Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review

Geophysicist at NOAA
Dec. 14, 2010
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review
1 of 45

More Related Content

What's hot

GIS Plateform and satelliteGIS Plateform and satellite
GIS Plateform and satelliteMohsin Siddique
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing SatelliteSimulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing Satellite
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing SatelliteAlber Douglawi
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...IEI GSC
Introduction to Seismic Method Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method Ahmed Younhais Tariq
Setellite image sensorsSetellite image sensors
Setellite image sensorsMd Asif Hasan
Planetary circumnavigationPlanetary circumnavigation
Planetary circumnavigationClifford Stone

Similar to Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review

Microwave remote sensingMicrowave remote sensing
Microwave remote sensingThen Murugeshwari
Geo imaging satelliteGeo imaging satellite
Geo imaging satelliteSachin Emmanuel
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satelliteGeo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satellite
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satelliteDivya Lal
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORSIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORgrssieee
ACCESS Mars project final presentationACCESS Mars project final presentation
ACCESS Mars project final presentationKonstantinos Antonakopoulos
915 pankine[1]915 pankine[1]
915 pankine[1]Clifford Stone

More from Brian Shiro

How to Become a MartianHow to Become a Martian
How to Become a MartianBrian Shiro
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...Brian Shiro
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”Brian Shiro
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC OperationsPacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC Operations
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC OperationsBrian Shiro
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...Brian Shiro
Tsunami Warning at PTWCTsunami Warning at PTWC
Tsunami Warning at PTWCBrian Shiro

Mars Geophysical Lander Proposal Authorization Review

Editor's Notes

  1. The propulsion system will consist of: Four (4) 3000 N Viking-like thrusters with throttle control. Eight (8) 4.5 N thrusters for roll control during landing, and TCMs and ACS during cruise Development Issues: Ultralight composite tanks are proposed to reduce total tank mass since two propellant and two pressurant tanks must be used for configuration reasons. These tanks are currently being developed by MSL and Scout efforts, and should be available at the time of launch. Monoprop and Viking Thrusters are all fed from a single feed system. It is assumed that some development and testing will need to be performed to confirm the 4.5 N thrusters can handle the higher pressure that is required by the Viking thrusters.
  2. RAD 750 Based Processor, 33 Mhz < 5.7Kg and < 45Watts Typ
  3. Aggressive mission as regard cost: science similar to Phoenix mission with $100M dart equipment and no free lander. Hard constraint: no less than 10 geophones and 5 explosives -> no cost flexibility/ incrementation Geophone = Explosive dart assumption: Does not take R&D (actually limited) and testing costs for explosive darts. This is offset by the fact that explosive is less expensive than instrumentation. Geophone study is the primary objective Adapt cost model to MGL: Darts: JPL model is not made for learning curve with 20 duplicates. Testing too conservative : test every batt and parachute Science dvpt: done in university Science team: the model accounts for too many people Ground operations: transferred to private contractors Total cost: Full science total cost is over the 450 cap. However we have a fall back plan. JPL CNES cooperation: Seismometer from Netlander mission (free) pay for some darts? Not politically easy… Free ride: No European mission to Mars is currently planned to follow Mars and Express Beagle 2 results (until 2020). France and Europe may well be interested in taking the MGL opportunity to fly their Netlander instruments and participate in launch costs