Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Ensuring Quality in Online Learning<br />Creating the Framework<br />Barry Dahl<br />Excellence in e-Education<br />
Link to wiki with many <br />additional resources<br />http://innovations-e-education.wetpaint.com<br />
Through the use of rubrics and standards related to the quality of online courses (i.e. Quality Matters™), we are sufficie...
Through the use of rubrics and standards related to the quality of online courses (i.e. Quality Matters™), we are sufficie...
QualityMatters is Sufficient<br /><ul><li>Um, no, it isn’t!!</li></ul>QualityMatters looks at the quality of course design...
Alternate case #1: student learning outcomes <br />are not being achieved. Serious problem.<br />Learning Level<br />Is Lo...
Alternate case #2: course design does not <br />“fit the mold.”  Why is this a problem?<br />Learning Level<br />Is High<b...
Alternate case #3: no evidence of teaching,<br />but this might not be a problem. (Ind. Study?)<br />Learning Level<br />I...
Alternate case #4: beautifully designed course <br />but there are serious quality problems here.<br />Learning Level<br /...
Alternate case #5: the most curious case, <br />which probably needs further investigation.<br />Learning Level<br />Is Lo...
Alternate case #5: call this the triple ick.<br />Serious quality problems; probably start over.<br />Learning Level<br />...
Ensuring Quality in Online Learning<br />Let’s get started!<br />Quality Standards of <br />Online Course Design<br />
E-learning Quality Intro
E-learning Quality Intro
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

E-learning Quality Intro

1,521 views

Published on

Slides used for the introduction to eLearning quality by Barry Dahl of Excellence in e-Education.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

E-learning Quality Intro

  1. 1. Ensuring Quality in Online Learning<br />Creating the Framework<br />Barry Dahl<br />Excellence in e-Education<br />
  2. 2. Link to wiki with many <br />additional resources<br />http://innovations-e-education.wetpaint.com<br />
  3. 3. Through the use of rubrics and standards related to the quality of online courses (i.e. Quality Matters™), we are sufficiently addressing the questions about e-learning quality<br />Real ity<br />Myth<br />Clicker question used at e-Learning conferences<br />
  4. 4. Through the use of rubrics and standards related to the quality of online courses (i.e. Quality Matters™), we are sufficiently addressing the questions about e-learning quality<br />Real ity<br />Myth<br />Clicker question used at e-Learning conferences<br />
  5. 5. QualityMatters is Sufficient<br /><ul><li>Um, no, it isn’t!!</li></ul>QualityMatters looks at the quality of course design.<br /><ul><li>That’s good, but it’s only one leg holding up the stool.</li></li></ul><li>Learning<br />Quality<br />Concerns<br />Design<br />Teaching<br />QualityMatters is Sufficient<br /><ul><li>Um, no, it isn’t!!</li></ul>QualityMatters looks at the quality of course design.<br /><ul><li>That’s good, but it’s only one leg holding up the stool.</li></li></ul><li>Ideal case: evidence that all three <br />aspects are occurring at a high level.<br />Learning Level<br />Is High<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is High<br />Course Design<br />Meets Standards<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  6. 6. Alternate case #1: student learning outcomes <br />are not being achieved. Serious problem.<br />Learning Level<br />Is Low<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is High<br />Course Design<br />Meets Standards<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  7. 7. Alternate case #2: course design does not <br />“fit the mold.” Why is this a problem?<br />Learning Level<br />Is High<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is High<br />Course Design<br />Below Standard<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  8. 8. Alternate case #3: no evidence of teaching,<br />but this might not be a problem. (Ind. Study?)<br />Learning Level<br />Is High<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is Low<br />Course Design<br />Meets Standards<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  9. 9. Alternate case #4: beautifully designed course <br />but there are serious quality problems here.<br />Learning Level<br />Is Low<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is Low<br />Course Design<br />Meets Standards<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  10. 10. Alternate case #5: the most curious case, <br />which probably needs further investigation.<br />Learning Level<br />Is Low<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is High<br />Course Design<br />Below Standard<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  11. 11. Alternate case #5: call this the triple ick.<br />Serious quality problems; probably start over.<br />Learning Level<br />Is Low<br /> Learning Assessment<br />Teaching Level<br />Is Low<br />Course Design<br />Below Standard<br />QualityMatters®<br />Performance Eval<br />
  12. 12. Ensuring Quality in Online Learning<br />Let’s get started!<br />Quality Standards of <br />Online Course Design<br />

×