McDunphy, secretary to the president, also visited the ambassador to express condolences. A note by McDunphy states: “After consultation with the government and acting on the authority of the president, I called today on the German minister, Herr Eduard Hempel, at the Legation in Northumberland Road, and on behalf of the president expressed condolence on the death of the Fuehrer and Chancellor of the German Reich.” In another note, dated May 7th, 1945, McDunphy writes that he raised with the government the issue of whether the Irish flag should be flown at half-mast over the Áras after Hitler’s death. The question arose, “in view of the fact that on the death of President Roosevelt of the USA, the flag was half-masted from the date of his death until after the funeral on the following Sunday”. The note continues: “The official view was that the special ties of historic friendship which linked Ireland with the USA did not apply to the same extent to Germany, and it appeared therefore that the half-masting of the flag immediately on the announcement of the death was not necessary. “A decision could be taken later as to whether the flag should be half-masted on the day of Herr Hitler’s funeral. At the moment it did not seem there would be any funeral.” The episode resurfaced in a letter dated January 22nd, 1970, when de Valera was president. Fr Kevin Keegan, writing from an address in France, said he had been watching a television documentary in which the famous Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal “said that you went to the German ambassador to express your sympathy when you heard that Hitler had committed suicide”. The letter continues: “Needless to say I was astounded to hear such a statement. I would be very grateful to you if you inform me whether it is true or not. In the case of it being untrue, I will inform the French Television immediately asking them to make a public rectification.” Responding, Máirtín Ó Flathartaigh, secretary general to the president wrote that de Valera was “convalescing from a recent illness” and was “not at present dealing with correspondence”. The letter confirmed, however, that in his capacity as minister for external affairs at the time, de Valera had called on ambassador Hempel on May 2nd, 1945, “following the announcement of the death of the German head of state” and the visit was made “in accordance with established diplomatic practice”. He continues: “The reference to suicide in your letter is, however, incorrect; no
  11. 11. announcement had then been made (or for long afterwards with any degree of certitude) about the circumstances of Hitler’s death. Had there been, both charity and protocol would, no doubt, still have had to be considered.” The presidential papers also include a report of a letter to the Times of London two weeks after the incident by playwright George Bernard Shaw, who defends de Valera as “a champion of the Christian chivalry we are all pretending to admire”. The Role of Women in the Jewish Community Abridged and adapted from Judaism 101, ‘The Role of Women’ (http://www.jewfaq.org/women.htm; Dan Cohn-Sherbok, Judaism: History, Belief and Practice; Jacob Neusner, Judaism: An Introduction) The emphasis here is more from a traditional Jewish perspective. The role of women in traditional Judaism has been grossly misrepresented and misunderstood. Many of the important feminist leaders of the 20th century (Gloria Steinem (American author, political activist), for example, and Betty Friedan (writer and activist) are Jewish women, and some commentators have suggested that this is no coincidence: the respect accorded to women in Jewish tradition was a part of their ethnic culture. In traditional Judaism, women are for the most part seen as separate but equal. Women's obligations and responsibilities are different from men's, but no less important (in fact, in some ways, women's responsibilities are considered more important). The equality of men and women begins at the highest possible level: In Judaism G-d has never been viewed as exclusively male or masculine. Judaism has always maintained that G-d has both masculine and feminine qualities. As one Hasidic rabbi explained, G-d has no body, no genitalia, therefore the very idea that G-d is male or female is patently absurd. Jews refer to G-d using masculine terms simply for convenience's sake, because Hebrew has no neutral gender. Both man and woman were created in the image of G-d. According to most Jewish scholars, "man" was created in Gen. 1:27 with dual gender, and was later separated into male and female. According to traditional Judaism, women are endowed with a greater degree of "binah" (intuition, understanding, intelligence) than men. The rabbis inferred this from the fact that woman was "built" (Gen. 2:22) rather than "formed" (Gen. 2:7), and the Hebrew root of "build" has the same consonants as the word "binah." It has been said that the matriarchs (Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel and Leah) were superior to the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) in prophecy. Women did not participate in the idolatry regarding the Golden Calf. Women have held positions of respect in Judaism since biblical times. Miriam is considered one of the liberators of the children of Israel along with her brothers
  12. 12. Moses and Aaron. One of the Judges (Deborah) was a woman. Seven of the 55 prophets of the Bible – Sarah, Miriam, Deborah, Hannah, Abigail, Huldah, and Esther - were women. The Ten Commandments require respect for both mother and father. Note that the father comes first in Exodus 20:12, but the mother comes first in Leviticus 19:3, and many traditional sources point out that this reversal is intended to show that both parents are equally entitled to honor and reverence. There were many learned women of note. The Talmud and later rabbinical writings speak of the wisdom of Berurya, the wife of Rabbi Meir (Jewish sage who lived in the time of the Mishnah, i.e. approximately 139-163 CE). In several instances, her opinions on halakah (Jewish Law) were accepted over those of her male contemporaries. In the ketubah (marriage contract) of Rabbi Akiba's son, the wife is obliged to teach the husband Torah! Many rabbis over the centuries have been known to consult their wives on matters of Jewish law relating to the woman's role, such as laws of kashrut and women's cycles. The wife of a rabbi is referred to as a rebbetzin, practically a title of her own, which should give some idea of her significance in Jewish life. There can be no doubt, however, that the Talmud also has many negative things to say about women. Various rabbis at various times describe women as lazy, jealous, vain and gluttonous, prone to gossip and particularly prone to the occult and witchcraft. Men are repeatedly advised against associating with women, although this is usually because of man's lust rather than because of any shortcoming in women. It is worth noting that the Talmud also has negative things to say about men, frequently describing men as particularly prone to lust and forbidden sexual desires. Women are discouraged from pursuing higher education or religious pursuits, but this seems to be primarily because women who engage in such pursuits might neglect their primary duties as wives and mothers. The rabbis are not concerned that women are not spiritual enough; rather, they are concerned that women might become too spiritually devoted. The rights of women in traditional Judaism are much greater than they were in the rest of Western civilization until the 20th century. Women had the right to buy, sell, and own property, and make their own contracts, rights which women in Western countries did not have until about 100 years ago. In fact, Proverbs 31:10-31, which is traditionally read at Jewish weddings, speaks repeatedly of business acumen as a trait to be prized in women (v. 11, 13, 16, and 18 especially). Women and Marriage Marriage is more than a legal contract; it is rather an institution with cosmic significance, legitimized through divine authority. The purpose of marriage is to build a home, create a family and thereby perpetuate society. In the Bible, marriages were arranged by fathers: Abraham, for example, sent his servant to find a wife for Isaac (Genesis 24:10-53), and Judah arranged the marriage
  13. 13. of his first-born son (Genesis 38:6). When the proposal of marriage was accepted by the girl’s father (or elder brother in his absence), the nature and amount of the mohar (the bride-price indicative of the value placed on the bride; payment to the groom) was agreed. By Second Temple times (538 BCE – 70 CE), there was a degree of choice in the selection of a bride – on 15 of Av (usually August) and the Day of Atonement, young men could select brides among the girls dancing in the vineyards. According to tradition, a period of engagement preceded marriage itself. The ceremony was a seven-day long occasion for celebration during which love songs were sung in praise of the bride. In the Talmudic period (70-500 CE) a major development occurred concerning the mohar – since it could be used by the father of the bride, a wife could become penniless if her husband divorced or predeceased her. As a result the mohar evolved into the formulation of a marriage document (ketubah) which gave protection to the bride. In addition, the act of marriage changed from being a personal civil procedure to a public religious ceremony which required the presence of a minyan (quorum) and the recitation of prayers. Women have the right to be consulted with regard to their marriage. Marital sex is regarded as the woman's right, and not the man's. Men do not have the right to beat or mistreat their wives, a right that was recognized by law in many Western countries until a few hundred years ago. In cases of rape, a woman is generally presumed not to have consented to the intercourse, even if she enjoyed it, even if she consented after the sexual act began and declined a rescue. Traditional Judaism recognizes that forced sexual relations within the context of marriage are rape and are not permitted. In many places throughout the world today, rape within marriage is still not a crime. In Biblical and Talmudic times marriage occurred in two stages: Betrothal and Nissuin: 1. Betrothal had two stages: (a) The commitment of a couple to marry as well as the terms of financial obligation (shiddukhin). An early instance of shiddukhin is found in Genesis 34 where the term mohar is used for a sum of money the father of the groom is to pay the father of the bride. During the Talmudic period, this term was not used; instead the Talmud stipulates that negotiations should take place between the respective parents concerning financial obligations. The term for such negotiations is shiddukhin (an Aramaic word meaning ‘tranquillity’). The terms agreed upon were written in a document called the shetar pesikta; the amount given to the son was called the nedunyah (dowry). From the medieval period to the present the prenuptial agreement was itself divided into two stages: a verbal understanding (vort) was made, followed by a ceremony (kinyan) symbolizing the acceptance of the obligation to marry. This normally occurred at a meal; the act of accepting was accomplished by taking an object (usually the corner of a handkerchief). The second stage involved the writing in a document (tenaim) of the terms undertaken. In addition, the tenaim designated the date and the place of the nuptial ceremony. The ceremony of the tenaim concludes with the mothers of the bride and the groom breaking a pottery dish. The ceremony is frequently celebrated with a dinner, and during
  14. 14. the following period the bride and groom exchange gifts. (b) A ceremony establishing a nuptial relationship independent of the wedding ceremony (kiddushin or erusin). In the rabbinic period the sages who outlined this procedure called it the kiddushin to indicate that the bride is forbidden to all men except her husband. According to the Mishnah, the bride could be acquired in marriage in three ways: by money, deed or intercourse. Traditionally the method involved placing a ring on the bride’s finger. At this stage the groom declared: ‘Behold, you are consecrated unto me with this ring according to the law of Moses and of Israel.’ Then the blessing over the wine was recited. After this ceremony the bride continued to remain in her father’s house until the stage of nissuin. 2. Nissuin: During the second stage of the procedure for marriage the seven blessings were recited. In ancient times, there was an interval of as much as a full year between these two stages, but in contemporary weddings, the rite encompasses both. In contemporary celebrations of marriage the rite occurs in stages beginning before the couple reaches the marriage canopy. First is the Ketubah: The Ketubah The Ketubah or marriage contract is validated by the signatures of the witnesses. This guarantees support for the wife in the event of a divorce or the death of her husband. The bride is not only Eve, she is also a woman who has obligations to her husband, and the groom, Adam, is reciprocally responsible. So the marriage rite represents not only an occasion of Israel’s story but a legal transaction by which the rights and obligations of each party have to be expressed and guaranteed by a contract. The ketubah is appropriately signed and delivered from the groom to the bride’s possession. The Ketubah Text from My Jewish Learning, http://www.myjewishlearning.com/life/Life_Events/Weddings/Liturgy_Ritual_and_C ustom/Ketubah/Details_I_Prn.shtml The traditional Aramaic text of the ketubah (marriage contract) reflects the history of Jewish marriage. By Rabbi Maurice Lamm This article explains the first half of the traditional ketubah, including the proposal and funds committed to the marriage from the bride's family and the groom. "Explaining the Ketubah Text (Part 2)" describes the additional gift from the groom, contractual protections for his wife, and how the ketubah is sealed. In liberal communities the bride and groom often write more egalitarian ketubot that
  15. 15. reflect their goals for the marriage--either in place of or in addition to the traditional ketubah. Both liberal and some traditional Jews may include a prenuptial agreement in their ketubah that would require the groom to give the bride a get, or Jewish bill of divorce, should the marriage end. Reprinted on the webset from The Jewish Way in Love and Marriage by permission of Jonathan David Publishers. The Date and Place of the Wedding "On the _______ day of the week, the _______ day of the month _______ in the year _______ since the creation of the world according to the reckoning which we are accustomed to use here in the city of _______ in _______ " The Date. The law prescribes that the date appears at the beginning in private agreements, but at the end in court agreements. Though the ketubah has the status of a court decree, it is in the nature of a private agreement and so the date is placed first. The Place. The same rationale is used for the place. A divorce document contains more geographical information (e.g., mention of a neighboring river). The Sephardim [Jews of Spain who, after the Expulsion, emigrated to North Africa and the Middle East] retained this custom, and Rema (Rabbi Moshe Isserles of Cracow), in the 16th century, urged that the technicalities of the ketubah follow those of the divorce. But the Talmud simplified the ketubah and the Jews of Europe have followed that tradition. The Groom, the Bride, & the Proposal "… _______ son of _______ of the family _______ said to this maiden _______ daughter of _______ of the family _______ "Be thou my wife according to the law of Moses and Israel." The Names. Their Hebrew names, their fathers' names, and usually, though not always, their family names. The mother's name is given when praying for recovery from illness, as a symbol of mother's compassion. A father's name is used in legal matters, just as a father's family name has always been used in legal affairs. [Today, though, many liberal Jews include the mother's name on a ketubah as well.] Added to their names is also the appellation for a rabbinic scholar, Rav, or priestly or Levitic descent, kohen or Levi. The Proposal. "Be thou my wife according to the law of Moses and of Israel" is the marriage proposal. The ketubah, following in time as it does the betrothal and its oral proposal formula, "You are hereby betrothed unto me according to the law of Moses and Israel," is written by witnesses testifying that the groom in fact proposed to the bride. The formula has remained intact for some 2,000 years. The Talmud considered variants, but this language of proposal endured.
  16. 16. The Groom Promised the Basic Support "... and I will work for thee, honor, provide for, and support thee, in accordance with the practice of Jewish husbands, who work for their wives, honor, provide for and support them in truth." Support. This is referred to as the alimentation clause. Providing support is elemental in marriage, and is considered so obvious that the Talmud makes no reference to it. But the phrase is so beautiful and appropriate that it appears in the ketubah not only once but twice, "honor, provide for, and support... honor, provide for, and support.... " Indeed, one authority described it as le'shufra di'she'tara (for the beauty of the contract). Funds for the Wife, If and When the Marriage Terminates "… and I will set aside for thee 200 silver zuz (a coin made during the Bar Kochba Revolt against the Roman Empire in 132 CE) mohar due thee for thy maidenhood, which belong to thee according to the law of the Torah, and thy food, clothing, and other necessary benefits which a husband is obligated to provide; and I will live with thee in accordance with the requirements prescribed for each husband." The Mohar. The funds, called mohar, are so important that this clause is called ikkar ketubah--the basic part of the ketubah, or simply the ketubah. Mohar is the cash gift the groom gives the bride, as Eliezer, Abraham's servant, gave "precious things" to Laban, Rebekah's father, and as Jacob gave seven years of service for the hand of Rachel. The great sage and the ketubah's most important author, Rabbi Simeon ben Shetach, decreed that this serve as protection for the bride rather than only a gift, and ordained that the funds were not given but set aside for the bride. During marriage, therefore, it was considered a debt which was paid only in case of death or divorce, and the mohar thus became a divorce or life insurance settlement rather than a mere marriage gift. This arrangement also enabled poor grooms to marry without any immediate monetary expenditure. The Talmud provides another reason, mishum china, to give the woman a secure financial position at the time of divorce so that she may remarry, and make the trials of marriage less poignant. The Law of the Torah. There is a running dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud as to whether this settlement, which all agree is historically of biblical times, is biblically or rabbinically mandated. Today we generally take mohar to be rabbinically commanded, yet because of the gravity of the marriage bond we persist in using, "which belong to thee according to the law of the Torah." We also include "200 silver zuz," the Tyrean coin used in biblical assessments, rather than the "current" coin used in rabbinically ordained payments. Mohar for brides previously married is one-half the total and is recorded as rabbinically mandated. Food, Clothing, and Conjugal Relations. The obligations are basic to marriage and are obligatory even without specific contractual condition. They are the rights (including conjugal relations) of the wife, and are accounted duties of the husband.
  17. 17. The Bride Accepted the Proposal "… and this _______ maiden, consented and became his wife." Willing Acceptance. The proposal having been made in the traditional formula, the witnesses now assert that the bride accepted with willing consent, and therefore "she became his wife." Ve'havat lih le'into is an Aramaic translation of Ruth 4:13, va-tehi lo le'ishah (when Boaz took Ruth as his wife). And She Brings a Dowry "The dowry (nedunya) that she brought from her _______ house, in silver, gold, valuables, clothing, and household furnishings, all this _______ the said groom accepted in the sum of 100 silver pieces." The Dowry. Nedunya (dowry), popularly referred to as naddan, is given the bride by her father for her use in the home she is about to build. This dowry includes the items listed plus any other valuables she may bring with her. In the Bible, Rachel and Leah are given servants Bilhah and Zilpah as dowry. It is the daughter's share of her parents' inheritance. The sons succeed their father, but the daughters leave him and therefore receive an equivalent in the form of dowry. The sages make it compulsory for a father to give his daughter, as a start in married life, sufficient funds to buy a woman's wardrobe for one year. The dowry is distinct from property or possessions that the bride owns and continues to own privately throughout marriage. Thus it serves as an inducement for suitors. The dowry is included in the ketubah, and is the property of the bride, technically "leased" to the groom for the duration of marriage. The bride's private property, called nikhsei melog, is given outright to the bride, the husband enjoying only the "fruit" (usufruct) during marriage. It is not part of the dowry and is not included in the ketubah. The Groom Accepted. The ketubah originally listed all items in the dowry and tabulated the cost. In time, this was standardized under the general categories listed and estimated at a standard sum of 100 silver pieces, one half of the mohar that the groom provided the bride for use of the dowry, but which, in reality, comes today to very much more than the half mohar. The language of the ketubah specifies the legal standing of the husband’s obligation to the wife. In order to pay what is owing to her, should he divorce her, or in order to provide for her if he dies before she does, the husband pledges even the shirt off his back. Next comes the touching moment when the groom places the veil over the bride’s face, before they take their places under the marriage canopy, and makes the following statement to her: May you, our sister, be fruitful and prosper. May God make you as Sarah, Rebecca,
  18. 18. Rachel and Leah. May the Lord bless and keep you. May the Lord show you favour and be gracious to you. May the Lord show you kindness and grant you peace. The next stage in the contemporary celebration is the stages of betrothal outlined above: Erusin, the woman is sanctified, or designated as holy, to a particular man. This part is carried out under the marriage canopy (chuppah) by drinking a cup of wine with a blessing. Then there is a gift of a ring to the bride which concludes the betrothal. Then come the Seven Blessings that mark the stage of nissuin, the fully realized union. The blessings are recited over a second cup of wine and they complete the rite under the chuppah. The ceremony concludes with the groom stepping on a glass and breaking it. After the ceremony the bride and groom are led to a private room for yihud (seclusion). At the end of the wedding meal, the Grace after Meals is recited, and is followed by another reading of the Seven Blessings. Spiritual Role of Women in Jewish Household There is no question that in traditional Judaism, the primary role of a woman is as wife and mother, keeper of the household. However, Judaism has great respect for the importance of that role and the spiritual influence that the woman has over her family. The Talmud says that when a pious man marries a wicked woman, the man becomes wicked, but when a wicked man marries a pious woman, the man becomes pious. The child of a Jewish woman and a gentile man is Jewish because of the mother's spiritual influence; the child of a Jewish man and a gentile woman is not. Women are exempted from all positive mitzvot ("thou shalts" as opposed to "thou shalt nots") that are time-related (that is, mitzvot that must be performed at a specific time of the day or year), because the woman's duties as wife and mother are so important that they cannot be postponed to fulfill a mitzvah. After all, a woman cannot be expected to just drop a crying baby when the time comes to perform a mitzvah. She cannot leave dinner unattended on the stove while she davens ma'ariv (recites the evening prayer services). It is this exemption from certain mitzvot that has led to the greatest misunderstanding of the role of women in Judaism. First, many people make the mistake of thinking that this exemption is a prohibition. On the contrary, although women are not required to perform time-based positive mitzvot, they are generally permitted to observe such mitzvot if they choose (though some are frustrated with women who insist on performing visible, prestigious optional mitzvot while they ignore mundane mandatory ones). Second, because this exemption diminishes the role of women in the synagogue, many people perceive that women have no role in Jewish religious life. This misconception derives from the mistaken assumption that Jewish religious life revolves around the synagogue. It does not; it revolves around the home, where the woman's role is every bit as important as the man's. Women's Mitzvot: Nerot, Challah and Niddah In Jewish tradition, there are three mitzvot (commandments) that are reserved for women: nerot (lighting candles), challah (separating a portion of dough), and niddah (sexual separation during a woman's menstrual period and ritual immersion afterwards). If a woman is present who can perform these mitzvot, the privilege of
  19. 19. fulfilling the mitzvah is reserved for the woman. Two of these mitzvot can be performed by a man if no woman is present. The third, for reasons of biology, is limited to the woman. All of these mitzvot are related to the home and the family, areas where the woman is primarily responsible. The first of these women's mitzvot is nerot (literally, "lights") or hadlakat ha-ner (literally, "lighting the lights"), that is, the privilege of lighting candles to mark the beginning of the Shabbat or a holiday. The lighting of candles officially marks the beginning of sacred time for the home; once candles are lit, any restrictions or observances of the holiday are in effect. The lighting of candles is a rabbinical mitzvah, rather than a mitzvah from the Torah. The second woman's mitzvah is challah, that is, the privilege of separating a portion of dough from bread before baking it. This mitzvah comes from Numbers 15:20, where we are commanded to set aside a portion of dough for the kohein (priest descendant of Aaron). This mitzvah is only in full effect in Israel; however, the rabbis determined that Jews throughout the world should be reminded of this mitzvah by separating a piece of dough before baking it and burning the dough. You may have noticed that on boxes of matzah at Pesach (Passover), there is usually a notation that says "Challah Has Been Taken," which means that this mitzvah has been fulfilled for the matzah. Note that this mitzvah has little to do with the traditional Shabbat bread, which is also called "challah." The third woman's mitzvah is the obligation to separate herself from her husband during her menstrual period and to immerse herself in a mikvah (ritual bath) after the end of her menstrual period. The Torah prohibits sexual intercourse during a woman's menstrual period. This ritual immersion marks the end of that period of separation and the resumption of the couple's sexual activities. Some sources point out that the name Chanah is an acronym of the names of these three mitzvot (Challah, Niddah, and Hadlakat HaNer). In the Bible, Chanah was the mother of Samuel and a prophetess. She is considered in Jewish tradition to be a role model for women. Women's Holiday: Rosh Chodesh Rosh Chodesh, the first day of each month, is a minor festival. There is a custom that women do not work on Rosh Chodesh. A midrash teaches that each of the Rosh Chodeshim was originally intended to represent the one of the twelve tribes of Israel, just as the three major festivals (Pesach, Sukkot and Shavu'ot) each represent one of the three patriarchs. However, because of the sin of the Golden Calf, the holiday was taken away from the men and given to women, as a reward for the women's refusal to participate in the construction of the Golden Calf. How do we know that women didn't participate in the Golden Calf incident? The midrash (interpretation of Jewish texts) notes that Exodus 32 says that "the people" came to Aaron and asked him to make an idol. Aaron told them to get the golden rings from their wives and their sons and their daughters. Note that the biblical verse doesn't say anything about "the people" getting the rings from their husbands, only
  20. 20. from wives and sons and daughters, from which we can infer that "the people" in question were the men. Then Exodus 32:3 says that "the people" broke off the golden rings that were in their ears. The bible does not say that they got the gold from their wives and sons and daughters; rather, it says that "the people" (i.e., the same people) gave their own gold. The midrash explains that the men went back to their wives and the wives refused to give their gold to the creation of an idol. As a reward for this, the women were given the holiday that was intended to represent the tribes.