Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Thesis presentation


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Thesis presentation

  1. 1. Co-creation from a consumer perspective<br />Consumer motivations to partake in and success factors of a co-creation initiative<br />13-04-2011<br />Bart Zwartjes<br />
  2. 2. What is co-creation?<br /> “The practice of product or service creation that is collaboratively executed, by both the firm and customer, together at multiple points of interaction within experience environments to create mutual value”<br />(Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004)<br />
  3. 3. Co-creation in theory and practice<br />
  4. 4. Main & sub research question(s)<br />Which factors influence how consumers value the co-creation initiative after participation?<br />What are motivations for novice as well as expert participants to partake in a co-creation initiative?<br />Which factors do novice and expert co-creating consumers perceive as determinant for the success/failure of a co-creation initiative?<br />Which factors influence the success of a co-creation initiative according to firms?<br />To what extent do novice and expert co-creating consumers present similar motivations to participate in a co-creation initiative and factors that determine the success of a co-creation initiative? And what will be the impact for an ideal co-creation initiative?<br />Motivation<br />Co-creation<br />Success factor<br />
  5. 5. Motivationliterature – Hierarchy of Needs<br />Maslowdescribedfiveneedlevels for anindividual. The top 3 can also be related to <br /> co-creation:<br />Belongingness: the need to belong to an online community<br />Self-esteem: Low level (recognition, prestige, status) vs. High level (need for competence, self-confidence, mastery)<br />Self-actualization: to becomeeverythinganindividual is competent of becoming<br />Hierarchy of Needs (Maslow, 1987)<br />
  6. 6. Motivationliterature – Self-determinationtheory<br />Intrinsicmotivations<br />Extrinsicmotivations<br />An individual’s inborn need to feel competent and self-determinant in a specific environment:<br /><ul><li>Need for autonomy: Urge to be in control of own life and act in harmony with integrated self.
  7. 7. Need for competence: Being effective in the environment an individual finds himself in.
  8. 8. Need for relatedness: The need to be connected, interact and care for others.
  9. 9. Externalregulation: Can control an individual’s behavior by stimulating the desire to obtain a reward or avoid punishment .
  10. 10. Introjection: a behavior where an individual feels pressure or tension within the self when the said behavior is not carried out.
  11. 11. Identification: An individual consciously appreciates a regulation or goals and acts by accepting this goal or regulation to be of personal importance.
  12. 12. Integration: Regulations are included in the individual’s beliefs and self evaluation on personal needs.</li></ul>Relation to Co-creation<br />Participant has ability to engage in particular co-creation initiatives, which matches the participants’ preferences<br /><ul><li>Need for autonomy: Providing the participant withchoice
  13. 13. Need for competence: Feedback fromother participants and firm can have positiveinfluence
  14. 14. Need for relatedness: Need to belong to a community and altruism (Maslow)</li></ul>Relation to Co-creation<br /><ul><li>Externalregulation: Monetary incentives (e.g. money, free product) to attract and reward participants for their participation.
  15. 15. Introjection: feeling pressure from environment to participate (e.g. for an excellent CV)
  16. 16. Identification: For gaining human capital or for self-marketing.
  17. 17. Integration: A personal need of a consumer.</li></li></ul><li>Literature – Factors for success of co-creation<br />Provide heterogeneousconsumerswithtasks of different levels<br />Interactionwithothercommunity members<br />Usemonetary as well as non-monetaryrewards<br />Füller (2010) proposed a list of principles to takeinto account whendeveloping a <br />co-creation initiative<br />Give participants a reason to keep returning and contributing to the platform<br />Offer a supportive and empowering environment<br />Direct interactionwith initiator of the challenge<br />
  18. 18. Methodology - Consumers<br />12 participants (4 novices, 8 experts) of two co-creation platforms were interviewed<br />Battle of Concepts<br />RedesignMe<br /><ul><li>Community members can upload new designs for a challenge, initiated by firms.
  19. 19. Design can be: anidea, conceptorfinished product.
  20. 20. Uploaded designs are visiblefor everyone and feedback can be given by community members as well as firms.
  21. 21. Winning concepts are rewardedwithpoints, which can be exchanged in money orproducts.
  22. 22. Battle of Concepts offers challengesthatvaryfromdilemmas in the socialsphere to practical and technicalproblems.
  23. 23. Uploadeddesigns can only be viewed by the initiator of the challenge
  24. 24. The top 20 concepts arerewardedwith a standardamountof money plus points.</li></ul>Participants<br />Participants<br /><ul><li>Everyone can partake in challenges of RedesignMe, onceregistered.
  25. 25. The participants, interviewed for this research, all had background in designing(e.g. education, career)
  26. 26. To participate in a challenge anindividual has to be a studentoryoung professional with a maximum age of 30.
  27. 27. The participants, interviewed for this research, all had different backgrounds, but were mostlystudents.</li></li></ul><li>Impression – RedesignMe and Battle of Concepts<br />
  28. 28. Methodology - Firms<br /><ul><li>Five firms, which initiated a challenge on the RedesignMe platform, were randomlyselected.
  29. 29. The firms differ in size and corporatestrategy.
  30. 30. The challengesvariedfromdesigning a logo, coming up with new packaging up to brainstorming for a new medical product.</li></li></ul><li>Results – Motivations to partake in co-creation<br />To test yourselfagainstothers, using core competences<br />Participants of both Battle of Concepts and RedesignMe indicated to partake in co-creation in order to test oneselfagainstothers.<br />Participants knowtheirown core competencesand usethis to choosebetweenchallenges.<br />Expert participants of RedesignMe addtheircontributions to theironline portfolio, to self-marketthemselves and show core competences.<br />R10 (84-85): “I only focus on developing a skill to solve complex problems. Especially, abstract problems” ……… (176) “yes indeed, it really is a fact of testing yourself.”(Expert participant 10, Battle of Concepts)<br />R4 (115-117): “It has to be something of my interest, so it has to be one of the three things that I do best. I perform less in, for example, creating a marketing campaign.” (Expert participant 4, RedesignMe)<br />R3 (38-39): “Biggest motive for me is adding designs to my portfolio. Enjoying to sketch, enjoying to create idea models.”……… (40-41) “But the main reason is contributing to my portfolio, gaining experience, engaging in my field of study…” (Expert participant 3, RedesignMe)<br />
  31. 31. Results – Motivations to partake in co-creation (2)<br />Possibility to watch concepts of other community members, to do what?<br />Partly to test own capabilities against that of others<br />Expert participants of RedesignMe partly see this as an opportunity to anticipate on the concepts of others during the challenge<br />R8 (83-85): “Yes, that is actually quite annoying. You would like to read the products of others, to see how they dealt with it, so you can learn from them. So it would be nice to… read the reports of others after the deadline has passed.” (Expert participant 8, Battle of Concepts)<br />R6 (140-141): “So the minimum criterion is now that I first would like to see what others do, so I can react upon that.” (Expert participant 6, RedesignMe)<br />
  32. 32. Results – Factors for success - Consumers<br />Interactionwith initiator during the challenge<br />Initiators should be carefulwiththeir feedback during the challenge, do not express favouriteconcepts<br />Receivingattention – Feedback<br />Feedback notoftenmentioned as a motivation to participate<br />Interviews with participants indicatethat participants want to receiveattention<br />R4 (324-328): “A good example of this challenge, in which I participated, was the feedback. There was little feedback provided and the feedback which was provided, from the start, was primarily focused on two participants. Everyone else got the feeling that is was useless to hand in an idea, because the company indirectly had already chosen the winner.” (Expert participant 4, RedesignMe)<br />R3 (436-438): “Yes, I appreciate the feedback. It feels like I cooperated with the company, for the company. That I really add something, and not that I’m just dumping stuff on the Internet. For me it definitely has added value.” (Expert participant 3, RedesignMe)<br />
  33. 33. Results – Factors for success - Firms<br />Concrete, but open briefing of challenge<br /><ul><li>Finding a balance in creativespace for participant and criteria set for challenge </li></ul>Interactwithcommunityduring challenge<br /><ul><li>Difficultto identify what the participants expect from the interaction.</li></ul>R16 (95-96): “So, we tried to stay as close as possible to the….yes, experience environment of the consumer. I think that this appeals to the participants.” (Company 4)<br />R13 (191-192): “I have to say, in the beginning I did not interact that much with the participants, because I found it hard to answer and ask questions.” (Company 1)<br />R17 (321-325): “…we want out of the box ideas and that is the purpose of the RedesignMe platform. And maybe it is impossible to create a certain concept, what we will deal with that in a later stadium. The concepts also have to be refined, it is all about the ideas.”(Company 5)<br />
  34. 34. Conclusion<br />
  35. 35. Implications of the results<br />“…we want out of the box ideas…”<br />“You would like to read the products of others, you can learn from them”<br />“I appreciate the feedback. It feels like I cooperated with the company”<br />“…there always has to be a reward, which can take different forms.”<br /> Formulate a challenge and determine the degree of concreteness and openness for this challenge.<br /> Develop a tool which allows participants to view work of others and interact with each other.<br /> Interact with the participants and share concerns and benefits of concepts with the group. However, beware not to focus on preferred concepts.<br /> Reward the winners by involving them in next steps of the initiative.<br />Explain choice for winning concept (dependent on co-creation set-up)<br />