Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Some requirements for badge systems

Slides from presentation at the CETIS 2012 conference, 2012-02-23

  • Login to see the comments

Some requirements for badge systems

  1. 1. Some requirementsfor badge systems Simon Grant JISC CETIS CETIS Conference, Nottingham 2012-02-23 1
  2. 2. Summary  What is a badge? What else is like a badge?  What are the issues with badges?  Four requirements ...  badges must add value over self-authored descriptions  nature and extent of any claim must be clarified  evidence and veracity must be checkable (where needed)  steps on ladders and paths must be sound  … for three interlocking badge systems  personal badge use system  badge quality system  pathways quality system for composite badges 2
  3. 3. What is a badge, anyway?  Wikipedia (2012-02-16)"A badge is a device or fashion accessory, often containingthe insignia of an organization, which is presented ordisplayed to indicate some feat of service, a specialaccomplishment, a symbol of authority granted by taking anoath (e.g., police and fire), a sign of legitimate employment orstudent status, or as a simple means of identification. Theyare also used in advertising, publicity, and for brandingpurposes." [emphasis added]  So I include uniform, T-shirts, ties, colours as “etc.” 3
  4. 4. Badges etc. I may have worn ...  Staff ID  Swimming badges  Conference attendee  personal survival  perhaps categorised  lifesaving  1999 path of totality  Cub Scout badges  Conference helper  PDSA Busy Bees  Choir member  I am ...  Dysgwr  (number of years old) (could have but I think not...)  siaradwch yn araf  Team supporter  Old school tie  NGO org member  School uniform  Religious symbol  Team player 4
  5. 5. So, agreement with Doug …  “visual representations of a skill or achievement”  ability  ability-related achievement  responsibility undertaken (needs abilities)  role (which is often “awarded” according to ability)  also simply completion of a defined experience  Also (but lets not focus on these):  skill aspiration?  identity  membership  support 5
  6. 6. … but issues remain  For “display layer” to be worth anything, people must have confidence in the “assessment layer”  particularly employers and the like who rely on them  If badges are to be “credentials”, they have to be effective in giving clarity and trust (“credence”)  How can we simultaneously  open up the issuing process  avoid hopeless over-proliferation  allow people easy ways of verifying and checking  to their satisfaction (thats the challenging part) 6
  7. 7. Requirement 1:make things better  (than self-authored text and traditional certificates)  We already have electronic certificates and CVs  Badges can still add value in three basic ways  by giving a unique identifier for a self-claim, making it global  by having quality processes in place for something awarded  by plotting out good pathways to something desirable  These relate to three interrelated systems  Lets consider each requirement and system in turn  (The “looker” is the party wanting people with badge) 7
  8. 8. Requirement 2:clarify nature and extent of claim  Self-awarded badges have value only if unambiguous  URIs give clarity independent of human language  then able to be searched for by machine  Awards in general vary in their detail  some are generic or broad, and imprecise  some are highly specific, detailing exactly what is entailed  Needs to be scope for claim to link to further detail  either terms from controlled vocabularies  or free text explanations  Badges may also be private and effective  credentials needed to view claim 8
  9. 9. The personal badge use system  Person claims a badge  Badge has an identifier (URI)  linking to overall description – many languages possible  Detail by further identifiers or free text (e-portfolio?)  E-portfolio claim includes link to issuer site  similarly to electronic certificate, maybe with “transcript”  maybe “issuer” is self or peer – OK if that is clear  Looker goes to issuer site to see claim detail  directly, or linked from badge or claim text  Ties in with systems supporting personal learning, action planning, goal setting and achievement, matching 9
  10. 10. Requirement 3:able to check evidence and truth  Lookers want to check credentials  they have seen the claim, but they still want  a good basis for trusting the claim  confidence in the assessment and awarding processes  to assess the badge claims value for them  Portfolios can give particular personal evidence  Further evidence from site of awarding body  body may be well known with good reputation  or look for more information about the body  including the bodys membership of wider bodies  bodys credentials may include badges (meta-badges?) …  evidence of badge assessment (etc.) process quality 10
  11. 11. The badge quality system  Designing  Specifying and managing assessment  Providing information about significance  Ensuring award quality  Confirming awards and holders to third parties  Expiry or retraction for time-limited or revoked badges  Gathering statistics of use including employer use  Managing versions and revision  Protection against misuse  Managing badge reputation with employers and others 11
  12. 12. Requirement 4:steps on paths must be sound  Open Badges white paper talks a lot about paths  an analogy: you cant trust a path with slippery stones  another: you cant trust a ladder with weak rungs  A badge may define pre-requisite badges  Pathways quality management means ensuring each step is right to fit in with the other steps  select appropriate pre-requisites, not too strict or too lax  check and monitor quality of pre-requisite badges  Composite badges are useful for employers who look  the degree itself is a kind of composite badge, but losing support  time to create better ones 12
  13. 13. The pathways quality system  Devising new ways of reaching objectives  giving up reinventing wheels  adding value by putting together existing badges  Effective goal decomposition  mirroring personal action planning  Investigating providers of each step  Checking and matching quality of each step  Promoting composite badge to employers and others  Managing composite badge reputation 13
  14. 14. Open Badges metadata spec  Badge Title  Badge Image URL  Short Badge Description (plain text)  Badge Criteria (URL, required)  Issuer (Organization name or just individual name)  Issuer Contact (email address)  Issue Date  Badge Expiration Date (optional; default none)  Badge Evidence URL (optional)signed within an Authentication/Verification Framework 14
  15. 15. Missing useful information  Short badge description OK, but distinctions needed:  overall badge significance true of all instances of the badge  individual personal claim giving further specific details  (evidence on which the award or claim is based is OK)  authentication / verification  PKI signing is less than ideal for several reasons  instead, could have a link to verification on issuer site  Quality confirmation for specific badges would be useful  distinct from the overall significance of the badge  Definition of composite badge components + links  and specify quality criteria for component badge selection 15
  16. 16. Conclusions / open questions  Badges can cover every sector  school, HE, vocational, professional, voluntary, hobby  Democratisation of ability credentials  for education, recruitment, training, advancement, matching  but is this the best solution for a common language?  Mozilla Open Badges is a good start  what extra metadata is needed to make badges work well?  Ive proposed some ideas – needs to move towards consensus  Exercise  envision more detailed scenarios  consider SWOT 16
  17. 17. Reference resources  http://www.openbadges.org/  spec is in http://www.openbadges.org/infrastructure-tech-docs/  (seems more stable than https://wiki.mozilla.org/Badges )  http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Are_open_badges_the_future_for_recognition_of_skills%3F  (this session)  Scott wrote a very useful page for electronic certificates  http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Technical_architecture_considerations_for_implementing_the_HEAR  most of this could be applied to badges  InLOC project will be taking badges into account  Integrating Learning Outcomes and Competences  http://wiki.teria.no/display/inloc/Home 17
  18. 18. Thanks...  ... for your attention  ... for any feedback you may be able to give  either now  or send to me at asimong@gmail.com

×