Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
October 29, 2015
United States Department of Transportation
Docket Management Facility
1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E.
W12-140...
2
FHWA published its AP Concessions Guide on October 8, 2015. This document is almost 150
pages in length and – understand...
3
 Recommendations on maximizing fair and open competition within the private sector,
while addressing considerations for...
4
We appreciate FHWA’s consideration of these initial views and the request for more interaction
as the agency further ref...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

ARTBA Comments Supporting FHWA’s Draft Availability Payments Concessions Public Private Partnership Model Contract Guide

518 views

Published on

ARTBA offers support for FHWA’s Draft Availability Payments Concessions Public Private Partnership Model Contract Guide.

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

ARTBA Comments Supporting FHWA’s Draft Availability Payments Concessions Public Private Partnership Model Contract Guide

  1. 1. October 29, 2015 United States Department of Transportation Docket Management Facility 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. W12-140 Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 Re: Docket ID Number FHWA-2014-0006, Draft Availability Payment Concessions Public Private Partnership Model Contract Guide On behalf of the more 6,000 members of the American Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), I offer these comments on the draft availability payment concessions public private partnerships model contract guide (AP Concessions Guide) recently published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Founded in 1902, ARTBA’s membership includes private and public sector members that are involved in the planning, design, construction and maintenance of the nation’s roadways, bridges, ports, airports and transit systems. Our industry generates more than $380 billion annually in U.S. economic activity and sustains more than 3.3 million American jobs. ARTBA maintains ongoing and thorough involvement in federal legislative, policy, regulatory and legal developments relating to transportation infrastructure development and investment. This includes public private partnerships (P3s) in transportation, with which ARTBA has a long history. Our P3 Division dates back more than 25 years and includes prominent concessionaires, planning and design firms, contractors, law firms, financial entities and other parties in the P3 field. Through the reauthorization processes which have produced a series of federal surface transportation bills in recent decades, ARTBA has advocated for provisions that have helped make P3s a viable option for the financing and delivery of transportation improvement projects in appropriate circumstances around the country. ARTBA has also worked closely with the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) and its agencies as they have implemented these statutory provisions on P3s, including Section 1534(d) of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), which became law in 2012. In this section, Congress instructed U.S. DOT to develop and disseminate model contracts for “the most popular types” of P3 arrangements relating to transportation facilities. In this regard, ARTBA participated in a related listening session conducted by FHWA on January 16, 2013. As a follow up, ARTBA submitted detailed written comments on May 31, 2013, outlining our suggested approach to, and content of, these forthcoming model contract documents. Additionally, ARTBA submitted comments on March 12, 2014, regarding the first part of the Toll Concessions Guide. Accordingly, we incorporate by reference each of these earlier submissions into our present comments.
  2. 2. 2 FHWA published its AP Concessions Guide on October 8, 2015. This document is almost 150 pages in length and – understandably – very detailed in its subject matter. Within the 30 days allotted for the comment period, ARTBA, and its interested members, have reviewed the document, but it is obvious that its complexity demands further discussion. Therefore, as the agency has done in earlier stages of this process, we would respectfully suggest that FHWA engage in additional interaction with affected stakeholders before finalizing the guide’s contents. This could involve an extension of the 30-day comment period and/or an interactive session of some sort. We particularly welcome this at ARTBA because, as noted above, our P3-related membership includes representatives from the entire sector, including members of the public and private sectors, as well as consultants for each, who have considerable expertise – as well as unique viewpoints – on certain details of the AP Concessions Guide. As in the past, ARTBA would be pleased to host or facilitate any such session with our P3 Division membership. What follows is an initial reaction to the AP Concessions Guide: Educational Nature of the Guide There are some overarching issues that reflect consensus from ARTBA’s standpoint. Chief among them is the nature of the AP Concessions Guide itself. In addressing MAP-21 Section 1534(d) through our 2013 comments, ARTBA’s main recommendation was that FHWA’s model contract documents should be educational – rather than prescriptive – in nature. Given that P3s seek to take full advantage of market efficiencies in financing and delivery projects, even the implication that FHWA’s model terms are “mandatory” would be unfortunate and counterproductive. Therefore, we are pleased that the agency explicitly agreed with this viewpoint in its recent request for comments, which is also reflected in the tone and content of the AP Concessions Guide itself. Scope of the Guide The AP Concessions Guide is meant to be utilized by a broad audience. This may well include parties who are inexperienced in P3 projects, but eager to learn about their history and context. Realizing this, ARTBA suggests the guide contain an up-front, broad discussion of the P3 process in two parts. First, this segment should address the entire life-cycle of the project – screening, development, procurement, contract operations and maintenance. The discussion should focus on explaining the benefits of AP concession deals to Owners as primarily a life- cycle risk transfer. Specifically, focus should be placed on how to explain the value of the availability payment concessions process to the taxpaying public who will be using the project once it is completed. Second, ARTBA recommends a separate section devoted to the procurement process. Specifically, this section would cover key procurement matters, such as:  The Owner’s having a definitive and clear P3 policy and governance regarding project selection and transparency to the public and elected officials, including when and how project and contract approvals should be gathered; and
  3. 3. 3  Recommendations on maximizing fair and open competition within the private sector, while addressing considerations for such specific items as proposal evaluation, confidentiality, consideration and approval of alternative technical concepts (ATCs), shortlisting, and stipend policies. Risk The concept of risk transfer to the private sector is fundamental to all P3 policy discussions. Again, however, this area produces complexities that are difficult to address in a short comment period. Within the P3 community there are some related differences of opinion. The key point is that a major benefit of an AP concession deal is the allocation of life-cycle and other risks to the private sector for its management, while some make the point that any transfer of risk comes at a cost which can make the project more expensive. It should be clear in any such policy document that there is an optimal level of risk allocation, through which the taxpayer is gaining a value and benefit that can be documented in a Value-for-Money analysis. However, when risk transfer exceeds that optimal level, the taxpayer will not likely realize good value. While there are various opinions as to where this optimal point lies on any particular project or specific risk, there needs to be recognition this concept exists and is in fact a pivot point in the matter of taxpayer value and P3 projects. Other Issues ARTBA also recommends further discussion within the AP Concessions Guide of the following areas:  Contract delays (i.e. supervening events and relief events) and their associated impacts on availability payments;  Benefits and risks associated with milestone and substantial completion payments;  Differing approaches to performance security packages and their impacts on financing;  Handbacks regime and joint party responsibility for such; and  Availability deducts regime as it relates to deducts and measurement of such. Finally, beyond the AP Concessions Guide, ARTBA also stresses the need for future forums in which information-sharing can take place. One of the most effective ways to encourage the use of P3s is a constant continuation of a dialogue among all participants in the industry on what works and what does not work. Again, ARTBA offers our P3 Division network and events such as our large annual P3s in Transportation Conference for this purpose. Again, these comments constitute initial feedback upon review of FHWA’s AP Concession Guide, and in many ways suggest areas for further discussion rather than definitive opinions on the many details of that draft.
  4. 4. 4 We appreciate FHWA’s consideration of these initial views and the request for more interaction as the agency further refines the AP Concessions Guide. As noted previously, ARTBA and its P3 Division remain available to work with U.S. DOT through the remainder of this process, as well as any other activities relating to P3 policy. Please contact ARTBA’s Senior Vice President for Strategic Initiatives Rich Juliano, who serves as managing director of ARTBA’s P3 Division, at any time. Sincerely, T. Peter Ruane President & CEO

×