arXiv Sustainability Initiative Oya Reiger RDAP12

711 views

Published on

arXiv Sustainability Initiative RDAP12
Oya Rieger, Cornell University Library, arXiv

Digital Libraries Sustainability panel
Presentation at Research Data Access & Preservation Summit
22 March 2012

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
711
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • We define sustainability broadly, including business strategies for sustaining services and organizations engaged in data curation, and sustainable approaches to accomplishing the work of data curation and preservation.
  • arXiv.org is internationally acknowledged as a pioneering and successful open access digital archive for research articles. Since 1991, the e-print repository has been a critical component of the scholarly communication infrastructure in multiple fields of physics, and plays an increasingly important role in mathematics, computer science, and related disciplines.
  • Top 200 – the first one Max Planck representing 3.10% of downloads – Cornell 20th at the list with 0.7% (update)sustainabilityis the ability to secure resources needed to protect and enhance the value of a service based on the needs of the user communitycover operation costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategiesenhance value based on the needs of the user community
  • Top 200 – the first one Max Planck representing 3.10% of downloads – Cornell 20th at the list with 0.7% (update)sustainabilityis the ability to secure resources needed to protect and enhance the value of a service based on the needs of the user communitycover operation costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategiesenhance value based on the needs of the user community
  • Disciplinary characteristics, work practices, and conventions of academia play an important role in researchers' assessment and appropriation repositories
  • Keeping open access academic resources such as arXiv sustainable involves not only covering their costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategies but also continuing to enhance their value based on the needs of the user community. Such a financial commitment is likely to be beyond a single institution’s resources. In seeking broader institutional support, we recommend that certain threshold criteria be established and met in assessing such requests, including consideration of the following:
  • Keeping open access academic resources such as arXiv sustainable involves not only covering their costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategies but also continuing to enhance their value based on the needs of the user community. Such a financial commitment is likely to be beyond a single institution’s resources. In seeking broader institutional support, we recommend that certain threshold criteria be established and met in assessing such requests, including consideration of the following:
  • Keeping open access academic resources such as arXiv sustainable involves not only covering their costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategies but also continuing to enhance their value based on the needs of the user community. Such a financial commitment is likely to be beyond a single institution’s resources. In seeking broader institutional support, we recommend that certain threshold criteria be established and met in assessing such requests, including consideration of the following:
  • Keeping open access academic resources such as arXiv sustainable involves not only covering their costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategies but also continuing to enhance their value based on the needs of the user community. Such a financial commitment is likely to be beyond a single institution’s resources. In seeking broader institutional support, we recommend that certain threshold criteria be established and met in assessing such requests, including consideration of the following:
  • arXiv Sustainability Initiative Oya Reiger RDAP12

    1. 1. arXivSustainability Initiative March 2012 Oya Y. Rieger rieger@cornell.edu 1
    2. 2. Sustainability is capacity to endure• technical• sociocultural• policy• business 2
    3. 3. Sustainability is capacity to endure• technical• sociocultural• policy• businessStewardship is the responsibility tomaintain this vision 3
    4. 4. 4
    5. 5. • established in 1991 by Paul Ginsparg• has been hosted at Cornell since 2001• includes 731,000 e-prints• 2011 – 76,578 new submissions – ~50 million downloads 5
    6. 6. 6
    7. 7. 2011 Institutional Downloads by Domain Name other 24% edu 26% es 2%gov 3% ca 3% de 12% ch 4% it 5% uk 8% fr 6% jp 7% 7
    8. 8. 2011 Institutional Downloads by Domain Name other 24% edu 26% CUL: 0.5% use rank #28 es 2%gov 3% ca 3% de 12% ch 4% it 5% uk 8% fr 6% jp 7% 8
    9. 9. CY 2011 Budget (Direct Expenses: $434,691 ) Other Expenses $15,381IT infrastructure $39,440 Salary - Management 0.50 FTE $56,000 Salary - User Support 2.25 FTE + 0.36 0.36 student 2.25 FTE + student $158,000 Salary - Programming 1.58 FTE $166,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000
    10. 10. Interim Sustainability Model 2010-2012voluntary contributions from libraries andresearch institutes – Target the top 200 based on downloads from institutional domain names • Annual contribution tiers per institution: $4,000 $3,200 $2,300 • CUL covers 15% of annual expenses plus indirect costs – Indirect: 37% of direct cost 10
    11. 11. 2010-2012: Sustainability Planning OutcomesReview and stabilize arXiv staffing andorganizationEvaluate arXiv’s IT infrastructureAssess arXiv’s functionality and user supportHold discussions with a group of publishersand societies about collaboration ideas 11
    12. 12. Sustainability Model 2013 and beyondFinancial Support – CUL – Foundation Support – Member OrganizationsGovernance – CUL – Member Advisory Board – Scientific Advisory Board 12
    13. 13. 2009
    14. 14. Repository Architecture Discovery and Archiving AccessInteroperability stewardship Submission, M with Related oderation, Qua Systems lity Control Designated Financial Community & Stability Sociology of Science
    15. 15. infrastructures are invisible and seamless
    16. 16. Principles for Sustainability1. Deep integration into academic community and scholarly processes2. Clearly defined mandate & governance structure3. Technology platform stability and innovation4. Systematic development of content policies5. Reliance on business planning strategies
    17. 17. 1. Deep Integration into Academic Community & Scholarly Processes • Factor in research, communication, and collaboration practices & values • Balance IT bandwidth with sociocultural bandwidth • Implement user-based strategies & feedback cycles
    18. 18. 2. Clearly Defined Mandate & Governance Structure • Ensure that an organization has the means to: – envision its future – implement the vision – sustain the process over time • Tenets: – Participatory, accountable, transparent, res ponsive, equitable, and inclusive
    19. 19. arXiv -- Key Principles• General – arXiv provides an open access repository of scientific research to authors and researchers worldwide. – arXiv is a scholarly communication forum informed and guided by scientists and the scientific cultures being served.• Editorial – Criteria and standards for deposit in arXiv are maintained by the Scientific Advisory Board.• Economic – arXiv is supported financially by Cornell University Library and a global collective of institutional members with potential foundation grants• Governance 20
    20. 20. 3. Technology Platform Stability and Innovation• Repository ecology: – interoperability & relation to other repositories – lowering the barriers in contributing content in multiple repositories – discovery & access: increasing relevance – archiving for access by designated communities – features in support of supplementary information objects
    21. 21. 4. Systematic Development of Content Policies • Clearly defined collection policies and submission guidelines • Quality control & endorsement systems • Scholarly communication chain – version control & persistence – author name disambiguation
    22. 22. 5. Reliance on Business Planning Strategies • Key elements of a business planning – Value proposition – Stakeholders’ perspectives – Financial planning – costs & revenues – ROI – Communication plan

    ×