Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
25
ÂãUÜè âÂê‡æü
¥¢»ýðÁè-çãU‹¼è Âç˜æ·¤æ
First Fully
English-Hindi Magazine
NEWDELHIVol.VINo.7
JULY 2014 ÁéÜæ§üU TAIL LONGE...
ForwardPresshastwovacanciesforthepostsofAdvertisingExecutiveand
AdvertisingRepresentativeforitsDelhioffice.Attractivesalar...
PAGE 28
Õæ§üçÕÜ Ùð ÖæÚUÌ ·¤ô ·ñ¤âð
çß·¤æâàæèÜ Îðàæ ÕÙæØæ
ÕæðŠæ»Øæ ¥æ´ÎæðÜÙ Ñ ¥‘Àð
çÎÙô´ ·¤è ¥æâ ×ð´ ×ãæÎçÜÌ
Consumerism an...
Vol. VI
Dr Silvia Fernandes
Chair, Aspire Prakashan Pvt. Ltd.
Prabhu Guptara
Patron and Chief Advisor
Satyaveer Chakrapani...
çmÖæáè
ÇUæò çâçËßØæ ȤÙæZÇUèâ
¿ðØÚU, ¥SÂæØÚU Âý·¤æàæÙ Âýæ. çÜ.
ÂýÖé »éŒÌæÚUæ
â¢ÚUÿæ·¤ °ß¢ ×éØ âÜæãU·¤æÚ
âˆØßèÚU ¿·ý¤Âæç‡æ...
Badaun incident triggers Bahujan protests
ÕÎæØê´ ·¤æ´ÇU ÂÚU ©UÕÜæ ÕãéUÁÙ â×æÁ
New Delhi: On 27 May, people all over
the co...
7
ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU
¥æßÚU‡æ
·¤Íæ
T
Âýð×·¤é×æÚU ×ç‡æ
·¤âÖæ ·Ô¤ çÂÀÜð ¿éÙæß Ùð ÖæÚUÌèØ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ
·¤è ·¤§ü »ý´çÍØ...
wasrulingtheroostinourcountryneededtobeexposedfor
whatitis.Noonemustbemourningthisdevelopmentexcept
thosewhoweretradingini...
9
ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU
¥æßÚU‡æ
·¤Íæ
»ØæÐ çÕãæÚU ×ð´ ÜæÜê ÂýâæÎ ¥õÚU °·¤ â×Ø ÚUæ×çßÜæâ ÂæâßæÙ Ùð Öè
¥ôâæ×æ çÕÙ Üæ...
JULY 2014 |
10
FORWARD Press
STORY
C O V E R
DoesModiunderstandhisvictory?
Nowthemillion-dollarquestionishowModiandtheBJPu...
11
ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU
¥æßÚU‡æ
·¤Íæ
ÁæçÌ ·¤ô Á‹× çÎØæÐ ç·´¤Ìé ÌÕ Ì·¤ Õýæ±×‡æßæçÎØô´ ¥ñÚU
ÁÙÌæ ·Ô¤ ß»ü âð ¥æ° ãé...
JULY 2014 |
12
FORWARD Press
STORY
C O V E R
©Ù ÂÚU ÁæÙÜðßæ ã×Üð ·¤è âæçÁàæ ãôÙð ÎèÐ Üðç·¤Ù §Ù âÕ·Ô¤
ÕæßÁêÎ ç·¤âè Ùð ©‹ãð´...
13
ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU
¥æßÚU‡æ
·¤Íæ
ÂãÜð ãè ×ñ´Ùð ¥æàæ´·¤æ ÃØQ¤ ·¤è ãñ ç·¤ ÖæÁÂæ SßØ´ ·¤ô ÕÎÜ
Âæ°»è ç·¤ Ùãè´Ð Ø...
JULY 2014 |
14
FORWARD Press
ANALYSIS
ATIF RABBANI
he recently concluded Lok Sabha elec-
tions in the country have been a ...
15
During the run-up to the polls, every party performed
all sorts of antics to woo the Muslims. That was because
they bel...
16
JULY 2014 | FORWARD Press
ANALYSIS
Often, many people, especially Muslim politicians and Ulema,
misinterpret the Saccha...
Thus, according to this study, of the 7,500 persons elected as
MPs from the first to the fourteenth Lok Sabhas, 400 were M...
JULY 2014 |
18
FORWARD Press
INTERVIEW
ike most of us, you too never anticipated that
the BJP would get such a large numbe...
19
win that many seats. I believe that the people voted more
against the Congress than for the BJP – because they were dis...
20
JULY 2014 | FORWARD Press
INTERVIEW
become an Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The Indian democracy has that
much power. Modi has ...
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई

1,855 views

Published on

फारवर्ड प्रेस के इस अंक में आप पाएंगे :
1. लोकसभा चुनावों का प्रेमकुमार मणि द्वारा बहुजन दृष्टिकोण से मूल्‍यांकन
2. मुस्लिम राजनीति पर अतिफ रब्‍बानी का लेख
3. लोकसभा चुनाव के संदर्भ में कुलदीप नैयर से बातचीत
4. गुजरात दंगों के दौरान जारी हुई एक तस्‍वीर के संबंध में आशीष अंशु की खोजी रिपोर्ट
5.बोधगया आंदोलन के बाद की स्थितियों पर देवेंद्र कुमार की रिपोर्ट
6. अनिल चमडिया का कॉलम 'जन मीडिया'
7. बहुजन साहित्‍य पर संदीप मील का विचारोत्‍तेजक लेख
8. आरक्षण और जाति के संबंध पर सवाल उठाता आनंद तेलतुमडे का लेख
9. आम्‍बेडकर की पुस्‍तक 'जाति का विनाश' की अरूंधति राय द्वारा लिखी गयी भूमिका पर चल रही बहस में मुसाफिर बैठा का लेख व अन्‍य अनेक सामग्री।

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

Forward Press July 2014 फॉरवर्ड प्रेस जुलाई

  1. 1. 25 ÂãUÜè âÂê‡æü ¥¢»ýðÁè-çãU‹¼è Âç˜æ·¤æ First Fully English-Hindi Magazine NEWDELHIVol.VINo.7 JULY 2014 ÁéÜæ§üU TAIL LONGER THAN THE BODY àæÚUèÚU âð ܐÕè Âê´ÀU Pg. 51 Pg. 22 Truth behind ‘Hindutva’ photo-face of Gujarat 2002 »éÁÚUæÌ w®®w ·Ô¤ çãU‹Îéˆß ¿ðãÚUð ·Ô¤ ÂèÀð ·¤æ â¿ ¿éÙæß ÂçÚU‡ææ×æð´ ·¤æð ·ñ¤âð Îð¹ð´ ÕãéUÁÙ? How Bahujans should view the election verdict ISSN 2348-9286
  2. 2. ForwardPresshastwovacanciesforthepostsofAdvertisingExecutiveand AdvertisingRepresentativeforitsDelhioffice.Attractivesalaryand commissionwillbepaidtotheappointees.Theminimumqualifications andotherconditionsforthesepositionsareasunder: 1) Fresherscanapplyforthispost. 2) TheapplicantshouldbeabletospeakHindifluentlywithproperdictionandunderstand spokenandwrittenEnglish. 3) TheareaofworkwillbeDelhiNCR.Applicantswhohavetheirownmotorbikeandlaptop willbegivenpreference. Applicantsshouldmailtheirbiodatatoinfo@forwardmagazine.in 1) Atleastoneyear'sexperienceofworkinginaprestigiousnewspaper/magazine/adagency whilelivinginDelhiORdiplomaordegreeinAdvertising/PRfromanyprestigiousinstitute. 2) Theapplicantshouldbewellversedintheworkingofandhavecontactsingovernmentand privateeducationalinstitutions,PSUsandprivatecorporations.He/Sheshouldbecapable of convincingprospectiveclientsoftheUSPofFORWARDPress 3) Meetingsettargetswouldbemandatoryforpersonsworkingonasalarybasis.Thiscondition will notapplytopersonsworkingonacommissionbasis. Applicantsshouldmailtheirbiodatatoinfo@forwardmagazine.inwith “ApplicationforAdvtg.Exec/Rep”onthesubjectline. Theminimumqualificationsandotherconditionsforthepostareasunder: Vacancy in Advertising, Marketing & Sales Foranyadditionalinformation/clarification,pleasecontactthemagazine'smanaging editor, Pramod Ranjan (Email):managing.editor@forwardmagazine.in, (Mobile):9811884495 (Ph)011-46538687,http://www.facebook.com/forward.press.india FORWARD PRESS FORWARDPress(Hindi-Englishbilingual)publishedfromNewDelhi requiresMarketingTraineesforitsCirculationDepartment.The traineeswillbepaidanstipendinadditiontoattractivecommissions onsale/subscription. FP Job Opening HIRING: Marketing Trainees for FP Circulation Department FORWARD PRESS
  3. 3. PAGE 28 Õæ§üçÕÜ Ùð ÖæÚUÌ ·¤ô ·ñ¤âð çß·¤æâàæèÜ Îðàæ ÕÙæØæ ÕæðŠæ»Øæ ¥æ´ÎæðÜÙ Ñ ¥‘Àð çÎÙô´ ·¤è ¥æâ ×ð´ ×ãæÎçÜÌ Consumerism and Bahujans »æ´ßô´ ·Ô¤ Õ´Î ÚUæSÌô´ ·¤ô ¹ôÜÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° Üð¹·¤ ¿æçãU° PAGE 34 PAGE 43 PAGE 26 Long way to go for justice PAGE 38 §â Îðàæ ·Ô¤ Ùãè´ ãñ´ Õ´ÁæÚUð? ©UÂÖæð€ÌæßæÎ ¥õÚU ÕãéÁÙ ·¤æ´»ýðâ ¥ôÕèâè ¥õÚU ÎçÜÌ ÙðÌëˆß ÂñÎæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·¤è PAGE 31 PAGE 61 WANTED: WRITERS WHO OPEN CLOSED VILLAGE ROADS BESIDES BAHUJAN LITERATURE, EVERYTHING IS PULP FICTIONNo country for the Banjaras Congress couldn’t create OBC and Dalit leadership Bodhgaya movement: Mahadalits wait for ‘Acche Din’ PAGE 46 Keeping alive the caste goose that lays golden eggs ÁæçÌ ãñ âôÙð ·¤æ ¥´Çæ ÎðÙð ßæÜè ×é»èü How Bahujans should view the election verdict ¿éÙæß ÂçÚU‡ææ×æð´ ·¤æð ·ñ¤âð Îð¹ð´ ÕãéUÁÙ? ÕãéUÁÙ âæçãUˆØ ·ð¤ ¥Üæßæ âÕ Üé»Îè PAGE 58 DEPRESSION IN CHILDREN Õ‘¿ô´×ð´¥ßâæÎ PAGE 18 7 How the Bible made India a developing nation Elections and minority politics ¿éÙæß ¥õÚU ¥ËÂⴁط¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ §´âæÈ ·¤è Ü´Õè ÚUæã PAGE 14
  4. 4. Vol. VI Dr Silvia Fernandes Chair, Aspire Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. Prabhu Guptara Patron and Chief Advisor Satyaveer Chakrapani Director and Advisor Ivan Kostka Editor-in-Chief Pramod Ranjan Consulting Editor Amrish Herdenia Assistant Editor (English) Pankaj Chaudhary Assistant Editor (Hindi) Amarendra Yadav Principal Correspondent CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Abhay Kumar Dubey (New Delhi) Prabhu Guptara (Europe) Dilip Mandal (New Delhi) Vishal Mangalwadi (India) Gail Omvedt (Maharashtra) Thom Wolf (New Delhi) Rajan Kumar Designer Office : FORWARD Press 803 Deepali, 92 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 Tel. (011) 46538687 Email: info@forwardpress.in Printed, published and owned by Ivan Anthony Kostka and printed at M.P. Printers, B-220, Phase-II, Noida, UP - 201301 and published from 803 Deepali, 92 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 Disclaimer: The views expressed in the articles are those of the writers. The magazine will not bear any responsibility for them. JULY 2014No. 07 Bilingual Victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan. So said US President John F. Kennedy following the 1961 Bay of Pigs (Cuba) fiasco. Following the Modi-led BJP’s decisive victory there are of course the usual claimants of paternity rights but we shall leave that to the Sangh Parivar and the polit- ical pundits to sort out. On the side of the defeated, particularly the Bahujan parties, there has been a deafening silence. This is where FORWARD Press steps in from this issue onwards. Our regular columnist Prem Kumar Mani begins by analysing where the Bahujan parties went wrong and then goes on to plot the out- lines of what truly Bahujan politics should and could look like. In his assessment of both the victory of the Modi-led BJP as well as of the defeat of the Bahujan parties he refuses to wear any tinted goggles – neither saffron nor green nor any shade of red – just an unwavering Phule-Ambedkar perspective. He certainly does not spare the Dalit- bahujan political leaders. This is in keeping with what JNU professor Vivek Kumar has said: FP is unique in the Bahujan media space in crit- ically evaluating even these leaders. Then again you might not agree with Mani’s qualified hopes for the Modi-led BJP – “If it rises above the ideology of Savarkar-Hedgewar and associates itself with the Phule- Ambedkarite ideology, that will not only benefit it but also the nation” – but in the months to come FP will carry diverse analyses and propos- als for a new, improved Bahujan politics. In his Cover Story, Mani frames the last elections against “the heady Indira Hatao days of 1971”. I would frame Mayawati’s visit to the families of the two Bahujan (MBC) cousin sisters gang-raped and left hanging in Badaun, UP, with another episode in Indira Gandhi’s long political innings: Belchi 1977. In that year, following her resounding defeat after the Emergency of 1975-77, she bounced back from the political wilderness by going out of her way to visit the families of the nine Dalits burnt alive by a mob of a locally dominant caste. She flew to Patna, then was driven first by jeep, then by tractor and, finally, when the roads were impassable (because of the rains), she rode on ele- phant back into Belchi village. Today, when the defeated Rahul Gandhi rushes to visit the Badaun “Dalit” (as originally reported) families, it is not news; it is expected of him. When her imperial Bahujan majesty, Mayawati, knocked off her high elephant, helicopters in the following day, it is news. Whether it will mark a Belchi moment in her political career only history can tell. Whatever the political future of leaders like Mulayam Singh or Laloo Prasad or Mayawati or even Modi, what matters most to us is the future of the nation of India. In our ongoing series ‘Making India A Great Nation’ this time Vishal Mangalwadi answers the question How the Bible made India a developing nation, showing how the roots of our republic go beyond and deeper than the Constitution. At a time when the new Modi government has already signalled its intent to rewrite his- tory (through saffron lens) we all the more need to know the truth of the history of modern India outside the Congress sanitized version or the Hindutva version in the making. Until next month … Truthfully, ORWARDT H I N K I N GF
  5. 5. çmÖæáè ÇUæò çâçËßØæ ȤÙæZÇUèâ ¿ðØÚU, ¥SÂæØÚU Âý·¤æàæÙ Âýæ. çÜ. ÂýÖé »éŒÌæÚUæ â¢ÚUÿæ·¤ °ß¢ ×éØ âÜæãU·¤æÚ âˆØßèÚU ¿·ý¤Âæç‡æ çÙ¼ðàæ·¤ °ß¢ âÜæãU·¤æÚU ¥æØßÙ ·¤ôS·¤æ ×éØ â¢Âæ¼·¤ Âý×ô¼ Ú¢UÁÙUU âÜæãU·¤æÚU â´Âæη¤ ¥×ÚUèàæ ãÚUÎðçÙØæUU âãæØ·¤ â´Âæη¤ (¥´»ýðÁè) ´·¤Á ¿õÏÚUè U âãæØ·¤ â´Âæη¤ (çã´Îè) ¥×ÚÔU‹Îý ØæÎß U Âý×é¹ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ Øô»¼æÙè â¢Âæ¼·¤ ¥ÖØ ·é¤×æÚU ÎéÕð (Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè) ÂýÖé »éŒÌæÚUæ (ØêÚUôÂ) ç¼Üè עÇUÜ (Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè) çßàææÜ ×¢»Üßæ¼è (ÖæÚUÌ) »ðÜ ¥æòßðÅUU (×ãæÚUæCþ ) Åæò× ßéËȤ (Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè) ÚUæÁÙ ·é¤×æÚU çÇU•ææ§ÙÚ ·¤æØæüÜØ Ñ È¤æòÚUßÇüU Âðýâ }®x ¼èÂæÜè, ~w ÙðãUM¤ ŒÜðâ, Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè vv® ®v~, ȤôÙ - (®vv) y{zx}{}| §ü-×ðÜ Ñ info@forwardpress.in ×é¼ý·¤ Âý·¤æàæ·¤ ß Sßæ×è ¥æØßÙ °¢ÍÙè ·¤ôSU·¤æ mæÚUæ °×.Âè.çÂý¢¢ÅUâü Õè- 22®, Èð¤Á -II, Ùô°ÇUæ, Øê.Âè. - 201301 âð ×éç¼ýÌ ß }®x ¼èÂæÜè, ~w- ÙðãUM¤ ŒÜðâ, Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè vv®®v~ âð Âý·¤æçàæÌ ¥æÜð¹ô´ ×ð´ ÃØ€Ì çß¿æÚU Üð¹·¤ô´ ·ð¤ ¥ÂÙð ãñ´U ©Uââð Âç˜æ·¤æ · è âãU×çÌ ¥çÙßæØü ÙãUè´Ð çßÁØ ·Ô¤ ãÁæÚU çÂÌæ ãôÌð ãñ´ ÂÚU´Ìé ãæÚU ¥ÙæÍ ãôÌè ãñÐ Øã âÙ÷ v~{v ×ð´ Õð ¥æòÈ ç‚â (€UØêÕæ) âñ‹Ø ¥çÖØæÙ ×ð´ ¥×ðçÚ·¤æ ·¤è çàæ·¤SÌ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ, ßãæ´ ·Ô¤ ÚUæCþÂçÌ ÁæòÙ°È ·Ô¤ÙðÇè Ùð ·¤ãæ ÍæÐ ×ôÎè ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ÖæÁÂæ ·¤è çÙ‡ææüØ·¤ çßÁØ ·¤æ ŸæðØ ÜðÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ·¤§ü Üô» ÌñØæÚU ãñ´ ÂÚU´Ìé ã× §â »éˆÍè ·¤ô âéÜÛææÙð ·¤æ ·¤æ× â´ƒæ ÂçÚUßæÚU ¥õÚU ÚUæÁÙñçÌ·¤ ´çÇÌô´ ÂÚU ÀôǸ ÎðÌð ãñ´Ð Áãæ´ Ì·¤ ÂÚUæçÁÌ Âÿæ, çßàæðá·¤ÚUU ÕãéÁÙ ÂæçÅUüØô´ ·¤æ ÂýàÙ ãñ, ©â·Ô¤ çàæçßÚU ×ð´ ¿éŒÂè Àæ§ü ãé§ü ãñÐ §â ¥´·¤ âð ã× §â çßáØ ÂÚU ¿¿æü àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ã×æÚUð çÙØç×Ì SÌ´Ö·¤æÚU Âýð×·¤é×æÚU ×ç‡æ ¥ÂÙð çßàÜðá‡æ ·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ×ð´ ÕÌæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ÕãéÁÙ ÂæçÅUüØô´ Ùð €UØæ »ÜÌ ç·¤Øæ ¥õÚU Øã Öè ç·¤ ¥âÜè ÕãéÁÙ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·ñ¤âè ãôÙè ¿æçã° ¥õÚU ãô â·¤Ìè ãñÐ ×ôÎè ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ÖæÁÂæ ·¤è çßÁØ ¥õÚU ÕãéÁÙ ÂæçÅUüØô´ ·¤è ãæÚU ·¤æ ¥æ·¤ÜÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ×ç‡æ ·¤ô§ü ¿à×æ Ùãè´ ÂãÙÌð-Ù Ö»ßæ, Ù ãÚUæ ¥õÚU Ù ÜæÜ-ßð ·Ô¤ßÜ Èé¤Üð-¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·Ô¤ ÎëçC·¤ô‡æ ÂÚU Îëɸ ÚUãÌð ãñ´Ð ßð ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ ÙðÌæ¥ô´ ·¤ô Öè ×æÈ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÌðÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ Áð°ÙØê ·Ô ÂýôÈÔ¤âÚU çßßð·¤ ·¤é×æÚU Ùð ·¤ãæ Íæ, ÕãéÁÙ ×èçÇØæ ×ð´ È æÚUßÇü Âýðâ §âçÜ° ¥ÙêÆè ãñ €UØô´ç·¤ ßã ÕãéÁÙ ÙðÌæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ¥æÜô¿Ùæˆ×·¤ ×êËØæ´·¤Ù ·¤ÚUÙð ×ð´ Ùãè´ â·¤é¿æÌèÐ ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñ ¥æ ×ôÎè-ÖæÁÂæ âð ×ç‡æ ·¤è ©×èÎô´ âð âã×Ì Ù ãô´-ÒØçÎ ßã âæßÚU·¤ÚU-ãðÇ»ðßæÚU ·¤è ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è â𠪤ÂÚU ©ÆÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÃØæ·¤ ÚUæCþèØ â´ÎÖæðZ ×ð´ Èé¤Üð-¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚUßæÎ âð ¹éÎ ·¤ô ÁôǸÌè ãñ, ÌÕ ©âð ¥õÚU ÂêÚUð ÚUæCþ ·¤ô §â·¤æ ÜæÖ ç×Üð»æÓ-ÂÚU´Ìé ¥æÙð ßæÜð ×ãèÙô´ ×ð´ ã× °·¤ Ù§ü, ÕðãÌÚU ÕãéÁÙ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·ñ¤âð ©ÖÚUð, §â ÂÚU çßçÖ‹Ù çßàÜðá‡æ ß âéÛææß ÂýSÌéÌ ·¤ÚUð´»ðÐ ¥ÂÙè ¥æßÚU‡æ·¤Íæ ×ð´ ×ç‡æ, ãæçÜØæ ¿éÙæß ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ ÒâÙ÷ v~|v ·Ô¤ §´çÎÚUæ ãÅUæ¥ô ·ð¤ çÎÙô´Ó âð ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð ×ñ´ ©žæÚUÂýÎðàæ ·Ô¤ ÕÎæØ´ê ×ð´ Îô ÕãéÁÙ (°×Õèâè) ÕãÙô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ âæ×êçã·¤ ÕÜ户¤æÚU ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ©‹ãð´ ÂðǸ âð ÜÅU·¤æ çΰ ÁæÙð ·Ô¤ ƒæÅUÙæSÍÜ ÂÚU ×æØæßÌè ·Ô¤ Âãé´¿Ùð ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ, §´çÎÚUæ »æ´Ïè ·¤è Ü´Õè ÚUæÁÙñçÌ·¤ Øæ˜ææ ·¤è °·¤ ¥‹Ø ƒæÅUÙæ âð ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æãê´»æ Ñ ÕðÜÀUè v~||Ð ©â âæÜ, ¥æÂæÌ·¤æÜ (v~|z-||) ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ©Ù·¤è ·¤ÚUæÚUè ãUæÚU âð §´çÎÚUæ »æ´Ïè ÌÕ ©ÕÚUè´, ÁÕ ßð ©Ù ~ ÎçÜÌô´ ·Ô¤ ÂçÚUßæÚUô´ âð ç×ÜÙð Âãé¿è´ çÁ‹ãð´ ÎÕ´»æð´ ·¤è ÖèǸ Ùð çÁ´Îæ ÁÜæ çÎØæ ÍæÐ ßð ãßæ§ü ÁãæÁ âð ÂÅUÙæ Âã´é¿è, ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Áè ¥õÚU çÈ ÚU Åþð€UÅUÚU ¥õÚU ¥´ÌÌÑ ÁÕ ÕæçÚUàæ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ âǸ·¤ ÂÚU Åþð€UÅUÚU ·¤æ ¿ÜÙæ Öè ÎêÖÚU ãô »Øæ, ÌÕ ßð ãæÍè ÂÚU âßæÚU ãô·¤ÚU ÕðÜÀUè Âãé´¿èÐ ¥æÁ, ÁÕ ÂÚUæçÁÌ ÚUæãéÜ »æ´Ïè ÕÎæØê´ ·Ô¤ ÒÎçÜÌÓ (Áñâæ ·¤è ÕÌæØæ »Øæ ãñ) ÂçÚUßæÚUô´ âð ç×ÜÙð Âãé´¿ð Ìô ßã ·¤ô§ü ÕǸæ â×æ¿æÚU Ùãè´ ÕÙæÐ Øã ¥ÂðçÿæÌ ÍæÐ ÂÚU´Ìé ÁÕ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤è ÚUæÙè ×æØæßÌè ¥»Üð çÎÙ ãßæ ×𴠩ǸÙð ßæÜð ãæÍè âð ßãæ´ Âãé´¿è Ìô ßã â×æ¿æÚU ÕÙ »ØæÐ Øã Øæ˜ææ ©Ù·Ô¤ çÜ° ÕðÜÀUè çâh ãô»è Øæ Ùãè´, Øã Ìô â×Ø ãè ÕÌæ°»æÐ ×éÜæØ× çâ´ã, ÜæÜê ÂýâæÎ, ×æØæßÌè Øæ ×ôÎè ·¤æ ÚUæÁÙñçÌ·¤ ÖçßcØ ·¤éÀ Öè ãô, ã×æÚUð çÜ° ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ãñ ÖæÚUÌèØ ÚUæCþ ·¤æ ÖçßcØÐ ã×æÚð Üð¹ô´ ·¤è Ÿæë´¹Üæ ÒÖæÚUÌ ·¤ô °·¤ ×ãæÙ ÚUæCþ ÕÙæÙæÓ ×ð´ çßàææÜ ×´»ÜßæÎè §â ÂýàÙ ·¤æ ©žæÚU ¥ÂÙð Üð¹ ÒÕæ§üçÕÜ Ùð ÖæÚUÌ ·¤ô ·ñ¤âð çß·¤æâàæèÜ ÚUæCþ ÕÙæØæ Ó ×ð´ ÎðÌð ãé° ÕÌæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ã×æÚU𠻇æÌ´˜æ ·¤è ÁǸð´ ã×æÚUð â´çßÏæÙ âð »ãÚUè ãñ´Ð ×ôÎè âÚU·¤æÚU Ùð (Ö»ßæ Üð´â âð) §çÌãæâ ·¤æ ÂéÙÜðü¹Ù ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ¥ÂÙæ §ÚUæÎæ ÁÌæ çÎØæ ãñÐ §âçÜ° Øã ¥õÚU Öè ¥æßàØ·¤ ãñ ç·¤ ã× ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ ·Ô¤ â¿ ·¤ô, ©â·Ô¤ ·¤æ´»ýðâ Øæ ÌñØæÚU ãô ÚUãð çã‹Îéˆß â´S·¤ÚU‡æ âð ÂÚUð ãÅU·¤ÚU, ÁæÙð´Ð ¥»Üð ×æã Ì·¤...âˆØ ×ð´ ¥æ·¤æ ¤æòÚUßÇü çß¿æÚUȤ ßáü VI ¥¢·¤ 07 ÁéÜæ§üU 2014
  6. 6. Badaun incident triggers Bahujan protests ÕÎæØê´ ·¤æ´ÇU ÂÚU ©UÕÜæ ÕãéUÁÙ â×æÁ New Delhi: On 27 May, people all over the country exploded in anger after the pictures of the bodies of two minor girls of Shakya Maurya (OBC) community, hang- ing from a tree in the Katra Shahganj village of Badaun district of Uttar Pradesh, appeared in the media. The girls were raped before being hanged. Sit-ins and demonstrations were organized right from Delhi up to the district headquarters. On 14 June, a huge demonstration was held at Jantar-Mantar in New Delhi by the Badaun Balatkar Evam Hatya Virodhi Manch under the auspices of Kushwaha Samaj, Delhi. The demonstration was led by the organization’s president Surendra Kushwaha. Addressing the demonstrators, Surendra Kushwaha said that the ruling caste of UP was committing atrocities on members of the Maurya, Shakya and Kushwaha castes. He said that these castes were being punished for voting for Modi in the Lok Sabha elections. On this occasion, Vimal Kumar, Shatrughan Singh Shakya, Dr Harirama Maurya, Jai Bhagwan Saini, Himadri Kushwaha, Gita Shakya, Dinesh Maurya, Rajesh Kushwaha, Premchand Prajapati and others said that Shakya, Maurya, Kushwaha, Saini and Kachi castes were socially vulnerable and the central and state governments should make special provisions for their protection.- FP DESK Ù§üU çÎËÜè Ñ »Ì÷ w| קü ·¤ô ©UžæÚUU ÂýÎðàæ ·Ô¤ ÕÎæØê´ çÁÜæ ·Ô¤ ·¤ÅUÚUæ àæãæÎÌ»´Á »æ´ß ×ð´ àææ€UØ ×õØü (¥ôÕèâè) â×éÎæØ ·¤è Îô ÙæÕæçÜ» ÜǸ緤Øæð´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ÕÜ户¤æÚU ·¤ÚU ©Ù·¤è Üæàæ ÂðǸ ÂÚU ÜÅU·¤æ çΰ ÁæÙð ·Ô¤ ȤôÅUô»ýæâ ×èçÇØæ ×ð´ ÁæÚUè ãôÙð ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ÎðàæÖÚU ×ð´ Üô»ô´ ·¤æ »éSâæ ȤêÅU ÂǸæÐ çÎËÜè âð Üð·¤ÚU çÁÜæ ×éØæÜØô´ Ì·¤ ×ð´ §â·Ô¤ çßÚUôÏ ×ð´ ÏÚUÙæ-ÂýÎàæüÙ ·¤æ ¥ØôÁÙ ç·¤Øæ »ØæÐ »Ì÷ vy ÁêÙ ·¤ô Ù§ü çÎËÜè ·Ô¤ Á´ÌÚU-×´ÌÚU ÂÚU ·¤éàæßæãæ â×æÁ, çÎËÜè ·Ô¤ ¥ŠÄæÿæ âéÚUð´Îý ·¤éàæßæãæ ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ÒÕÎæØê´ ÕÜ户¤æÚU °ß´ ãUˆØæ çßÚUôÏè ×´¿Ó mæÚUæ çßàææÜ ÂýÎàæüÙ ç·¤Øæ »ØæÐ âéÚUð´Îý ·¤éàæßæãæ Ùð ·¤ãæ ç·¤ ©UžæÚUÂýÎðàæ ·¤è âžææÏæÚUè ÁçÌ ×õØæü, àææ€UØ ß ·¤éàæßæãæ ÁæçÌØô´ ·¤æ ÖØæÙ·¤ ©UˆÂèǸ٠·¤ÚU ÚUãè ãñÐ ©‹ãô´ðÙð ·¤ãæ ç·¤ §Ù ÁæçÌØô´ ·¤ô Üô·¤âÖæ ¿éÙæß ×ð´ ÙÚUðÎý ×ôÎè ·¤ô ßôÅU ÎðÙð ·¤è âÁæ Îè Áæ ÚUãè ãñÐ §â ¥ßâÚU ÂÚU çß×Ü ·¤é×æÚU, àæ˜æéƒæÙ çâ´ã àææ€UØ, Çæò. ãçÚUÚU×æ ×õØæü, ÁØ Ö»ßæÙ âñÙè, çã×æÎýè ·¤éàæßæãæ, »èÌæ àææ€Ø ß çÎÙðàæ ×õØæü, ÚUæÁðàæ ·¤éàæßæãæ, Âýð׿´Î ÂýÁæÂçÌ ¥æçÎ Ùð ·¤ãæ ç·¤ àææ€UØ, ×õØæü, ·¤éàæßæãæ, âñÙè, ·¤æÀè ¥æçÎ ÁæçÌØæ´ âæ×æçÁ·¤ M¤Â âð ·¤æÈ¤è ·¤×ÁôÚU ãñ´Ð §Ù·Ô¤ â´ÚUÿæ‡æ ·Ô¤ çÜ° ·ð´¤Îý ß ÚUæ’Ø âÚU·¤æÚU ·¤ô çßàæðá ÂýæߊææÙ ·¤ÚUÙð ¿æçã°Ð -ȤæÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ÇðUS·¤ JULY 2014 | 6 FORWARD Press FEATURE P H O T O
  7. 7. 7 ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ T Âýð×·¤é×æÚU ×ç‡æ ·¤âÖæ ·Ô¤ çÂÀÜð ¿éÙæß Ùð ÖæÚUÌèØ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤è ·¤§ü »ý´çÍØô´ ·¤ô ÌôǸ çÎØæÐ §â×ð´ âÕâð Âý×é¹ ãñ âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎ ·¤æ, Áô °·¤ ãõÃßæ ·Ô¤ ÌõÚU ÂÚU ¹Ç¸æ Íæ ¥õÚU â¿ ÂêçÀ° Ìô ©â·¤è ¥æÚUÌè ©ÌæÚUÙæ °·¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç ÕÙ »Øæ ÍæÐ âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎ ·Ô¤ ©Îæžæ ×êËØô´ ·¤è PREM KUMAR MANI herecentgeneralelectionshaveexplodedmanymythsand disprovedmanypresumptions.Theforemostamongthem isthebogeyofsecularism.Singingpaeanstosecularismhad becomeapoliticalritual.Theliberalvalueswhich secularismencompassesareasinequanonforevery healthydemocracybutthekindofpseudo-secularismthat Üæð How Bahujans should view the election verdict ¿éÙæß ÂçÚU‡ææ×æð´ ·¤æð ·ñ¤âð Îð¹ð´ ÕãéUÁÙ?
  8. 8. wasrulingtheroostinourcountryneededtobeexposedfor whatitis.Noonemustbemourningthisdevelopmentexcept thosewhoweretradinginit.InNorthIndia,MulayamSinghYa- davandLalooPrasadYadavwereitsolddealersand,abouta yearago,NitishKumarhadalsojumpedintothebusiness.The Congress,ofcourse,wastheall-Indiamerchantofsecularism. Infact,thissecularismwasnolongeranideology.Ithad becomeatwopennymeansofgarneringMuslimvotes.The concepthadbeenpoliticizedtosuchanextentthatithadlost itsmeaning.Secularthoughtandvaluesshouldtakeustowards modernity.TheideologiesofNehruandAmbedkarareideal secularideologiesandwewouldliketolearnfromthemeven today.Butcanaleader,whoisnotmoderninhisthoughtsand ideas,besecular?What,forinstance,qualifiesLalooPrasador MulayamSinghtobedescribedassecular?Buttheyhad becometheflag-bearersofsecularisminthecountry.Their politicswasbasedonit.Throughtheirspeeches,statements andactions,theyonlymadetheMuslimsmorebackward- thinking.Theywereonlyinterestedinrousingthecommunity’s emotionssothattheirvotescouldfallintotheirkitty. Theintellectualseculariststoonevertriedtoturnthe Muslimstowardssocialchangeorreform.Theyalsolaidmore emphasisontheideologyofAkbarandDaraShikohthanthat ofKabir.ForasectionofMuslims,thisbrandofsecularism cameinhandy.AndthissectionwastheAshrafMuslimupper caste.Itusedthissecularismtoperpetuateitsholdonthe majoritycraftsmen-workerclassofIndianMuslims,whowere madetoignoretheirbasicneedsandtoforcedtoliveinthe shadowoffearandinsecurity.This,inturn,strengthened terrorismononehandandMuslimBrahmanismorMullawaad ontheother.Theproponentsofthepoliticsofsecularismhad notimetothinkabouttheeconomicandeducationalissuesre- latingtotheMuslims.Theyweremoreinterestedinthe strange-lookingdress,themedievallanguagesofArabicand Persian,maintenanceoftheburialgroundsandproviding morefacilitiesforHajpilgrimage. Puttingthepromulgationofauniformcivilcode–advocated byleaderslikeJawaharlalNehru,AmbedkarandRamManohar Lohia–intocoldstoragebecametheprimeagendaofthispoli- tics.Itwasunderthis‘secularpolitics’thatcriminalsandgood- ÁM¤ÚUÌ °·¤ SßSÍ ÁÙÌ´˜æ ·¤ô ã×ðàææ ÚUãð»è, Üðç·¤Ù çÁâ ÌÚUã ·¤æ ÛæêÆæ âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎ ã×æÚUð Îðàæ ×ð´ ¿Ü ÚUãæ Íæ, ©â·¤æ Âæ¹´Ç ÅUêÅUÙð ÂÚU àææØÎ ãè ç·¤âè ·¤ô ¥È¤âôâ ãé¥æ ãô, çâßæ ©Ù·Ô¤ Áô §â·¤è Îé·¤æÙð´ ¿Üæ ÚUãð ÍðÐ ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ×éÜæØ× çâ´ãU ØæÎß, ÜæÜê ÂýâæÎ §â·Ô¤ ÂéÚUæÙð ÃØæÂæÚUè Íð ¥õÚU âæÜ ÖÚU ÂãÜð §â Îé·¤æÙÎæÚUè ×ð´ ÙèÌèàæ Öè ·¤êÎ ÂǸð ÍðÐ ¥ç¹Ü ÖæÚUÌèØ SÌÚU ÂÚU ·¤æ´»ýð⠧⠷¤æÚUôÕæÚU ×ð´ Ü»è ÍèÐ ÎÚU¥âÜ Øð âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎ °·¤ çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ âð ¥çÏ·¤ ×éçSÜ× ßôÅUÚUô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð Âÿæ ×ð´ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ °·¤ ƒæçÅUØæ ÁçÚUØæ ÕÙ »Øæ Íæ ¥õÚU §â·Ô¤ çÙÚU´ÌÚU ãô ÚUãð ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ÚU‡æ Ùð §âð §ÌÙæ çß·¤ëÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ Íæ ç·¤ Øã ¥ÂÙæ ×êÜ ¥Íü ãè ¹ô ÕñÆæ ÍæÐ âð·¤éÜÚU Öæß-çß¿æÚU ã×ð´ ¥æÏéçÙ·¤Ìæ ·¤è ¥ôÚU ¥»ýâÚU ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð ÙðãL¤-¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·¤è ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ¥æÎàæü âð·¤éÜÚU ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ãñ ¥õÚU §ââð ã× ¥æÁ Öè âè¹Ùæ ¿æãÌð ãñ´Ð Üðç·¤Ù Áô ÙðÌæ ¹éÎ ¥ÂÙð Öæß-çß¿æÚUô´ ×ð´ ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ âô¿ ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãñ, ßã ç·¤â ÌÚUã âð·¤éÜÚU ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñ ? ÜæÜê ÂýâæÎ Øæ ×éÜæØ× çâ´ã ØæÎß ·Ô¤ âð·¤éÜÚU ãôÙð ·Ô¤ €UØæ ¥æÏæÚU ãñ´ ? Üðç·¤Ù âð·¤éÜÚU-ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤æ ÂýâæÎ Ìô Øãè Õæ´ÅU ÚUãð ÍðÐ §âè ÂÚU §Ù·¤è ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ Îé·¤æÙð´ Öè ¿Ü ÚUãè Íè´Ð §‹ãô´Ùð ¥ÂÙð Öæá‡æô´, ÕØæÙô´ ¥õÚU ·¤æØü·¤ÜæÂô´ âð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤ô ×æÙçâ·¤ ÌõÚU ÂÚU ¥õÚU çÂÀǸæ ÕÙæØæÐ §Ù·¤æ ŠØæÙ ©Ù·Ô¤ Õè¿ Á’ÕæÌè ØæÜ ©ÖæÚUÙð ÂÚU ’ØæÎæ ãôÌæ Íæ, €UØô´ç·¤ §âè âð ©Ù·Ô¤ ßôÅU §‹ãð´ ¥æâæÙè âð ç×Ü â·¤Ìð ÍðÐ Õõçh·¤ âð·¤éÜÚUßæçÎØô´ Ùð Öè ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ âæ×æçÁ·¤ Áæ»ÚU‡æ Øæ âéÏæÚU Öæß Áæ»ýÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ÂýØæâ Ùãè´ ç·¤ØæÐ ©Ù Üô»ô´ Ùð Öè ·¤ÕèÚU âð ¥çÏ·¤ ¥·¤ÕÚU ß ÎæÚUæçàæ·¤ôã ·¤è ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ·¤ô ÚUð¹æ´ç·¤Ì ç·¤ØæÐ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ °·¤ ¹æâ ÌÕ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤ çÜ° °ðâð âð·¤éÜÚU çß¿æÚU ÕãéÌ ·¤æ× ·Ô¤ ÍðÐ Øã ÌÕ·¤æ Íæ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤æ ©‘¿ ÌÕ·¤æÐ ÎÚU¥âÜ §â ÌÕ·Ô¤ Ùð §â âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎ ·¤ô ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ ÎSÌ·¤æÚU-·¤æ×»æÚU ÌÕ·Ô¤ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè ·¤Ç¸ ×ð´ ÚU¹Ùð ·¤æ ×æŠØ× ÕÙæØæÐ §â·Ô¤ mæÚUæ ©‹ãð´ ÕéçÙØæÎè ÁM¤ÚUÌæð´ ·¤è ¥ÙÎð¹è ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ×ÁÕêÚU ç·¤Øæ »ØæÐ ©‹ãð´ ÖØ ¥õÚU ¥âéÚUÿææ ·Ô¤ ØæÜô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ÚU¹æ »ØæÐ §ââð °·¤ ÌÚUȤ ¥æÌ´·¤ßæÎ ·¤ô ÕÜ ç×Üæ Ìô ÎêâÚUè ÌÚUȤ ×éçSÜ× Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ ¥ÍæüÌ÷ ×éËÜæßæÎ ·¤ôÐ âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ Ùð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ ×æÜè ¥õÚU ÌæÜè×è ãæÜæÌ ÂÚU ·¤× âð ·¤× çß¿æÚU ç·¤ØæÐ ©Ù·¤æ ’ØæÎæ ŠØæÙ ©Ù·Ô¤ çß翘æ âð Ü»Ùð ßæÜð ÂãÙæßð, ©Ù·¤è ׊ØØé»èÙ Öæáæ ¥ÚUÕè-ȤæÚUâè, ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤çÕýSÌæÙô´ ·Ô¤ ÚU¹ÚU¹æß ¥õÚU ãÁ Øæ˜ææ¥ô´ ÂÚU ¥çÏ·¤ âéçßÏæ ÎðÙð ÂÚU Ü»æØæ »ØæÐ Çæò. ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU, ÁßæãÚUÜæÜ ÙðãL¤ ¥õÚU ÚUæ× ×ÙæðãUÚU ÜôçãØæ Áñâð ÙðÌæ¥ô´ Ùð çÁâ â×æÙ Ùæ»çÚU·¤ â´çãÌæ ·¤è ß·¤æÜÌ ·¤è Íè, ©âð Æ´Çð ÕSÌð ×ð´ ÇæÜÙæ âð·¤éÜÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤æ âßüÂý×é¹ °Áð´Çæ ÕÙ »ØæÐ §â âð·¤éÜÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ ÌãÌ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ âð ¥ÂÚUæÏè ¥õÚU ÙæÜæØ·¤ ̈ßô´ ·¤ô ¥æ»ð ç·¤Øæ JULY 2014 | 8 FORWARD Press STORY C O V E R THE OBC-DALITS HAVE PLAYED A KEY ROLE IN THE BJP’S MASSIVE VICTORY. IT IS OUR VICTORY. WE SHOULD ACCEPT IT AS THAT ÎçÜÌ, ¥æðÕèâè Ùð ÖæÁÂæ ·¤è ÖæÚUè çßÁØ ×ð´ ×ãUˆßÂê‡æü Öêç×·¤æ ¥Îæ ·¤è ãñUÐ ØãU ãU×æÚUè ÁèÌ ãñU ¥æñÚU ãU×ð´ ©Uâð §Uâè M¤Â ×ð´ Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æçãU°
  9. 9. 9 ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ »ØæÐ çÕãæÚU ×ð´ ÜæÜê ÂýâæÎ ¥õÚU °·¤ â×Ø ÚUæ×çßÜæâ ÂæâßæÙ Ùð Öè ¥ôâæ×æ çÕÙ ÜæÎðÙ ·¤è °·¤ ã×àæ€UÜ ·¤ô âæÍ Üð·¤ÚU ¿éÙæßè âÖæ°´ ·¤è´Ð °ðâè ç·¤ÌÙè ×ê¹üÌæ°´ ãéU§ZU, §â·¤æ çãâæÕ Ü»æÙæ ÕãéÌ ¥æâæÙ Ùãè´ ãô»æÐ ÕãéUÁÙ ¿éÙæß ÂçÚU‡ææ×æð´ ·¤æð ·ñ¤âð Îð¹ð´ çÂÀÜð ¿éÙæß Ùð ¥ÂÙð SÂC Õãé×Ì âð ÛæêÆð âð·¤éÜçÚU’× ·¤è ÂêÚUè çÕâæÌ ·¤ô ŠßSÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ ãñÐ ×ñ´ â×ÛæÌæ ãê´, Øã ÖæÚUÌèØ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ çÜ° ¥‘Àæ ãè ãé¥æ ãñÐ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ ©â ÕãéÁÙ â×éÎæØ ·Ô¤ çÜ° Öè ØãU ¥‘Àæ ãñ, Áô ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ ¥ÍæðZ ×ð´ ×éçSÜ× ¥ôÕèâè ãñ´Ð ØçÎ ×éçSÜ× ¥ÂÚU ·¤æSÅU ¥ÂÙæ ×æÍæ ÂèÅUÌð ãñ´ Ìô ©‹ãð´ °ðâæ ·¤ÚUÙð çÎØæ ÁæÙæ ¿æçã°Ð ×éÛæâð çטæô´ Ùð âßæÜ ÂêÀð ãñ´ ç·¤ §â ¿éÙæßè ÙÌèÁð ·¤ô ÕãéÁÙ ç·¤â ÙÁçÚU° âð Îð¹ð´Ð ×ðÚUæ ©žæÚU ÕãéÌ âæȤ ãñÐ ã×ð´ ¹éàæ ãôÙæ ¿æçã°, €UØô´ç·¤ Øã ÙÌèÁæ çÕÙæ ã×æÚUè Sßè·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ Ùãè´ ¥æØæ ãñÐ ¥æ·¤è Âç˜æ·¤æ (ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ) Ùð çÂÀÜð ¥´·¤ ×ð´ Áô ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ð Âý·¤æçàæÌ ç·¤° ãñ´, ßã Øãè ÕÌÜæÌð ãñ´Ð ØçÎ ÙÚUð´‹Îý ×ôÎè Ùð ¥ÂÙð ·¤ô »ÚUèÕ, çÂÀÇ¸æ ¥õÚU ¿æØßæÜæ ÕÌÜæØæ, ÌÕ ÂêÚUð ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ·¤æ×»æÚU ç·¤âæÙô´ ß ÎSÌ·¤æÚUô´ Ùð §â·¤è ÙôçÅUâ ÜèÐ ØçÎ ÖæÁÂæ ÕÎÜ â·¤Ìè ãñ Ìô ã× Öè ÕÎÜ â·¤Ìð ãñ´, §â Öæß ·¤ô ©Áæ»ÚU ç·¤ØæÐ ¥æÁ ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô Âý¿´Ç Õãé×Ì ç×Üæ ãñ Ìô §â×ð´ âÕâð ÕǸè Öêç×·¤æ ÖæÚUÌ ·¤è çÂÀǸè- ÎçÜÌ ÁÙÌæ ·¤è ãñÐ Øã ã×æÚUè ÁèÌ ãñÐ ã×ð´ §âð §â M¤Â ×ð´ ãè Sßè·¤æÚUÙæ ¿æçã°Ð Üðç·¤Ù ã× Øãæ´ §â çßáØ ÂÚU ÁM¤ÚU çß¿æÚU ·¤ÚUð´ ç·¤ ã×Ùð ¥ÂÙð ÂéÚUæÙð ÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤ô €UØô´ ŠßSÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ ÙæØ·¤ô´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤æØü·¤ÜæÂô´ ·¤æ ÕæÚUè·¤è âð çßàÜðá‡æ ·¤èçÁ°Ð ßð ¥ÂÙð çß¿æÚUô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ã×ð´ ç·¤â ÎéçÙØæ ·¤è ¥ôÚU Üð Áæ ÚUãð ÍðÐ Ù ©Ù·Ô¤ Âæâ ·¤ô§ü ßñ™ææçÙ·¤, âæ×æçÁ·¤-¥æçÍü·¤ ÙÁçÚUØæ Íæ, Ù ãè ©‘¿ ÙñçÌ·¤ÌæÐ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ‹ØæØ ·¤æ âæ§ÙÕôÇü ܻ淤ÚU ßð ¥ÂÙð çÙçãÌ SßæÍæðZ ·¤ô ÂæÜ-Âôâ ÚUãð ÍðÐ ×éÜæØ× çâ´ãU ØæÎß Ùð ÂêÚUð ÂçÚUßæÚU ·¤ô ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚUôÕæÚU ×ð´ Üæ ¹Ç¸æ ç·¤Øæ, Ìô ×æØæßÌè ÎôÙô´ ãæÍô´ âð Âñâæ ÕÅUôÚUÙð ×ð´ ×SÌ Íè´Ð ÜæÜê ÂÚU ÖýCæ¿æÚU ¥õÚU ÂçÚUßæÚUßæÎ ·¤éÀ ’ØæÎæ ãè âßæÚU ÍæÐ Ù° âð·¤éÜÚU ÙèÌèàæ ·¤éÀ ãæSØæSÂÎ ÌÚUè·Ô¤ âð ŒØæÁ ¹æ ÚUãð ÍðÐ ¥õÚU â×ßðÌ SßÚU Íæ Ìô ×ôÎè çßÚUôÏ ·¤æÐ ·¤éÀ °ðâæ ãè SßÚU v~|v ×ð´ ÂêÚUð çßÂÿæ ·¤æ §´çÎÚUæ çßÚUôÏ ·¤æ ÍæÐ ©Ù·¤æ ÙæÚUæ ãè Íæ §´çÎÚUæ ãÅUæ¥ôÐ ãæÜæ´ç·¤ ÌÕ ÂêÚUð çßÂÿæ Ùð ç×Ü·¤ÚU °·¤ ×ãæ»ÆÕ´ÏÙ (»ýñ´Ç ¥ÜæØ´â) ÕÙæØæ Íæ, çÁâ×ð´ ×êÜ ·¤æ´»ýðâè, ÁÙâ´ƒæ (ÖæÁÂæ ·¤æ ÂéÚUæÙæ ¥ßÌæÚU) ¥õÚU â×æÁßæÎè àææç×Ü ÍðÐ §â ÕæÚU Ìô °ðâè ·¤ô§ü ÚUæÁÙèçÌ Öè Ùãè´ ÍèÐ ãæ´ ÙæÚUæ ÁM¤ÚU Íæ ×ôÎè ãÅUæ¥ô ·¤æÐ ÌÕ §´çÎÚUæ »æ´Ïè Ùð çßÂçÿæØô´ ·Ô¤ §´çÎÚUæ ãÅUæ¥ô ·Ô¤ ÁßæÕ ×ð´ »ÚUèÕè ãÅUæ¥ô ·¤æ ÙæÚUæ çÎØæ ÍæÐ §â ÕæÚU ×ôÎè Ùð ¥ÂÙè Ïé¥æ´ÏæÚU ÚUñçÜØô´ âð ÁÙÌæ âð âèÏæ â´ßæÎ ç·¤Øæ ¥õÚU Ò°·¤ ÖæÚUÌ, ŸæðD ÖæÚUÌÓ ·¤æ ÙæÚUæ çÎØæÐ Ù ·Ô¤ßÜ Ù§ü ÂèÉè ·¤ô, ÕçË·¤ ÖæÚUÌèØ ÁÙÌæ ·¤è °·¤ çßàææÜ ¥æÕæÎè ·¤ô ÂýÖæçßÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ×ð´ ×ôÎè âÈ¤Ü ãé°Ð ©‹ãô´Ùð Áô ¥ôÕèâè ·¤æÇü ¹ðÜæ, ©â·¤æ ÁæÎê Öè ¿Ü »ØæРֻܻ ÂêÚUð ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸô´ Ùð §â Ù° ÙæØ·¤ ×ð´ °·¤ ©×èÎ Îð¹èÐ ©âÙð ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·¤ô ßôÅU ç·¤Øæ, ÖæÚUÌèØ ÁÙÌæ ÂæÅUè ·¤ô Ùãè´Ð Øã ¿éÙæßè ÁèÌ ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·¤è ÁèÌ ãñ, ÖæÚUÌèØ ÁÙÌæ ÂæÅUèü ·¤è Ùãè´Ð Áñâð v~|v ·¤è ÁèÌ §´çÎÚUæ »æ´Ïè ·¤è ÁèÌ Íè, ·¤æ´»ýðâ ·¤è Ùãè´Ð ×êÜ ·¤æ´»ýðâ ·¤ô Ìô §´çÎÚUæ »æ´Ïè Ùð ÂãÜð ãè ÏêÜ ¿ÅUæ Îè Íè, Áñâð §â ÎȤæ ×êÜ ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè Ùð ÂãÜð ãè ÏêÜ ¿ÅUæ ÎèÐ ØçÎ ¥æÚU°â°â Ù ãôÌè Ìô ¥æÇßæ‡æè-âéá×æ Õ»ñÚUã ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ §â ÕæÚU ÖæÁÂæ Öè ¿éÙæß ·Ô¤ ÂãÜð Îô ÅUê·¤ ãô ÁæÌèÐ for-nothingsamongtheMuslimswerepromoted.Atonetime, LalooPrasadYadavandRamvilasPaswanaddressedpublic meetingsinBiharwithanOsamaBinLadenlook-alikestanding bytheirside.Thelistofsuchidiosyncrasiesisaprettylongone. HowBahujansshouldviewtheelectionresults BygivingtheBJPaclearmajority,theelectoratehasexhibited itsdisdainforthispseudo-secularism.Iviewitasaheartening developmentforIndianpolity.Itisalsogoodforthemajority amongtheMuslims,whocanbecalledMuslimOBCsinmodern terms.Iftheupper-casteMuslimsarebeatingtheirbreasts,sobe it. MyfriendswanttoknowhowtheBahujansshouldviewthe polloutcome.Myanswerisveryclear.Weshouldbehappy becausetheresultsreflectourwill.Thedatapublishedinthelast issueofthismagazineprovesthis.WhenNarendraModi describedhimselfasapoor,backwardchaiwallah,itwasnoticed bythepeasants,theworkersandthecraftsmenofthiscountry.It gavebirthtothefeelingthatiftheBJPcanchange,socanwe.The OBC-DalitshaveplayedakeyroleintheBJP’smassivevictory.It isourvictory.Weshouldacceptitasthat. Buthere,weshouldalsoponderastowhywehaveabandoned ouroldheroes.Letusputtheutterancesandtheconductofour oldheroesunderthescanner.Letustrytodiscovertheworld theywereleadingusinto.Theyneitherhadanyscientificsocio- economicworldview,norhighmorals.Crouchingbehindthe signboardofsocialjustice,theywerenursingtheirownvested interests.TheentirefamilyofMulayamSinghYadavjoinedthe businessofpolitics.Mayawatiwasbusyrakinginasmuch moolahaspossible.Laloo,ofcourse,wasthehighpriestof corruptionand nepotism.Neo-secularNitishwassounding laughable. Tosomeextent,thejust-concludedpollscanbecompared withtheheadyIndiraHataodaysof1971.Theentireopposition wasinterestedinonlyonething–gettingIndiraGandhioutof theway.Then,theoriginalCongressmen,SocialistsandtheJana Sangh(theBJP’sfirstavatar)hadforgedagrandalliance.This time,nosuchformalalliancewasformedbuttheModiHatao sloganwasverymuchthere.IndiraGandhirespondedtothe IndiraHataosloganwithGaribiHatao.Inhiswhirlwindtourof thecountry,Modidirectlyconversedwiththepeopleandgave thesloganofEkBharat,ShresthaBharat(OneIndia,BestIndia). Thesloganappealednotonlytothenewgenerationbuttoan overwhelmingmajorityofpeopleofallagegroups.Themagicof hisOBCcardalsoworked.TheDalit-OBCsofthecountrysaw hopeintheirnewhero.TheyvotedforNarendraModi,notfor theBJP.ThisvictoryisModi’s,nottheBJP’sjustasthe1971 victorywasIndiraGandhi’s,nottheCongress’.Shehad successfullybulldozedtheoriginalCongresswellbeforethe polls;justasModivirtuallyranovertheoriginalBJPthistime around.ButfortheRSS,Advani,Sushmaetalwouldhavesplit theBJPbeforethepolls.
  10. 10. JULY 2014 | 10 FORWARD Press STORY C O V E R DoesModiunderstandhisvictory? Nowthemillion-dollarquestionishowModiandtheBJPunder hisleadershipperceivethischange.OnlyModicananswerthis question.Hewillhavetowintheconfidenceofthevoterswhohad overwhelminglyrespondedtothesloganofAbkiBaar,Modi Sarkaar(Thistime,aModigovernment)–thevoterswhohad backednottheBJPbutthepoor,chaiwallahOBCModi.IfModifails tounderstandtheemotionsofthosevotersanddoesnotchange thecharacterofhisparty,nexttime,thesevoterswillchangehim.In thewordsofModihimself,theBJPwasapartyofBrahminsand Banias.Andnow,againinModi’sownwords,“Thecomingdecade willbelongtoDalit-OBCs.” TheDalit-OBCsofIndiadonotharbouranarrowoutlook.They workhard,theytillthefields,theycreatehandicrafts.Ithasnotrele- gateditsworkanditscastetothelowerrungsofthesocialorder. Othershavedoneit.Intimespast,itwastheso-calledlow-caste peoplewhogavemomentumtoculturalmovementsand establishedthehighestidealsofspiritualism.Saintswerebornfrom amongthem.Kabir,Raidas,Sela,Nai,Gora–allcamefromthe loweredcastes. LeadingmodernpoetMuktibodhhadaskedwaybackin1955, “Whenthesecastescouldproducesaintsindaysgonebyand generalssubsequently,whycan’ttheyproducepoliticalleadersand ideologuesnow?”Muktibodhanswersthequestionhimself.A directquotefromhimwillbebetter.“Thepeople’ssaintsmade Maharashtraawareandconscious.RamdasandShivajigavebirth €Øæ ×æðÎè ¥ÂÙè çßÁØ ·ð¤ çÙçãUÌæÍü â×ÛæÌð ãñ´U Üðç·¤Ù ¥Õ ÙÚUð´Îý ×ôÎè ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ÖæÁÂæ §â ÂêÚUð ÕÎÜæß ·¤ô ç·¤â M¤Â ×ð´ »ýã‡æ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ, Øã °·¤ ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ÂýàÙ ãô»æÐ Üðç·¤Ù §â·¤æ ©žæÚU Ìô ×ôÎè ãè Îð â·ð´¤»ðÐ ©Ù ßôÅUÚUô´ ·¤ô ©‹ãð´ çßàßæâ ×ð´ ÜðÙæ ãô»æ, çÁ‹ãô´Ùð Ò¥Õ·¤è ÕæÚU ×ôÎè âÚU·¤æÚUÓ ·Ô¤ ÙæÚUð ·¤ô ßôÅU ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ çÁÙ·¤æ ßôÅU ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô Ùãè´ ©â ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·¤ô »Øæ ãñ Áô ¿æØßæÜæ ¥õÚU »ÚUèÕ ¥æÕèâè ãñÐ ØçÎ ×ôÎè ¥õÚU ©Ù·¤è ÂæÅUèü Ùð ©Ù·¤è ÖæßÙæ¥ô´ ·¤ô Ùãè´ â×Ûææ ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙè ÂæÅUèü ·¤ô Ùãè´ ÕÎÜæ, ÌÕ ¥»Üè ÕæÚU ÁÙÌæ ©‹ãð´ ÕÎÜ Îð»èÐ ÖæÚUÌèØ ÁÙÌæ ÂæÅUèü SßØ´ ×ôÎè ·Ô¤ àæŽÎô´ ×ð´ Õýæ±×‡æ-ÕçÙØô´ ·¤è ÂæÅUèü Íè ¥æñÚU ¥Õ çȤÚU ×ôÎè ·Ô¤ ãè àæŽÎ ãñ´-¥æÙð ßæÜæ â×Ø ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸô´ ·¤æ ãô»æÐ ÖæÚUÌ ·¤è ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸè ÁÙÌæ â´·¤è‡æü ÎëçC·¤ô‡æ Ùãè´ ÚU¹ÌèÐ ßã Ìô ×ðãÙÌ-×ÁÎêÚUè ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ, ·¤æSÌ·¤æÚUè ¥õÚU ÎSÌ·¤æÚUè ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ ©âÙð ¥ÂÙð ·¤×ü ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙè ÁæçÌ ·¤ô SßØ´ ãè Ùè¿ ƒæôçáÌ Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ §âð Ùè¿ ƒæôçáÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð ¥‹Ø ÍðÐ ÂéÚUæÙð Á×æÙð ×ð´ §‹ãè´ ÌÍæ·¤çÍÌ Ùè¿ ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ Üô»ô´ Ùð âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙô´ ·¤ô »çÌ Îè ¥õÚU ©‘¿ ¥æŠØæçˆ×·¤Ìæ ·Ô¤ ¥æÎàæü SÍæçÂÌ ç·¤°Ð §‹ãô´Ùð ¥ÂÙð Õè¿ âð â´Ì ÂñÎæ ç·¤°Ð ·¤ÕèÚU, ÚUñÎæâ, âðÙæ, Ùæ§ü, »ôÚUæ âÕ·Ô¤ âÕ §‹ãè´ Ùè¿ ÁæçÌØô´ âð ¥æ° ÍðÐ °·¤ ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ ·¤çß ×éçQ¤ÕôÏ Ùð v~zz ×ð´ ãè âßæÜ ¹Ç¸æ ç·¤Øæ Íæ-¥æç¹ÚU ÁÕ §‹ãè´ ÁæçÌØô´ âð ÂéÚUæÙð Á×æÙð ×ð´ â´Ì ¥æ â·¤Ìð Íð, ¥æ»ð ¿Ü·¤ÚU âðÙæŠØÿæ çÙ·¤Ü â·¤Ìð Íð, Ìô ¥Õ ÚUæÁÙñçÌ·¤ ÙðÌæ ¥õÚU çß¿æÚU·¤ €UØô´ Ùãè´ çÙ·¤Ü â·¤Ìð ? Üðç·¤Ù §â·¤æ ÁßæÕ Öè ×éçQ¤ÕôÏ ãè ÎðÌð ãñ´Ð âèÏð ©‹ãè´ ·¤ô Îð¹Ùæ ¥‘Àæ ãô»æ-ÁÙ â´Ìô´ Ùð ÂÚUôÿæ M¤Â âð ×ãæÚUæCþ ·¤ô Áæ»ýÌ ¥õÚU â¿ðÌ ç·¤ØæÐ ÚUæ×Îæâ ¥õÚU çàæßæÁè Ùð ÂýˆØÿæ M¤Â âð ÙßèÙ ÚUæCþèØ PEOPLE HAVE PUNISHED MAYAWATI, LALOO, MULAYAM AND NITISH FOR THE NAUSEATING STRUCTURE OF NEPOTISM, CORRUPTION, IMMORALITY AND ANARCHY BUILT BY THEM ×æØæßÌè ãô´ Øæ ×éÜæØ× Øæ ÜæÜê ãô´ Øæ ÙèÌèàæ, Áô ¥ÚUæÁ·¤Ìæ ¥õÚU ¥ÙñçÌ·¤Ìæ §‹ãô´Ùð ¹Ç¸è ·¤è Íè, ÖýCæ¿æÚU ¥õÚU ·¤éÙÕæßæÎ ·¤æ çƒæÙõÙæ ·¤ëˆØ ç·¤Øæ Íæ, ÁÙÌæ Ùð ç·¤ÙæÚUð Ü»æ çÎØæ ãñ
  11. 11. 11 ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ ÁæçÌ ·¤ô Á‹× çÎØæÐ ç·´¤Ìé ÌÕ Ì·¤ Õýæ±×‡æßæçÎØô´ ¥ñÚU ÁÙÌæ ·Ô¤ ß»ü âð ¥æ° ãé° ÂýÖæßàææÜè âðÙæŠØÿæô´ ¥õÚU â´Ìô´ mæÚUæ °·¤-ÎêâÚUð ·Ô¤ çÜ° ·¤æÈ¤è ©ÎæÚUÌæ ÕÌÜæØè ÁæÙð Ü»èÐ çàæßæÁè ·Ô¤ ©ÂÚUæ´Ì, ÁÙÌæ ·Ô¤ »ÚUèÕ ß»æðZ âð ¥æ° ãé° âðÙæŠØÿæô´ ¥õÚU ÙðÌæ¥ô´ Ùð Ù° âæ×´Ìè ƒæÚUæÙð SÍæçÂÌ ç·¤°Ð ÙÌèÁæ Øã ãé¥æ ç·¤ Âðàæßæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÜ ×ð´ Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ çȤÚU ÁôÚUÎæÚU ãô »ØæÐ ×ãæÚUæCþ ×ð´ ßãè ãæÜ ãé¥æ Áô ©žæÚU ÂýÎðàæ ×ð´Ð ×ãæÚUæCþ ×ð´ çِ٠ÁæÌèØ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ¿ðÌÙæ çÁâð ÂÜ-ÂÜ ÂÚU ·¤ÅU÷ÅUÚUÂ´Í âð ×é·¤æÕÜæ ·¤ÚUÙæ ÂǸæ Íæ, ßã ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ âð ¥çÏ·¤ Îèƒæü·¤æÜ Ì·¤ ÚUãèÐ ¥´»ýðÁè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ Á×æÙð ×ð´ Õýæ±×‡æ-Õýæ±×‡æðžæÚUßæÎ ·¤æ ÂéÙÁü‹× ¥õÚU çß·¤æâ ãé¥æÐ ¥õÚU §â â×Ø Öè ֻܻ ßãè çSÍçÌ ãñРȤ·ü¤ §ÌÙæ ãè ãñ ç·¤ çِ٠ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ çÂÀǸð ãé° Üô» çàæÇ÷ØêËÇ ·¤æSÅU ÈÔ¤ÇÚUðàæÙ (¥õÚU §â â×Ø §âè ÌÚUã ·¤è ·¤éÀ ¥‹Ø ÂæçÅUüØô´-×ç‡æ) ×ð´ ãñ ¥õÚU ¥»ý»æ×è Üô» ·¤æ´»ýðâ, ÂðÁð‹ÅU÷â °´Ç ß·¤üâü ÂæÅUèü, ·¤ØéçÙSÅU ÂæÅUèü ¥õÚU ¥‹Ø ßæ×´Íè ÎÜô´ ×ð´ àææç×Ü ãô »° ãñ´Ð ×éçQ¤ÕôÏ Ùð v~zz ×ð´ ØæÙè ¥æÁ âð ֻܻ âæÆ âæÜ ÂãÜð çÁâ »éˆÍè ·¤ô ŠØæÙÂêßü·¤ â×Ûææ Íæ, ÖæÚUÌ ·¤è ÕãéÁÙ ÁÙÌæ ¥Õ Áæ·¤ÚU ¥æ´çàæ·¤ M¤Â âð ãè âãè, ©âð â×Ûæ â·¤è ãñÐ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ‹ØæØ â´ß»ü ·Ô¤ çÁÙ ÙðÌæ¥ô´ Ùð çàæßæÁè ·Ô¤ ß´àæÁô´ ·¤è ÌÚUã âæ×´Ìè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ƒæÚUæÙð SÍæçÂÌ ç·¤° ©âð §â ÕæÚU ÁÙÌæ Ùð °·¤ÕæÚU»è ŠßSÌ ·¤ÚU çΰР×æØæßÌè ãô´ Øæ ×éÜæØ× Øæ ÜæÜê ãô´ Øæ ÙèÌèàæ Ùð Áô ¥ÚUæÁ·¤Ìæ ¥õÚU ¥ÙñçÌ·¤Ìæ ¹Ç¸è ·¤è Íè, ÖýCæ¿æÚU ¥õÚU ·¤éÙÕæßæÎ ·¤æ çƒæÙõÙæ ·¤ëˆØ ç·¤Øæ Íæ, ÁÙÌæ Ùð ç·¤ÙæÚUð Ü»æ çÎØæ ãñÐ §Ù âÕ×ð´ ÙèÌèàæ ÍôǸæ çÖ‹Ù çιÌð ãñ´, Üðç·¤Ù ©Ù·¤è çÁ×ðßæÚUè ·¤× Ùãè´ ãôÌèÐ Øã Æè·¤ ãñ ç·¤ ©Ù ÂÚU ¥æçÍü·¤ ç·¤S× ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÚUæÏ ¿SÂæ´ Ùãè´ ãé° Üðç·¤Ù ßñ¿æçÚU·¤ ÎæçÚUÎýØ §â Õè¿ âÕâð ¥çÏ·¤ ©Ù×ð´ ãè Âý·¤ÅU ãé°Ð ßã Ü´ÂÅU Âýßëçžæ ·Ô¤ ·¤æ»Áè ÕéçhÁèçßØô´ âð çƒæÚUÌð »°, Áô ¥ÂÙð ßæSÌçß·¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ÎÚU¥âÜ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ¿æÂÜêâ ÍðÐ §Ù·¤è ¿æÂÜêâè ©‹ãð´ çÂýØ Ü»Ùð Ü»èÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð ×æØæßÌè SÅUæ§Ü ·¤æ â߇æüßæÎ ¥õÚU ÜæÜê SÅUæ§Ü ·¤æ âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎ °·¤ âæÍ ç×ÜæØæ ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙð çãâæÕ âð °·¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ·¤æò·¤ÅUðÜ ÕÙæÙæ ¿æãæÐ Üðç·¤Ù Øã ¿Üæ Ùãè´Ð ßã Ìô ÖæÁÂæ ·Ô¤ âæÍ Íð ¥õÚU ßãæ´ ÚUã·¤ÚU âæ×æçÁ·¤ ‹ØæØ ·Ô¤ çãÌô´ ·¤è ÕðãÌÚU ÂãÚUðÎæÚUè ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ÍðÐ ç·¤âè â×Ø ßã ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·Ô¤ ƒæÙƒæôÚU Âýàæ´â·¤ Íð, ¹æâ·¤ÚU ©Ù·¤è ©‘¿ ÙñçÌ·¤Ìæ ¥õÚU ¥ôÕèâè SßM¤Â ·Ô¤Ð Üðç·¤Ù ©Ù·Ô¤ ¿æÂÜêâô´ Ùð ©‹ãð´ âæÜÖÚU ÂãÜð âð·¤éÜÚU ÂæòçÜçÅU€UâU ·Ô¤ ÍÇü Èý´¤ÅUU ×ð´ Ï·Ô¤Ü çÎØæ, Áô ÎÚU¥âÜ ÍÇü €UÜæâ Èý´¤ÅUU ÍæÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð w®v® ·Ô¤ ÁêÙ ×ð´ ÂÅUÙæ ¥æ° ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð ¥æßæâ ÂÚU ÖôÁÙ ·Ô¤ çÜ° ¥æ×´ç˜æÌ ·¤ÚU ¥æÙð âð ×Ùæ ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ ·Ô¤ßÜ §âçÜ° ç·¤ ©‹ãð´ ×éçSÜ×ÂÚUSÌ ×æÙ çÜØæ Áæ°Ð ÜæÜê ¥æÇßæ‡æè ·¤æ ÚUÍ ÚUô·¤ â·¤Ìð ãñ´, Ìô ã× ×ôÎè ·¤æ ÙæàÌæ ÚUô·¤ â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð ç·¤âè ·¤ô ¥Â×æçÙÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è °ðâè ×ê¹üÌæÂê‡æü ãÚU·¤Ì ·¤ô ç·¤âè Ù𠥑Àæ Ùãè´ ×æÙæÐ w®vx ×ð´ Çæã ×ð´ ÇêÕð ÙèÌèàæ Ùð ×ôÎè ·¤è ÂÅUÙæ ÚUñÜè ×ð´ toanewnationalcaste.Butgradually,thebrahmanicalelementsandthe generalsandleaders,whohademergedfromamongthesubaltern,became veryaccommodativetowardseachother.AfterShivaji,thegeneralsand leaderswhohademergedfromthepoorersectionsofsocietyestablished theirownfeudalclans.TheresultwasthatBrahmanismagainbecamepow- erfulintheageofthePeshwas.AndMaharashtrabecameanotherUttar Pradesh.Theculturalconsciousnessofthelowcastes,whichhadto incessantlybattlefundamentalism,lastedlongerinMaharashtrathanin northIndia.IntheBritishera,BrahmanismandBrahmins–bothwere rejuvenatedandwentfromstrengthtostrength.Andthesameisthe situationnow.Theonlydifferenceisthatthebackwardmembersoflow casteshavejoinedtheScheduledCastesFederation(andothersuchparties inthecurrenttimes–Mani)whiletheforwardpeoplehavejoinedthe Congress,thePeasantsandWorkersParty,theCommunistPartyandother leftistpoliticalparties.” TheriddlethatMuktibodhcouldunravelbyhisdiligencein1955–almost 60yearsago–hasbeenonlypartlyunderstoodbytheBahujansnow.And thatiswhythefeudalpoliticalclansestablishedbytheproponentsofsocial justice,justlikethesuccessorsofShivaji,havebeenblownupbythe Bahujans.PeoplehavepunishedMayawati,Laloo,MulayamandNitishfor thenauseatingstructureofnepotism,corruption,immoralityandanarchy builtbythem. Inallthis,Nitishseemstobeabitdifferentbutnolessresponsible.Itis truethathewasnotinthedockforgraftbuthisideologicalbankruptcywas starklyapparent.Heallowedhimselftobesurroundedbylumpenindividu- als,whowereflatterersdonningthecloakofintellectuals.Hestarted enjoyingbeingflattered.HewhippedupapoliticalcocktailofMayawati- brandsavarnavaadandLaloo-brandsecularism.Butitdidnotwork.Hewas inalliancewiththeBJPandcouldhavebetterplayedtheroleofthesentinel ofsocialjusticethere.Atonetime,hewasagreatadmirerofModi,especially ofhishighmoralsandhisOBCstatus.But,aboutayearago,hissycophants pushedhimintotheThirdFrontofsecularpolitics,which,infact,wasa third-classfront.InJune2010,hehadrefusedtoinviteNarendraModi,who wasvisitingPatna,tolunchathisplacebecausehewantedtobuildhispro- Muslimimage.“IfLaloocanstopAdvani’srath,IcanstopModi’slunch.” The ideologies of Nehru and Ambedkar are ideal secular ideologies and we would like to learn from them even today. But can a leader, who is not modern in his thoughts and ideas, be secular? What, for instance, qualifies Laloo Prasad or Mulayam Singh to be described as secular? But they had become the flag-bearers of secularism in the country. Their politics was based on it. Through their speeches, statements and actions, they only made the Muslims more backward-thinking ÙðãL¤-¥æÕððÇ·¤ÚU ·¤è ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ¥æÎàæü âð·¤éÜÚU ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ãñ ¥õÚU §ââð ã× ¥æÁ Öè âè¹Ùæ ¿æãÌð ãñ´Ð Üðç·¤Ù Áô ÙðÌæ ¹éÎ ¥ÂÙð Öæß-çß¿æÚUô´ ×ð´ ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ âô¿ ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãñ, ßã ç·¤â ÌÚUã âð·¤éÜÚU ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñ ? ÜæÜê ÂýâæÎ Øæ ×éÜæØ× çâ´ã ØæÎß ·Ô¤ âð·¤éÜÚU ãôÙð ·Ô¤ €UØæ ¥æÏæÚU ãñ´ ? Üðç·¤Ù âð·¤éÜÚU-ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤æ ÂýâæÎ Ìô Øãè Õæ´ÅU ÚUãð ÍðÐ §âè ÂÚU §Ù·¤è ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ Îé·¤æÙð´ Öè ¿Ü ÚUãè Íè´Ð §‹ãô´Ùð ¥ÂÙð Öæá‡æô´, ÕØæÙô´ ¥õÚU ·¤æØü·¤ÜæÂô´ âð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤ô ×æÙçâ·¤ ÌõÚU ÂÚU ¥õÚU çÂÀǸæ ÕÙæØæ
  12. 12. JULY 2014 | 12 FORWARD Press STORY C O V E R ©Ù ÂÚU ÁæÙÜðßæ ã×Üð ·¤è âæçÁàæ ãôÙð ÎèÐ Üðç·¤Ù §Ù âÕ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ ç·¤âè Ùð ©‹ãð´ âð·¤éÜÚU Ùãè´ ×æÙæÐ ¥ÂÙð ×é´ã ¥ÂÙè Âýàæ´âæ ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUãðÐ ·¤Öè â´ÁèÎæ ¥õÚU ÎêÚUÎàæèü çιÙð ßæÜð §â ¥ôÕèâè ÙðÌæ ·Ô¤ ÎÎüÙæ·¤ ÂÌÙ ·Ô¤ çÜ° ©Ù·¤è ¥ã´·¤æÚUÂê‡æü ×ê¹üÌæ°´ çÁ×ðÎæÚU ãñ´Ð ÕãéÁÙ €UØæ ·¤ÚUð´ ? Ü´Õð â×Ø âð ÖæÁÂæ ·¤è Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸè ÁÙÌæ Ùð ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·¤ô ¥ÂÙæ Õãé×Ì ßôÅU Ìô Îð çÎØæ ãñ Üðç·¤Ù ¿éÙæßè ÙÌèÁô´ Ùð ©âð ©ÜÛæÙ ×ð´ ÇæÜ çÎØæ ãñÐ ×ñ´ ·¤ãê´»æ, ©‹ãð´ ©ÜÛæÙ âð ÕæãÚU ¥æÙæ ¿æçã° ¥õÚU §â ¿éÙæßè ÁèÌ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè ÁèÌ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Sßè·¤æÚUÙæ ¿æçã°, €UØô´ç·¤ çÕÙæ ©Ù·Ô¤ âãØô» ·Ô¤ Øã ÁèÌ â´Öß Ùãè´ ÍèÐ ãæ´ ©‹ãð´ ×ôÎè ÂÚU ÙÁÚU ÚU¹Ùè ¿æçã°Ð ÖæÁÂæ ×ð´ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ¥´Ì·¤üÜ㠹Ǹæ ãôÙð ·¤è â´ÖæßÙæ âð §Ù·¤æÚU Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ Áæ â·¤ÌæÐ ÕãéÁÙô´ (ÎçÜÌ- çÂÀǸð) ·Ô¤ ç×Üð ßôÅU ·Ô¤ âæÍ ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô â´»Ì ·¤ÚUÙè ãô»èÐ §â â´»Ì ·Ô¤ çÜ° ©âð ¥ææ´ÌçÚU·¤ M¤Â âð ÕÎÜÙæ ãô»æÐ ¥ÅUÜ- ¥æÇßæ‡æè ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ßæÜè çã´ÎéˆßßæÎè-Îçÿæ‡æ´Íè ÖæÚUÌèØ ÁÙÌæ ÂæÅUèü ØçÎ ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ÕãéÁÙßæÎè â׈ßßæÎè SßM¤Â ÜðÌè ãñ, Ìô §â·¤æ Sßæ»Ì ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙæ ¿æçã°Ð Üðç·¤Ù ßã ØçÎ °·¤ ÕæÚU çȤÚU çã´ÎéˆßßæÎè-Îçÿæ‡æ´Íè ×ôǸ ÜðÌè ãñ Ìô çßÚUôÏ ·Ô¤ çÜ° ©U‹ãð´U ©Æ ¹Ç¸æ ãôÙæ ¿æçã°Ð Üðç·¤Ù ÂýàÙ Øã Öè ©ÆÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ÖæÁÂæ ·Ô¤ çÜ° ¥ÂÙð ·¤ô ßñ¿æçÚU·¤ M¤Â âð ÕÎÜÙæ €UØæ §ÌÙæ ¥æâæÙ ãô»æ ? ©Ù·¤è çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ âæßÚU·¤ÚU-ãðÇ»ðßæÚU ·¤è çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ ãñÐ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤è SßæÖæçß·¤ çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ ȤéÜð-¥æÕððÇ·¤ÚUßæÎ ãñÐ ÎôÙô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ çßÚUôÏæÖæâè Ìˆß ¥Ùð·¤ ãñ´Ð §â·¤æ ·¤æÚU‡æ ãñ ÎôÙô´ çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ°´ Îô ÂÚUSÂÚU çßÚUôÏè ß»æðZ ·¤è ãñ´Ð ç·¤âè ß»ü ·¤è çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ âð ©â ß»ü ·Ô¤ çÙãèÌ SßæÍæðZ ·¤æ ÙæçÖ-ÙæÜ â´Õ´Ï ãôÌæ ãñÐ §âçÜ° Heapingthiskindofhumiliationonsomeonecanbe describedasnothingbutfolly.In2013,alividNitishallowed theconspiracyforamurderousattackonModiduringhis Patnarallytobehatched.Butdespitethathecouldnotwin theseculartag.Hehadtopathisownback.Hisarrogance andhisfolliesareresponsibleforthepainfuldownfallofthis once-matureOBCleaderwhoseemedtobefar-sighted. WhatshouldtheBahujansdo? TheDalit-OBCs,whoforlongwerebitterlyopposingthe brahmanicalpoliticsoftheBJP, votedforModibutthe resultshaveintriguedthem.Theyshouldshedtheir hesitation,puttheirdoubtsasideandacceptthisvictoryas theirown–ifnotforanyotherreasonthanbecauseitcould nothavebeenpossiblewithoutthem.Yes,theyshouldkeep aneyeonModi.Thepossibilityofaninternecinewarfare eruptingintheBJPcannotberuledout.TheBJPwillhaveto becomecompatiblewithitsBahujansupportbase.Andfor this,itwillhavetochangefromtheinside.IftheHindutvava- di,rightistBJP,ledbyAtal-Advanigetstransformedintoa Bahujanvaadi,egalitarianBJPundertheleadershipofModi, thenitshouldbewelcomed.Butifitagainturnstowards Hindtuvaandadoptsrightistpostures,thentheBahujansto amanshouldriseagainstit. Aquestionthatcanbelegitimatelyaskediswhetheritwill beeasyfortheBJPtochangeitselfideologically?Itsideology istheideologyofSavarkarandHedgewar.Thenaturalideol- ogyofBahujansisthatofPhuleandAmbedkar.Thereare manycontradictionsbetweenthetwo,andthatisbecause âð·¤éÜÚUßæÎè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ Ùð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ ×æÜè ¥õÚU ÌæÜè×è ãæÜæÌ ÂÚU ·¤× âð ·¤× çß¿æÚU ç·¤ØæÐ ©Ù·¤æ ’ØæÎæ ŠØæÙ ©Ù·Ô¤ çß翘æ âð Ü»Ùð ßæÜð ÂãÙæßð, ©Ù·¤è ׊ØØé»èÙ Öæáæ ¥ÚUÕè-ȤæÚUâè, ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤çÕýSÌæÙô´ ·Ô¤ ÚU¹ÚU¹æß ¥õÚU ãÁ Øæ˜ææ¥ô´ ÂÚU ¥çÏ·¤ âéçßÏæ ÎðÙð ÂÚU Ü»æØæ »ØæÐ Çæò. ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU, ÁßæãÚUÜæÜ ÙðãL¤ ¥õÚU ÚUæ× ×ÙðæãÚU ÜôçãØæ Áñâð ÙðÌæ¥ô´ Ùð çÁâ â×æÙ Ùæ»çÚU·¤ â´çãÌæ ·¤è ß·¤æÜÌ ·¤è Íè, ©âð Æ´Çð ÕSÌð ×ð´ ÇæÜÙæ âð·¤éÜÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤æ âßüÂý×é¹ °Áð´Çæ ÕÙ »ØæÐ §â âð·¤éÜÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ ÌãÌ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ âð ¥ÂÚUæÏè ¥õÚU ÙæÜæØ·¤ ̈ßô´ ·¤ô ¥æ»ð ç·¤Øæ »Øæ Theproponentsofthepoliticsofsecularismhadnotimetothinkabouttheeconomicand educationalissuesrelatingtotheMuslims.Theyweremoreinterestedinthestrange-looking dress,themedievallanguagesofArabicandPersian,maintenanceoftheburialgroundsand providingmorefacilitiesforHajpilgrimage.Puttingthepromulgationofauniformcivilcode –advocatedbyleaderslikeJawaharlalNehru,AmbedkarandRamManoharLohia–intocold storagebecametheprimeagendaofthispolitics.Itwasunderthis‘secular’politicsthat criminalsandgood-for-nothingsamongtheMuslimswerepromoted
  13. 13. 13 ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ ÂãÜð ãè ×ñ´Ùð ¥æàæ´·¤æ ÃØQ¤ ·¤è ãñ ç·¤ ÖæÁÂæ SßØ´ ·¤ô ÕÎÜ Âæ°»è ç·¤ Ùãè´Ð ØçÎ ßã âæßÚU·¤ÚU-ãðÇ»ðßæÚU ·¤è ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è â𠪤ÂÚUU ©ÆÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ÃØæ·¤ ÚUæCþèØ â´ÎÖæðZ ×ð´ ȤéÜð- ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚUßæÎ âð ¹éÎ ·¤ô ÁôǸÌè ãñ, ÌÕ ©âð ¥õÚU ÂêÚUð ÚUæCþ ·¤ô §â·¤æ ÜæÖ ç×Üð»æÐ §â×ð´ ·¤çÆÙæ§Øæ´ ¥æ â·¤Ìè ãñ´, Üðç·¤Ù °ðâæ ãôÙæ ¥SßæÖæçß·¤ Ùãè´ ãô»æРȤéÜð- ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚUßæÎ ×ð´ âç‹ÙçãUÌ Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ çßÚUôÏ ¥õÚU âˆØâ´ÏæÙ ¥ÍæüÌ÷ ßñ™ææçÙ·¤ ¿ðÌÙæ ·Ô¤ Öæß ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô ßñ¿æçÚU·¤ M¤Â âð ×ÁÕêÌ ÕÙæ°´»ðÐ âæßÚU·¤ÚU SßØ´ ÁæçÌ ÃØßSÍæ ¥õÚU Àé¥æÀêÌ ·Ô¤ âÌ çßÚUôÏè ÍðÐ ßã °·¤ ×ÁÕêÌ ÚUæCþ ·Ô¤ çã×æØÌè Íð ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙð ØæÜ âð ÖæÚUÌèØ çß¿æÚUô´ ·¤è °·¤ ×Ù·¤æ ÌñØæÚU ·¤ÚU ÚUãð Íð, çÁâ·¤æ Ùæ× ©‹ãô´Ùð çã´Îéˆß ÚU¹æ ÍæÐ ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤éÀ çß¿æÚUßæÙ ×êËØô´ âð âè¹Ùð ×ð´ ç·¤âè ·¤ô €UØô´ ÂÚUðàææÙè ãô»èÐ Üðç·¤Ù ÖæÁÂæ ØçÎ ©âð ¥ÂÙè ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ·¤è âè×æÚUð¹æ ÕÙæ°»è ÌÕ Øã ¿Üð»æ Ùãè´Ð ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ âžææ ¥Õ ÖæÁÂæ ·Ô¤ ãæÍ ×ð´ ãñÐ ¥Õ ÂýSÌæß·¤ ©âð ÕÙÙæ ãñР׊ط¤æÜ ×ð´ ¥·¤ÕÚU ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ×é»Ü- ×éçSÜ× âæ×´Ìô´ ¥õÚU çã´Îê âæ×´Ìô´ ·¤æ °·¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ »ÆÁôǸ ãé¥æ ÍæÐ §â »ÆÁôǸ Ùð ÎSÌ·¤æÚU-ç·¤âæÙ çã´Îê ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·Ô¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ (ÖçQ¤) ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ·¤ô ·¤é¿Ü çÎØæ ÍæÐ ¥æÁ Öè Ï×üçÙÚUÂðÿæ ·¤ãð ÁæÙð ßæÜð §çÌãæâ·¤æÚU ¥õÚU â×æÁçß™ææÙè ¥·¤ÕÚU ·¤ô ×ãæÙ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð Õèâßè´ âÎè ·Ô¤ ã×æÚUð ÚUæCþèØ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ Ùð Öè §â »éˆÍè ·¤ô Æè·¤ âð Ùãè´ â×Ûææ ¥õÚU SßÌ´˜æ ·¤ãð ÁæÙð ßæÜð ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ çÁâ âð·¤éÜÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤è ÂõÏ Ü»è ßã ¥·¤ÕÚUÙèÌ ¥âÚUæȤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ¥õÚU â߇æü çã´Îé¥ô´ ·¤æ »ÆÁôǸ ÕÙ·¤ÚU ÚUã »§üÐ ¥æÁ ·¤è âð·¤éÜÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ Öè ©âè ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU ¿Ü ÚUãè ãñÐ Øã çâÚU ·Ô¤ ÕÜ ¹Ç¸è ãñÐ ×æ€âü ·Ô¤ àæŽÎô´ ·¤ô ©ÏæÚU Üð·¤ÚU ·¤ãð´ Ìô §âð ÂñÚU ·Ô¤ ÕÜ ¹Ç¸æ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è ÁM¤ÚUÌ ãñÐ âÖè Ï×ü-â´ÂýÎæØô´ ·Ô¤ ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸð ¥õÚU àæôçáÌ ÌÕ·Ô¤ ¿æãð ßð ç·¤âæÙ-×ÁÎêÚU ãô´, Øæ ×çãÜæ°´ Øæ ÎçÜÌ- ¥æçÎßæâè °·¤ âæÍ ¥æ°´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·¤è ¥æ·¤æ´ÿææ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéM¤Â °·¤ Ù° ÖæÚUÌ ·¤æ çÙ×æü‡æ ãô´, Øãè ¥æñÚU ¥Õ â“æð ¥ÍæðZ ×ð´ Ò°·¤ ÖæÚUÌ ¥õÚU ŸæðD ÖæÚUÌÓ ãô»æÐ ØãUè ȤéÜð- ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·¤æ ×êÜ Sߌ٠ÍæÐ theyaretheideologiesoftwoclasseswhichareinconflict. Theumbilicalcordofvestedinterestslinksaclasswithits ideology.ThatiswhyIhaveexpressedtheapprehensionas towhethertheBJPwillbeabletochangeitself.Ifitrises abovetheideologyofSavarkar-Hedgewarandassociates itselfwiththePhule-Ambedkariteideology,thatwillnot onlybenefititbutalsothenation.Thismaynotbeeasy.But then,itisnotexpectedtobe.Theanti-Brahmanismand scientificconsciousnessthatisintegraltoPhule- AmbedkariteideologywillonlyputBJPonastrongideologi- calfooting.Savarkarhimselfwasagainstthecastesystem anduntouchability.Hewasforastrongnationandhehad preparedacanonof,whathebelievedtobe,Indian thoughts,whichhenamed‘Hindutva’.Ifthereissomething ofvalueinit,thereisnoharminitsemulation.Butifthat canonbecomesthebe-allandend-allofBJPideology,then theproblemwillbegin. SincetheBJPnowholdspoliticalpower,ithastotakethe initiative.InmedievalIndia,apoliticalfrontofMuslimand HindifeudallordswasforgedunderAkbar’sleadership.This fronthadcrushedthecraftsmen-farmer,Hindu-Muslim cultural(Bhakti)movement.Buteventoday,historiansand socialscientistsappend‘Great’toAkbar’sname. Our20th-centurynationalmovementtoocouldnot unravelthisriddle.Thesecularpoliticsthatstruckrootsin ‘independent’IndiawasreducedtoajointfrontofAshraf MuslimsandHinduSavarnas.Today’ssecularpoliticsis treadingthesamepath.Itisstandingonitshead.Borrowing Marx’swords,itneedstobeputonitsfeet.TheDalits-OBCs andexploitedclassesofallreligionsandsects,whetherthey befarmersorworkersorwomenorDalitsorTribals,should developanewjointconsciousnessandbuildanewIndiain keepingwiththeiraspirations.ThiswilltrulybeEk Bharat,ShresthaBharat.Thiswastheoriginaldreamof PhuleandAmbedkar. The Dalit-OBCs, who were long bitterly opposing the Brahmanical politics of the BJP, voted for Modi but the results have intrigued them. They should shed their hesitation, put their doubts aside and accept this victory as their own Ü´Õð â×Ø âð ÖæÁÂæ ·¤è Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸè ÁÙÌæ Ùð ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè ·¤ô ¥ÂÙæ Õãé×Ì ßôÅU Ìô Îð çÎØæ ãñ Üðç·¤Ù ¿éÙæßè ÙÌèÁô´ Ùð ©âð ©ÜÛæÙ ×ð´ ÇæÜ çÎØæ ãñÐ ×ñ´ ·¤ãê´»æ, ©‹ãð´ ©ÜÛæÙ âð ÕæãÚU ¥æÙæ ¿æçã° ¥õÚU §â ¿éÙæßè ÁèÌ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè ÁèÌ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Sßè·¤æÚUÙæ ¿æçã° Prem Kumar Mani is a leading Hindi writer and ideologue. A political activist committed to social justice, he is presently the vice president of the Rashtriya Janata Dal Âýð×·é¤×æÚU ×ç‡æ çã´UÎè ·ð¤ ÂýçÌçÙçŠæ Üð¹·¤, ç¿´Ì·¤ ß âæ×æçÁ·¤ ‹ØæØ ·ð¤ ÂÿæŠæÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤×èü ãñ´UÐ §UÙ çÎÙæð´ ßð ÚUæCþUèØ ÁÙÌæ ÎÜ ·ð¤ ©UÂæŠØÿæ ãñ´ðU
  14. 14. JULY 2014 | 14 FORWARD Press ANALYSIS ATIF RABBANI he recently concluded Lok Sabha elec- tions in the country have been a game- changer in more ways than one. They have proved that elections can be won by effectively and strategically using money, media and marketing. They have also busted the myth of the Muslim vote bank. ¥æçÌȤ ÚUŽÕæÙè Üãßè´ Üô·¤âÖæ ·¤æ ¿éÙæß ·¤éÀ ×æ×Üô´ ×ð´ Øé»æ´ÌÚU·¤æÚUè ãñÐ §â ¿éÙæß Ùð Áãæ´ §â ÕæÌ ·¤ô çâh ·¤ÚU çÎØæ ç·¤ Âñâæ,×èçÇØæ ¥õÚU ×æ·ðü¤çÅ´U» ·¤æ ÂýÖæßè §SÌð×æÜ ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ ¿éÙæßè Á´» ÁèÌè Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñ ßãè´ §âÙð Ò×éçSÜ× ßôÅU Õñ´·¤Ó ·Ô¤ ç×Í·¤ ·¤ô Öè ŠßSÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ ãñÐ §â ¿éÙæß ×ð´ Îðàæ ·¤è ֻܻ âÖè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ÂæçÅUüØô´ Ùð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤ô çÚUÛææÙð ·¤è ÖÚUÂêÚU Âñ´ÌÚUðÕæÁè ·¤è €UØô´ç·¤ ©Ù·¤æ ×æÙÙæ Íæ ç·¤ ×éçSÜ× â´»çÆÌ ãô·¤ÚU ×ÌÎæÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ §âçÜ° âôT ¿éÙæß ¥õÚU ¥ËÂⴁط¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ¿éÙæß ¥õÚU ¥ËÂⴁط¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ Elections and minority politics
  15. 15. 15 During the run-up to the polls, every party performed all sorts of antics to woo the Muslims. That was because they believed that Muslims vote en bloc and that they are primarily concerned with issues related to their identity and religion. Among other things, the parties made prom- ises regarding personal law,Waqf properties, Urdu, minority institution status for Aligarh Muslim University and reservations for Muslims. Developmental issues were conspicuous by their absence. The political parties behaved as if the Muslims have nothing do with the social mainstream development and that the leaders of the community are only concerned with themselves and with preserving and perpetuating their hold over the commu- nity. How Muslims can join the national mainstream and what their role in it can be was not the concern of either the key political parties or the representatives of the Muslims. Whenever Muslims are talked about in the Indian con- text, the stratification that informs the community’s social structure is ignored. Muslims are taken to be a homoge- nous community. The entire discourse on minorities suf- fers from this basic flaw. The fact is that, historically, Muslims have been divided into many classes and there are ‘Forward Muslims’ and ‘Backward Muslims’. The Forward Muslims are called Ashraf while the Backward or Dalit Muslims are called Pasmanda. The Muslim commu- nity is as stratified as the Hindus. Prof Imitiaz Ahmed, in his book Caste and Social Stratification among Muslims in India, says that a stratified social structure, based on ‘Jaat Biradari’, which is analogous to caste, is very much in place among the Muslims. This stratification among the Muslims is often ignored – either inadvertently or otherwise. The Sacchar commit- tee, however, seemed to have grasped this stratification very well. In the tenth chapter of its report, the committee presents an excellent analysis of the caste divisions and discrimination among Muslims. The report says that there are three classes of Muslims: first, which suffer from no social inadequacies – Ashraf; second, which can be compared with Hindu OBCs – Ajlaf; and third, which can compared with Hindu SCs – Arjal. The second and third classes jointly form the Pasmanda or Muslim OBC class. Not only the politicians but even the intelligentsia seems to believe that Muslims are a homogenous com- munity. The outcome of this misconception is that the Forward Muslims almost always manage to monopolize the gains from policies and programmes designed for the welfare of the minorities. The majority Pasmanda class – which comprises Dalit and Backward Muslims and which has always suffered socially, economically and politically – is left high and dry, despite forming almost 85 per cent of the community. ©Ù·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð ×ÁãUÕ ¥õÚU ¥çS×Ìæ ¥æÏæçÚUÌ ×éÎ÷Îð ãè ÚU¹ð ÁæÙð ¿æçã°Ð ¿éÙæß ×ð´ ÂâüÙÜ Üæò, ߀Ȥ âÂçžæØô´ ·¤è âéÚUÿææ, ©Îêü, ¥Üè»É¸ ×éçSÜ× çßàßçßlæÜØ ·¤ô ¥ËÂⴁط¤ çàæÿæ‡æ â´SÍæ ·¤æ ÎÁæü çÎÜæÙæ ¥õÚU ×éçSÜ× ¥æÚUÿæ‡æ ·¤è ÕæÌ Âý×é¹ M¤Â âð ÍèÐ çß·¤æâ â´Õ´Ïè ×éÎ÷Îð çâÚUð âð »æØÕ ÍðÐ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ÎÜô´ ·¤æ ÃØßãæÚU §â Âý·¤æÚU ·¤æ ãôÌæ ãñ ×æÙæð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤æ ×éØÏæÚUæ ¥õÚU çß·¤æâ âð ·¤ô§ü ÜðÙæ-ÎðÙæ ãè Ùãè´ ãñÐ ßãè´, ×éçSÜ× ÙðÌæ¥ô´ ·¤æ âæÚUæ ŠØæÙ §â ÂÚU ·Ô¤ç‹ÎýÌ ÚUãÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ç·¤â Âý·¤æÚU °ðâæ ßæÌæßÚU‡æ ÌñØæÚU ç·¤Øæ Áæ° ç·¤ SßØ´ ·¤æ ×ãˆß ¥õÚU ÚUÿææ ·Ô¤ Õ´ÎôÕSÌ ·¤æ Áé»æǸ ãôÐ ÚUæCþU ·¤è ×éØÏæÚUæ ×ð´ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤ô ç·¤â Âý·¤æÚU ·¤è ¥õÚU ·ñ¤âð Öæ»èÎæÚUè ãô, §â ÂÚU ÌçÙ·¤ Öè ç¿´Ìæ Ù ×éØÏæÚUæ ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ÎÜô´ ·¤ô ãñ ¥õÚU Ùæ ãè ×éçSÜ× Ùé×槴Îô´ ·¤ôÐ ¥æ×ÌõÚU ÂÚU ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ÂçÚUÂýðÿØ ×ð´ ×éçSÜ×ô´ ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ×éçSÜ× â×æÁ ·Ô¤ ÖèÌÚU ×õÁêÎ SÌÚUè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ô ÙÁÚU´ÎæÁ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤ô °·¤ °·¤æà× â×éÎæØ â×Ûææ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÂêÚUæ ¥ËÂⴁط¤ çß×àæü §âè ÕéçÙØæÎè »ÜÌè ·¤æ çàæ·¤æÚU ÚUãÌæ ãñÐ ãU·¤è·¤Ì Øã ãñ ç·¤ °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ M¤Â âð ×éçSÜ× Öè ·¤§ü çãSâô´ ×ð´ çßÖæçÁÌ ãñ´ ¥õÚU §â ß»ü ·Ô¤ ÖèÌÚU ¥»Ç¸ð ¥õÚU çÂÀǸð ×éçSÜ× Áñâè Ÿæðç‡æØæ´ ãñ´Ð ¥»Ç¸ð ×éçSÜ×ô´ ·¤ô ¥àæÚUæȤ ¥õÚU ÎçÜÌ Øæ çÂÀǸð ×éçSÜ×ô´ ·¤ô Ââ×æ´Îæ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð ×éçSÜ× ©ÌÙð ãè SÌÚUè·¤ëÌ ãñ´U, çÁÌÙð ç·¤ çã‹ÎêÐ Âýô §çÌØæÁ ¥ã×Î ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ Ò·¤æSÅU °´Ç âôàæÜ SÅþðçÅUçȤ·Ô¤àæÙ ¥×´» ×éçSܐ⠧٠§´çÇØæÓ ×ð´ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ×ð´ ÁæÌ-çÕÚUæÎÚUè Ùæ×·¤ SÌÚUè·¤ëÌ âæ×æçÁ·¤ â´ÚU¿Ùæ ×õÁêÎ ãñ´ Áô ÒÁæçÌÓ ·¤è ã×ÂÂËÜæ ãñÐ ×éçSÜ× â×éÎæØ ·Ô¤ §â SÌÚUè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ô ·¤Öè §ÚUæÎÌÙ Ìô ·¤Öè »ñÚU-§ÚUæÎÌÙ, ÙÁÚU´ÎæÁ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ãæÜæ´ç·¤, â‘¿ÚU ·¤×ðÅUè Ùð ×éçSÜ× â×æÁ ·Ô¤ SÌÚUè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ô ÖÜè-Öæ´çÌ â×ÛææÐ â‘¿ÚU ·¤×ðÅUè çÚUÂôÅUü ·¤æ Îâßæ´ ¥ŠØæØ, ×éçSÜ× ß»ü ·Ô¤ ÁæçÌ»Ì Õ´ÅUßæÚUð ¥õÚU ÖðÎÖæß ·¤æ çßàÜðá‡æ ÂýSÌéÌ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ §â çÚUÂôÅUü ×ð´ ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ ç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ÌèÙ Ÿæðç‡æØæ´ ãñ´ - ÂãÜè, ßð çÁÙ×ð´ ·¤ô§ü âæ×æçÁ·¤ ¥Øô‚ØÌæ Ùãè´ ãñ-¥àæÚUæȤРÎêâÚUè, ßð Áô çã‹Îê ¥ôÕèâè ·Ô¤ â×ÌéËØ ãñ´-¥ÁÜæȤРÌèâÚUè, ßð Áô çã‹Îê °ââè ·Ô¤ â×ÌéËØ ãñ´-¥ÚUÁæÜÐ Áô ×éçSÜ× ¥ôÕèâè (Ââ×æ´Îæ) â´ÕôçÏÌ ç·¤° ÁæÌð ãñ´, ßð ÎêâÚUð ¥õÚU ÌèâÚUð â×êã ·¤ô ç×Üæ·¤ÚU ãñ´Ð ÙðÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ãè Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ ÂýÕéh ß»ü ·Ô¤ ÖèÌÚU Öè ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤ô °·¤æà× â×éÎæØ â×ÛæÙð ·¤è §â ¥æ× Âýßëçžæ ·¤æ ÙÌèÁæ Øã ãñ ç·¤ ¥ËÂⴁط¤ô´ ·Ô¤ çãÌô´ ·Ô Ùæ× ÂÚU ÕÙÙð ßæÜè ÙèçÌØæ´ ¥õÚU ØôÁÙæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤´Îý ×ð´ ã×ðàææ ¥»Ç¸è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ ×éçSÜ× ÚUãÌð ãñ´Ð ×éçSÜ× â×æÁ ·¤æ Õãéⴁط¤-ÎçÜÌ ¥õÚU çÂÀǸð ×éçSÜ×ô´ ·¤æ Ââ×æ´Îæ ß»ü-Áô °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ M¤Â âð âæ×æçÁ·¤, ¥æçÍü·¤ ¥õÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ÎëçC âð çÂÀǸæ ãñ ¥õÚU ·¤éÜ ÁÙⴁØæ ·¤æ }z ÂýçÌàæÌ ãôÙð ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ, ·¤ô§ü Âý»çÌ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU ÂæÌæРȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU çßàÜðá‡æ A HALALKHOR (MEHTAR) IS AS UNTOUCHABLE FOR A HIGH-CASTE MUSLIM AS A HINDU BHANGI FOR A HINDU OF THE HIGHER VARNA °·¤ ª¤´¿è ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ×éâÜ×æÙ ·Ô¤ çÜ° °·¤ ãUÜæܹæðÚU U(×ðãÌÚU) ©ÌÙæ ãè ¥ÀêÌ ãñ, çÁÌÙæ °·¤ ©‘¿ß‡æèüØ çã‹Îê ·Ô¤ çÜ° °·¤ çã‹Îê Ö´»è
  16. 16. 16 JULY 2014 | FORWARD Press ANALYSIS Often, many people, especially Muslim politicians and Ulema, misinterpret the Sacchar committee report to claim that “Sacchar committee has revealed that the condition of India Muslims is worse than that of Dalits”. This is not true. Sacchar panel has, of course, said that on some indices, the condition of Muslims is worse than that of Hindu Dalits. But that does not mean that all Muslims are worse off than Hindu Dalits on socio-economic markers or they are as oppressed and neglected as Dalits are or they are facing the same kind and degree of economic hardship. The reality is that it is the condition of Dalit and Backward Muslims that can be compared with that of Hindu Dalits. For instance, NSS (61st Round) reveals that in terms of income, Muslim Ashrafs are ahead of not only Pasmanda (Dalit-OBC Muslims) but also the Hindu OBCs. According to the available sta- tistics, the per-person-per-month expenditure of Hindu OBCs is Rs620 and of Muslim OBCs Rs605. The corresponding figure for Muslim Forward castes is Rs633. Thus, in terms of income, Muslim Ashrafs are better off than not only Pasmanda (OBC) Muslims but even Hindu OBCs. A Halalkhor (Mehtar) is as untouchable for a high-caste Muslim as a Hindu Bhangi for a Hindu of the higher Varna. In India, minority politics originated as an elite-dominated Muslim politics in response to Hindu fascist politics. The Muslim politics was confined to binaries like minority versus majority, com- munalism versus secularism and witch-hunting versus security. The elite-dominated Muslim politics had no place for democracy. The Ashraf elites ruled over all institutions, including the political ones. Ashfaq Hussain Ansari, in his book Basic Problems of OBC and Dalit Politics, has analyzed the share of Pasmanda Muslims among the members of the first to the fourteenth Lok Sabhas. ¥€UâÚU ×éçSÜ× ÙðÌæ ¥õÚU ×õÜæÙæ â‘¿ÚU ·¤×ðÅUè ·¤æ »ÜÌ ÌÚUè·ð¤ âð ãßæÜæ Îð·¤ÚU §â ÕæÌ ·¤ô ·¤ãÌð Îð¹ð-âéÙð Áæ â·¤Ìð ãñ´ ç·¤-â‘¿ÚU ·¤×ðÅUè Ùð ÕÌæØæ ç·¤ çã‹ÎéSÌæÙè ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ãæÜÌ ÎçÜÌô´ âð ÕÎÌÚU ãñÐ â‘¿ÚU ·¤×ðÅUè Ùð §ÌÙæ ÁM¤ÚU ÕÌæØæ ç·¤, ·¤éÀ âê¿·¤æ´·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ âÎÖü ×ð´ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è çSÍçÌ çã‹Îê ÎçÜÌô´ âð ¹ÚUæÕ ãñÐ §â·¤æ ·¤Ì§üU Øã ×ÌÜÕ Ùãè´ ãñ ç·¤ âæÚUð ×éâÜ×æÙ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ¥õÚU ¥æçÍü·¤ ×ô¿ðü ÂÚU ÎçÜÌô´ âð ’ØæÎæ ©ˆÂèçÇ¸Ì ¥õÚU ©ÂðçÿæÌ ãñ´ Øæ ©‹ãð´ Öè ©âè Âý·¤æÚU ·¤è âæ×æçÁ·¤ ´»éÌæ ·¤æ âæ×Ùæ ·¤ÚUÙæ ÂǸÌæ ãñ, Áñâæ ç·¤ ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤ô ·¤ÚUÙæ ÂǸÌæ ãñÐ â‘¿æ§ü §â·Ô¤ ÕÚU€Uâ ãñ, ãæÜÌ Ìô ÎçÜÌ ß çÂÀǸð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ÕÎÌÚU ãñÐ ç×âæÜ ·Ô¤ ÌõÚU ÂÚU, ÚUæCþèØ Ù×êÙæ âßðüÿæ‡æ (°Ù°â°â) ·¤æ {vßæ´ ¿·ý¤ ÕÌÜæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ×éçSÜ× ¥àæÚUæȤ ¥æ×ÎÙè ·Ô¤ çÜãUæÁ âð Ù çâÈü¤ Ââ×æ´Îæ ×éçSÜ× (ÎçÜÌ-¥ôÕèâè ×éçSÜ×) âð ¥æ»ð ãñ´ ÕçË·¤ ßð çã‹Îê ¥ôÕèâè âð Öè ¥æ»ð ãñ´Ð §Ù ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ô´ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, çã‹Îê ¥ôÕèâè ·¤æ ÂýçÌ ÃØçQ¤ ×æçâ·¤ ¹¿ü {w® L¤Â° ãñ ¥õÚU ×éçSÜ× ¥ôÕèâè ·¤æ {®z L¤Â° ãñ, ÁÕç·¤ ×éçSÜ× ¥»Ç¸è (âæ×æ‹Ø) ÁæçÌ ·¤æ {xx L¤ÂØð ãñÐ §â ÌÚUã, ×éçSÜ× ¥àæÚUæȤ ¥æ×ÎÙè ·Ô¤ çÜãæÁ âð Ù çâÈü¤ Ââ×æ´Îæ ×éçSÜ× (×éçSÜ× ¥ôÕèâè) âð ¥æ»ð ãñ´ ÕçË·¤ ßð çã‹Îê ¥ôÕèâè âð Öè ¥æ»ð ãñ´Ð °·¤ ª¤´¿è ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ×éâÜ×æÙ ·Ô¤ çÜ° °·¤ ãUÜæܹæðÚU (×ðãÌÚU) ©ÌÙæ ãè ¥ÀêÌ ãñ, çÁÌÙæ °·¤ ©‘¿ß‡æèüØ çã‹Îê ·Ô¤ çÜ° °·¤ çã‹Îê Ö´»èÐ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ¥Ëⴁط¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ß¿üSßßæÎè çã´Îê ȤæâèßæÎè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ ÁßæÕ ×ð´ ¥çÖÁÙßæÎè-ß¿üSßßæÎè ×éçSÜ× ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ãé§üÐ ÂêÚUè ×éçSÜ× ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ¥Ëⴁط¤-Õãéⴁط¤, âæÂýÎæçØ·¤Ìæ-Ï×üçÙÚUÂðÿæÌæ ¥õÚU ÏÚU·¤Ç¸-âéÚUÿææ Áñâð çm¿ÚUô´ ×ð´ çâ×ÅU·¤ÚU ÚUã »§üÐ ¥çÖÁÙßæÎè-ß¿üSßßæÎè ×éçSÜ× ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ×ð´ ×éçSÜ× â×æÁ ·Ô¤ Üô·¤Ìæ´ç˜æ·¤ÚU‡æ ·Ô¤ âßæÜ ÙÎæÚUÎ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ÚUæÁÙèçÌ âçãÌ â×SÌ â´SÍæ¥ô´ ÂÚU ¥àæÚæȤ-¥çÖÁÙ ·¤æ ·¤ŽÁæ ÚUãæÐ ¥àæȤ淤 ãéâñÙ ¥´âæÚUè Ùð ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ ÒÕðçâ·¤ ÂýæòŽÜâ ¥æòȤ ¥ôÕèâè °´Ç ÎçÜÌ ×éçSܐâÓ ×ð´ Üô·¤âÖæ ×ð´ Ââ×æ´Îæ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è Öæ»èÎæÚUè ·¤æ çßàÜðá‡æ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ Total number of MPs from first to fourteenth Lok Sabha 7500 400 340 [4.5%] 60 [0.8%] 14.23% 2.13% 11.40% ÂãÜè âð ¿õÎãßè´ Üô·¤âÖæ Ì·¤ ¿éÙð »° ·¤éÜ âæ´âÎ Total number of Muslim MPs from first to fourteenth Lok Sabha ÂãÜè âð ¿õÎãßè´ Üô·¤âÖæ Ì·¤ ¿éÙð »° ·¤éÜ ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎ No of Ashrafs among Muslim MPs ¿éÙð »° ·¤éÜ ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎô´ ×ð´ ¥àæÚUæȤ âæ´âÎ No of Pasmandas among Muslim MPs ¿éÙð »° ·¤éÜ ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎô´ ×ð´ Ââ×æ´Îæ âæ´âÎ Percentage of Muslims in population of India (Census 2011) ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·¤æ ÂýçÌàæÌ (ÁÙ»‡æÙæ w®vv) Percentage of Ashraf Muslims in population of India (They form 15 per cent of the Muslim population)) ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ¥àæÚæçȤØæ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·¤æ ÂýçÌàæÌ (Áôç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ·¤éÜ ¥æÕæÎè ·¤æ vz ÂýçÌàæÌ ãñ) Percentage of Pasmanda Muslims in population of India (They form 85 per cent of the Muslim population) ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Ââ×æ´Îæ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·¤æ ÂýçÌàæÌ (Áô ç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ·¤éÜ ¥æÕæÎè ·¤æ }z ÂýçÌàæÌ ãñ) Source: Ansari (2007); Election Commission of India; Registrar General of India âýæðÌ Ñ ¥´âæÚUè (w®®|); ÖæÚUÌèØ çÙßæü¿Ù ¥æØô» ·Ô¤ ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ð, ÚUçÁSÅþæÚU ÁÙÚUÜ ¥æòȤ §´çÇØæ Muslims in Parliament – A Statistical Profile â´âÎ ×ð´ ×éâÜ×æÙ Ñ ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ð °·¤ ÙÁÚU ×ð´
  17. 17. Thus, according to this study, of the 7,500 persons elected as MPs from the first to the fourteenth Lok Sabhas, 400 were Muslims. And among them, 340 were Ashrafs and only 60 came from Pasmanda castes. If the percentage of Muslims in total population of India (Census 2011) is 14.23, then the Ashrafiya population is only 2.13 per cent (which is 15 per cent of Muslim population).Their rep- resentation in the Lok Sabhas was, however, 4.5 per cent (340/7500), which is double their percentage in the population. On the other hand, the representation of Pasmanda Muslims, who form 11.4 per cent of the total population of India, was only 0.8 per cent. Given the share of Muslims in the population of India, cumulatively, at least 1,000 Muslims should have been elected to the Lok Sabha, but only 400 were. At first glance, it may appear that the Muslims did not get their due. But a closer analysis would indicate that Ashraf (Forward) Muslims got twice what was due to them. It is the Pasmanda (Backward) Muslims who have suffered as they could not get representation in proportion to their population. In the elections to the sixteenth Lok Sabha, not a single Muslim candidate has won from 21 states and six Union territories. Probably, in the history of Indian democracy, never was the number of Muslim Lok Sabha members so low. Only 23 Muslim MPs have been elected.This takes us back to 1957 when also only 23 Muslim MPs were elected. It was in 1990 that the highest number of Muslims – 49 – was elected to the Lok Sabha. Not a single Muslim has been elected from Uttar Pradesh, which sends 80 members to the Lok Sabha. After Independence, it is the first occasion when no Muslim has been returned from UP. These figures suggest that the representation of Muslims is falling. But if the Muslim MPs are segregated into Forward and Backward, then a different picture emerges. Of the 23 Muslim MPs, only one is a Pasmanda; all the rest are Ashrafs. The truth is that the representation of Backward Muslims, which was already low, is falling further. According to Nobel laureate Economist Douglas North, the foundation of the performance of a society rests on both informal and formal institutions built by it. These institutions are endoge- nous, ie the different social, economic, legal and political institu- tions influence one another. Clearly, democratization of one insti- tution will lead to democratization of the other institutions. Now that the sixteenth Lok Sabha is in place and the myth of Muslim vote bank has been busted, the need of the hour is democratization of the Muslim community to ensure that all its classes and castes get representation in its institutions. Also, Dalits, OBCs, Pasmandas and Bahujans need to forge a common front. The Muslim politicians and parties have to decide whether they want all sections of the 18-crore Muslims of the country to be represented in the political institutions or whether they intend to perpetuate the hold of the elite-dominated groups with their communal and identity-based politics and demands. §â ¥ŠØØÙ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, ¥»ÚU ÂãÜè âð Üð·¤ÚU ¿õÎãßè´ Üô·¤âÖæ ·¤è ÈÔ¤ãçÚUSÌ ©Ææ·¤ÚU Îð¹ð´ Ìô Âæ°´»ð ç·¤ ¥Õ Ì·¤ ¿éÙð »° |,z®® â´âÎ âÎSØô´ ×ð´ âð y®® ×éâÜ×æÙ Íð, §Ù y®® ×ð´ xy® ¥àæÚUæȤ ¥õÚU ·Ô¤ßÜ {® Ââ×æ´Îæ ÌÕ·ð¤ âð ÍðÐ ¥»ÚU ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·¤éÜ ¥æÕæÎè ·¤è vy.wx ȤèâÎ (ÁÙ»‡æÙæ, w®vv) ãñ Ìô ¥àæÚUæçȤØæ ¥æÕæÎè w.vx ȤèâÎ (Áô ç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙ ¥æÕæÎè ·¤æ vz ȤèâÎ ãñU) ·Ô¤ ¥æâÂæâ ãô»è, ÁÕç·¤ Üô·¤âÖæ ×ð´ ©Ù·¤æ ÂýçÌçÙçÏˆß y.z (xy®/|z®®) ÂýçÌàæÌ ãñ Áô ç·¤ ©Ù·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéÂæÌ ×ð´ Îô»éÙð âð Öè ’ØæÎæ ãñÐ ßãUè´, ÎêâÚUè ÌÚUȤ, Ââ×æ´Îæ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è Ùé×槴λè, çÁÙ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè vv.y ȤèâÎ ãñ, ×ãUÁ ®.} ȤèâÎ ãñÐ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ¥æÕæÎè ·Ô¤ ×éÌæçÕ·¤ ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎ ·¤× âð ·¤× °·¤ ãUÁæÚUU ãôÙð ¿æçã° ÍðÐ §âçÜ° çâÈü¤ ¿æÚU âõ âæ´âÎô´ ·¤è ×õÁêλè âð Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è Öæ»èÎæÚUè ×æÚUè »§ü ãñ, ×»ÚU ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ô´ ·¤æ Æè·¤ âð çßàÜðá‡æ ·¤ÚUÙð ÂÚU ã× Îð¹ð´»ð ç·¤ ¥»Ç¸ð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ (¥àæÚUæȤ) ·¤ô Ìô ©Ù·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·Ô¤ Îô»éÙð âð Öè ’ØæÎæ Öæ»èÎæÚUè ç×Üè ãñÐ ¥âÜ ×ð´ Ìô çÂÀǸð (Ââ×æ´Îæ) ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è çãSâðÎæÚUè ×æÚUè »§ü ãñÐ v{ßè´ Üô·¤âÖæ ·Ô¤ ¿éÙæß ×ð´ wv ÚUæ’Øô´ ¥õÚU Àã ·Ô¤´Îý àææçâÌ ÂýÎðàæô´ âð °·¤ Öè ×éçSÜ× ÂýˆØæàæè Ùð ÁèÌ ãæçâÜ Ùãè´ ·¤èÐ ÖæÚUÌèØ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ ×ð´ ÂãÜè ÕæÚU §ÌÙð ·¤× ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎ Üô·¤âÖæ âÎSØ Ù ÕÙ Âæ° ãñ´Ð §â ¿éÙæß ×ð´ ·¤éÜ wx âæ´âÎ ãè ÁèÌ·¤ÚU ¥æ Âæ° ãñ´Ð §â·Ô¤ ÂãÜð, v~z| ×ð´ âÕâð ·¤× ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎ ¥æ° ÍðÐ ©â âæÜ Öè çâȤü wx âæ´âÎ ãè ÁèÌð ÍðÐ âÕâð ’ØæÎæ ×éçSÜ× âæ´âÎ v~~® ×ð´ ¥æ° Íð ÁÕ ·¤éÜ y~ âÎSØ ÁèÌð ÍðÐ ©žæÚUÂýÎðàæ âçãÌ w| ÚUæ’Ø ¥õÚU ·ð´¤Îý àææçâÌ ÂýÎðàæô´ ×ð´ âð °·¤ Öè ×éçSÜ× ©×èÎßæÚU Üô·¤âÖæ ×ð´ Ùãè´ Âãé´¿ â·¤æÐ ¥æÁæÎè ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Øã ÂãÜæ ¥æ׿éÙæß ãñ ÁÕ Üô·¤âÖæ ×ð´ âßæüçÏ·¤ }® âæ´âÎ ÖðÁÙð ßæÜð ©žæÚUÂýÎðàæ âð °·¤ Öè ×éâÜ×æÙ â´âÎ ×ð´ Ùãè´ Âãé´¿æ ÁÕç·¤ §â ÚUæ’Ø ·¤è ·¤éÜ ¥æÕæÎè ×ð´ §â â×éÎæØ ·¤æ çãSâæ v} ÂýçÌàæÌ ãñÐ §Ù ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ô´ ·¤ô Îð¹·¤ÚU °ðâæ Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è Ùé×æ§´Î»è ·¤× ãô ÚUãè ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù ¥»ÚU §Ù ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ô´ ·¤ô ¥»Ç¸ð ¥õÚU çÂÀǸð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ×ð´ ÂëÍ·¤ ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ Îð¹ð´ Ìô çȤÚU ßãè ÌSßèÚU çιæ§ü ÎðÌè ãñ-§Ù wx âæ´âÎô´ ×ð´ âð ×æ˜æ °·¤ ãè âæ´âÎ Ââ×æ´Îæ ÌÕ·Ô¤ âð ãñ´ Õæ·¤è âÕ ¥àæÚUæȤ ãñ´Ð â‘¿æ§ü Ìô Øã ãñ ç·¤ Ùé×槴λè Ìô çÂÀǸð ×éâÜ×æÙô´ ·¤è ·¤× ãô ÚUãè ãñ çÁÙ·¤æ ÂãÜð âð ãè ÂýçÌçÙçÏˆß ¥ˆØ´Ì ·¤× ãñÐ ÙôÕðÜ ÂéÚUS·¤æÚU âð â×æçÙÌ ¥ÍüàææS˜æè Ç»Üâ ÙæòÍü ·¤æ ·¤ãÙæ ãñ ç·¤ ç·¤âè Öè â×æÁ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU·¤ÚUλè (ÂÚUȤæò×ð´üâ) ·¤è ÕéçÙØæÎ ©â·¤è ÕÙæ§ü ãé§ü ¥õ¿æçÚU·¤ ÌÍæ ¥Ùõ¿æçÚU·¤ â´SÍæ¥ô´ ÂÚU çÙÖüÚU ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ Øð â´SÍæ°´ ¥æÂâ ×ð´ ¥´ÌÑçß·¤çâÌ Öè ãôÌè ãñ´Ð ¥æàæØ Øã ç·¤, çßçÖ‹Ù âæ×æçÁ·¤, ¥æçÍü·¤, çßçÏ·¤ ¥õÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ â´SÍæ°´ °·¤ ÎêâÚUð âð ¥õÚU °·¤ ÎêâÚUð ·¤ô ÂýÖæçßÌ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ´Ð ×ÌÜÕ âæȤ ãñ-°·¤ â´SÍæ ·¤æ Üô·¤Ìæ´ç˜æ·¤ÚU‡æ ÎêâÚUè â´SÍæ ·¤ô Üô·¤Ìæ狘淤 ÕÙæ°»æÐ ¥Õ, ÁÕç·¤ âôÜãßè´ Üô·¤âÖæ ·¤æ »ÆÙ ãô ¿é·¤æ ãñ ¥õÚU Ò×éçSÜ× ßôÅU Õñ´·¤Ó ·¤æ ç×Í·¤ ÂêÚUè ÌÚUã ¹æçÚUÁ ãô ¿é·¤æ ãñ Ìô ÁM¤ÚUÌ §â ÕæÌ ·¤è ãñ ç·¤ ×éçSÜ× â×æÁ ·¤æ Üô·¤Ìæ´ç˜æ·¤ÚU‡æ ç·¤Øæ Áæ° ¥õÚU â×éÎæØ ·¤è â´SÍæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ÂýˆØð·¤ ÌÕ·Ô¤ ¥õÚU ÁæçÌ ·¤è Öæ»èÎæÚUè âéçÙçà¿Ì ·¤è Áæ°Ð âæÍ ãè, ÎçÜÌ-çÂÀǸæ-Ââ×æ´Îæ-ÕãéÁÙ ·¤ô °·¤ÁéÅU ç·¤Øæ Áæ°Ð ¥Õ ×éçSÜ× ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ô´ ¥õÚU ÂæçÅUüØô´ ·¤ô ÌØ ·¤ÚUÙæ ãñ ç·¤ ßð ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ â´SÍæ¥ô´ ×ð´ v} ·¤ÚUôǸ ·¤è ×éçSÜ× ¥æÕæÎè ·Ô¤ ÂýˆØð·¤ ß»ü ·¤è çãSâðÎæÚUè ¿æãÌð ãñ´ Øæ âæ´ÂýÎæçØ·¤-¥çS×ÌæßæÎè ×æ´»ô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ÕÙð- ÕÙæ° ¥çÖÁÙßæÎè-ß¿üSßßæÎè ÉÚUðü ÂÚU ·¤æØ× ÚUãÙæ ¿æãÌð ãñ´Ð Atif Rabbani worksattheInstituteofSocialSciences,JawaharlalNehruUniversity ¥æçÌȤ ÚUŽÕæÙè ÁßæãÚUÜæÜ ÙðãL¤ çßçß ·Ô¤ âæ×æçÁ·¤ çß™ææÙ â´SÍæÙ ×ð´ àæôÏÚUÌ ãñ´ 17 ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU çßàÜðá‡æ
  18. 18. JULY 2014 | 18 FORWARD Press INTERVIEW ike most of us, you too never anticipated that the BJP would get such a large number of seats.You had even said in Dhaka… Definitely. In fact, I was not ready to give more than 180 seats to the BJP. After polling, I felt that the figure may go up to 200. But 282, I never imagined. Even the BJP never hoped to × Üô»ô´ ·¤è ÌÚU㠥淤ô Öè ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô §ÌÙè âèÅUð´ ç×ÜÙð ·¤æ ¥Ùé×æÙ Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ¥æÂÙð ¿éÙæß ·Ô¤ Âêßü Éæ·¤æ ×ð´ °ðâæ ·¤ãæ Öè Íæ ... çÕË·¤éÜ, ÕçË·¤ ×ñ´ Ìô ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô v}® âèÅUð´ ãè Îð ÚUãæ ÍæÐ ×ÌÎæÙ ãô ÁæÙð ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ×éÛæð Ü»æ ç·¤ w®® âèÅUð´ ÕèÁðÂè ·¤ô ç×Üð´»èÐ Üðç·¤Ù w}w ·¤æ ¥Ùé×æÙ Ìô çÙçà¿Ì ãè ×éÛæð Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ¥Ùé×æÙ Ìô ¹éÎ ÕèÁðÂè ·¤ô Öè Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ×ðÚUæ ØæÜ ãñ L Congress couldn’t create OBC and Dalit leadership ·¤æ´»ýðâ ¥ôÕèâè ¥õÚU ÎçÜÌ ÙðÌëˆß ÂñÎæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·¤è ãU Well-known journalist Kuldip Nayar speaks with FORWARD Press’ Roving Correspondent Sanjiv Chandan ÂýçâhU ˜淤æÚU ·¤éÜÎè ÙñØÚU âð ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ ·Ô¤ ƒæé×´Ìê â´ßæÎÎæÌæ â´Áèß ¿´ÎÙ ·¤è ÕæÌ¿èÌ
  19. 19. 19 win that many seats. I believe that the people voted more against the Congress than for the BJP – because they were dis- appointed with the Congress. Since the people had no option except the BJP, so it got a majority. The AAP is just a budding outfit. Congress did not perform so badly even after the Emergency. This time, people seemed to be seething with anger against the Congress – against corruption, skyrocketing prices and arrogance of being in power. People were boiling from within. The BJP victory has nothing to do with any Modi wave. There were no issues in this election.The level of campaign- ing was very low. Yes, that is correct. Neither poverty figured in the campaign, nor quality education, health and employment. The speeches of campaigners were quite run-of-the-mill. According to a CSDS study, this time, the BJP was substan- tially backed by the EBCs, Dalits and OBCs whereas the par- ties indulging in politics of identity performed poorly.The BSP could not get even one seat. Should this be considered a major shift in politics of identity? Is it on the way to extinc- tion? Or it is too early to say this? It is true that the BSP could not even open its account but the BJP has garnered 282 seats with only 31.2 per cent votes. This has happened for the first time. The votes of the other parties got divided. Only those regional parties whose governments performed well got the people’s backing. Regional parties did spectacularly in West Bengal, Odisha and Tamil Nadu but Mulayam Singh Yadav has been nearly wiped out. Nitish Kumar’s party in Bihar is an exception, whose government did well but still lost. It will be too early to say that the politics of identity is on its way out. This time also, caste did play a role, money did bring in votes; it wasn’t that only religion counted. Modi is being seen as a potential Hitler. Do you think if Modi is able to maintain his popularity for the next 10 years, he would become another Hitler? I don’t think so. He will not become a Hitler. But he may well ç·¤ ÁÙÌæ Ùð çÁÌÙæ ÕèÁðÂè ·¤ô ßôÅU ç·¤Øæ ãñ, ©ââð ¥æçÏ·¤ ·¤æ´»ýðâ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæȤ ßôÅU ç·¤Øæ ãñ, ©ââð çÙÚUæàææ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æÐ ¿ê´ç·¤ ÁÙÌæ ·Ô¤ Âæâ ·¤ô§ü çß·¤Ë Ùãè´ Íæ, ÕèÁðÂè ·Ô¤ ¥Üæßæ, §âçÜ° ÕèÁðÂè ·¤ô Õãé×Ì ç×Ü »ØæÐ ¥æ× ¥æÎ×è ÂæÅUèü Ìô ¥Öè àæñàæß ¥ßSÍæ ×ð´ ãè ãñÐ ·¤æ´»ýðâ ·¤æ §ÌÙæ ¹ÚUæÕ ÂýÎàæüÙ Ìô §×ÚUÁð´âè ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Öè Ùãè´ ÍæÐ Üô»ô´ ×ð´ §â ÕæÚU ·¤æ´»ýðâ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæȤ ÕãéÌ »éSâæ Íæ-©â·Ô¤ ÖýCæ¿æÚU, ×ã´»æ§ü ¥õÚU âžææ ·Ô¤ ¥ã´·¤æÚU ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæȤРÁÙÌæ ×ð´ ·¤æÈ¤è ¥æ·ý¤æðàæ ÍæÐ Øã ÁÙæÎðàæ ×ôÎè ÜãÚU ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ Ùãè´ ãñÐ §â ÕæÚU ·¤æ ¿éÙæß ×éÎ÷ÎæçßãèÙ Öè ÍæÐ Âý¿æÚU ·¤æ SÌÚU ·¤æȤè çÙ¿Üæ Íæ ... ãæ´, ßã Ìô Íæ ãèÐ ¿éÙæß ×ð´ Ù »ÚUèÕè ·¤ô§ü ×éÎ÷Îæ Íè, Ùæ ãè ¥‘Àè ÂÉæ§ü Øæ SßæS‰Ø Øæ ÚUôÁ»æÚUÐ §â ÕæÚU ·Ô¤ ¿éÙæß ×ð´ Öæá‡æ Öè ¥‘Àð Ùãè´ ÍðÐ âè°âÇè°â ·Ô¤ °·¤ àæôÏ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU §â ÕæÚU ¥çÌçÂÀǸô´, ÎçÜÌô´ ¥õÚU çÂÀǸô´ ·Ô¤ ßôÅU ÕǸè ⴁØæ ×ð´ ÖæÁÂæ ·¤ô ç×Üð ãñ´, ÁÕç·¤ ¥çS×Ìæ ·¤è ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜè ÂæçÅUüØô´ ·¤æ ÂýÎàæüÙ ¹ÚUæÕ ÚUãæÐ ÕâÂæ ·¤æ Ìô ¹æÌæ Ì·¤ Ùãè´ ¹éÜæÐ €UØæ §âð ¥çS×Ìæ ·¤è ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·¤è Îàææ ¥õÚU çÎàææ ×ð´ ÂçÚUßÌüÙ ×æÙæ Áæ°, Øæ ·¤ãè´ ßã ¹ˆ× Ìô Ùãè´ ãôÙð Áæ ÚUãè ãñ ? Øæ °ðâæ ·¤ãÙæ ÁËÎÕæÁè ãô»è ? Øã ÁM¤ÚU ãñ ç·¤ ÕâÂæ ·¤æ ¹æÌæ Ùãè´ ¹éÜæ, Üðç·¤Ù ÖæÁÂæ Ùð Öè ×ãÁ xv.w ȤèâÎè ßôÅU Üð·¤ÚU ãè w}w âèÅUð´ ãæçâÜ ·¤è ãñ´Ð °ðâæ ÂãÜè ÕæÚU ãé¥æ ãñÐ ÎêâÚUè ÂæçÅUüØô´ ·¤æ ßôÅU Õ´ÅU »Øæ ãñÐ ÿæð˜æèØ ÂæçÅUüØæ´ ßãè Õ¿è ãñ´, çÁ‹ãô´Ùð ·¤æ× ç·¤ØæÐ Âçà¿× Õ´»æÜ, ¥ôçÇàææ ¥õÚU Ìç×ÜÙæÇé ×ð´ ÿæð˜æèØ ÂæçÅUüØô´ ·¤æ ÂýÎàæüÙ àææÙÎæÚU ÚUãæ, Üðç·¤Ù ×éÜæØ× çâ´ã ·¤è ÂæÅUèü ·¤æ ֻܻ âȤæØæ ãô »ØæÐ ¥ÂßæÎSßM¤Â çÕãæÚU ×ð´ ÙèÌèàæ ·¤é×æÚU ·¤è ÂæÅUèü ÁM¤ÚU ãñ, çÁâÙð ·¤æ× ç·¤Øæ, Üðç·¤Ù çȤÚU Öè ¹ðÌ ÚUãèÐ ¥çS×Ìæ ·¤è ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ¹ˆ× ãô Áæ°»è, °ðâæ ·¤ãÙæ ÁËÎÕæÁè ãô»èÐ §â ÕæÚU Öè ÁæçÌ ¿Üè, Âñâæ ¿Üæ, çâȤü Ï×ü ·¤æ ·¤æÇü Ùãè´ ¿ÜæÐ ×ôÎè ×ð´ çãÅUÜÚU ·¤è Àçß Îð¹è Áæ ÚUãè ãñ, €UØæ ¥æ·¤ô °ðâæ Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ v® âæÜô´ Ì·¤ ØçÎ ×ôÎè ·¤è Üô·¤çÂýØÌæ ÕÙè ÚUãè, Ìô ßð çãÅUÜÚU ·¤è ÚUæã ÂÚU ¿Ü çÙ·¤Üð´»ð ? ×éÛæð °ðâæ Ùãè´ Ü»ÌæÐ ßð çãÅUÜÚU Ìô Ùãè´, ¥ÅUÜçÕãæÚUè ßæÁÂðØè ÁM¤ÚU ÕÙ Áæ°´»ðÐ çã‹ÎéSÌæÙ ·Ô¤ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ×ð´ Øã Ìæ·¤Ì ãñÐ ×ôÎè ·¤ô Õãé×Ì ç×Üæ ãñ, Øã ©‹ãð´ ÕÎÜ Îð»æÐ §â·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ©‹ãô´Ùð Âæç·¤SÌæÙ ·Ô¤ ÂýÏæÙ×´˜æè ·¤ô ÕéÜæ·¤ÚU ·¤ÚU Îè ãñÐ Õãé×Ì ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ßð °ðâè çSÍçÌ ×ð´ ȤæòÚUßÇüUU Âýðâ | 2014ÁéÜæ§üU âæÿæ户¤æÚU KULDIP NAYAR SAYS THE PARTY WAS TOO BUSY PROMOTING THE GANDHI FAMILY AND COULD NOT COMPREHEND THE POST-MANDAL SITUATION ·¤æ´»ýð⠻洊æè ÂçÚUßæÚU ·¤è âðßæ ×ð´ ãè Ü»è ÚUãè ¥õÚU ×´ÇÜ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ·¤è çSÍçÌØô´ ·¤ô â×Ûæ Ùãè´ â·¤è
  20. 20. 20 JULY 2014 | FORWARD Press INTERVIEW become an Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The Indian democracy has that much power. Modi has got a majority. This will force him to change. He has already made a beginning by inviting Pakistan’s prime minister to his swearing-in. He can do such things because he has a majority. Now, he will talk like the PM of India, not like a BJP leader. I don’t think what the VHP people are saying is correct – that he will get the temple built or will abrogate Article 370. There is no doubt that he is a divisive personality. But as the PM, his personality will change. This is the power of Indian democracy. Did his divisive personality draw the people towards him? No. The people were dejected and disappointed due to spiralling prices, unemployment, etc. They thought a change would improve the situation on these fronts. People would observe him for the next six months. And if they feel disappointed, they will form their own opinions, take their own decisions. The government that was ruling the country for the last couple of years was a ‘non-govern- ing’ government. So, if Modi only gives the people governance, if he gives them only an effective administration, they will be more than happy. But at some places, the Hindutvavadis are raising their heads. Some of their organizations are taking the law into their hands. I don’t think these people have much influence on Modi. He is much more influenced by people who believe in governance. For Modi, Arun Jaitley is more important than Ashok Singhal, ie peo- ple who are sensible. It also seems that the dividing line between the RSS and the BJP has blurred to such an extent that it has almost disappeared. Both are no longer hardliners. Jhandewalan and Nagpur are now closer. Modi will listen to the RSS bosses. So, you do not fear a replay of 1975? No. It will be very difficult to impose Emergency now. Now, the consent of six states is mandatory. But what I apprehend is that a ãñ´ ÖèÐ ßð çã‹ÎéSÌæÙ ·Ô¤ ÂýÏæÙ×´˜æè ·¤è ÌÚUã ÕæÌ ·¤ÚÔ´U»ð, ÕèÁðÂè ·Ô¤ ÙðÌæ ·¤è ÌÚUã Ùãè´Ð ×éÛæð Ùãè´ Ü»Ìæ, Áñâæ ç·¤ çßçã ßæÜð ·¤ã ÚUãð ãñ´, ç·¤ ßð ×´çÎÚU ÕÙæ°´»ð, Øæ x|® ·¤ô ãÅUæ Îð´»ðÐ ×ôÎè °·¤ çßÖæÁÙ·¤æÚUè ÃØçQ¤ˆß ãñ´ Üðç·¤Ù ÂýÏæÙ×´˜æè ·Ô¤ ÌõÚU ÂÚU ©â·¤æ Øã ÃØçQ¤ˆß ÕÎÜ Áæ°»æ, Øãè ÖæÚUÌèØ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·¤è Ìæ·¤Ì ãñÐ Ìô €UØæ Üô»ô´ ·¤ô §â çßÖæÁÙ·¤æÚUè ÃØç€Ìˆß ×ð´ ¥æàææ çιè ? Ùãè´Ð Üô»ô´ ·¤ô çÙÚUæàææ Íè ÕðÚUôÁ»æÚUè âð, ×ã´»æ§ü âðÐ ©‹ãð´ Ü»æ ç·¤ ÕÎÜæß âð ©â ÂÚU çÙØ´˜æ‡æ ãô»æÐ ¥»Üð Àã ×ãèÙð Ì·¤ Üô» Îð¹ð´»ðÐ ØçÎ Ù橐×èÎ ãô´»ð Ìô Èñ¤âÜæ ·¤ÚUð´»ðÐ çÂÀUÜð ·¤éÀ âæÜô´ âð Áô âÚU·¤æÚU Íè, ßã ÒÙæÙ »ßÚUÙð´âÓ ·¤è âÚU·¤æÚU ÍèÐ çâÈü¤ ÂýàææâÙ ãè Îð Îð´, »ßÚUÙð´â ãè Îð Îð´, Ìô Öè Üô» ¹éàæ ãô Áæ°´»ðÐ Üðç·¤Ù ·¤éÀ Á»ãô´ ÂÚU çã‹Îéˆß ·¤æ ÂýÖæß çιÙð Ü»æ ãñ, ©â·Ô¤ ¥Ü»-¥Ü» â´»ÆÙ ·¤æÙêÙ ãæÍ ×ð´ Üð ÚUãð ãñ´... ×éÛæð Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ ©Ù Üô»ô´ ·¤æ ©ÌÙæ ÂýÖæß ×ôÎè ÂÚU Ùãè´ ãñ, çÁÌÙæ ç·¤ ßñâð Üô»ô´ ·¤æ, Áô ÂýàææâÙ ×ð´ Ø·¤èÙ ÚU¹Ìð ãñ´Ð ×ôÎè ÂÚU ¥àæô·¤ çâ´ƒæÜ âð ’ØæÎæ ¥L¤‡æ ÁðÅUÜè ·¤æ ÂýÖæß ãñ, ØæÙè ©Ù Üô»ô´ ·¤æ, Áô âð´çâÕÜ (â×ÛæÎæÚ)UU ãñ´Ð ×éÛæð Øã Öè Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æÚU°â°â ¥õÚU ÕèÁðÂè, ÎôÙô´ ×ð´ ¥Õ ¹æâ Ȥ·ü¤ Ùãè´ ÚUã »Øæ ãñÐ ÎôÙô´ ãè ãUæÇüUÜæ§UÙÚU Ùãè´ ÚUã »° ãñ´Ð Ûæ´ÇðßæÜæÙ ¥õÚU Ùæ»ÂéÚU ·¤æ ȤæâÜæ ·¤× ãé¥æ ãñÐ ¥æÚU°â°â ·Ô¤ ÕǸð Üô»ô´ ·¤è ÕæÌð´ ×ôÎè ×æÙð´»ðÐ Ìô ¥æ v~|z ·¤è çSÍçÌØæ´ Ùãè´ Îð¹Ìð ? Ùãè´Ð °·¤ Ìô ßñâð Öè ¥Õ §×ÚUÁð´âè Ü»æÙè ×éçà·¤Ü ãñÐ ¥Õ Àã ÚUæ’Øô´ ·¤è âã×çÌ ÜðÙè ãôÌè ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù ×éÛæð Áô ÇÚU ãñ, ßã ãñ ÚUæCþÂçÌ Âý‡ææÜè ·¤è àææâÙ ÃØßSÍæ ·¤æÐ âÚU·¤æÚU ×ð´ ×ôÎè ·¤æ ß¿üSß ÚUãð»æÐ ßñâð Öè, ×ôÎè Ùð ¿éÙæß Âý¿æÚU ÚUæCþÂçÌ Âý‡ææÜè ·¤è ÌÁü ÂÚU ãè ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ ×ôÎè çâ´»Ü Œß槴ÅU ¥æòȤ Ȥô·¤â ãô Áæ°´»ðÐ ©Ù Üô»ô´ ·¤æ ©ÌÙæ ÂýÖæß ×ôÎè ÂÚU Ùãè´ ãñ, çÁÌÙæ ç·¤ ßñâð Üô»ô´ ·¤æ, Áô ÂýàææâÙ ×ð´ Ø·¤èÙ ÚU¹Ìð ãñ´Ð ×ôÎè ÂÚU ¥àæô·¤ çâ´ƒæÜ âð ’ØæÎæ ¥L¤‡æ ÁðÅUÜè ·¤æ ÂýÖæß ãñ, ØæÙè ©Ù Üô»ô´ ·¤æ, Áô âð´çâÕÜ (â×ÛæÎæÚ)U ãñ´Ð ×éÛæð Øã Öè Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æÚU°â°â ¥õÚU ÕèÁðÂè, ÎôÙô´ ×ð´ ¥Õ ¹æâ Ȥ·ü¤ Ùãè´ ÚUã »Øæ ãñÐ ÎôÙô´ ãè ãUæÇüUÜæ§UÙÚUU Ùãè´ ÚUã »° ãñ´Ð Ûæ´ÇðßæÜæÙ ¥õÚU Ùæ»ÂéÚU ·¤æ ȤæâÜæ ·¤× ãé¥æ ãñ Modi is much more influenced by the people who believe in governance. For Modi, Arun Jaitley is more important than Ashok Singhal, i.e. people who are sensible. It also seems that the dividing line between the RSS and the BJP has blurred to such an extent that it has almost disappeared. Both are no longer hardliners. Jhandewalan and Nagpur are now closer

×