Students Competition Evaluation Form
Revision 1.1,
Jan. 2012
European Commission
Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev...
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Proposal Information
Proposal No.
Title
Acronym
Evaluator Information
Name
Position
Organization
Co...
Note:
 Please chose the most appropriate item
TO THE EVALUATOR
To what degree are you familiar with the proposed topic?
▒...
II. Quality of Science
Criteria1
Score
1- Scientific significance of the proposal objectives
▒
Justifications:
2- Clarity ...
III. Implementation and Project Plan
Criteria Score
1- Capabilities of the project team (students) to conduct the project ...
IV. Impact of the project results
Criteria Score
1- Novelty of the expected outcome(s)
▒
Justifications:
2- The solution a...
V. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
1- Overall confidence of the success of this project in both technical
implementation and market ...
V. HONORARIUM
As a small recognition for the evaluators’ valuable contribution, ASRF provides
JOD 50 to each evaluator. If...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

ASRF students evaluation form

450 views

Published on

ASRF students evaluation form

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
450
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

ASRF students evaluation form

  1. 1. Students Competition Evaluation Form Revision 1.1, Jan. 2012 European Commission Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 1 / 8
  2. 2. I. GENERAL INFORMATION Proposal Information Proposal No. Title Acronym Evaluator Information Name Position Organization Contact information Email Fax Mobile Phone Mailing Address Research interest keywords1 Note1: For future evaluations Key specialization Acronym Scientific Area Field Selection AF Agriculture, Food and Fisheries Sciences BT Biotechnology CI Chemical Industries DM Drugs & Medicines EE Electrical & Electronics Technologies EG Energy (including renewable energies) EN Environment, (including Climate Change) HE Healthcare IT Information and Communication Technologies MC Mechanics & Construction NN Nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials & new production technologies NS Natural / Pure science SE Security and Safety SH Socio-economic Sciences and the Humanities TT Transport & logistics WA Water, Waste & Utilities OT Other: Please specify Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 2 / 8
  3. 3. Note:  Please chose the most appropriate item TO THE EVALUATOR To what degree are you familiar with the proposed topic? ▒ I am currently active in this specific area ▒ I have carried out research work recently (<5 yrs) in this specific area ▒ I have carried out research work (>5 yrs) in this specific area ▒ My experience is in the general area but I have not worked in this specific area Other comments: Note:  Please complete all questions and explain, where possible, your answers  at least one criteria from each section, to help with a comprehensive view  evaluation forms without supporting explanation can NOT be accepted  In parts II., III. And IV please select values from 0 to 5 to rate the evaluation criteria where 5 is the highest and 0 is the lowest, check the following table1 for description of the score/rate. Value Score Description1 0 Fail The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete information 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses. 2 Fair While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses. 3 Good The proposal addresses the criterion well, although improvements would be necessary. 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well, although certain improvements are still possible. 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor. NC Don’t know or can NOT assess from the available information Note1: Description adopted form EU Framework Program (FP7) Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 3 / 8
  4. 4. II. Quality of Science Criteria1 Score 1- Scientific significance of the proposal objectives ▒ Justifications: 2- Clarity of the project goals and the identification of the problem to be solved ▒Justifications: 3- Measurable outcome(s) of the project ▒ Justifications: Note 1: Please justify your rating, at least one question from each section for the evaluation to be considered valid Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 4 / 8
  5. 5. III. Implementation and Project Plan Criteria Score 1- Capabilities of the project team (students) to conduct the project (refer also to the students supervisors recommendations in the application) ▒Justifications: 2- Clarity of the project partner support and contribution ▒ Justifications: 3- Budget estimation/request adequacy ▒ Justifications: Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 5 / 8
  6. 6. IV. Impact of the project results Criteria Score 1- Novelty of the expected outcome(s) ▒ Justifications: 2- The solution addresses immediate market or industrial need/pain (does the solution meet an identifiable industrial need?) ▒Justifications: 3- Potential impact of the project results / solutions on enhancing the productivity, cost saving or products quality, etc. ▒Justifications: Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 6 / 8
  7. 7. V. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1- Overall confidence of the success of this project in both technical implementation and market introduction (rating of 1 low – 5 high) ▒ Justifications: 2- In your opinion, should the research be successful, where the project will make the highest impact? Environment (CleanTechnologies) Economy/Employment/pro ductivity Public health and safety Social or community benefit (quality of life) Technology excellence Other impacts 2- Funding recommendation ▒ I recommend this proposal for funding ▒ I do not recommend this proposal for funding Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 7 / 8
  8. 8. V. HONORARIUM As a small recognition for the evaluators’ valuable contribution, ASRF provides JOD 50 to each evaluator. If you prefer to decline this compensation, the amount will be re-invested into the fund as a contribution to future funding opportunities. Honorarium payment options 1- I prefer a certified cheque on the following name ▒ Full Name: 2- I prefer to transfer/wire/deposit the amount to my bank account with the following details ▒ 1- Bank name: 2- Bank address: 3- Bank branch: 4- Account number: 5- Swift code if outside Jordan: 6- Beneficiary name: 3- Would prefer to decline and have the amount put in the research fund I would like my name to be published in ASRF website as one of contributors/supporters to ASRF fund ▒ I prefer NOT to mention my contribution to the fund in ASRF website under list of supporters ▒ You are kindly requested to return this form to:  Applied Scientific Research Fund (ASRF)  Email: info@asrf.jo  Tel: +962-6-515-5095  Fax: +962-6-516-1399 Student Competition Evaluation Form - Rev.1 1 8 / 8

×