Features of translation 2 (1)


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Features of translation 2 (1)

  1. 1. FEATURES OF TRANSLATION By : Gratiana Sama Ari Listiani Agnes
  2. 2. <ul><li>The potential influence and constraint the translator and on the process of translation is often placed on that exerted by the source language. </li></ul><ul><li>The term ‘ translationese’ is a common description for translated language that appears to be influenced by the source language, usually in an inappropriate way or to undue extent. </li></ul>7.1What Influences the translator ?
  3. 3. Cont’ <ul><ul><li>For example (pg. 91) : </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Johansson and Hofland (2000) , </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>I n their study of various aspects of English and Norwegian modal auxiliaries and modal particles, observe that the choices made in translation tend to reflect source-text influence. </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. <ul><li>. </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>Explicitation SIMPLIFICATION 7.2. Baker’s Features of Translation The idea that translators subconsciously simplify the language or message or both The tendency to spell th ings out in translation, i ncluding in its simplest form, t he practice of adding background information.
  5. 5. The tendency to conform to patterns and practices that are typical of the target language, even the point of exaggerating them. the tendency of translated text to gravitate around the centre of any continuum rather than move towards the fringes Cont’ Normalisation or Conservatism Levelling Out
  6. 6. 7.2.1. Are Translation Feature s Universal? Baker (1993) <ul><li>explains universal features of translation as being “features which typically occur in translated text rather than original utterances and which are not the result of interference from specific linguistics systems”. </li></ul><ul><li>The universal features of translation concern simplification, explicitation, normalization and levelling out. </li></ul>
  7. 7. 7.2.2. Explicitation <ul><li>I nvolves adding material in the target text that is implicit in the source text. </li></ul><ul><li>It means that the translator expands the target text by inserting additional words to be more explicit on a number of levels than non-translated texts </li></ul>Baker (1993)
  8. 8. <ul><li>Explicitation is observed in the way in which cultural information is spelled out for target-language readers who would not be familiar with the cultural references of the source text. </li></ul><ul><li>Example of Explicitation: </li></ul><ul><li>SL: “ Bodies stripped bare, mutilated and left to rot in the sun”. </li></ul><ul><li>TL: “Tubuh mereka ditelanjangi dan dipotong-potong dan </li></ul><ul><li>dibiarkan membusuk di terik matahari” </li></ul>Cont’
  9. 9. <ul><li>The above sentence demonstrates additional words to </li></ul><ul><li>make the meaning clear without altering the </li></ul><ul><li>significance; </li></ul><ul><li>t he word mereka is added to point whose bodies that </li></ul><ul><li>are stripped , dipotong-potong as a reduplication word </li></ul><ul><li>of Indonesian refers to mutilated , and terik matahari </li></ul><ul><li>is to clarify the hotness of the sun where the bodies </li></ul><ul><li>left to rot in. </li></ul><ul><li>It was done in order to get a better and exact </li></ul><ul><li>perceptive dealing with what actually say in the </li></ul><ul><li>scene . Therefore, the TL is in an accurate sense in </li></ul><ul><li>such a way. </li></ul>
  10. 10. 7.2.3. Normalization or Conservatism Baker (1996:176-7) “ T he tendency to conform to patterns and practices w hich are typical of the target language, even to the point of exaggerating them. In this way, translation uses language in a more conventional or normalized way than non- translated texts ”
  11. 11. Normalization or conservatism refers to concepts of ‘domesticating ’ (keeping the form) and ‘ foreignizing ’ (adapting the meaning) translation. L. Venuti (1995:19-20)
  12. 12. Example of Normalization <ul><li>Concept of Domestication : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>SL : “He was killed in the war” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>TL : Dia gugur di medan perang </li></ul><ul><li>Concept of foreignization : </li></ul><ul><li>SL : as white as snow </li></ul><ul><li>TL : seputih salju </li></ul>
  13. 13. 7.2.4. SIMPLIFICATION <ul><li>This phenomenon is reflected in various strategies including the breaking up o f long sentences, omission of redundant or repeated information , shortening of complex collocations, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Example: </li></ul><ul><li>Source language : “…trees will come back to live here. Young trees, wild trees .” </li></ul><ul><li>Target language : “… pohon-pohon muda liar akan hidup disini.” </li></ul>
  14. 14. 7.2.5. L EVELLING OUT <ul><li>The tendency of translated text to </li></ul><ul><li>gravitate towards the centre of a </li></ul><ul><li>continuum rather than move towards the </li></ul><ul><li>fringes (Baker 1996: 184). </li></ul><ul><li>Laviosa (1998c) shows low variance in </li></ul><ul><li>both translational and non-translational </li></ul><ul><li>corpora </li></ul>
  15. 15. 7.2.6. CO-OCCURRENCE OF FEATURES <ul><li>Co-occurrence is occurrence of the two terms </li></ul><ul><li>from a text corpus along side each other in a </li></ul><ul><li>certain order ( www.wikipedia.com ) </li></ul><ul><li>In their study of the optional reporting that , </li></ul><ul><li>Olohan and Baker (2000) state linguistics </li></ul><ul><li>literature on use and omission of that with range </li></ul><ul><li>of verbs indicates omission to be more likely in </li></ul><ul><li>informal contexts </li></ul>Olohan and Baker (2000)
  16. 16. Cont’ <ul><li>Olohan (2003) - in the framework of </li></ul><ul><li>both explicitation and normali z ation - contracted forms in translated fiction and biography text (a subset of the TEC) compared with non-translation (a subset of the imaginative writing section of the BNC). </li></ul><ul><li>BNC text are more likely to omit that </li></ul><ul><li>and use contractions; the TEC text are more likely to include that and not use contractions. </li></ul>
  17. 17. CONCLUSION <ul><ul><li>The universal features of translation is viewed as a language activity which is different from original text productions and translation itself presents features explicitation, simplification, normalization and levelling out different from those of original language as well. </li></ul></ul>