4. Civic
technology
is
technology
that
enables
engagement
or
par1cipa1on
of
the
public
for
good
development,
enhancing
ci1zen
communica1ons,
improving
government
infrastructure,
or
generally
making
na1onal
and
local
governments
more
effec1ve.*
Data
is
the
fundamental
ingredient
in
civic
technology.
*Source:
hDps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civic_technology
6. CollecGng
data
is
simple
and
ubiquitous
• Social
media
• Repor1ng
applica1ons
• Sensor
data
(automa1c,
e.g.
from
phone)
…
this
is
what
we
are
talking
about
when
we
discuss
“Big
Data”…
and
it
means
lots
more
people
are
involved!
15. • (Smart)
city
data;
• Applica1on
data
(e.g.
Waze);
• Ci1zen
data
(cheap
sensors).
…
vastly
improved
compu2ng
enables
transport
agencies
–
and
“anyone”
else
–
to
analyze
countless
scenarios
and
develop
precise
transport
plans.
*
So
easy
anyone
could
do
it
(open
data)!
Analyzing
all
this
data
is
easy*
16. CiGzen
developed
applicaGons
and
visualizaGons
from
open
data.
Stumble
Safely,
Washington
D.C.
Open
data
mash-‐ups.
Hackathons.
17. WayCount
vehicle
counter
and
soXware
www.waycount.com
Your
own
personal
traffic
counter.
Cost:
200
Euros.
18. Smart
CiGzen
sensor
and
soXware
hDp://www.smartci1zen.me/
Your
own
personal
weather
and
environmental
sensor.
21. • Educa1on
–
transport
planning
is
complex;
• BeDer
processes
–
mee1ng
management;
• Increased
engagement
–
more
is
beDer.
…
improving
the
quality
of
ideas,
increasing
the
ability
to
implement
and
test
new
ideas,
and
helping
build
community
spirit.
CollaboraGon
is
becoming
more
efficient
30. Providing
transport
is
becoming
open
• Informa1on
via
social
networks
(TwiDer
real
1me);
• Implementa1on
via
civic
groups
(596
Acres,
Casserole);
• Behaviour
modifica1on
(Chromaroma,
Walk-‐a-‐Stop);
• Crowd-‐sourced
civic
works
(Spacehive,
Kickstarter);
• Service
providers
&
sharing
(Uber,
BlahBlahCar,
Bridj).
…
reducing
the
need
for
centralized
transport
planning
and
service
provision.
32. Designing
passionate,
people-‐powered
public
services
Casserole
is
an
example
of
how
understanding
ci:zens
as
producers
as
well
as
consumers
leads
to
services
that
help
communi1es
turn
the
issues
they’re
passionate
about
into
ways
to
be
more
self-‐
sufficient
and
less
invested
in
expensive
public
services.
35. Walk-‐a-‐Stop
!
Info
+
Social
Network
!
Influence
behaviour
Human
is
an
all-‐day
ac1vity
&
calorie
tracker
that
inspires
you
to
move
30
minutes
a
day.
AcGvity
monitor
(e.g.,
Human)
+
Public
transport
travel
planner
+
Real
Gme
transport
data
(official
/
user)
+
Social
networking
=
Walk-‐a-‐Stop
Users
receive
push
data
when
sta1ons
are
crowded
sugges1ng
they
walk
or
bike
one
or
two
sta1ons.
Ac1vity
is
rewarded
(transit
1ckets),
social
networking
provides
info
about
good
routes,
interes1ng
shops,
companions
to
walk
with,
and/or
system
suggests,
It’s
a
nice
day
why
not
walk?
39. Uber
“One
of
the
most
subtle
underlying
issues
with
the
rise
of
Uber
is
the
company’s
slow
siphoning
of
the
poliGcal
will
to
fix
exis1ng
–
or
build
new
–
public
transit
infrastructure
in
major
ci1es.
…
The
people
lee
riding
public
transit
become,
increasingly,
the
ones
with
liDle
or
no
poli1cal
weight
to
demand
improvements
to
the
system.”
MaD
Buchanan,
The
Awl,
hDp://www.theawl.com/2015/08/ubiquity
41. The
dilemma:
How
can
these
technological
improvements
and
new
services
be
harnessed
for
the
public
good?
• Public-‐private
partnerships?
• Strong
public
benefit
requirements?
• Privacy
requirements
and
data
ownership?
• Role
of
the
market?
47. So,
back
to
the
dilemma:
How
can
these
technological
improvements
and
new
services
be
harnessed
for
the
public
good?
48. Andrew
Nash
develops
engaging
public
par1cipa1on
applica1ons
and
games
designed
to
improve
city
live-‐ability
and
transport.
• GreenCityStreets.com
• Ringstrasse150.com
• AndyNash.com