Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
OnTrack substance use programs<br />David Kavanagh<br />Jennifer Connolly<br />Dawn Proctor<br />Leanne Hides<br />Steven ...
Our programs based on<br />Successful studies using mailed treatments<br />    Pre-Post SD units<br />		Full		Info/Monitor...
Internet survey (n = 3008)<br />Important web features<br />Easy navigation/search<br />Open access<br />Right amount of i...
Likely use<br />Portal giving advice on websites<br />Online tests/self-assessments with feedback<br />Downloadable fact s...
Implications<br />Rapid access to key elements<br />and within program, a strong initial module<br />Screening, feedback, ...
Current OnTrack programs<br />Alcohol<br />Alcohol & Depression<br />Depression (recurrences)<br />Get Real—psychosis-like...
app to track drinking<br />
Coming soon...<br />Drug diversion (practitioner-assisted)<br />Substance use program for clients<br />“Say when” (binge d...
Usage<br />>35,000 Australian visits over 1st 20 months<br />5.2 pages/visit;  5.0 min<br />2299 users; 1314 in alcohol pr...
What do they use?Alcohol & Depression studyMost frequent “Signpost”  /6 and Tool<br />1	Making Plans Introduction<br />0	W...
So…don’t choose to do allAre they correct?<br />
Alcohol pilot trial (n = 56)Abstinent Days/Wk<br />Time<br />Time x Gender<br />
Drinks per week<br />Time<br />Time x Gender<br />
Days/week over 6 drinks<br />Time<br />Time x Gender<br />Time x Gender x Condition<br />
For greatest reach:  Internet only<br />
Internet survey (3008)<br />If a problem with alcohol, would want <br />Internet only 	19% <br />Therapist support + inter...
Similar responses from 9 focus groups<br />Cautious, somewhat negative re internet treatment<br />Impersonal<br />Skeptica...
…and in interviews with participants of an internet-based alcohol trial<br />I found it hard to get motivated to follow th...
...and might expect therapists to be important<br />Alliance argued to account for substantial variance in face-to-face tr...
Brands & Kavanagh (in submission)<br />RCTs directly comparing no/less vs. more contact<br />Psychological treatment for a...
Low vs. high contact<br />
Alcohol and Depression trial<br />Brief intervention based on<br />Motivational interview—pros & cons, self-efficacy<br />...
Current data suggest-no effect of therapist-brief initially not as effective, but catches up<br />
Since a therapist is preferred by usersdoes it aid retention in program?<br />
Alcohol & Depression (n = 203)<br />	Full program:		No therapist	Therapist<br />Number of logins 	        10.6  		      15...
Need to examine further, whether<br />impacts on initial engagement<br />impacts on retention when going badly<br />more i...
Some strategies flow from epidemiology<br />Co-occurrence is common<br />Often complex problems<br />Similar risk factors ...
DrugInfo seminar: OnTrack internet and smart phone approaches to alcohol misuse
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

DrugInfo seminar: OnTrack internet and smart phone approaches to alcohol misuse

1,063 views

Published on

David Kavanagh, DrugInfo seminar: Information and communication technology. 22 August 2011

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

DrugInfo seminar: OnTrack internet and smart phone approaches to alcohol misuse

  1. 1. OnTrack substance use programs<br />David Kavanagh<br />Jennifer Connolly<br />Dawn Proctor<br />Leanne Hides<br />Steven Edge<br />Jeremy Gibson<br />Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation<br />Queensland University of Technology<br />Britt Klein<br />Swinburne University of Technology<br />Frances Kay-Lambkin, Judy Proudfoot<br />University of NSW<br />Angela White<br />University of Queensland<br />August, 2011<br />
  2. 2. Our programs based on<br />Successful studies using mailed treatments<br /> Pre-Post SD units<br /> Full Info/Monitoring<br /> .85,.85,.88 .65,.50,.49 (Diff .20-.39)<br />Internet trials by others (vs. controls) <br />College samples (mainly normative feedback, preventive)<br /> .13 -.17 (Diff .30<br />Riper et al. (2007) community sample<br /> .69 .13 (Diff .56)<br />Our research with potential users <br />
  3. 3. Internet survey (n = 3008)<br />Important web features<br />Easy navigation/search<br />Open access<br />Right amount of information <br />Easy to understand language <br />Does not require extra software <br />Interesting pages<br />Trustworthy<br />
  4. 4. Likely use<br />Portal giving advice on websites<br />Online tests/self-assessments with feedback<br />Downloadable fact sheets<br />Systems tailoring information to user<br />Observation of free search—max 6.5 min on a site<br />Less if<br />young<br />not 1st site (2 min)<br />
  5. 5. Implications<br />Rapid access to key elements<br />and within program, a strong initial module<br />Screening, feedback, information without login<br />Self-tailoring, self-pacing within the program<br />but with advice on order, pace<br />Attractive, easy to use<br />Minimised text entry; pictorial icons<br />Brief videos to explain concepts<br />Summary pages to refer to<br />Diary, progress summaries<br />
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11. Current OnTrack programs<br />Alcohol<br />Alcohol & Depression<br />Depression (recurrences)<br />Get Real—psychosis-like experiences<br />Family & Friends<br />
  12. 12. app to track drinking<br />
  13. 13. Coming soon...<br />Drug diversion (practitioner-assisted)<br />Substance use program for clients<br />“Say when” (binge drinking) for Better Health Channel<br />Indigenous version of alcohol/drug program<br />Likely<br />Substance use tools for CRC Youth Health & Wellbeing<br />
  14. 14. Usage<br />>35,000 Australian visits over 1st 20 months<br />5.2 pages/visit; 5.0 min<br />2299 users; 1314 in alcohol programs<br />They do come back to the programs<br />Alcohol: Brief Full<br /># logins: 10.4 16.4 ns<br />Duration of use (days) 42.6 69.6 <.10<br />Alcohol + Depression Brief Full <br /># logins: 7.8 10.6 ns<br />
  15. 15. What do they use?Alcohol & Depression studyMost frequent “Signpost” /6 and Tool<br />1 Making Plans Introduction<br />0 Welcome To OnTrack<br />1 Deciding What to Do<br />1 Monitoring<br />1 Feeling Confident<br />1 Building My Support Team<br />1 Making a Plan<br />1 Planning tool<br />2 First Steps Introduction<br />1 Making Plans Feedback<br />2 Mindfulness Intro<br />1 Making Plans Summary<br />2 Activities I Enjoy<br />2 Mindfulness Practice<br />2 Mindfulness Sensations<br />2 Fun Activity Planning<br />2 What I've Got Already<br />3 Closing a Risky Track Introduction<br />
  16. 16. So…don’t choose to do allAre they correct?<br />
  17. 17. Alcohol pilot trial (n = 56)Abstinent Days/Wk<br />Time<br />Time x Gender<br />
  18. 18. Drinks per week<br />Time<br />Time x Gender<br />
  19. 19. Days/week over 6 drinks<br />Time<br />Time x Gender<br />Time x Gender x Condition<br />
  20. 20. For greatest reach: Internet only<br />
  21. 21. Internet survey (3008)<br />If a problem with alcohol, would want <br />Internet only 19% <br />Therapist support + internet<br />18% telephone<br />22% face-to-face<br />35% email<br />
  22. 22. Similar responses from 9 focus groups<br />Cautious, somewhat negative re internet treatment<br />Impersonal<br />Skeptical re validity of assessment, effects of treatment<br />Need for ongoing support<br />Positive comments re<br />Initial step—e.g. screening<br />Anonymity <br />Likely to require more motivation<br />
  23. 23. …and in interviews with participants of an internet-based alcohol trial<br />I found it hard to get motivated to follow the program being web-based<br />I found it hard doing it on my own<br />I wasn’t challenged if I didn’t do the steps<br />Some sort of external accountability might help<br />Maybe you need to have a face-to-face [element]…<br />I think I’m more of a person that needs more of a one-on-one person…<br />
  24. 24. ...and might expect therapists to be important<br />Alliance argued to account for substantial variance in face-to-face treatment outcomes<br />
  25. 25. Brands & Kavanagh (in submission)<br />RCTs directly comparing no/less vs. more contact<br />Psychological treatment for a health problem<br />Not solely preventive<br />Contact not solely involving support groups<br />Paper in English<br />Computer not just an adjunct to face to face<br />Not confound between contact/other elements<br />Presented sufficient data for analysis<br />Prior to December 2010<br />
  26. 26. Low vs. high contact<br />
  27. 27. Alcohol and Depression trial<br />Brief intervention based on<br />Motivational interview—pros & cons, self-efficacy<br />Building social support<br />Concrete goal, plan<br />Full intervention<br />Wide range of CBT, mindfulness elements<br />Full intervention + therapist/coach<br />Regular emails, modified according to progress/issues<br />
  28. 28. Current data suggest-no effect of therapist-brief initially not as effective, but catches up<br />
  29. 29. Since a therapist is preferred by usersdoes it aid retention in program?<br />
  30. 30. Alcohol & Depression (n = 203)<br /> Full program: No therapist Therapist<br />Number of logins 10.6 15.4*<br />% program completed 27% 41%<br />
  31. 31. Need to examine further, whether<br />impacts on initial engagement<br />impacts on retention when going badly<br />more important if depression is higher<br />there are better ways to boost coaches’ impact<br />preference, expectancies are modified by marketing<br />
  32. 32. Some strategies flow from epidemiology<br />Co-occurrence is common<br />Often complex problems<br />Similar risk factors to rest of population<br />Substantial impact on mortality, symptoms, functioning<br />In severe disorder, may have symptomatic impact from small amount<br />Substances compound any cognitive effects of disorder<br />

×