Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

HeLF UK HE Learning Spaces Survey 2016


Published on

The quantitative results of the Heads of eLearning Forum Learning Spaces Survey 2016

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

HeLF UK HE Learning Spaces Survey 2016

  2. 2. AIMS OF SURVEY • the current situation regarding Learning Spaces in UK HE • the focus of and responsibilities for developments • the impact on Heads of eLearning
  3. 3. A network of senior staff in institutions engaged in promoting, supporting and developing technology enhanced learning Over 130 nominated Heads from UK Higher Education institutions A regular programme of well attended events Represents the interests of its members to various national bodies and agencies including the Higher Education Academy and JISC HEADS OF ELEARNING FORUM (HELF)
  4. 4. DEFINITIONS FOR THE SURVEY Learning spaces – formal and informal Learning spaces include both learning and teaching spaces. The survey is about centrally managed spaces and not spaces managed by departments. Formal eg lecture theatre, seminar room (excluding laboratory, computer classroom) Informal eg café, library, open space
  5. 5. The survey was available: • to HeLF members who were asked to respond with regard to their knowledge of their own institution • in May/June 2016 and took about 15 minutes to complete The questions were a mixture of closed multiple-choice/multiple-answer and multiple selection as well as open response type Participants were assured that all data collected in the survey would be held anonymously and securely No personal data was asked for or retained unless the participant indicated a willingness to be contacted in the future The results were analysed using quantitative and qualitative methods 53 responses from 138 HeLF members – 38% response rate METHODOLOGY
  6. 6. POLICY, STRATEGY OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 28.3% 54.7% 17.0% Yes Under consideration No
  7. 7. LS DEVELOPMENTS 36.5% 11.5% 46.2% 5.8% Mainly in formal spaces Mainly in informal spaces Equally in both In neither
  8. 8. NEW DESIGNS OF LS 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Across the whole university In some places Yes Planned No
  9. 9. IT EQUIPMENT IN FORMAL SPACES MAINLY STANDARD 90.6% 9.4% 0.0% Yes No Don't know
  10. 10. HEAD OF ELEARNING INVOLVED IN SETTING THE STANDARD 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Leading Participating in formal committee/working group Meeting with relevant people eg IT, media, academics, students Not involved
  11. 11. FOCUS OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTS IN LS 29.4% 13.7% 56.9% Bringing them up to a consistent standard Maintaining the consistent standard Raising the consistent standard
  12. 12. IT AND SOFTWARE IN FORMAL SPACES 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Video projector or Plasma screen PC and Powerpoint Live lecture capture Wifi Clickers Interactive whtieboards Nearpod or Polleverywhere or Socrative All Most Some None
  13. 13. LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT AS HEAD OF ELEARNING 40.4% 50.0% 9.6% Greatly involved Some involvement No involvement
  14. 14. HEAD OF ELEARNING AND MORE INVOLVEMENT 40.4% 55.8% 3.8% Yes OK with current level of involvement No
  15. 15. AWARENESS OF TOOLKITS 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0% Educause Learning Space Rating System (LSRS) JISC Learning Spaces guidelines UCISA UK HE Learning Space Toolkit
  16. 16. REFERENCES Educause Learning Space Rating System (LSRS) system/about-learning-space-rating-system JISC Learning Spaces guidelines UCISA UK HE Learning Space Toolkit
  17. 17. Dr Barbara Newland CONTACT DETAILS