Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Otp 2009 2011 rto grant final report


Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Otp 2009 2011 rto grant final report

  1. 1.
  2. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8<br />SECTION 1: Background 14<br />Transit Only and Single-Mode Trip Planners<br />Multimodal Trip Planners <br />Open Source Software Considerations <br />Open Source Approach Selected for OTP<br />SECTION 2: Project Overview 20 <br />Kick-Off Workshop July 2009 <br />Project Management Plan September 2009 <br />Project Scope and Goals <br />Project Plan and Milestones <br />The Open Elements of the Open Trip Planner <br />Open Source Development Method <br />Open Source Software <br />Open Architecture <br />Open Data <br />Implementation of Prototypes February 2010 <br />Year One Anniversary July 2010 <br />Progress in Year Two <br />
  3. 3. SECTION 3: Developing a Routable Network in Open Street Map 32<br />Analyzing Routable Street Network Alternatives for OTP <br />Open Street Map Improvement Process<br />Geocoding Issues<br />OpenStreetMap Conclusions<br />SECTION 4: Evaluation Studies 38<br />Preliminary Transit Trip Testing in January 2011 <br />Preliminary Bicycle Trip Testing June 2011 <br />Preliminary Bicycle-to-Transit Trip Testing June 2011 <br />SECTION 5: Next Steps43<br />Metro RTO Grant Phase II<br />OTP Metro RTO Grant 2011-2013 Target Goals<br />July 2011 Kick-Off Workshop <br />OTP October Launch <br />Continued OSM Improvements<br />
  4. 4. APPENDICES 46<br />Appendix A – High Level System Requirements <br />Appendix B – Map of Test Areas for Open Trip Planner <br />Appendix C – OTP Bicycle Safety Weights <br />Appendix D – Procedures for PDX-OSM Improvement Project 50<br />Part 1 – Groundwork and Preparation <br />Part 2 – Evaluations and Results <br />Part 3 – Detailed Editing Procedures <br />Part 4 – Quality Control Process <br />
  5. 5. S2 project overview<br />Metro Regional Travel Options Grant <br />July 1, 2009 – July 1, 2011<br />
  6. 6. S2 project overview<br />Project Kick-Off Workshop <br />July 2009<br />
  7. 7. S2 project overview<br /><br />
  8. 8. S2 project overview<br />Open Source Development Method<br />
  9. 9. S2 project overview<br />Shapefiles<br />Oracle<br />OSM<br />OpenStreetMap<br />Regional<br />Data<br />PostGIS<br />Adapter<br />Adapter<br />Adapter<br />Adapter<br />Adapter<br />Data API<br />Geocoding<br />Service<br />Address<br />Normalizer<br />Service<br />Etc.<br />Routing<br />Service<br />Client<br />Application<br />Web Services<br />API<br />Open Architecture<br />
  10. 10. S2 project overview<br />OTP uses open source datasets (GTFS, NED, and OSM) to build a routable graph.<br />
  11. 11. S2 project overview<br />Progress in Year 1 (July 2009 – July 2010)<br />Worldwide interest and participation<br />
  12. 12. S2 project overview<br />Progress in Year 1<br />Support and maintenance options<br />
  13. 13. S2 project overview<br />Demos Released<br />Granada, Spain July 2010<br />Pune, India October 2010<br />Smartrip Transport for Dublin Journey Planner January 2011<br />Ottawa Canada Green Trip Planner January 2011<br />Tampa, Florida May 2011<br />Gipuzkoa Transit Android App May 2011<br />TeleAviv, Israel <br />Budapest, Hungary July 2011 <br />Translations into: French, Gaelic, Hungarian, Italian, Marathi, Polish, Spanish, Hebrew <br />In-Kind Code Development<br />Code quality improvements <br />Improved wheelchair accessibility <br />Graph reloading <br />Speed improvements <br />Memory usage improvements<br />Code documentation <br />Tutorials and user guides <br />Intermediate stops in API <br />Better extensibility <br />Visualization improvements <br />Making bikes on transit optional <br />Kept up-to-date with changing technology <br />Edge notes <br />Nominatimgeocoder support <br />Cleaner max walk distance support <br />Support for certain common GTFS failure modes <br />Workarounds for OSM data issues (pedestrian islands) <br />Support loading OSM from Protocol Buffers format & bz2 xml <br />OSM future proofing <br />OSM permission bug fixes <br />Traffic circles / roundabouts <br />Much improved transfer support (min transfer times; transfers now routed on walking network) <br />Support for multiple route names on the same stop pattern (typically night buses) <br />Dozens of miscellaneous bug fixes <br />Gvsig visualization <br />Documentation for graph builder <br />Better names for some OSM ways <br />Better slope visualization <br />Slope override for bridges <br />Some integration with OneBusAway<br />Preferred/non-preferred/banned routes<br />Progress in Year 2 July 2010 – July 2011 <br />
  14. 14. S3 routable network for OTP<br />Street Map Data Options <br />Why OSM? Investment in community product for shared benefits<br />
  15. 15. S3 routable network for OTP<br />Betsy Breyer <br />Melelani <br />Sax-Barnett<br />PJ Houser<br />Grant Humphries <br />Portland State University Student Interns <br />
  16. 16. S3 routable network for OTP<br />
  17. 17. S3 routable network for OTP<br />
  18. 18. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />15 trips <br />Trips representative of suburban cyclists, downtown commuters<br />Chosen to reveal OTP’s sensitivity to particular data<br />Test Trips and Areas <br />
  19. 19. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />Where is the bicycle infrastructure?<br />How are data translated for the algorithm?<br />Configuration<br />How does the router determine the best path from A to B?<br />Bicycle Routing Dependencies <br />
  20. 20. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />Custom weights<br />Routes consider a variety of factors:<br /><ul><li>Bicycle infrastructure
  21. 21. Street type
  22. 22. User preferences </li></ul>Very competitive with other <br />bicycle trip planners<br />Bicycle Trip Planning Results<br />
  23. 23. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />Routes consider a variety of factors:<br /><ul><li>Bicycle infrastructure
  24. 24. Street type
  25. 25. User preferences </li></ul>Minutes<br />Bicycle-to-Transit Trip Planning Results<br />
  26. 26. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />Routes consider a variety of factors:<br /><ul><li>Bicycle infrastructure
  27. 27. Street type
  28. 28. User preferences </li></ul>Arrival time<br />All trips set to depart at/after 12:00 PM<br />Bicycle-to-Transit Trip Planning Results<br />
  29. 29. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />Results<br />OTP produced a significantly faster trip in all cases<br />OTP trips also arrived earlier in all cases<br />Bicycle Trip Planning Results<br />
  30. 30. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />OpenTripPlanner provides competitive transit and bicycle trip planning<br />Local knowledge has been critical for adding data in OpenStreetMap and evaluating results in OTP<br />Multimodal (bike-to-transit) trip planning offers significant trip time reductions<br />Trip Testing Conclusions<br />
  31. 31. S4 otptrip evaluation studies<br />Current version<br />Earlier version<br />Trip Itinerary Improvements <br />
  32. 32. S5 next steps<br />Metro Regional Travel Options Grant <br />July 1, 2011 – July 1, 2013<br />
  33. 33. S5 next steps<br />
  34. 34. S5 next steps<br />
  35. 35. New Features Introduced <br />Target Release Date October 15, 2011 <br />