2. Presentation:
•The business case and benefits in practice
•Are we being too scientific about benefits
management?
•What is the relationship between the business
case process and programme/project
management?
3. What is a Better Business Case?
• A flexible, pragmatic and common sense approach for supporting
business decisions in a wide range of contexts
• The Better Business ‘Five Case Model’ jointly developed by HM
Treasury and Welsh Government
• Investments £5m+ a Three stage process
• Strategic outline case (SOC)
• Outline Business Case (OBC)
• Full Business Case (FBC)
• Provides decision makers with confidence and assurance that they
are making the right decisions (business assurance) and in the
correct way (programme and project assurance)
5. Better Business Cases ask 5 Key Questions
High level benefits identified
Detailed quantification of
benefits
Refinement of benefits through
market testing
Balance sheet impact and
timing of cash releasing benefits
Management of benefits
delivery
6. Practical Application
About the Programme
• £1.4 billion investment programme
2014-2019
• Funding split 50% WG / 50% LA’s
• All 22 Welsh LA’s participating
• Reduce Surplus Capacity
• Improve Educational Outcomes
• Reduce overall running and lifetime
costs
150+ New / improved Schools
9. Programme
Business Case
(PBC)
Outline Business Cases (OBC) and Full
Business Cases (FBC)
Programme
delivery
Identify
Refine &
prioritise
Quantify and
profile
Deliver and
manage
Clear identification of
high level direct and
indirect benefits
Priority benefits
identified (20% that
represent 80% of value)
Approach to
quantification
Benefits
strategy
content
Strategy reviewed and
updated as appropriate
Strategy reviewed and
updated as appropriate
10. Programme
Business Case
(PBC)
Outline Business Cases (OBC) and Full
Business Cases (FBC)
Programme
delivery
Identify
Refine &
prioritise
Quantify and
profile
Deliver and
manage
Clear identification of
high level direct and
indirect benefits
Priority benefits
identified (20% that
represent 80% of value)
Approach to
quantification
Benefits
strategy
content
Benefits
action
plan
content
Stakeholder engagement
plan to commence
‘benefits discussion’
Apply metrics to direct
and indirect benefits
Approach to direct and
indirect benefits (%
claim)
Continued stakeholder
liaison and build
compelling narrative
Profile priority benefits
Record benefits profiles
in economic analysis
(and financial analysis
where appropriate)
Clear delivery plans set
up with SMART actions
and clear
ownership/responsibility
for benefits realisation
Articulation of benefits
review cycle and likely
changes to action plan
over time
Strategy reviewed and
updated as appropriate
Strategy reviewed and
updated as appropriate
11. Programme
Business Case
(PBC)
Outline Business Cases (OBC) and Full
Business Cases (FBC)
Programme
delivery
Identify
Refine &
prioritise
Quantify and
profile
Deliver and
manage
Clear identification of
high level direct and
indirect benefits
Priority benefits
identified (20% that
represent 80% of value)
Approach to
quantification
Benefits
strategy
content
Benefits
action
plan
content
Stakeholder engagement
plan to commence
‘benefits discussion’
Apply metrics to direct
and indirect benefits
Approach to direct and
indirect benefits (%
claim)
Continued stakeholder
liaison and build
compelling narrative
Profile priority benefits
Record benefits profiles
in economic analysis
(and financial analysis
where appropriate)
Clear delivery plans set
up with SMART actions
and clear
ownership/responsibility
for benefits realisation
Articulation of benefits
review cycle and likely
changes to action plan
over time
Strategy reviewed and
updated as appropriate
Strategy reviewed and
updated as appropriate
13. Main Stakeholder
beneficiaries
Benefit
no.
Main Benefit Criteria
Benefit
category
Learners
B1 Improved learning outcomes QB
B2
Appropriate pupil-teacher ratio and reduced age ranges
within individual classes
QB
B3 Improved social and sporting opportunities Qual
B4 Improved appropriate and flexible learning environment QB
Community
B5 Increased community engagement Qual
B6
Opportunity to raise awareness of the Welsh language and
Welsh-medium provision in the locality
Qual
B7 Sustainable primary education in the area Qual
Staff
B8 increased staff morale and wellbeing Qual
B9
Improved professional development opportunities and job
security for teachers
Qual
B10
Reduced age range of learners and reduction in current
range of abilities
QB
B11 Improved leadership and governance Qual
Local Authority
B12 Reduction in backlog maintenance Non-CRB
B13 Reduction in staffing costs CRB
B14 Reduction in premises running costs CRB
B15 Less administrative burden, servicing reduced governance Non-CRB
B16 Reduction (and/or mitigation) of pupil transportation costs CRB
B17
Meeting best practice and regulatory standards for learning
environments
Qual
14. No. Benefit criteria
weight
Option
1
Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5
score
W x S
score
W x S
score
W x S
score
W x S
score
W x S
B1 Improved learning outcomes 19 0 0 8 152 9 171 9 171 9 171
B2 Appropriate pupil – teacher ratio and reduced age
ranges within individual classes
12 0 0 7 84 7 84 7 84 7 84
B3 Improved social and sporting opportunities
8 0 0 4 32 5 40 5 40 5 40
B4 Improved appropriate and flexible learning
environment
9 0 0 7 63 9 81 9 81 9 81
B5 Increased community engagement 6 0 0 3 18 6 36 6 36 6 36
B6 Opportunity to raise awareness of the Welsh language
and Welsh-medium provision in the locality
6 0 0 5 30 5 30 5 30 5 30
B7 Sustainable primary education in the area 12 0 0 7.5 90 8.5 102 9 108 9 108
B8 increased staff morale and wellbeing 9 0 0 8.5 76.5 9 81 9 81 9 81
B9 Improved professional development opportunities and
job security for teachers
7 0 0 6 42 7 49 7 49 7 49
B10 Reduced age range of learners and reduction in
current range of abilities
- - - - - - - - - - -
B11 Improved leadership and governance 12 0 0 5 60 6.5 78 6.5 78 6.5 78
TOTAL 100 0 647.5 752 758 758
16. Are we being too scientific about
benefits management?
• Quantify and claim the 20% of benefits that represent 80% of
the value
• Is this the right approach?
18. Invest in
Public Health
smoking
cessation
campaign
Reduced
number of
smokers
Leads to Leads to
Improved
health of x
people
Leads to
Less GP
visits (£)
Less
treatment
of smoking
related
diseases
(££)
Improved
public
knowledge of
the dangers
of smoking
Leads to
Reduction
in work
lost time
(££££)
Can we claim these
benefits?
Measure
public
knowledge
before and
after –
reasonable
to assume
majority of
increase due
to the
campaign
Assumes
increased
knowledge
translates
into changed
behaviour –
tenuous to
assume this
is due to the
campaign
Assumes health
improvement
due to smoking
cessation but
could be due to:
• The campaign
• Reduction in
disposable
income
• Tax increase
on cigarettes
• Increased
physical
activity
Assumes £
benefits due to
improved
health but
could be due
to:
• Busier at
work
• More
effective
treatments
• Improved
economy and
work
availability
19. Solution?
• Focus on paying for the scheme with direct benefits (anything
over and above this is a bonus)
• Work with stakeholders to develop a convincing narrative for
the large indirect benefits
• Encourage investment decisions to be taken with the full
understanding that indirect benefits cannot be controlled
• Measure programme/project success on delivery of clearly
articulated outcomes (spending objectives)