1. iGCDP LC Inferences
Parameters:-
•LC Growth In exchanges absolute and relative growth.
•Contribution to nationalized projects.
•Programme sustainability “Finance”.
•Learning events for external visibility and collaboration.

2. AIESEC AHMEDABAD
• Growth of 300% in Experience delivery but need to carry forward in
coming years.
• Highly focused on Nationalized Projects, it contributes to 50% exchanges
out of total realization in iGCDP.
• Financially sustainability at operational level.
• Frequently need to do more learning events and workshop for more
external visibility as youth run organization focusing towards Social
Impact.

3. AIESEC BANGALORE
• Growth of 90% in Experience delivery but need to carry forward in coming years.
• For sustainability need to contribute more towards Nationalized Projects. Out of
total exchanges in lc’s 29x contribute to national projects.
• Runing iGCDP operation at loss and there is no financial sustainability in
programme.
• Need to collaborate with more learning partners for external visibility and high
quality of exchange delivery.

4. AIESEC BARODA
• Growth of 31% in Experience delivery. But how much its externally visible
• Highest contribution to Nationalized projects. But there is no document
submission at national office.
• Most cost centric portfolio for lc. Docs was not submitted with audits.
• Incomplete audits
• Conducted external impact based events and collaborated with different org.

5. AIESEC CHANDIGARH
• Took a downfall in exchanges but has more process oriented approach in delivery
and reception.
• Contributed 124x to nationalized project out of total x.
• Need to financially sustain the exchange its most cost centric portfolio.
• Frequently involved in more workshops and events. Need to collaborate with
more org for increase in experience delivery.

6. AIESEC CHENNAI
• Has shown relative growth compared to last year but need to capitalized on more
issues for increase in experience delivery.
• Financially sustained at operational delivery.
• Less contribution to nationalized projects.
• Need to conduct more learning events and workshop for external visibility.

7. AIESEC DELHI UNIVERSITY
• Growth of 173% in Experience delivery but need to carry forward in coming year.
• One of the lc which is financially sustained in iGCDP portfolio and making profit
out of it.
• Highly focused on nationalized project and contributing 160x out of total x at lc
level iGCDP.
• Most externally visible through its events and learning events for trainees.

8. AIESEC DELHI IIT
• Increased in Experience delivery and have capacity to grow through its sustainable
model in iGCDP.
• Contributing 110x to Nationalized projects out of total x in iGCDP.
• Need to sell more projects and events to generate income for financially
sustainable.
• Collaborate with more organization which can drive growth for increase in
experience delivery and quality improvement.

9. AIESEC JAIPUR
• Relative growth is less in over all portfolio.
• Less contribution to nationalized project out of total exchange.
• Need to revamp financial model for igcdp due to most cost centric portfolio.
• For external visibility need to conduct more learning events and collaborate to
external organization for increase in quality delivery.

10. AIESEC HYDERABAD
• Growth of 24% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.
• Contributing 137x to nationalized project out of total x.
• Financially not sustained due to lack of planning and poor delivery.
• Need to organize more learning events, workshops and impact events for external
visibility.

11. AIESEC IIT KGP
• Showed massive growth in experience delivery but can do more.
• All the exchange delivered are nationalized projects.
• Need to financially sustain at operational level.
• Conduct more workshop and collaborate with issues related Ngo’s.

12. AIESEC INDORE
• Growth of 334% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.
• No contribution towards nationalized projects.
• One of the most profit generated portfolio and financially sustained.
• Successfully conducting external events and contributed to Discover India.

13. AIESEC JALANDHAR
• Growth of 130% in Experience delivery but need to focus on quality and delivery.
• Contributing 74x out of total x to nationalized projects.
• More cost centric portfolio.
• Lack of external visibility and no external collaboration.

14. AIESEC KOLKATA
• Massive growth in experience delivery compared to last year.
• 80% contribution to nationalized project out of total x.
• Financially sustained due to nationalized project as well selling project and
conducting events.
• Delivered maximum learning events and workshop.

15. AIESEC LUCKNOW
• Negative growth compare to last year.
• Low contribution towards nationalized projects.
• Most cost centric portfolio and no financial model for this portfolio.
• Need to conduct more events and collaborate with external organization.

16. AIESEC MANIPAL UNIVERSITY
• Growth of 47% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.
• Nationalized project contribute only 30% to total exchange.
• Financially not sustain at operational level.
• Conduct more learning events and work shop for visibility.

17. AIESEC MUMBAI
• Growth of 70% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.
• Lack of contribution to nationalized projects.
• Financially unstable in programme.
• Need to conduct learning events for trainees and focus on quality.

18. AIESE NAVI MUMBAI
• Define process for x and delivery.
• Focus on nationalized projects.

19. AIESEC PUNE
• Growth of 240% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.
• Contributing 65% to nationalized project out of total x.
• Financially not stable and need to revamp the finance model.
• Lack of external visibility and need to collaborate with external org for quality
delivery.

20. AIESEC SURAT
• Massive growth in exchange.
• Contributing 58% to nationalized projects.
• Working on financially sustainable model.
• Need to conduct more external events and
collaborate with other org for visibility.