OBJECTIVE   To examined the   usability evaluation of   education websites for   children  LIMITATIONSLIMITATIONS    Study...
METHODS USED:   Survey   Questionnaire
YAHOO KIDS Yahoo Kid is the least educational of all the choices since the site includes both games and videos of all sort...
How satisfied are the users after        using the website? How quickly can the respondents perform the task with prior kn...
Specified Users Children ages 6-12User 1: have tried both sitesUser 2: have not tried both sitesUser 3: common users of Ya...
User Satisfaction from the different task54321           2.4                       2.160         Yahoo kids               ...
Relevance of results5432          2.44                            2.4410       Yahoo kids                      Info please...
Ease of Use5432            2.48                           2.5210          Yahoo kids                 Info please    Weight...
• FINDINGS•How satisfied are the users after using the website?Based on the results found in table 7, the users rated both...
CONCLUSIONThis study evaluated the usability of two educational websites.None of the sites proved to be superior in terms ...
usability evaluation: educational website yahoo kids and infoplase.com homework center
usability evaluation: educational website yahoo kids and infoplase.com homework center
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

usability evaluation: educational website yahoo kids and infoplase.com homework center

473 views

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
473
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

usability evaluation: educational website yahoo kids and infoplase.com homework center

  1. 1. OBJECTIVE To examined the usability evaluation of education websites for children LIMITATIONSLIMITATIONS Study consist of only four respondents
  2. 2. METHODS USED: Survey Questionnaire
  3. 3. YAHOO KIDS Yahoo Kid is the least educational of all the choices since the site includes both games and videos of all sorts. But, kids can find lots to learn on this interactive website like homework help, learning about science, and access to an encyclopaedia.InfoPlease.com Homework Center a division of educational publisher Person Education
  4. 4. How satisfied are the users after using the website? How quickly can the respondents perform the task with prior knowledge of the website?In terms of relevance of results, are theusers satisfied with the results gathered in the different educational websites? Which of the two educationalwebsite are preferred by the users?
  5. 5. Specified Users Children ages 6-12User 1: have tried both sitesUser 2: have not tried both sitesUser 3: common users of Yahoo KidsUser 4: common users of InfoPleasem.co
  6. 6. User Satisfaction from the different task54321 2.4 2.160 Yahoo kids Info please Weights Range Scale 4 3.26 – 4.00 Very Effective 3 2.51 – 3.25 Effective 2 1.76 – 2.50 Less Effective 1 1.00 – 1.75 Ineffective
  7. 7. Relevance of results5432 2.44 2.4410 Yahoo kids Info please Weights Range Scale 4 3.26 – 4.00 Very Relevant 3 2.51 – 3.25 Relevant 2 1.76 – 2.50 Less Relevant 1 1.00 – 1.75 Not Relevant
  8. 8. Ease of Use5432 2.48 2.5210 Yahoo kids Info please Weights Range Scale 4 3.26 – 4.00 Excellent 3 2.51 – 3.25 Good 2 1.76 – 2.50 Fair 1 1.00 – 1.75 Poor
  9. 9. • FINDINGS•How satisfied are the users after using the website?Based on the results found in table 7, the users rated bothonline educational website as less effective.•How quickly can the respondents perform the task withprior knowledge of the website?With no particular length of time, the users rated YahooKids as less effective while NGA Kids rated as effective.•In terms of relevance of results, are the users satisfiedwith the results gathered in the two educational website?Based on the results found in table 7, both Yahoo kids andNGA kids provides relevant results.
  10. 10. CONCLUSIONThis study evaluated the usability of two educational websites.None of the sites proved to be superior in terms of efficiency orsatisfaction. Terminology, number and organization of links,location of information above the fold, and length of individualpages all influenced performance on the tasks. RECOMMENDATIONS Designers of K-12 educational sites should continue to conductusability testing with a wide range of children to insure ease of usefor all students.

×