SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Proposal Submission Rules & Guidelines




                 Revision 4,
               September 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS

             Context and scope .........................................................................................................................3
             1.          Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3
             2.          Submission .................................................................................................................... 5
             2.1.        Calls for proposals........................................................................................................ 5
             2.2.        Pre-proposal checks ..................................................................................................... 5
             2.3.        Submission of proposals .............................................................................................. 5
             2.4.        Reception ...................................................................................................................... 6
             2.5.        Eligibility check ........................................................................................................... 6




Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4                                                                                                                         2/7
CONTEXT AND SCOPE

              This document establishes ASRF’s rules for the proposals submission, and gives the basic
              guidelines the applicants would need to follow.
              The related evaluation, selection and award procedures can be found in separate documents.


              1.          INTRODUCTION


              This call is designed to capture innovative ideas and opportunities at colleges, universities and
              research institutes. We solicit your best ideas on a range of targeted research topics with the
              goal of commercialization, solving industrial needs or community/environmental needs.

              Funding made through ASRF is primarily intended to provide financial support for the
              Principal Investigator (PI) and his/her team of researchers, students and technicians. We grant
              3-5 awards annually each provide cash support for a limited period of one year, renewable up
              to a maximum of three years, typically in the range of $15,000 - $150,000 US inclusive of
              overheads. This can vary depending on the type of research funded.

               Type                     Amount
               Innovation Grant         10,000 ≤ 100,000
               Proof of concept         ≤ 10,000
               Student                  ≤ 1,000


              Applications for financial support from ASRF are generally made in the form of proposals
              submitted electronically.


              The selection & treatment of the proposals rest on a number of well-established principles:

              i)          Excellence. Projects selected for funding must demonstrate a high quality in the
                          context of the topics and criteria set out in the calls.

              ii)         Transparency. Funding decisions must be based on clearly described rules and
                          procedures, and applicants should receive adequate feedback on the outcome of the
                          evaluation of their proposals.

              iii)        Fairness and impartiality. All proposals submitted to a call are treated equally.
                          They are evaluated impartially on their merits, irrespective of their origin or the
                          identity of the applicants.

              iv)         Confidentiality. All proposals and related data, knowledge and documents
                          communicated ASRF & the evaluation committee are treated in confidence.
                          ASRF will take all possible precautions not to disclose the submitted information in
                          proposals outside the review system.



Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4                                                                             3/7
v)          Efficiency and speed. Evaluation, award and grant preparation should be as rapid as
                          possible, c o m m e n s u r a t e w i t h m a i n t a i n i n g t h e q u a l i t y o f t h e
                          e v a l u a t i o n , a n d respecting the timeframe.

              vi)         Ethical and security considerations: Any proposal which contravenes fundamental
                          ethical principles, or which fails to comply with the relevant security procedures may
                          be excluded at any time from the process of evaluation, selection and award. (see
                          Ethics Checklist).

              The call and associated Guide for Applicants may spell out in more detail the way in which
              these rules and procedures will be implemented and, where relevant, which options are to be
              followed.

              The various steps involved in the proposal, submission, evaluation and selection procedures
              are summarised in a diagram in a separate document; refer to “02 Chart for Submission Rules
              & Guidelines”




Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4                                                                                     4/7
2.          SUBMISSION


              2.1.        Calls for proposals
              Proposals are submitted in response to calls for proposals announced through the ASRF
              website, every six months. The content and timing of calls are set when the calls are
              announced. If there are specific notes related to the call, they will be published with the
              announcement. ASRF website http://asrf.jo/ provides access to all the necessary information for
              those wishing to apply to calls, including contact details for further inquiries.

              Calls are considered 'open' until the specified deadline.


              Depending on the objectives of the call, the work programme and call may make a distinction
              between different types of projects.

              In general there will be announcements of three different types.
              i) Specific Calls.
                  These calls would address the needs of certain industries, or will be announced as a
                  response to specific demands of the fast changing market.

              ii) General Calls
                  Calls that will support rising of general innovative ideas

              iii) Special Calls.
                   Calls that may be announced outside the schedule cycle, as a response to a sudden need, or
                   to support a new idea.

              A call will have a two-stage submission and evaluation procedure.
              Applicants first submit reduced or outline proposals (also called pre-proposals). Only those
              whose proposals were evaluated positively at the first stage are invited to submit complete
              proposals in a second stage.


              2.2.        Pre-proposal checks

              When warranted by the nature of a particular call, an informal advisory pre-proposal check
              service may be offered by the CEO. The purpose is to advise potential applicants on whether
              proposals appear to be eligible and within the scope of the call. If applicable, details of the
              procedure for pre-proposal checks will be set out in the relevant Guide for Applicants. The
              CEO may be contacted by phone or email, details can be found on ASRF website.

              2.3.        Submission of proposals
              The call for proposals will have two stages. In the first stage, participants are asked to submit
              an pre-proposal of their proposed collaborative research project through FastLane.

              Usually within 1 month, all submitted pre-proposals would be reviewed, and selected authors
              will be invited to submit a full proposal for the second stage.


Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4                                                                             5/7
ASRF must emphasize that the written language for the pre and full proposals must be
              English.

              Application must be all sent before the announced deadline.


              Proposals should be sent in electronic versions; additional hard (printed) copies are welcomed.

              If more than one copy of the same proposal is received, only the most recent eligible version
              is evaluated.

              Proposals are archived under secure conditions at all times. After completion of the evaluation
              and any subsequent negotiation, all copies are destroyed other than those required for
              archiving and/or auditing purposes.

              Ethics check list should be sent along with the agreement, Refer to Document “04 Ethics
              Checklist”

              2.4.        Reception

              The date and time of receipt of the last version of submitted proposals are recorded. After the
              call closure, an acknowledgement of receipt is sent to the applicant by e-mail containing:

              –           Proposal title, acronym and unique proposal identifier (proposal number);

              –           Name of the programme and/or activity/research area and call identifier to which the
                          proposal was addressed;

              –           Date and time of receipt (which is set to the time of the call deadline for proposals
                          submitted electronically).

              There is normally no further contact between ASRF and applicants on their proposal
              until after completion of the evaluation, except for proposals which are subject to hearings
              or where applicant is called for negotiation. ASRF may, however, contact an applicant in order
              to clarify matters such as eligibility.

              2.5.        Eligibility check

              Proposals must fulfil all of the eligibility criteria if they are to be retained for evaluation.
              These criteria are rigorously applied. Each stage is subject to an eligibility check. The
              following eligibility criteria apply to all proposals submitted under a call.

              –           Receipt of proposal before the deadline date and time established in the call, if
                          applicable.
              –           Completeness of the proposal, i.e. the presence of all requested administrative forms
                          and the proposal description (N.B. the completeness of the information contained in
                          the proposal will be for the experts to evaluate; the eligibility checks only apply to
                          the presence of the appropriate parts of the proposal).

              –           Scope of the call: the content of the proposal must relate to the topic(s) and funding
                          scheme(s) set out in t h e a n n o u n c e m e n t o f the call (in the case of Specific &
                          Special Calls). A proposal will only be deemed ineligible on grounds of „scope‟ in
                          clear-cut cases.


Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4                                                                                  6/7
–           Applicants must have an affiliation, where the latter will be responsible for all the
                          legal issues related to the project. An individual is also welcome to apply, in that case,
                          ASRF will help find him an affiliate where he could conduct his research.


              If it becomes clear before, during or after the evaluation phase that one or more of the
              eligibility criteria have not been fulfilled, the proposal is declared ineligible, and is withdrawn
              from any further examination. Where there is a doubt on the eligibility of a proposal, ASRF
              reserves the right to proceed with the evaluation, pending a final decision on eligibility. The
              fact that a proposal is evaluated in such circumstances does not constitute proof of its
              eligibility.



              3.          Communication and announcement of selected/reject proposal


              Shortly after the call deadline, ASRF will send an acknowledgement of receipt to the e-mail address
              given in the submitted proposal.

              The applicant may be called for hearing during evaluation phase to give further illustrations about their
              proposal.

              The applicant shall be informed of evaluation result.

              If application is approved, applicant and affiliate shall be called to sign agreements with the first party, the
              funder, milestones shall be agreed, and start of project shall be announced.
              Principle investigator shall also give written confirmation assuring the project is his idea & could not be
              found anywhere through a literature search.




Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4                                                                                     7/7

More Related Content

Similar to ASRF Submission rules & guidelines

Procurement seminar
Procurement seminarProcurement seminar
Procurement seminarshabbirjaved
 
Research Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for Success
Research Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for SuccessResearch Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for Success
Research Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for SuccessWilfrid Laurier University
 
Wb consultant 2b
Wb consultant 2bWb consultant 2b
Wb consultant 2bJoy Irman
 
2014 12 grant process
2014 12 grant process2014 12 grant process
2014 12 grant processElchinMelikov
 
Peer Review and Grant Management Michael Dinges
Peer Review and Grant Management Michael DingesPeer Review and Grant Management Michael Dinges
Peer Review and Grant Management Michael DingesMEYS, MŠMT in Czech
 
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to Ppply
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to PpplyAoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to Ppply
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to PpplyAssociation of Colleges
 
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - application
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - applicationAoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - application
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - applicationAssociation of Colleges
 
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdfGrant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdfDHIVAKAR33
 
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdfGrant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdfssuser4982021
 
Technical report writing skills for civil engineers pdf
Technical report writing skills for civil engineers pdfTechnical report writing skills for civil engineers pdf
Technical report writing skills for civil engineers pdfSaqib Imran
 
Complaints and Customer Feedback Policy and Procedures
Complaints and Customer Feedback Policy and ProceduresComplaints and Customer Feedback Policy and Procedures
Complaints and Customer Feedback Policy and ProceduresThe Pathway Group
 

Similar to ASRF Submission rules & guidelines (20)

Applied Scientific Research Fund
Applied Scientific Research FundApplied Scientific Research Fund
Applied Scientific Research Fund
 
RFP
RFPRFP
RFP
 
Procurement seminar
Procurement seminarProcurement seminar
Procurement seminar
 
Research Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for Success
Research Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for SuccessResearch Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for Success
Research Week 2014: CIHR: Opportunities, Eligibility, and Strategies for Success
 
Wb consultant 2b
Wb consultant 2bWb consultant 2b
Wb consultant 2b
 
2014 12 grant process
2014 12 grant process2014 12 grant process
2014 12 grant process
 
ASRF Application Form
ASRF Application FormASRF Application Form
ASRF Application Form
 
Research projects080921 (1)
Research projects080921 (1)Research projects080921 (1)
Research projects080921 (1)
 
Assessment Handbook 2013
Assessment Handbook 2013Assessment Handbook 2013
Assessment Handbook 2013
 
Peer Review and Grant Management Michael Dinges
Peer Review and Grant Management Michael DingesPeer Review and Grant Management Michael Dinges
Peer Review and Grant Management Michael Dinges
 
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to Ppply
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to PpplyAoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to Ppply
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 - How to Ppply
 
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - application
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - applicationAoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - application
AoC Beacon Awards 2014-15 prospectus - application
 
Webinar for Applicants - EPA Research Call 2022
Webinar for Applicants - EPA Research Call 2022Webinar for Applicants - EPA Research Call 2022
Webinar for Applicants - EPA Research Call 2022
 
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdfGrant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
 
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdfGrant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
Grant-Awarding-user-guide.pdf
 
Research Ethics Basics
Research Ethics BasicsResearch Ethics Basics
Research Ethics Basics
 
Development of SBAS-Enabled Shipborne Receivers
Development of SBAS-Enabled Shipborne Receivers Development of SBAS-Enabled Shipborne Receivers
Development of SBAS-Enabled Shipborne Receivers
 
Technical report writing skills for civil engineers pdf
Technical report writing skills for civil engineers pdfTechnical report writing skills for civil engineers pdf
Technical report writing skills for civil engineers pdf
 
Complaints and Customer Feedback Policy and Procedures
Complaints and Customer Feedback Policy and ProceduresComplaints and Customer Feedback Policy and Procedures
Complaints and Customer Feedback Policy and Procedures
 
Applied Scientific Research Fund
Applied Scientific Research FundApplied Scientific Research Fund
Applied Scientific Research Fund
 

More from Applied Scientific Research Fund (8)

ASRF students competition 2011 wining projects
ASRF students competition 2011 wining projectsASRF students competition 2011 wining projects
ASRF students competition 2011 wining projects
 
ASRF students evaluation form
ASRF students evaluation formASRF students evaluation form
ASRF students evaluation form
 
ASRF students competition application form
ASRF students competition application formASRF students competition application form
ASRF students competition application form
 
ASRF ethics checklist
ASRF ethics checklistASRF ethics checklist
ASRF ethics checklist
 
ASRF chart for submission rules & guidelines
ASRF chart for submission rules & guidelinesASRF chart for submission rules & guidelines
ASRF chart for submission rules & guidelines
 
ASRF SDIG evaluation form
ASRF SDIG evaluation formASRF SDIG evaluation form
ASRF SDIG evaluation form
 
Asrf poc application form
Asrf poc application formAsrf poc application form
Asrf poc application form
 
Asrf poc evaluation form
Asrf poc evaluation formAsrf poc evaluation form
Asrf poc evaluation form
 

Recently uploaded

Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESSALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESmohitsingh558521
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfPrecisely
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfLoriGlavin3
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionDilum Bandara
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESSALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 

ASRF Submission rules & guidelines

  • 1. Proposal Submission Rules & Guidelines Revision 4, September 2011
  • 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS Context and scope .........................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 2. Submission .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Calls for proposals........................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Pre-proposal checks ..................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Submission of proposals .............................................................................................. 5 2.4. Reception ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.5. Eligibility check ........................................................................................................... 6 Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4 2/7
  • 3. CONTEXT AND SCOPE This document establishes ASRF’s rules for the proposals submission, and gives the basic guidelines the applicants would need to follow. The related evaluation, selection and award procedures can be found in separate documents. 1. INTRODUCTION This call is designed to capture innovative ideas and opportunities at colleges, universities and research institutes. We solicit your best ideas on a range of targeted research topics with the goal of commercialization, solving industrial needs or community/environmental needs. Funding made through ASRF is primarily intended to provide financial support for the Principal Investigator (PI) and his/her team of researchers, students and technicians. We grant 3-5 awards annually each provide cash support for a limited period of one year, renewable up to a maximum of three years, typically in the range of $15,000 - $150,000 US inclusive of overheads. This can vary depending on the type of research funded. Type Amount Innovation Grant 10,000 ≤ 100,000 Proof of concept ≤ 10,000 Student ≤ 1,000 Applications for financial support from ASRF are generally made in the form of proposals submitted electronically. The selection & treatment of the proposals rest on a number of well-established principles: i) Excellence. Projects selected for funding must demonstrate a high quality in the context of the topics and criteria set out in the calls. ii) Transparency. Funding decisions must be based on clearly described rules and procedures, and applicants should receive adequate feedback on the outcome of the evaluation of their proposals. iii) Fairness and impartiality. All proposals submitted to a call are treated equally. They are evaluated impartially on their merits, irrespective of their origin or the identity of the applicants. iv) Confidentiality. All proposals and related data, knowledge and documents communicated ASRF & the evaluation committee are treated in confidence. ASRF will take all possible precautions not to disclose the submitted information in proposals outside the review system. Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4 3/7
  • 4. v) Efficiency and speed. Evaluation, award and grant preparation should be as rapid as possible, c o m m e n s u r a t e w i t h m a i n t a i n i n g t h e q u a l i t y o f t h e e v a l u a t i o n , a n d respecting the timeframe. vi) Ethical and security considerations: Any proposal which contravenes fundamental ethical principles, or which fails to comply with the relevant security procedures may be excluded at any time from the process of evaluation, selection and award. (see Ethics Checklist). The call and associated Guide for Applicants may spell out in more detail the way in which these rules and procedures will be implemented and, where relevant, which options are to be followed. The various steps involved in the proposal, submission, evaluation and selection procedures are summarised in a diagram in a separate document; refer to “02 Chart for Submission Rules & Guidelines” Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4 4/7
  • 5. 2. SUBMISSION 2.1. Calls for proposals Proposals are submitted in response to calls for proposals announced through the ASRF website, every six months. The content and timing of calls are set when the calls are announced. If there are specific notes related to the call, they will be published with the announcement. ASRF website http://asrf.jo/ provides access to all the necessary information for those wishing to apply to calls, including contact details for further inquiries. Calls are considered 'open' until the specified deadline. Depending on the objectives of the call, the work programme and call may make a distinction between different types of projects. In general there will be announcements of three different types. i) Specific Calls. These calls would address the needs of certain industries, or will be announced as a response to specific demands of the fast changing market. ii) General Calls Calls that will support rising of general innovative ideas iii) Special Calls. Calls that may be announced outside the schedule cycle, as a response to a sudden need, or to support a new idea. A call will have a two-stage submission and evaluation procedure. Applicants first submit reduced or outline proposals (also called pre-proposals). Only those whose proposals were evaluated positively at the first stage are invited to submit complete proposals in a second stage. 2.2. Pre-proposal checks When warranted by the nature of a particular call, an informal advisory pre-proposal check service may be offered by the CEO. The purpose is to advise potential applicants on whether proposals appear to be eligible and within the scope of the call. If applicable, details of the procedure for pre-proposal checks will be set out in the relevant Guide for Applicants. The CEO may be contacted by phone or email, details can be found on ASRF website. 2.3. Submission of proposals The call for proposals will have two stages. In the first stage, participants are asked to submit an pre-proposal of their proposed collaborative research project through FastLane. Usually within 1 month, all submitted pre-proposals would be reviewed, and selected authors will be invited to submit a full proposal for the second stage. Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4 5/7
  • 6. ASRF must emphasize that the written language for the pre and full proposals must be English. Application must be all sent before the announced deadline. Proposals should be sent in electronic versions; additional hard (printed) copies are welcomed. If more than one copy of the same proposal is received, only the most recent eligible version is evaluated. Proposals are archived under secure conditions at all times. After completion of the evaluation and any subsequent negotiation, all copies are destroyed other than those required for archiving and/or auditing purposes. Ethics check list should be sent along with the agreement, Refer to Document “04 Ethics Checklist” 2.4. Reception The date and time of receipt of the last version of submitted proposals are recorded. After the call closure, an acknowledgement of receipt is sent to the applicant by e-mail containing: – Proposal title, acronym and unique proposal identifier (proposal number); – Name of the programme and/or activity/research area and call identifier to which the proposal was addressed; – Date and time of receipt (which is set to the time of the call deadline for proposals submitted electronically). There is normally no further contact between ASRF and applicants on their proposal until after completion of the evaluation, except for proposals which are subject to hearings or where applicant is called for negotiation. ASRF may, however, contact an applicant in order to clarify matters such as eligibility. 2.5. Eligibility check Proposals must fulfil all of the eligibility criteria if they are to be retained for evaluation. These criteria are rigorously applied. Each stage is subject to an eligibility check. The following eligibility criteria apply to all proposals submitted under a call. – Receipt of proposal before the deadline date and time established in the call, if applicable. – Completeness of the proposal, i.e. the presence of all requested administrative forms and the proposal description (N.B. the completeness of the information contained in the proposal will be for the experts to evaluate; the eligibility checks only apply to the presence of the appropriate parts of the proposal). – Scope of the call: the content of the proposal must relate to the topic(s) and funding scheme(s) set out in t h e a n n o u n c e m e n t o f the call (in the case of Specific & Special Calls). A proposal will only be deemed ineligible on grounds of „scope‟ in clear-cut cases. Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4 6/7
  • 7. Applicants must have an affiliation, where the latter will be responsible for all the legal issues related to the project. An individual is also welcome to apply, in that case, ASRF will help find him an affiliate where he could conduct his research. If it becomes clear before, during or after the evaluation phase that one or more of the eligibility criteria have not been fulfilled, the proposal is declared ineligible, and is withdrawn from any further examination. Where there is a doubt on the eligibility of a proposal, ASRF reserves the right to proceed with the evaluation, pending a final decision on eligibility. The fact that a proposal is evaluated in such circumstances does not constitute proof of its eligibility. 3. Communication and announcement of selected/reject proposal Shortly after the call deadline, ASRF will send an acknowledgement of receipt to the e-mail address given in the submitted proposal. The applicant may be called for hearing during evaluation phase to give further illustrations about their proposal. The applicant shall be informed of evaluation result. If application is approved, applicant and affiliate shall be called to sign agreements with the first party, the funder, milestones shall be agreed, and start of project shall be announced. Principle investigator shall also give written confirmation assuring the project is his idea & could not be found anywhere through a literature search. Submission Rules & Guidelines - Rev.4 7/7