Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Dr Barbara Newland, Brighton        Lindsey Martin, Edge HillAlice Bird, Liverpool John Moores
eSubmission   online submission of an assignment        eMarking      marking online ie not paper        eFeedback     pro...
   Methodology    ◦ Target group – members of UK Heads of      eLearning Forum representing over 125 UK      HEIs    ◦ Me...
Drilling down (2012 only)    40    35    30                                        eSubmission    25    20                ...
Percentage of responses*8070605040                                                                                        ...
   Recurring use of patchy’ in relation to levels    of adoption    ◦ Typically, experimental/individual/local initiative...
   Evidence of eSubmission becoming more mainstream    ◦ 18/44 respondents indicated increased use of eSubmission, in the...
   Anxieties about eSubmission, eMarking and    eFeedback process    ◦ 31/34 identified one or more anxiety   Need for ‘...
   Comparison of 2011 and 2012 survey    demonstrate    ◦ Emerging trend towards mainstreaming      eSubmission and great...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

E submissionaltc12

321 views

Published on

Pecha Kucha session at ALTC 2012

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

E submissionaltc12

  1. 1. Dr Barbara Newland, Brighton Lindsey Martin, Edge HillAlice Bird, Liverpool John Moores
  2. 2. eSubmission online submission of an assignment eMarking marking online ie not paper eFeedback producing online feedback which could be text, audio etc but not paper In UK Higher Education ◦ eSubmission is becoming more mainstream ◦ There is a shift towards eFeedback.
  3. 3.  Methodology ◦ Target group – members of UK Heads of eLearning Forum representing over 125 UK HEIs ◦ Method – anonymous online surveys carried out in 2011 and 2012. Results ◦ 38 responses in 2011 (30% response rate) ◦ 44 responses in 2012 (35% response rate)
  4. 4. Drilling down (2012 only) 40 35 30 eSubmission 25 20 eFeedback with 15 eMarking 10 eFeedback without 5 eMarking 0 Yes No Dont know
  5. 5. Percentage of responses*8070605040 201130 20122010 0 esubmission as only form esubmission and student esubmission and student efeedback and student can of submission hard copy printed by hard copy printed by choose to print hard copy student department * Institution or department-wide
  6. 6.  Recurring use of patchy’ in relation to levels of adoption ◦ Typically, experimental/individual/local initiatives led by enthusiasts But interest in moving to wider adoption ◦ 12/38 planning to increase adoption substantially
  7. 7.  Evidence of eSubmission becoming more mainstream ◦ 18/44 respondents indicated increased use of eSubmission, in the previous 12 months ◦ only one reference to patchy‘ adoption  replaced by terms such as moving towards, rolling out‘ Some evidence of move to eMarking and eFeedback ◦ Frequent reference to ‘pilots’ and projects to evaluate/test new ways of working 7/44 working on improving technology (not evident in 2011)  better integration  improved robustness  anonymous submission  feedback tool
  8. 8.  Anxieties about eSubmission, eMarking and eFeedback process ◦ 31/34 identified one or more anxiety Need for ‘Balance of progress Vs preserving academic choice’ ◦ Adoption being driven mainly by senior management, learning technologists, students ◦ Fewer examples of academic staff driving adoption
  9. 9.  Comparison of 2011 and 2012 survey demonstrate ◦ Emerging trend towards mainstreaming eSubmission and greater use of eFeedback But ◦ Need for balanced approach when rolling out institutionally to overcome barriersReferences - www.helf.ac.uk

×