brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com | @ubiquitypress
University presses represent a much
more effective way of doing things
• We are closer to researchers
• We are more innovative
• We are closely tied to the goals
of libraries and universities
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com | @ubiquitypress
The future is not what legacy
publishers want it to be
• it’s more than books and journals
• It’s open science
• It’s all forms of communication
• It’s unrestricted and collaborative
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com | @ubiquitypress
The future is not what legacy
publishers want it to be
• It’s truly global, not a north-south
hierarchy
• It’s open science
• It’s philanthropic, because that’s
what science and open access are
• It’s cost-effective and efficient
brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com | www.ubiquitypress.com | @ubiquitypress
Source: Washington Post, May 7 2013 / Imgur: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/05/07/map-more-
than-half-of-humanity-lives-within-this-circle/
they represent a new and better way of doing things (not just because we want to hurt legacy publishers)
Closer to researchers
More innovation
Closer to libraries and the actual goals of universities
Economy of scale
Network-wide ‘big deal’ – or at least a cheap OA version.
Cascading content
Shared user base
Shared voice in advocacy and counter-lobbying
Steering board
Revolution by 1000 ducks.
We can migrate scholarly publishing to the future it ought to have together.