Advertisement
Check these out next
REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration
Dec. 15, 2015•0 likes•343 views
0 likes
Be the first to like this
Show More
views
Total views
0
On Slideshare
0
From embeds
0
Number of embeds
0
Download to read offline
Report
Environment
REDD+ - Way forward for Indonesia Showing leadership in nested approaches to REDD+- RAD-RNK and RAD-RNK. Provincial Strategy and Planning on REDD+ Implementation (Strategi dan Rencana Aksi Propinsi –SRAP). Bringing in more peatland areas through HKM (Village forest) mechanisms would help more high value forest areas come under protected areas and generate local emission reduction and multiple benefits. Improving cross-sectoral actions to Readiness speed and effectiveness (would help break path dependency)
ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recommended
Tanzania experience on incorporating safeguards at pilot project levelIIED
Examples of how Agroforestry and REDD+ can reduce tropical deforestation and ...SIANI
CIFOR and Global Comparative study on REDD+ Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Red Stripe: We Take the Lead - Institutional ArrangementsNAP Global Network
Module 5: Consideration of social aspects for inclusive developmentCCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
Mainstreaming biodiversity into production sectors: The South African experienceDevelopment Co-operation Directorate (DCD-DAC)
REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration
- REDD+ Readiness across countries: time for reconsideration Peter A Minang World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) & ASB Partnership For the Tropical Forest Margins Land and forest governance at multiple levels in supporting climate change mitigation: lessons learned from the tropics Indonesia Pavillion at UNFCCC COP 21 December 3, 2015, Paris, France
- Minang et al., 2014
- The problem • More than 75 countries engaged in some kind of REDD Readiness • Attracting upto USD 7.2 Billion of investments committed to supporting REDD+ including Readiness in large part (Creed and Nakhooda 2011) • YET LITTLE EXISTS IN TERMS OF COMPARING READINESS ACROSS COUNTIRES IN AN OBJECTIVE WAY • HENCE LEARNING SO FAR LARGELY ANECDOTAL
- REDD+ READINESS PHASED APPROACH ELEMENTS FROM CANCUN AGREEMENTS- PARA 70 - 73 DECISION 1/CP16
- REDD Readiness comparison framework Minang et al., 2014
- How about multilevel governance and land in REDD+ Readiness?
- Are Agricultural drivers of deforestation being considered?
- Selected countries fit along forest transition
- Results Minang et al., 2014
- The Indonesia Paper
- Some notes on results • Most countries scored really well on process indicators like R-PIN, R-PP and REDD Strategy- Thanks to FCPF & UN- REDD Support • Indonesia is the only country that had a full-fledged REDD Policy and also linked REDD+ to a wider economic strategy. Policy, legal & institutional frameworks were patchy for the Peru, Cameroon and Vietnam • Vietnam stands out in the development of a benefit sharing framework • Most countries score poorly on benefit sharing, MRV and audit and financing (most financing still external)
- Way forward for Indonesia? • Showing leadership in nested approaches to REDD+- RAD-RNK and RAD-RNK. Provincial Strategy and Planning on REDD+ Implementation (Strategi dan Rencana Aksi Propinsi –SRAP). • Bringing in more peatland areas through HKM (Village forest) mechanisms would help more high value forest areas come under protected areas and generate local emission reduction and multiple benefits. • Improving cross-sectoral actions to Readiness speed and effectiveness (would help break path dependency)
- • AKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONTRIBUTORS – Agung, Putra – Meine van Noordwijk – Lalisa Duguma – Atiek Widayati – Sonya Dewi Merci! Terima Kasih!
Advertisement