SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
Training Needs
   Analysis



Content Design




Implementation



 Post Training
 Effectiveness

   Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
Map role based                                    Identify
   Competency                                    Competency gaps
   requirements




Evaluate                                                Design
training                                          training programs




                   Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013    9/20/2012
 Identify competency map
 Create an evaluation format
 Use single degree or multi degree analysis




                        Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
 Context Analysis- An analysis of the business needs or other reasons
    the training is desired.
   User Analysis- Analysis dealing with potential participants and
    instructors involved in the process.
   Work Analysis- Analysis of the tasks being performed.
   Content Analysis- Analysis of documents, laws, procedures used on
    the job.
   Training Suitability Analysis- Analysis of whether training is the
    desired solution.
   Cost-Benefit Analysis- Analysis of the return on investment (ROI) of
    training.



                                 Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
 Several basic Needs Assessment techniques include:
   Direct observation
   Questionnaires
   Consultation with persons in key positions, and/or with specific
      knowledge
     Review of relevant literature
     Interviews
     Focus groups
     Tests
     Records & report studies
     Work samples



                                  Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
DIAGNOSTIC TARGETS   EXPLANANTION AND       TYPICAL INFORMATION          COMMON METHODS OF
                     IDENTIFYING            SOUGHT                       DIAGNOSIS
                     EXAMPLES

INDIVIDUALS          ALL INDIVIDUALS       DO PEOPLE PERFORM           INTERVIEWS
                     WITHIN THE             ACCORDING TO THE             DIAGNOSTIC MEETINGS
                     ORGANISATION           ORGANISATION’S               PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED
                                            EXPECTATIONS?                BY THE HR
                                            THEIR VIEW OF THEIR         DEPARTMENT
                                            PLACE &                      SELF-ASSESSMENT
                                            PERFORMANCE
                                            CERTAIN PROBLEMS
                                            THAT TYPICALLY ARISE
                                            DO PEOPLE MEET
                                            STANDARDS & NORMS
                                            OF THE ORGANISATION
                                            WHETHER PARTICULAR
                                            KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS &
                                            ABILITY IS REQUIRED.
                                            CAREER DEVLOPMENT
                                            OPPORTUNITIES
                                            WHAT PAIN ARE THEY
                                            EXPERIENCING


                               Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
4
                    Process System                          Receiving System
                1                        OUTPUT                                          Mission
                                     2                  3
  9                                                                                             5
                                                                                         Goal
Post Training
 Activities




                                     Measure Data

                                              7
       8                                      Criteria
                     Feedback


                                                                                   6
                                                                                   Criteria
                    Feedback



                                             Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
TARGET GROUP               INTERVENTIONS DESIGNED TO
                           IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS




INDIVIDUALS                COACHING & COUNSELING
                           TRAINING TO IMPROVE SKILLS
                           BEHAVIOUR MODELING




               Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
Quality of training                                                 Learning outcome
received                                                            (maps to Kirkpatrick
(maps to Kirkpatrick                                                Level 2)
Level 1)
                        REACTION LEVEL         LEARNING
                                                 LEVEL


                                                               Organisational
                               BEHAVIOUR
                                                               benefit (maps to
 Performance                                                   Kirkpatrick Level 4)
                                 LEVEL
 improvement (maps
 to Kirkpatrick Level
 3)



                                     ROI
                              Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
 Level 1: Reactions. What did the participant think of the intervention?

 Level 2: Learning. What did the participant learn during the
  intervention?
 Level 3: Behavior. What learning's, skills, etc., did the participant
  apply on the job?
 Level 4: Results. What changes in results and productivity have been
  observed on the job?




                              Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
Find tangible evidence of the impacts of behavioral
change:

     Re-administer 360-degree surveys
     Average on pre and post surveys
     Climate surveys
     Performance metrics
     Customer surveys
     Personal balanced scorecard


                    Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
REACTION                 LEARNING                 BEHAVIOUR               FUNCTIONAL
LEVEL                    LEVEL                    LEVEL                   LEVEL
A reaction              A test of learning      A behaviour            An evaluation of
evaluation will be       will follow the          questionnaire will      business results will
                         "Summary for             ascertain how well      also be conducted six
conducted                                                                 months/ 1year after
immediately before       Action" at the end       the learning from       training.
the "Summary for         of the last session.     the program has
                                                                          The business results
Action" that              The test assesses      been put into           of the training group
concludes the            the participants’        practice. It            will be compared to a
program.                 knowledge of the         measures                control group of equal
All participants will   key learning             behaviour               size.
be asked to              objectives in the        according to the        The evaluation will
                         evaluation plan.         application             compare increased
complete a Level
                                                  objectives of the       profits due to sales,
One questionnaire.                                                        reduced meeting time,
                                                  evaluation plan.
A member of the                                                          and reduction in
evaluation team will                              Three weeks after      customer complaints (
distribute the form                               training, all           parameters to be
                                                  participants will       decided).
while the instructor
is not present.                                   receive a Level
                                                  Three questionnaire
.
                                                  in the mail/ person.
                                Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
S.NO   STEPS           1st Month   2nd Month       3rd Month            4th Month   5th Month   6th Month
1      TRAINING
       NEEDS
       EVALUATION
2      RECOMMENDATI
       ONS
3      TRAINING
       INTERVENTION
4      TRAINING
       EFFECTIVENESS –
       REACTION LEVEL
       & LEARNING
       LEVEL

5      BEHAVIOUR
       LEVEL ANALYSIS

6      FOLLOW UP
       PROGRAM
7      ROI
       CALCULATION &
       FINAL
       EVALUATION OF
                                      Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012
       INTERVENTION
“THANK YOU”

Ashok Narayanan




 Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013   9/20/2012

More Related Content

Similar to Training Needs Analysis Process

Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012
Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012
Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012Shadowmatch
 
Gulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) converted
Gulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) convertedGulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) converted
Gulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) convertedHarryJohnson77
 
Shadowmatch Overview
Shadowmatch OverviewShadowmatch Overview
Shadowmatch OverviewmichelleSM
 
Region 14 Planning Opening Presentation
Region 14 Planning Opening PresentationRegion 14 Planning Opening Presentation
Region 14 Planning Opening PresentationEdAdvance
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisalVishy Vincent
 
Management Training and Development
Management Training and DevelopmentManagement Training and Development
Management Training and DevelopmentAvi Anand
 
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROIThe Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROIMichelle Buckland, B.A.A.
 
Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)rajeevgupta
 
Apg Capabilities V3
Apg Capabilities V3Apg Capabilities V3
Apg Capabilities V3MrktPwrPnts
 
Learning & Development and the Performance management
Learning & Development and the Performance managementLearning & Development and the Performance management
Learning & Development and the Performance managementAhmed Shamim
 
Recruitment and selection(dimension group)
Recruitment and selection(dimension group)Recruitment and selection(dimension group)
Recruitment and selection(dimension group)Praveen Bhardwaj
 
Training Need Analysis - Apr 2012
Training Need Analysis -  Apr 2012Training Need Analysis -  Apr 2012
Training Need Analysis - Apr 2012Hj Arriffin Mansor
 
University project performance appraisal(4)
University project performance appraisal(4)University project performance appraisal(4)
University project performance appraisal(4)hema_nt
 
Performance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical Industry
Performance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical IndustryPerformance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical Industry
Performance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical IndustryAkshay Jirage
 
Philip -dqo
Philip  -dqoPhilip  -dqo
Philip -dqoGRIDMMS
 

Similar to Training Needs Analysis Process (20)

Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012
Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012
Shadowmatch Overview Jun2012
 
Gulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) converted
Gulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) convertedGulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) converted
Gulam sarwar 19 mcrmc910075(amit sir) converted
 
Shadowmatch Overview
Shadowmatch OverviewShadowmatch Overview
Shadowmatch Overview
 
P A5
P A5P A5
P A5
 
Competency Mapping for Performance Management
Competency Mapping for Performance ManagementCompetency Mapping for Performance Management
Competency Mapping for Performance Management
 
Region 14 Planning Opening Presentation
Region 14 Planning Opening PresentationRegion 14 Planning Opening Presentation
Region 14 Planning Opening Presentation
 
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisalPerformance appraisal
Performance appraisal
 
Management Training and Development
Management Training and DevelopmentManagement Training and Development
Management Training and Development
 
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROIThe Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
The Four Levels of Training Evaluation + ROI
 
Hr performance appraisal
Hr performance appraisalHr performance appraisal
Hr performance appraisal
 
Competency mapping
Competency mappingCompetency mapping
Competency mapping
 
Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Performance Appraisal 03(2)
 
Apg Capabilities V3
Apg Capabilities V3Apg Capabilities V3
Apg Capabilities V3
 
Learning & Development and the Performance management
Learning & Development and the Performance managementLearning & Development and the Performance management
Learning & Development and the Performance management
 
Recruitment and selection(dimension group)
Recruitment and selection(dimension group)Recruitment and selection(dimension group)
Recruitment and selection(dimension group)
 
Training Need Analysis - Apr 2012
Training Need Analysis -  Apr 2012Training Need Analysis -  Apr 2012
Training Need Analysis - Apr 2012
 
University project performance appraisal(4)
University project performance appraisal(4)University project performance appraisal(4)
University project performance appraisal(4)
 
Performance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical Industry
Performance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical IndustryPerformance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical Industry
Performance Based Appraisal System in Pharmaceutical Industry
 
Designing compensation system Part I
Designing compensation system Part IDesigning compensation system Part I
Designing compensation system Part I
 
Philip -dqo
Philip  -dqoPhilip  -dqo
Philip -dqo
 

Training Needs Analysis Process

  • 1.
  • 2. Training Needs Analysis Content Design Implementation Post Training Effectiveness Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 3. Map role based Identify Competency Competency gaps requirements Evaluate Design training training programs Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 4.  Identify competency map  Create an evaluation format  Use single degree or multi degree analysis Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 5.  Context Analysis- An analysis of the business needs or other reasons the training is desired.  User Analysis- Analysis dealing with potential participants and instructors involved in the process.  Work Analysis- Analysis of the tasks being performed.  Content Analysis- Analysis of documents, laws, procedures used on the job.  Training Suitability Analysis- Analysis of whether training is the desired solution.  Cost-Benefit Analysis- Analysis of the return on investment (ROI) of training. Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 6.  Several basic Needs Assessment techniques include:  Direct observation  Questionnaires  Consultation with persons in key positions, and/or with specific knowledge  Review of relevant literature  Interviews  Focus groups  Tests  Records & report studies  Work samples Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 7. DIAGNOSTIC TARGETS EXPLANANTION AND TYPICAL INFORMATION COMMON METHODS OF IDENTIFYING SOUGHT DIAGNOSIS EXAMPLES INDIVIDUALS ALL INDIVIDUALS DO PEOPLE PERFORM INTERVIEWS WITHIN THE ACCORDING TO THE DIAGNOSTIC MEETINGS ORGANISATION ORGANISATION’S PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED EXPECTATIONS? BY THE HR THEIR VIEW OF THEIR DEPARTMENT PLACE & SELF-ASSESSMENT PERFORMANCE CERTAIN PROBLEMS THAT TYPICALLY ARISE DO PEOPLE MEET STANDARDS & NORMS OF THE ORGANISATION WHETHER PARTICULAR KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS & ABILITY IS REQUIRED. CAREER DEVLOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES WHAT PAIN ARE THEY EXPERIENCING Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 8. 4 Process System Receiving System 1 OUTPUT Mission 2 3 9 5 Goal Post Training Activities Measure Data 7 8 Criteria Feedback 6 Criteria Feedback Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 9. TARGET GROUP INTERVENTIONS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS INDIVIDUALS COACHING & COUNSELING TRAINING TO IMPROVE SKILLS BEHAVIOUR MODELING Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 10. Quality of training Learning outcome received (maps to Kirkpatrick (maps to Kirkpatrick Level 2) Level 1) REACTION LEVEL LEARNING LEVEL Organisational BEHAVIOUR benefit (maps to Performance Kirkpatrick Level 4) LEVEL improvement (maps to Kirkpatrick Level 3) ROI Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 11. Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 12.  Level 1: Reactions. What did the participant think of the intervention?  Level 2: Learning. What did the participant learn during the intervention?  Level 3: Behavior. What learning's, skills, etc., did the participant apply on the job?  Level 4: Results. What changes in results and productivity have been observed on the job? Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 13. Find tangible evidence of the impacts of behavioral change:  Re-administer 360-degree surveys  Average on pre and post surveys  Climate surveys  Performance metrics  Customer surveys  Personal balanced scorecard Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 14. REACTION LEARNING BEHAVIOUR FUNCTIONAL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL A reaction A test of learning A behaviour An evaluation of evaluation will be will follow the questionnaire will business results will "Summary for ascertain how well also be conducted six conducted months/ 1year after immediately before Action" at the end the learning from training. the "Summary for of the last session. the program has The business results Action" that  The test assesses been put into of the training group concludes the the participants’ practice. It will be compared to a program. knowledge of the measures control group of equal All participants will key learning behaviour size. be asked to objectives in the according to the The evaluation will evaluation plan. application compare increased complete a Level objectives of the profits due to sales, One questionnaire. reduced meeting time, evaluation plan. A member of the and reduction in evaluation team will Three weeks after customer complaints ( distribute the form training, all parameters to be participants will decided). while the instructor is not present. receive a Level Three questionnaire . in the mail/ person. Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012
  • 15. S.NO STEPS 1st Month 2nd Month 3rd Month 4th Month 5th Month 6th Month 1 TRAINING NEEDS EVALUATION 2 RECOMMENDATI ONS 3 TRAINING INTERVENTION 4 TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS – REACTION LEVEL & LEARNING LEVEL 5 BEHAVIOUR LEVEL ANALYSIS 6 FOLLOW UP PROGRAM 7 ROI CALCULATION & FINAL EVALUATION OF Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012 INTERVENTION
  • 16. “THANK YOU” Ashok Narayanan Ashok Narayanan :2012 -2013 9/20/2012