(except logo’s)
The good, the efficient, and the open
changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to...
analysis
outreach
assessmentpublication
writingdiscovery
Simple cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds o...
Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with
loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discov...
A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered
model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
...
A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered
model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
...
Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests
• replication & reproducibility
• meaningful...
good
efficient open
Ongoing discussions
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
2005
2010
Analysis
Outreach
Changing research workflows
Open Science
Survey: scholarly communication tools
Survey: scholarly communication tools
Survey: 1st 1000 results
What is you research role? What discipline are you working in?
Survey: 1st 1000 results
64 countries
1 300
Breakdown examples
What tools do you use to get access to literature etc.?
Breakdown examples
What tools do you use to archive/share data &code ?
Tool combinations in workflows
ResearchGate
(share pub +
researcher profile)
SPSS
LaTeX
1000
0
Distribution across Good-Efficient-Open
Good Efficient Open
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Make these data work for you
?
Make these data work for you
Do Asian postdocs look more to impact
factors to select a journal to publish in than
their La...
Make these data work for you
Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond
the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and...
Make these data work for you
Which tools are used in multiple research
phases, and are they leading tools
in any of these ...
Policy applications
Policy applications
“Focus shifting from ‘journals’
to individual publishable units
(articles, but also other research output)”
“Clear(er) shift towards open science /
open access, leading to a diminishing
importance of traditional journals”
Call to action
[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
Call to action
[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
custom URL
Call to action
Thank you!
The good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science -...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

The good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science - OAI9

2,688 views

Published on

presented at the Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015

Science is in transition. If all goes well, the transition is towards more open, efficient and honest/reproducible practices. Libraries should move with this change by supporting open science instead of just open access. Building on their successful project "101 innovations in scholarly communication" Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer present their interpretations of what is going on and can be expected in the six phases of the research cycle. They have tested their hypothetical workflows and show how real, day-to-day research workflows are changing from traditional to modern, innovative and experimental. These changes are reflected in tools and sites people use in various phases of that workflow. They might for example change from Web of Science → SPSS → Word+Endnote → Nature → ResearcherID → Impact Factors to Sparrho → ROpenScience+IPythonNotebooks → WriteLateX+Docear → The Winnower → Kudos → Publons+PubPeer. The way new generations of researchers work affects how information will be discovered, re-used, created, shared, communicated and assessed. There are huge opportunities for libraries and other stakeholders to contribute and work with the research community, but only if they are well prepared!

Published in: Science
1 Comment
10 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,688
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
394
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
48
Comments
1
Likes
10
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Motiverend en voor ons belangrijk, afgelopen 20 jaar en vooral laatste 5-10 jaar meer in onderzoek/publiceren veranderd dan 350 jaar daarvoor
  • Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
  • Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
  • Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
  • Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
  • Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
  • The good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science - OAI9

    1. 1. (except logo’s) The good, the efficient, and the open changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman , Utrecht University Library Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015 @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman
    2. 2. analysis outreach assessmentpublication writingdiscovery
    3. 3. Simple cyclic model of the research workflow preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery
    4. 4. Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
    5. 5. Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with loops preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
    6. 6. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered model of the research workflow, with loops preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
    7. 7. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered model of the research workflow, with loops preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
    8. 8. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O) • declaring competing interests • replication & reproducibility • meaningful assessment • effective quality checks • credit where it is due • no fraud, plagiarism • connected tools & platforms • no publ. size restrictions • null result publishing • speed of publication • (web)standards, IDs • semantic discovery • re-useability • versioning open peer review • open (lab)notes • plain language • open drafting • open access • CC-0/BY • good efficient open technical changes & standards research governance changes economic & copyright changes researcher funder publisher public government library
    9. 9. good efficient open Ongoing discussions researcher funder publisher public government library
    10. 10. 2005 2010 Analysis Outreach
    11. 11. Changing research workflows Open Science
    12. 12. Survey: scholarly communication tools
    13. 13. Survey: scholarly communication tools
    14. 14. Survey: 1st 1000 results What is you research role? What discipline are you working in?
    15. 15. Survey: 1st 1000 results 64 countries 1 300
    16. 16. Breakdown examples What tools do you use to get access to literature etc.?
    17. 17. Breakdown examples What tools do you use to archive/share data &code ?
    18. 18. Tool combinations in workflows ResearchGate (share pub + researcher profile) SPSS LaTeX 1000 0
    19. 19. Distribution across Good-Efficient-Open Good Efficient Open 100% 80% 60% 40% 20%
    20. 20. Make these data work for you ?
    21. 21. Make these data work for you Do Asian postdocs look more to impact factors to select a journal to publish in than their Latin American counterparts?
    22. 22. Make these data work for you Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and if so, what platforms are used?
    23. 23. Make these data work for you Which tools are used in multiple research phases, and are they leading tools in any of these phases?
    24. 24. Policy applications
    25. 25. Policy applications
    26. 26. “Focus shifting from ‘journals’ to individual publishable units (articles, but also other research output)”
    27. 27. “Clear(er) shift towards open science / open access, leading to a diminishing importance of traditional journals”
    28. 28. Call to action [Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?] http://101innovations.wordpress.com
    29. 29. Call to action [Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?] http://101innovations.wordpress.com custom URL
    30. 30. Call to action
    31. 31. Thank you!

    ×