Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

403 views

Published on

- Project Overview

- State BB Map with state base maps and locator services

- Availability Analysis using 2010 census block level housing unit counts

- Mobile broadband drive testing, 6000 miles

- Address points

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
403
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
13
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

  1. 1. Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC
  2. 2. Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission <ul><li>Comcast </li></ul><ul><li>Covad </li></ul><ul><li>Digis </li></ul><ul><li>Direct Communications </li></ul><ul><li>Emery </li></ul><ul><li>Frontier </li></ul><ul><li>Gtelco (Gunnison) </li></ul><ul><li>Hughes </li></ul><ul><li>InfoWest </li></ul><ul><li>Integra </li></ul><ul><li>Leap/Cricket </li></ul><ul><li>Level3 </li></ul><ul><li>Manti </li></ul><ul><li>Myvocom </li></ul><ul><li>Nebonet </li></ul><ul><li>River Canyon Wireless </li></ul><ul><li>SatView </li></ul><ul><li>Skywire </li></ul><ul><li>SouthCentral </li></ul><ul><li>Spanish Fork </li></ul><ul><li>Sprint/Nextel </li></ul><ul><li>Strata </li></ul><ul><li>T-Mobile </li></ul><ul><li>ThreeSixty </li></ul><ul><li>Union </li></ul><ul><li>Utah Broadband </li></ul><ul><li>Utopia </li></ul><ul><li>Veracity </li></ul><ul><li>Verizon </li></ul><ul><li>Wild Blue </li></ul><ul><li>XOCommunications </li></ul><ul><li>XpressWeb </li></ul><ul><li>ATC (Albion) </li></ul><ul><li>AllWest </li></ul><ul><li>Altazip </li></ul><ul><li>American Fiber </li></ul><ul><li>AT&T </li></ul><ul><li>Baja </li></ul><ul><li>Beehive </li></ul><ul><li>Bresnan </li></ul><ul><li>Cache Broadband </li></ul><ul><li>Catapulsion </li></ul><ul><li>CentraCom </li></ul><ul><li>CenturyLink </li></ul><ul><li>Clearwire </li></ul>
  3. 3. Data Submissions: Service Areas, Speeds, Tech Type Infrastructure, Anchor Institutions, etc. Electronic Upload Pen & Ink Web Conference Map Views <ul><li>April 1, 2010 </li></ul><ul><li>October 1, 2010 </li></ul><ul><li>April 1, 2011 </li></ul><ul><li>October 1, 2011 </li></ul>
  4. 4. Where does the data go? <ul><li>National Broadband Map (FCC/NTIA) </li></ul><ul><li>Utah Broadband Map </li></ul><ul><li>State Broadband Policy Making </li></ul><ul><li>Planning / Business Recruitment </li></ul><ul><li>Other Analysis/ Uses </li></ul><ul><li>(data is public) </li></ul>
  5. 5. Overall State Coverage
  6. 6. Service By Address
  7. 7. Technology + Speed Filter: Wireless
  8. 8. Provider Filter: Rural Telecoms
  9. 9. Provider Filter: Rural Telecoms
  10. 10. 10 Day Update Cycle
  11. 11. Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map
  12. 12. Broadband Availability Analysis
  13. 13. 2010 Census Block Data
  14. 14. Process <ul><li>For each Census Block: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>How many providers serve it? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>At what speed? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Using what technology(s) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Summarize Pop. & Housing Units for </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Counties </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Unincorporated Named Places (ex. Brighton, Magna) </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. “ Trimmed Census Blocks” <ul><li>Only Populated Census Blocks </li></ul><ul><ul><li>population and housing unit counts </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Visually ‘Trim’ Unpopulated Areas </li></ul><ul><li>Improved Demographic Density Capability </li></ul>Before After
  16. 16. Results
  17. 17. Class #1: Basic Consumer <ul><li>Case1HUPct </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>3 mbps+ download speeds, and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>0.768 mbps+ upload speeds </li></ul></ul></ul>
  18. 18. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  19. 19. Class #2: Home Office/Entertainment <ul><li>Case2HUPct </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>10 mbps+ download speeds, and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>3 mbps+ upload speeds </li></ul></ul></ul>
  20. 20. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  21. 21. Mobile Wireless Availability July 2011 Field Tests
  22. 22. Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Background <ul><li>Sub Contractor: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Selected through competitive bid </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Isotrope, LLC (Medfield, MA) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Test Plan, Details testing procedures </li></ul><ul><li>Test Period: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>July 4 th – July 23 rd 2011 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>What was tested: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>CDMA, EVDO, GSM, GPRS/EDGE/UMTS, HSPA & LTE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Comparable consumer grade ‘smart phones’ from 6 carriers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ZK Test’s ZK SAMp test/logging platform </li></ul></ul>
  23. 23. Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Goals <ul><li>Goals: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Obtain footprint for different mobile bb technologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Verification of mobile bb provider data submissions </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Inferred voice availability </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Gather performance data for typical ‘consumer experience’ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Signal strength </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Speed </li></ul></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes
  25. 25. Drive Testing, July 4 – July 23, 2010 <ul><li>9328 miles driven 7 million observation pts </li></ul><ul><li>50 Gb of data thru put </li></ul><ul><li>3 road closures </li></ul><ul><li>1 gas outage…0 speeding tickets </li></ul>
  26. 26. Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology
  27. 27. Mapping Infrastructure: Signal Strength <ul><li>A function of: </li></ul><ul><li>Tower distance </li></ul><ul><li>Antennae direction </li></ul><ul><li>Obstruction </li></ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul><ul><li>Power levels </li></ul><ul><li>Congestion </li></ul>
  28. 28. Mapping Infrastructure: Down/Up Link Speed <ul><li>A function of: </li></ul><ul><li>Signal Strength </li></ul><ul><li>Tech/Protocol </li></ul><ul><li>Congestion </li></ul><ul><li>Transaction length </li></ul>
  29. 29. PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage + Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch
  30. 30. <ul><li>May 2011: </li></ul><ul><li>421000 points </li></ul><ul><li>11 complete counties </li></ul><ul><li>3 partial counties </li></ul>Building Statewide Address Points Using Statewide Address Points <ul><li>July 2011 </li></ul><ul><li>Address Pts in used by statewide geocoding web service </li></ul><ul><li>PSAPs, esp. Regional Dispatch </li></ul><ul><li>SST/MTSA </li></ul><ul><li>Statewide Voters DB </li></ul>Maintaining Statewide Address Points Address Point Standards <ul><li>Addressing Stnrd  Data Model </li></ul><ul><li>Address System ! </li></ul><ul><li>Tiered </li></ul><ul><li>Keep it Simple ! </li></ul><ul><li>Voters DB Feedback Loop: </li></ul><ul><li>Clerks </li></ul><ul><li>Integrated </li></ul><ul><li>Map & Web </li></ul><ul><li>Services </li></ul><ul><li>Web Service Δ Reports </li></ul><ul><li>PSAPs, 911 Comm. </li></ul>vote Address Points
  31. 32. Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology
  32. 33. Competition <ul><li>TwoPlusHUPct </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of housing units within county that have 2 or more providers offering services </li></ul></ul>Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
  33. 34. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  34. 35. Class #3: Higher Capacity <ul><li>Case3HUPct </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>25 mbps+ download speeds, and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>10 mbps+ upload speeds </li></ul></ul></ul>
  35. 36. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  36. 37. Services Classes Map Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
  37. 38. Mapped Broadband Technologies
  38. 39. Mobile Availability <ul><li>MobileHUPct </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of housing units within county that have broadband qualifying mobile wireless service </li></ul></ul>Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
  39. 40. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  40. 41. Unserved <ul><li>UnservHUPct </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Percentage of housing units within county that DO NOT have broadband qualifying service </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>< 0.768 mbps download speeds, and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>< 0.200 mbps upload speeds </li></ul></ul></ul>Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet UnservHUPct
  41. 42. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  42. 43. Fall 2011 Mapping Initiatives <ul><li>Interactive Map </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Addition of Community Anchor Institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Highlight capability within Rural Areas </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Generalized Speed Test “weather map” ?? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Explore Business Recruitment-oriented infrastructure map concept </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Fiber-served backbone served areas </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Redundancy </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Address Point dataset grants to counties </li></ul><ul><li>Sharing mobile drive test data to respective providers and partners (Public Safety, etc) </li></ul>
  43. 44. Broadband Map Tour

×