City Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations

401 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
401
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
25
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • In analyzing this case, Planning Staff wanted to understand the potential consequences of having a single lot with two different zoning districts.We find that it could limit development potential because these particular zoning districts have very different development standards as far as Floor Area Ratios, setbacks, outdoor storage, etc.Also, we find that R&E and CG/CH have opposite intents.Ranch & Estate is intended to be a very low intensity residential districts whereasGeneral Commercial/Heavy Commercial is intended to be a very high intensity commercial district.The opposing intents of these districts on a single lot is contrary to the Zoning Ordinance Section 104 “purpose of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Angelo.” One of the ways this is accomplished, according to the Ordinance, is to “prevent or minimize land use incompatibilities”
  • City Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations

    1. 1. City Council<br />October 4, 2011<br />
    2. 2. Mobile Home Permit<br />Mobile Home Permit 38<br /> a request for approval of a temporary mobile home permit to authorize a manufactured home to be placed for a length of up to 2 years in a Single-Family Residence (RS-1), on the following property:<br /> <br /> 3612 Lake Drive, located approximately 300 feet southeast from the intersection of Humble Road and Lake Drive, specifically occupying Reyes Addition, Lot 1, Section 1 in northwest San Angelo. <br />13 notifications were sent.<br />
    3. 3. Zoning Map<br />
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Looking East at the Subject Property<br />
    7. 7. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Looking South from site along Lake Dr.<br />
    8. 8. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Looking West from site along Lake Dr.<br />
    9. 9. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Looking North at site along Lake Dr.<br />
    10. 10. Staff Recommendation<br />Planning Commission recommended partial approval of the requested Mobile Home Permit, only allowing one year; and<br />City staff advises recommending denying the requested Mobile Home Permit as presented.<br />
    11. 11. History & Background<br />Existing Zoning: RS-1;<br />Vision Plan: Neighborhood<br />First permit approved on 9/1/09, in order to live on-site while building a home;<br />Manufactured homes are not allowed, even with a special or conditional use, in RS-1 zoning districts;<br />
    12. 12. History & Background<br />Article 12.500 = “A mobile home may be placed temporarily on a site during the construction of a home.”<br />In this case, no construction has occurred.<br />Intent is not to allow a long-term variance; in fact, such a variance would be prohibited.<br />Council & PC created a two-year maximum.<br />
    13. 13. History & Background<br />Hard to quantify if another two years will end in a different result.<br />Provides an exception not available to others – all other lots in this zoning district are required to meet requirements.<br />The permit becomes less “temporary” the more that time goes on.<br />
    14. 14. Zone Change<br />Z 11-18: Michael Pittman<br /> A request for approval of a zone change from RS-1 (Single Family Residential) to OW (Office Warehouse) for the following property:<br /> <br /> 428 Montague Avenue, at the southeast intersection of Ellis Street and Montague Avenue, encompassing two tracts approximately 1.861 and 2.79 acres respectively, and specifically occupying Abstract Number 1854, Survey 0326 of the G. Shubitz subdivision, in northeastern San Angelo.<br />Nine (9) notifications were sent. One (1) received in favor.<br />
    15. 15.
    16. 16. Zoning Map<br />
    17. 17. Aerial Map<br />
    18. 18.
    19. 19.
    20. 20. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Looking East at rear of Subject Property<br />
    21. 21. Looking North on Montague Avenue from site<br />
    22. 22. Looking West from Subject Property<br />
    23. 23. Pic looking s along grape creek & chadbourne<br />Looking South on Montague Avenue<br />
    24. 24. Pic looking s along grape creek & chadbourne<br />Looking East from North of Site<br />
    25. 25. Staff Recommendation<br />City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change as presented.<br />Planning Commission unanimously recommends approving the proposed zone change as presented.<br />
    26. 26. History & Background<br />RS-1– Vacant;<br />Surrounding:<br /> North – OW & RS-1 – Vacant Land & Highway;<br /> East – CG- Vacant Commercial Property;<br /> South – RS-1- Residences; and<br /> West – RS-1 – Residences.<br />
    27. 27. History & Background<br />General Information<br />Thoroughfares:<br /> Houston Harte – “freeway”; <br />South of HH, Ellis & Montague – “local” streets;<br />North of HH, Montague – “minor collector.”<br />OW Zoning – integration for office & warehouse space with lower intensities.<br />Expansion of existing OW zoning to the north.<br />
    28. 28. Analysis<br />OW districts require complete screening of outdoor storage;<br />Thus, they are appropriate transitions/buffers.<br />Vision Plan Map calls for a “scaling back of activity” that is “passive in character” at this location.<br />Consistent with Comprehensive Plan.<br />
    29. 29. Zone Change<br />Z 11-12: Mike Carter<br /> Subject: a request for approval of a change of zoning from CG/CH (General Commercial/Heavy Commercial) and R&E (Ranch & Estate) to CG (General Commercial)<br /> <br /> Property: 4003 North Chadbourne Street, located west of the intersection of East 40th Street, North Chadbourne Street, and Grape Creek Road, specifically 3.18 acres out of A & M G RR CO survey, in northwestern San Angelo<br />Fourteen (14) notifications were sent; 1 in favor, 2 in opposition<br />
    30. 30.
    31. 31. Zoning Map<br />
    32. 32. Aerial Map<br />
    33. 33.
    34. 34. Responses in Opposition (2)<br />Traffic on Grape Creek Rd;<br />Being next to a business – business traffic;<br />Robbery & theft around storage facilities;<br />Increase of congestion;<br />
    35. 35.
    36. 36. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Direction of Snapshot (Note: State from where the photo was taken and in what direction).<br />Caption should have a white background <br />Photo should take up the whole slide <br />Looking West at Subject Property<br />
    37. 37. Looking North from Site along N. Chadbourne Street<br />
    38. 38. Looking South from Site along Grape Creek Road<br />
    39. 39. Pic looking s along grape creek & chadbourne<br />Looking at R&E South of Site<br />
    40. 40. Pic of residences off w 40thst south & w of site<br />Looking at R&E West of Site<br />
    41. 41. Staff Recommendation<br />Planning Staff recommends approving the proposed zone change as presented. <br />Planning Commission unanimously recommends approving the proposed zone change as presented. <br />
    42. 42. History & Background<br />General Information<br />Combination CG/CH & R&E zoning;<br />Snow cone stand, house on-site, otherwise vacant;<br />Request to CG is much less intensive;<br />
    43. 43. History & Background<br />General Information<br />Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:<br /> North – CG – The Cowboy Church<br /> East – CG/CH – Commercial Uses<br /> South – R&E – Residences<br /> West – R&E – Residences<br />
    44. 44. History & Background<br />General Information<br />Thoroughfares:<br /> 40th Street – “local” street;<br /> Grape Creek Road – “collector” street;<br /> N. Chadbourne Street – “arterial” street;<br />Grape Creek & Chadbourne are built to accommodate.<br />
    45. 45. Analysis – Existing Situation<br />Limits Development Potential;<br />R&E and CG/CH are of opposing intents:<br /> R&E – very low intensity residential,<br /> CG/CH – very high intensity commercial;<br />
    46. 46. Analysis – Proposed Zoning<br />CG is compatible with Vision Map – Neighborhood designation;<br />CG is compatible with adjacent commercial uses;<br />CG provides a ‘step down’ from surrounding CG/CH zoning.<br />
    47. 47. Analysis – Proposed Zoning<br />CG (General Commercial)<br />Decreased intensity;<br />Limited outdoor storage (currently unlimited);<br />Current CG/CH zoning allows industrial services, vehicle repair, freight, some types of manufacturing & fabrication.<br />
    48. 48. Alley Abandonment<br />Fairview Addition, Block 50<br /> A request to abandon one block of an alley extending from North Archer Street to North Bell Street<br /> <br /> A 20’ x 330’ alley right-of-way extending from North Archer Street to North Bell Street in Block 50 of the Fairview Addition, running parallel to and south of East Houston Harte Expressway in northeastern San Angelo.<br />7 notifications were sent. 0 returned.<br />
    49. 49. Zoning Map<br />
    50. 50. Aerial Map<br />
    51. 51. Map of notifications received if any<br />
    52. 52. Photographs of Subject Property<br />Direction of Snapshot (Note: State from where the photo was taken and in what direction).<br />Caption should have a white background <br />Photo should take up the whole slide <br />Looking at the West side of the Alley from N. Archer Street<br />
    53. 53. Looking at the East side of the Alley across N. Bell Street <br />
    54. 54. Staff Recommendation<br />Planning staff recommends approving the alley abandonment as presented.<br />Planning Commission unanimously recommends approving the alley abandonment as presented.<br />
    55. 55. History & Background<br />General Information<br />In a Light Manufacturing (ML) zoning district;<br />Roberts Truck Center;<br />Surrounded by ML, MH, CH;<br />
    56. 56. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation<br />City divisions have no objections to the abandonment;<br />Private utilities have no objections to the abandonment;<br />Recommendation subject to condition that applicant pay all fees associated with abandonment.<br />

    ×