Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Upcoming SlideShare
Altmetrics & mendeley AIOTHO-dag 121129 Bianca Kramer
Next
Download to read offline and view in fullscreen.

1

Share

Small steps-big-opportunities-brussels-open-access-week-2015-kramer-bosman slideshare

Download to read offline

Presentation on 'Innovations in scholarly communication' for Open Access 2015 meeting, Brussels, October 21, 2015. Slides in pdf format.

See also http://101innovations.wordpress.com

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Small steps-big-opportunities-brussels-open-access-week-2015-kramer-bosman slideshare

  1. 1. (except logo’s) Small steps, big opportunities Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman Open Acces Week 2015 meeting, Brussels, October 21, 2015 @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman
  2. 2. Support of Open Access / Open Science Do you support the goal of Open Access ? 89 % 5 % 5 % 90 % 7 % 3 % Do you support the goal of Open Science ?
  3. 3. analysis outreach assessmentpublication writingdiscovery
  4. 4. Simple cyclic model of the research workflow preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery
  5. 5. Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
  6. 6. Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with loops preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
  7. 7. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered model of the research workflow, with loops preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
  8. 8. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered model of the research workflow, with loops preparation analysis writingpublication outreach assessment discovery Rounds of grant writing and application Iterations of search and reading Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting Rounds of experiments and measurements
  9. 9. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O) • declaring competing interests • replication & reproducibility • meaningful assessment • effective quality checks • credit where it is due • no fraud, plagiarism • connected tools & platforms • no publ. size restrictions • null result publishing • speed of publication • (web)standards, IDs • semantic discovery • re-useability • versioning open peer review • open (lab)notes • plain language • open drafting • open access • CC-0/BY • good efficient open technical changes & standards research governance changes economic & copyright changes researcher funder publisher public government library
  10. 10. 20 minutes of high speed group action! • groups of 8-10 people, find your corner of the room or walk out of the room • put you two cents on the 1 development you think is the most important for science, on your own paper sheet • now tick the same one on the group sheet • discuss your choices, also try to relate this to what you see happing in your own field/position and what you like to see happening
  11. 11. 2005 2010 Analysis Outreach
  12. 12. Example research workflows 1: traditional and innovative Innovative
  13. 13. Example research workflows 2: Elsevier ?Elsevier
  14. 14. Example research workflows 3: Open Science Open Science
  15. 15. Survey: scholarly communication tools
  16. 16. Survey results: Researcher profiles 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% others MyScienceWork ResearcherID Academia.edu Profile page at own institution ORCID Google Scholar Citations ResearchGate PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)
  17. 17. Survey results: Altmetrics’ share
  18. 18. Compare yourself to your peer group
  19. 19. “ The move away from centralized, expensive, and bad-for-science publishers to a more open, institution/government-funded self-regulating peer review system ”
  20. 20. “ good ”
  21. 21. Thank you ! 101innovations.wordpress.com
  • JulianaGReis1

    Oct. 24, 2015

Presentation on 'Innovations in scholarly communication' for Open Access 2015 meeting, Brussels, October 21, 2015. Slides in pdf format. See also http://101innovations.wordpress.com

Views

Total views

1,208

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

91

Actions

Downloads

15

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

1

×