Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Bkump Ed Media 20080627


Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Bkump Ed Media 20080627

  1. 1. A Competence-based Approach for Formalizing Learning Goals in Work-integrated Learning Tobias Ley, Barbara Kump, Armin Ulbrich, Peter Scheir und Stefanie N. Lindstaedt Barbara Kump
  2. 2. Outline <ul><li>A Workplace Learning Context Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Process Package </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Domain Knowledge Package </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Competency Package </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Modelling Learning Goals for Work-Integrated Learning </li></ul><ul><li>Implementation of the Workplace Learning Context Approach in the APOSDLE Project </li></ul><ul><li>Real-World Applications and a Prototype </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusions and Outlook </li></ul>20 October 2009 /
  3. 3. A Workplace Learning Context Model 20 October 2009 / [adapted form Lindstaedt & Farmer, 2004] Worker Learner Expert
  4. 4. Domain Knowledge Package <ul><li>Usually: documents are stored in structured databases </li></ul><ul><li>E.g. Ontology </li></ul>20 October 2009 / Domain Concepts Relation [e.g. Green, 1999] Domain Concepts as semantic metadata
  5. 5. Process Package <ul><li>Twofold role of the work process: </li></ul><ul><li>Tasks as organizational constraints </li></ul><ul><li>Task at hand defines personal learning need of a worker </li></ul>20 October 2009 / KNOWLEDGE WORKER PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASKS Sara (Engineer) Estimating Project Effort Analysing Project Results Learning Need
  6. 6. 20 October 2009 / Process Models
  7. 7. Competency Package <ul><li>Contains the competencies that are relevant for performing all tasks in a learning domain, and that can be acquired based on existing resources </li></ul>20 October 2009 / Process Package: defines the scope of competencies Domain Knowledge Package: limits the number of competencies (due to resources)
  8. 8. Focus of the Competency Package <ul><li>Human User </li></ul>20 October 2009 / Task Demand (in terms of Knowledge & Skills) Competencies: Knowledge & Skills, Ability to perform Tasks Learning Goals (in terms of Knowledge & Skills to acquire) Learning Opportunity [compare Schmidt, 2004; Sicilia, 2005] Competency Gap Analysis
  9. 9. Modeling Learning Goals for Work-integrated Learning – the APOSDLE Approach 20 October 2009 /
  10. 10. Scenario 20 October 2009 / Paul, Requirements Engineer Recently changed his department Build a first cut Context Model Carry out an initial stakeholder analysis User Profile Tasks: Build a first cut Context Model Cary out an initial stakeholder analysis Knowledge & Skills: Knowledge of different types of system stakeholders Understand the Syntax and Semantics of Context Models Ability to create a Context Model Knowledge of diffent types of stakeholder analyses Allocate functions between actors according to boundaries Competency Gap Analysis Learning Opportunity Knowledge & Skills: Knowledge about actors, tasks, goals and resources Knowledge about different types of dependencies between actors
  11. 11. Interlinking packages of the Workplace Learning Context Model 20 October 2009 / Task-Competency Assignment Annotation of Resources Task History Knowledge & Skills
  12. 12. Implementation of the Workplace Learning Context Approach in the APOSDLE project 20 October 2009 / [APOSDLE meta-model, Extract] Task Demand
  13. 13. Formal Specification of the Task Demand in APOSDLE <ul><li>Competence based Knowledge Space Theory </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Korossy, 1997; Düntsch & Gediga, 1994; based on Doignon & Falmagne, 1985, 1999 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Knowledge Space Theory has been applied and tested in various fields : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>ALEKS (ALEKS Corp, 2003), RATH (Hockemeyer & Albert, 1999) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Workflow Processes (Stefanutti & Albert, 2002 ), Knowledge Management (Ley, 2006; Ley & Albert, 2003) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Implications for teacher education and training (Albert, 2006), Skills of Medical Trainees (Albert et al., 2007) </li></ul></ul>20 October 2009 /
  14. 14. Real World Applications of the APOSDLE Workplace Learning Context Approach 20 October 2009 /
  15. 15. Four Application Partner specific APOSDLEs 20 October 2009 / Network of SMEs eConsulting for Innovation-management Large Corporation SW Simulation Public Org. & SME REACH Consulting & Event-Management RESCUE
  16. 16. Integrated modelling methodology 20 October 2009 / Domain Knowledge Package Process Package Competency Package
  17. 17. Informal Models – EADS Example 20 October 2009 / Informal Simulation Domain Model Informal Simulation Tasks Model Define Objectives Design Develop Execute
  18. 18. 20 October 2009 / EADS Domain Concept (Example)
  19. 19. 20 October 2009 / EADS Task (Example) Informal Task Demand (in terms of domain concepts)
  20. 20. Modelling the Task Demand: TACT tool 20 October 2009 / [TACT for modelling Requirements Engineering]
  21. 21. and a Prototype… 20 October 2009 /
  22. 22. 20 October 2009 / 1 2
  23. 23. 20 October 2009 / Tasks (Process Package) Learning Goals (Competency Package)
  24. 24. 20 October 2009 / Resource Viewer Domain Concepts (Domain Knowledge Package)
  25. 25. Conclusions & Outlook 20 October 2009 /
  26. 26. Conclusions & Outlook <ul><li>We have presented a Workplace Learning Context Model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Concrete implementation in 4 different application domains </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Allows for competency gap analysis (based on task history) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus of further research: Additional indicatiors for skills and knowledge </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Differences in the application domains, due to certain characteristics of the domains </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Relatedness of process package and domain knowledge package </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Granularity of the task model and the domain model </li></ul></ul>20 October 2009 /
  27. 27. Conclusions & Outlook <ul><li>The modelling methodology was useful, but needs further revision at certain stages, e.g. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>It should allow for moving back and forth from informal to formal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Formative evaluation and model revision at different modelling stages is indispensable => tools for evaluation support </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Combining the APOSDLE implementation of the Workplace Learning Context Model with existing Competency Management approaches </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Bi-directional (APOSDLE and existing Competency Management Approaches) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Suggestions have been made, e.g. in Ley, 2007 </li></ul></ul>20 October 2009 /
  28. 28. Thank you for your attention! <ul><li>Barbara Kump </li></ul><ul><li>Graz University of Technology </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge Management Institute </li></ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>20 October 2009 /
  29. 29. References <ul><li>Albert, D., Hockemeyer, C., Mayer, B., Steiner, C. M (2007). Cognitive Structure Modelling of Skills for Technology-Enhanced Learning. Paper presented at the 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) , July 18-20, 2007, Niigata, Japan. </li></ul><ul><li>ALEKS Corp. (2003), ALEKS - A Better State of Knowledge, retrieved from . </li></ul><ul><li>Doignon, J. and Falmagne, J. (1999), Knowledge Spaces, Springer, Heidelberg. </li></ul><ul><li>Falmagne, J., Doignon, J., Koppen, M., Villano, M. and Johannesen, L. (1990), &quot;Introduction to Knowledge Spaces: How to Build, Test, and Search Them&quot;, Psychological Review, Vol. 97 No. 2, pp. 201-224. </li></ul><ul><li>Green, P.C. (1999), Building Robust Competencies: Linking Human Resource Systems to Organizational Strategies, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. </li></ul><ul><li>Hockemeyer, C., Held, T. and Albert, D. (1998), &quot;RATH - A Relational Adaptive Tutoring Hypertext WWW-Environment Based on Knowledge Space Theory&quot;, in Alvegard, C. (Ed.), CALISCE`98: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Aided Learning in Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, pp. 417-423. </li></ul><ul><li>Korossy, K. (1997), &quot;Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: A competence-performance approach&quot;, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 205, pp. 53-82. </li></ul><ul><li>Ley, T., Albert, D. and Lindstaedt, S.N. (2007), &quot;Competency Management using the Competence Performance Approach: Modeling, Assessment, Validation and Use&quot;, in Sicilia, M. A. (Ed.), Competencies in Organizational E-Learning: Concepts and Tools, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, pp. 83-119. </li></ul><ul><li>Ley, T., Lindstaedt, S.N. and Albert, D. (2005), &quot;Supporting Competency Development in Informal Workplace Learning&quot;, in Althoff, K., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M. and Roth-Berghofer, T. (Eds.), Professional Knowledge Management, Springer, Berlin, pp. 189-202. </li></ul><ul><li>Lindstaedt, S.N. and Farmer, J. (2004), &quot;Kooperatives Lernen in Organisationen&quot;, in Haake, J., Schwabe, G. and Wessner, M. (Eds.), CSCL-Kompendium - Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Munich, Germany, pp. 191-220. </li></ul><ul><li>Schmidt, A. (2004), &quot;Context-Steered Learning: The Learning in Process Approach&quot;, Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 04) Joensuu, Finnland. </li></ul><ul><li>Sicilia, M. (2005), &quot;Ontology-Based Competency Management: Infrastructures for the Knowledge-intensive Learning Organization&quot;, in Lytras, M. and Naeve, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Learning Infrastructures in Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web perspective, Idea Group, Hershey, pp. 302-324. </li></ul>20 October 2009 /
  30. 30. Appendix: Competence-based Knowledge Space Theory 20 October 2009 /
  31. 31. Task-Learning Goal Structure: Relevant Assumptions for APOSDLE <ul><li>A learning domain can be structured as a set A of tasks t  A. </li></ul><ul><li>Each Task requires a specific set of worker knowledge and skills (task demand) </li></ul><ul><li>Tasks can be structured by a subset-relation based on the task demand </li></ul>20 October 2009 / A A={t1, t2, t3, t4, t5}
  32. 32. Competence based Knowledge Space Theory – Relevant Assumptions for TEWIL <ul><li>A learning domain encompasses a set K of competencies c  K. </li></ul><ul><li>Competencies are structured according to a prerequisite relation </li></ul><ul><li>(c1, c2)  R, R  K X K </li></ul><ul><li>c1 R c2 => c1 is prerequisite for c2 </li></ul><ul><li>Theory: a person who has one competency c, also has all competencies that are prerequisites for c </li></ul><ul><li>Example: If a person has competency c2, then she also has c1 </li></ul><ul><li>The set of competencies that a person has available is called the „competence state“ of the person </li></ul><ul><li>A competence state is a subset of K that takes into account the prerequisite relationship </li></ul>20 October 2009 / K K={c1, c2, c3, c4}
  33. 33. 20 October 2009 / Prerequisite Relation (Competencies) Subset Relation (Tasks) Task Demand: takes into account prerequisite relation on competencies Competence State: takes into account prerequisite relation on competencies <ul><li>Consequently: </li></ul><ul><li>Each Task Demand is a feasible </li></ul><ul><li>Competence State </li></ul><ul><li>The set union of two or more </li></ul><ul><li>Task Demands is a feasible </li></ul><ul><li>Competence State </li></ul><ul><li>The Competence State of a user </li></ul><ul><li>is inferred by taking set unions </li></ul><ul><li>of the task demands of all tasks </li></ul><ul><li>the user is able to perform </li></ul><ul><li>(Performance Pattern) </li></ul>
  34. 34. 20 October 2009 / Prerequisite Relation (Competencies) Subset Relation (Tasks) Competence State Task-Competency Structure Performance State (theoretically assumed)
  35. 35. The CbKST and the Learning Need… <ul><li>In terms of Competence-based Knowledge Space Theory in my approach to technology-enhanced work-integrated leraning , </li></ul><ul><li>the Learning Need is the Discrepancy of </li></ul><ul><li>Task Demand (of a Task) and Competence State (of a User) </li></ul>20 October 2009 / Learning Need = {c3, c4} Example: