Successfully reported this slideshow.

Django Package Thunderdome by Audrey Roy & Daniel Greenfeld

16

Share

Loading in …3
×
1 of 87
1 of 87

Django Package Thunderdome by Audrey Roy & Daniel Greenfeld

16

Share

Download to read offline

What makes a package useful? What is it about certain packages that makes them must-haves for any project?

We’ll go over topics like: purpose, structure, docs, tests, availability on PyPI and Github/Bitbucket, activity, and more.

We will visit some of the most useful grid categories on djangopackages.com and highlight our top package picks, showing examples of what makes the top packages so great and what could use improvement.

What makes a package useful? What is it about certain packages that makes them must-haves for any project?

We’ll go over topics like: purpose, structure, docs, tests, availability on PyPI and Github/Bitbucket, activity, and more.

We will visit some of the most useful grid categories on djangopackages.com and highlight our top package picks, showing examples of what makes the top packages so great and what could use improvement.

More Related Content

Related Books

Free with a 14 day trial from Scribd

See all

Django Package Thunderdome by Audrey Roy & Daniel Greenfeld

  1. 1. by Audrey Roy and Daniel Greenfeld @audreyr / @pydanny 1
  2. 2. Audrey Roy • Python & Django developer for Cartwheel Web / RevSys • MIT ’04, EE/CS • PyLadies, djangopackages.com, OpenComparison Django Packages Thunderdome (Packaginator) • @pydanny / @audreyr Fiancée of Daniel Greenfeld (pydanny) http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisjrn/6102009780/ 2
  3. 3. Daniel Greenfeld • Python & Django developer for Cartwheel Web / RevSys • Learned Python at NASA • djangopackages.com, OpenComparison (Packaginator), django-uni-form Django Packages Thunderdome http://www.flickr.com/photos/pydanny/4442245488/ • Fiancé of Audrey Roy (audreyr) @pydanny / @audreyr 3
  4. 4. A Year+ of Package Comparisons • We launched djangopackages.com July 2010 • We’ve seen the Django package Django Packages Thunderdome ecosystem grow and change @pydanny / @audreyr 4
  5. 5. Why a Thunderdome? • Pattern: you hear about the “best” package for X, and you use it • Comparison grids on djangopackages.com help • but not 100% effective/objective • Why not a Consumer Reports-style analysis? Django Packages Thunderdome • This is what a Django community manager @pydanny / @audreyr would do 5
  6. 6. Our review criteria What makes your package worthy? 6
  7. 7. 1. Purpose • The name tells you what it does • “django-” prefix says it’s a Django package • Even better if coupled with a related Python package Django Packages Thunderdome • The package addresses a real need @pydanny / @audreyr 7
  8. 8. Scoring: Purpose Range: 0 to +15 • Descriptive name: +5 • “django-” prefix: +5 • Incredibly useful purpose: +5 Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 8
  9. 9. 2. Scope • Small scope, narrow focus is better • Application logic will be tighter • Patching/replacing the app will be Django Packages Thunderdome easier @pydanny / @audreyr 9
  10. 10. Scoring: Scope Range: -5 to +5 • Does one thing: +5 • Does two things: 0 • Does three or more things: -5 Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 10
  11. 11. 3. Documentation • No docs means your app is pre-alpha • Doc strings do not suffice as documentation • If there are dependencies, they should be in your docs Django Packages Thunderdome • Installation steps should be bulletproof @pydanny / @audreyr 11
  12. 12. Scoring: Docs Range: -5o to +15 • Docs folder in RST/Sphinx format: +10 • Displayed on http://rtfd.org: +5 • Lousy Docs (wiki for example): -5 to -20 • Only README + docstrings: -10 Django Packages Thunderdome • No docs: -50 @pydanny / @audreyr 12
  13. 13. 4. Testing • Tests improve reliability • Tests make it easy to advance Python/ Django versions • Tests make it easier for others to Django Packages Thunderdome contribute effectively @pydanny / @audreyr 13
  14. 14. Scoring: Tests Range: -50 to +15 • Public Jenkins site: +5 • django_coverage/coverage.py: +5 • Well done tests: +5 • No Tests: -10 Django Packages Thunderdome • Placeholder tests: -50 @pydanny / @audreyr 14
  15. 15. 5. Activity • When was the last commit? • How frequent are commits? • Are there periodic version updates? Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 15
  16. 16. Scoring: Activity Range: 0 to +15 • Last commit up to 3 months ago: +15 • Last commit up to 6 months ago: +10 • Last commit up to 1 year ago: +5 Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 16
  17. 17. 6. Community • Active community leader(s) • How many people are contributing? • Proper attribution of authors? • CONTRIBUTORS.txt? Django Packages Thunderdome • README @pydanny / @audreyr 17
  18. 18. Scoring: Community Range: 0 to +35 • Active community leader: +10 • Lots of divergent forks? Then no • Number of contributors = # of points • Maximum of 20 points Django Packages Thunderdome • Proper attribution: +5 @pydanny / @audreyr 18
  19. 19. 7. Modularity • “Pluggability” • Installation should be minimally invasive • Do not confuse modularity with over Django Packages Thunderdome engineering @pydanny / @audreyr 19
  20. 20. Scoring: Modularity Range: -20 t0 +20 • Just add to up to these things: • INSTALLED_APPS • MIDDLEWARE • urls.py Django Packages Thunderdome • models.py in a few cases @pydanny / @audreyr • A few custom settings +20 20
  21. 21. Scoring: Modularity • Having to write your own custom code/ backends from scratch • Having to write your own templates • Having to study the code to make it work Django Packages Thunderdome • More framework than pluggable @pydanny / @audreyr -5 for any of these violations 21
  22. 22. 8. Availability on PyPI • Actually on PyPI • Latest release on PyPI • Should not have to go to repo for working version Django Packages Thunderdome • Proper version numbers @pydanny / @audreyr 22
  23. 23. Scoring: PyPI Availability Range: 0 to +30 • Latest release download link on PyPI: +15 • Latest stable release +5 • Historical versions kept on PyPI: +5 Django Packages Thunderdome • Good versioning scheme: +5 @pydanny / @audreyr 23
  24. 24. 9. VCS/Hosting • Great: Github or BitBucket • Okay: Launchpad or SourceForge • Outdated: Google Project Hosting Django Packages Thunderdome • Poor: Your own site @pydanny / @audreyr 24
  25. 25. Scoring: VCS/Hosting Range: -20 t0 +20 • Github or BitBucket: +20 • Launchpad or SourceForge: +5 • Google Project Hosting: +0 Django Packages Thunderdome • Hosting your own VCS: -20 @pydanny / @audreyr 25
  26. 26. 10. License • You need a license • Companies prefer BSD or MIT licenses • http://opensource.org/licenses/category Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 26
  27. 27. Scoring: License Range: -15 to +5 • BSD or MIT license: +5 • Any other formal license: 0 • Custom license: -5 to -15 Django Packages Thunderdome • No license: -15 @pydanny / @audreyr 27
  28. 28. Thunderdome Fight, packages! Fight! 28
  29. 29. A quick warning • We’re just kidding about the fighting • Friendly, “constructive criticism” • Use our feedback to help improve your favorite package Django Packages Thunderdome • Think of us as your friendly Django @pydanny / @audreyr community managers (during the talk) 29
  30. 30. How packages were chosen for this • We sent out a survey and chose the: ★ most commonly-used packages ★ most interesting packages Django Packages Thunderdome • Not direct one-to-one comparisons @pydanny / @audreyr 30
  31. 31. Round 1 API Creation 31
  32. 32. Contenders: API Creation They’re all a little different: • django-piston • django-tastypie • djangorestframework Django Packages Thunderdome • django-xmlrpc @pydanny / @audreyr 32
  33. 33. django- django- djangorestframe django- API Creation piston tastypie work xmlrpc Purpose 10 10 10 15 Scope 5 5 5 5 Documentation -10 15 15 -10 Tests 5 10 15 -10 Activity 0 15 15 5 Community 5 30 27 6 Modularity -10 20 20 -5 PyPI 20 25 30 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 50 155 162 56 33
  34. 34. django- django- djangorestframe django- API Creation piston tastypie work xmlrpc Purpose 10 10 10 15 Scope 5 5 5 5 Documentation -10 15 15 -10 Tests 5 10 10 -10 Activity 0 15 15 5 Community 5 30 27 6 Modularity -10 20 -5 -5 PyPI 20 25 30 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 50 155 162 56 34
  35. 35. django- django- djangorestframe django- API Creation piston tastypie work xmlrpc Purpose 10 10 10 15 Scope 5 5 5 5 Documentation -10 15 15 -10 Tests 5 10 15 -10 Activity 0 15 15 5 Community 5 30 27 6 Modularity -10 20 -5 -5 PyPI 20 25 30 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 50 155 162 56 35
  36. 36. django- django- djangorestframe django- API Creation piston tastypie work xmlrpc Purpose 10 10 10 15 Scope 5 5 5 5 Documentation -10 15 15 -10 Tests 5 10 15 -10 Activity 0 15 15 5 Community 5 30 27 6 Modularity PyPI Jenkins!!! -10 20 20 25 20 30 -5 25 Django Packages Thunderdome http://jenkins.tibold.nl/job/djangorestframework/ VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 50 155 162 56 36
  37. 37. django- django- djangorestframe django- API Creation piston tastypie work xmlrpc Purpose 10 10 10 15 Scope 5 5 5 5 Documentation -10 15 15 -10 Tests 5 10 15 -10 Activity 0 15 Activity 15 5 Community Modularity 5 -10 30 20 Community 27 20 6 -5 PyPI 20 25 30 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 50 155 162 56 37
  38. 38. Winners: API Creation 1. djangorestframework: 162 out of 175 points 2. django-tastypie: 155 out of 175 points Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 38
  39. 39. django- django- djangorestframe django- API Creation piston tastypie work xmlrpc Purpose 10 10 10 15 Scope 5 5 5 5 Documentation -10 15 15 -10 Tests 5 10 15 -10 Activity 0 15 15 5 Community 5 30 27 6 Modularity -10 20 20 -5 PyPI 20 25 30 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 50 155 162 56 39
  40. 40. Round 2 Fundamentals 40
  41. 41. Contenders: Fundamentals 2 utilities: • django-debug-toolbar • django-coverage 2 boilerplate-style “must need” pieces Django Packages Thunderdome • django-extensions @pydanny / @audreyr • Pinax 41
  42. 42. django- django- django- Fundamentals debug-toolbar coverage extensions Pinax Purpose 15 15 15 10 Scope 5 5 -5 -5 Documentation -10 -10 15 10 Tests -10 -10 0 0 Activity 15 15 15 10 Community 35 25 30 35 Modularity 20 20 -10 -5 PyPI 25 25 30 20 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 0 5 5 Totals 120 105 115 100 42
  43. 43. django- django- django- Fundamentals debug-toolbar coverage extensions Pinax Purpose 15 15 15 10 Scope 5 5 -5 -5 Documentation -10 -10 15 10 Tests -10 -10 0 0 Activity 15 15 15 10 Community 35 25 30 35 Modularity 20 20 -10 -5 PyPI 25 25 30 5 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 0 5 5 Totals 120 105 115 100 43
  44. 44. django- django- django- Fundamentals debug-toolbar coverage extensions Pinax Purpose 15 15 15 10 Scope 5 5 -5 -5 Documentation -10 -10 15 10 Tests -10 -10 0 0 Activity 15 15 15 10 Community 35 25 30 35 Modularity 20 20 -10 -5 PyPI 25 25 30 20 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 History unclear 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 on PyPI 5 0 5 Totals 120 105 115 100 44
  45. 45. Winners: Fundamentals 1. django-debug-toolbar: 120 out of 175 points 2. django-extensions: 115 out of 175 points Note that this was obviously not a one-to- Django Packages Thunderdome one comparison, but a purely points-based @pydanny / @audreyr evaluation 45
  46. 46. django- django- django- Fundamentals debug-toolbar coverage extensions Pinax Purpose 15 15 15 10 Scope 5 5 -5 -5 Documentation -10 -10 15 10 Tests -10 -10 0 0 Activity 15 15 15 10 Community 35 25 30 35 Modularity 20 20 -10 -5 PyPI 25 25 30 20 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 0 5 5 Totals 120 105 115 100 46
  47. 47. Round 3 Registration 47
  48. 48. Contenders: Registration Different approaches: • django-registration • Pinax (accounts part) • django-userena (registration+profiles) Django Packages Thunderdome • django-social-auth @pydanny / @audreyr 48
  49. 49. django- Pinax django- Registration registration (accounts) django-userena social-auth Purpose 15 10 15 15 Scope 5 -5 -5 5 Documentation 10 10 15 10 Tests 5 0 5 0 Activity 15 10 15 15 Community 25 35 16 26 Modularity -15 -5 -10 -5 PyPI 15 20 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 100 100 101 116 49
  50. 50. django- Pinax django- Registration registration (accounts) django-userena social-auth Purpose 15 10 15 15 Scope 5 -5 -5 5 Documentation 10 10 Inaccurate authors list! 15 10 Tests 5 0 5 0 Activity 15 10 15 15 Community 25 35 16 26 Modularity -15 -5 -10 -5 PyPI 15 20 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 100 100 101 116 50
  51. 51. django- Pinax django- Registration registration (accounts) django-userena social-auth Purpose 15 10 15 15 Popular Scope unofficial 5 mirror -5 -5 5 with templates? If the Documentation 10 10 15 10 original had templates, Tests common fork5would this 0 5 0 not be needed Activity 15 10 15 15 Community 25 35 16 26 Modularity -15 -5 -10 -5 PyPI 15 20 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 100 100 101 116 51
  52. 52. Winners: Registration 1. django-social-auth: 116 out of 175 points 2. django-userena: 101 out of 175 points Interesting comment from survey: Django Packages Thunderdome “Site registration sucks and using Twitter, Facebook, or @pydanny / @audreyr Google auth is easier” 52
  53. 53. django- Pinax django- Registration registration (accounts) django-userena social-auth Purpose 15 10 15 15 Scope 5 0 -5 5 Documentation 10 10 15 10 Tests 5 0 5 0 Activity 15 10 15 15 Community 25 35 16 26 Modularity -15 -5 -10 -5 PyPI 15 5 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 100 90 101 116 53
  54. 54. Round 4 Profiles 54
  55. 55. Contenders: Profiles Different approaches: • django-profiles • django-easy-profiles • django-userena (registration+profiles) Django Packages Thunderdome • idios @pydanny / @audreyr 55
  56. 56. django- django-easy- Profiles profiles profiles django-userena idios Purpose 15 15 10 10 Scope 5 5 -5 5 Documentation 5 10 15 15 Tests -10 -10 5 5 Activity 0 15 15 15 Community 16 16 16 16 Modularity -5 -10 -5 20 PyPI 25 5 25 0 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 76 71 101 111 56
  57. 57. django- django-easy- Profiles profiles profiles django-userena idios Purpose 15 15 10 10 Scope 5 5 -5 5 Documentation 5 10 15 15 Tests -10 -10 5 5 Activity 0 15 15 15 Community 16 16 16 16 Modularity -5 -10 -5 20 PyPI 25 5 25 0 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 76 71 101 111 57
  58. 58. Winners: Profiles 1. idios: 111 out of 175 points 2. django-userena: 101 out of 175 points Room for improvement: Django Packages Thunderdome Low point values. Few surveyed users knew of a good Django @pydanny / @audreyr profiles app. Some roll their own each time. 58
  59. 59. django- django-easy- Profiles profiles profiles django-userena idios Purpose 15 15 10 10 Scope 5 5 -5 5 Documentation 5 10 15 15 Tests -10 -10 5 5 Activity 0 15 15 15 Community 16 16 16 16 Modularity -5 -10 -5 20 PyPI 25 5 25 0 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 5 Totals 76 71 101 111 59
  60. 60. Round 5 Blogs 60
  61. 61. Contenders: Blogs Again, different approaches: • biblion • django-mingus • django-basic-apps (blog part) Django Packages Thunderdome • django-blog-zinnia @pydanny / @audreyr 61
  62. 62. django-basic- django-blog- Blogs biblion django-mingus apps (blog part) zinnia Purpose 5 10 15 15 Scope 5 5 -5 5 Documentation -10 -5 -10 10 Tests -10 5 5 5 Activity 15 10 15 15 Community 15 32 10 35 Modularity -10 -15 -5 20 PyPI 0 0 0 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 -15 5 Totals 35 67 30 155 62
  63. 63. django-basic- django-blog- Blogs biblion django-mingus apps (blog part) zinnia Purpose 5 10 15 15 Scope 5 5 -5 5 Documentation -10 -5 -10 10 Tests -10 5 5 5 Activity 15 10 15 15 Community 15 32 10 35 Modularity -10 -15 -5 20 PyPI 0 0 0 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 -15 5 Totals 35 67 30 155 63
  64. 64. Winner: Blogs 1. django-blog-zinnia: 155 out of 175 points Most points by a landslide. So many blog packages exist that this gets buried. Django Packages Thunderdome Note that biblion is early/pre-alpha. With docs, it @pydanny / @audreyr could become a promising option for 1 blog per profile sites. 64
  65. 65. Round 6 Tagging 65
  66. 66. Contenders: Tagging A closer comparison here: • django-taggit • django-tagging Django Packages Thunderdome • django-tagging-ng @pydanny / @audreyr 66
  67. 67. Tagging django-taggit django-tagging django-tagging-ng Purpose 15 15 15 Scope 5 5 5 Documentation 15 0 0 Tests 5 0 5 Activity 10 0 5 Community 26 15 12 Modularity 20 20 20 PyPI 25 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 Totals 146 105 112 67
  68. 68. Tagging django-taggit django-tagging django-tagging-ng Purpose 15 15 15 Scope 5 5 5 Documentation 15 0 0 Tests 5 0 5 Activity 10 0 5 Community 26 15 12 Modularity 20 20 20 PyPI 25 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 Totals 146 105 112 68
  69. 69. Winner: Tagging 1. django-taggit: 146 out of 175 points Sets the bar for the other packages. High points for all compared. Django Packages Thunderdome “Stable API and responsive dev” @pydanny / @audreyr “Lots of magic under the hood, though” 69
  70. 70. Tagging django-taggit django-tagging django-tagging-ng Purpose 15 15 15 Scope 5 5 5 Documentation 15 0 0 Tests 5 0 5 Activity 10 0 5 Community 26 15 12 Modularity 20 20 20 PyPI 25 25 25 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 5 5 5 Totals 146 105 112 70
  71. 71. Round 7 Database Migrations 71
  72. 72. Contenders: DB Migrations Only 2 good options to even evaluate: • South • nashvegas Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 72
  73. 73. Database Migrations South nashvegas Purpose 5 5 Scope 5 5 Documentation 15 15 Tests 5 -10 Activity 15 10 Community 30 22 Modularity 20 15 PyPI 25 30 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 0 5 Totals 140 117 73
  74. 74. Database Migrations South nashvegas Purpose 5 5 Scope 5 5 Documentation 15 15 Tests 5 -10 Activity 15 10 Community If nashvegas 22 tests plus one 11 had Modularity other higher 15 20 sub-score, it could have won! PyPI 25 30 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 0 5 Totals 140 117 74
  75. 75. Winners: DB Migrations 1. South: 140 out of 175 points 2. nashvegas: 117 out of 175 points “I’m looking forward to someone else cha#enging this space but South is by far the best that we currently have” Django Packages Thunderdome “South is the de facto standard...sti# run into more @pydanny / @audreyr %iction on managing DB changes than I care for, but it’s a lot better than doing without.” 75
  76. 76. Database Migrations South nashvegas Purpose 5 5 Scope 5 5 Documentation 15 15 Tests 5 -10 Activity 15 10 Community 30 22 Modularity 20 15 PyPI 25 30 Django Packages Thunderdome VCS/Hosting 20 20 @pydanny / @audreyr License 0 5 Totals 140 117 76
  77. 77. Best of the best Who got the most points? 77
  78. 78. Leaderboard 1. djangorestframework: 162 points 2. django-tastypie: 155 points django-blog-zinnia: 155 points (tie) 3. django-taggit: 146 points 4. South: 140 points 5. django-debug-toolbar: 120 points 6. nashvegas: 117 points Django Packages Thunderdome 7. django-social-auth: 116 points @pydanny / @audreyr 8. django-extensions: 115 points 9. django-tagging-ng: 112 points 10. idios: 111 points 78
  79. 79. Honorable mentions What the surveyed users said 79
  80. 80. They also can’t live without • celery & django-celery with redis • django-haystack with pysolr, sometimes whoosh • django-fixture-generator, django-sorting, Django Packages Thunderdome django-pagination, django-uni-form, django-floppy-forms @pydanny / @audreyr 80
  81. 81. Summary The key to a prize-winning Django package 81
  82. 82. Judging Report • http://bit.ly/django-thunderdome-2011 • A detailed report is available (PDF) Django Packages Thunderdome @pydanny / @audreyr 82
  83. 83. Score high on the base criteria • Purpose (0 to +15) • Community (0 to +35) • Scope (-5 to +5) • Modularity (-20 to +20) • Docs (-50 to +15) • PyPI Availability (0 to +30) • Tests (-50 to +15) • VCS/Hosting (-20 to +20) • Activity (0 to +15) • License (-15 to +5) Maximum Score: +175 83
  84. 84. Beyond the base criteria • Run code through PEP8 checker • Aim for 100% test coverage • Elegant, clean, explicit ways of doing things • Django Packages Thunderdome Minimize magical code @pydanny / @audreyr 84
  85. 85. How to get more users for your package Use djangopackages.com to find similar packages • Add a grid (if needed) • Add your package to the grid • Add grid features Django Packages Thunderdome • Make yours better than its competitors @pydanny / @audreyr 85
  86. 86. • Tweet your self-calculated score at @pydanny and @audreyr • We’ll evaluate it ourselves Django Packages Thunderdome • If it ranks high, we’ll help spread the word @pydanny / @audreyr • (conference bandwidth-permitting) 86
  87. 87. Thank you • Twitter: @pydanny & @audreyr • PyLadies meetup/party: Wed 8pm • http://pyladies.com/blog/pyladies- Django Packages Thunderdome meetup-at-djangocon/ @pydanny / @audreyr • PyLadies open space: Thurs 1-1:30pm 87

Editor's Notes

  • A\n
  • DANNT\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • A \ncriterion (SINGULAR) \ncriteria (PLURAL)\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • T\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • D\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • Alternate!\n
  • A\n
  • D\n
  • A\n
  • A\n
  • ×