Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Client Survey 2008

447 views

Published on

Published in: Entertainment & Humor, Sports
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Client Survey 2008

  1. 1. ATR Client Survey Fall 2008
  2. 2. 1. Quality of Candidates Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  3. 3. 1. Quality of Candidates Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 16 6 0 88% 2007 2008
  4. 4. 1. Quality of Candidates Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 16 6 0 88% 2007 1 0 0 17 18 0 92% 2008
  5. 5. 1. Quality of Candidates Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 16 6 0 88% 2007 1 0 0 17 18 0 92% 2008 1 0 8 31 8 2 85%
  6. 6. 2. Quality of Employees Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  7. 7. 2. Quality of Employees Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 14 8 0 89% 2007 2008
  8. 8. 2. Quality of Employees Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 14 8 0 89% 2007 0 0 0 16 18 2 93% 2008
  9. 9. 2. Quality of Employees Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 14 8 0 89% 2007 0 0 0 16 18 2 93% 2008 0 1 5 27 16 1 88%
  10. 10. 3. Employee Reliability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  11. 11. 3. Employee Reliability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 12 9 1 90% 2007 2008
  12. 12. 3. Employee Reliability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 12 9 1 90% 2007 0 0 1 19 14 2 91% 2008
  13. 13. 3. Employee Reliability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 12 9 1 90% 2007 0 0 1 19 14 2 91% 2008 0 1 4 22 20 3 90%
  14. 14. 4. Diverse Labor Pool Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  15. 15. 4. Diverse Labor Pool Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 3 13 7 0 87% 2007 2008
  16. 16. 4. Diverse Labor Pool Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 3 13 7 0 87% 2007 0 1 2 11 21 1 93% 2008
  17. 17. 4. Diverse Labor Pool Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 3 13 7 0 87% 2007 0 1 2 11 21 1 93% 2008 0 1 11 21 11 6 86%
  18. 18. 5. Response Time Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  19. 19. 5. Response Time Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 1 11 11 0 91% 2007 2008
  20. 20. 5. Response Time Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 1 11 11 0 91% 2007 0 1 0 6 29 0 97% 2008
  21. 21. 5. Response Time Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 1 11 11 0 91% 2007 0 1 0 6 29 0 97% 2008 0 1 3 14 28 2 89%
  22. 22. 6. Follow-up Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  23. 23. 6. Follow-up Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 2 10 11 0 90% 2007 2008
  24. 24. 6. Follow-up Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 2 10 11 0 90% 2007 0 0 1 4 31 0 98% 2008
  25. 25. 6. Follow-up Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 2 10 11 0 90% 2007 0 0 1 4 31 0 98% 2008 0 1 3 9 31 4 94%
  26. 26. 7.Value vs. Pricing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  27. 27. 7.Value vs. Pricing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 3 12 7 2 88% 2007 2008
  28. 28. 7.Value vs. Pricing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 3 12 7 2 88% 2007 0 0 1 13 20 2 94% 2008
  29. 29. 7.Value vs. Pricing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 3 12 7 2 88% 2007 0 0 1 13 20 2 94% 2008 0 1 5 20 18 4 90%
  30. 30. 8. Accuracy of Billing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  31. 31. 8. Accuracy of Billing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 11 9 2 90% 2007 2008
  32. 32. 8. Accuracy of Billing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 11 9 2 90% 2007 0 0 0 2 24 10 99% 2008
  33. 33. 8. Accuracy of Billing Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 11 9 2 90% 2007 0 0 0 2 24 10 99% 2008 0 0 4 19 18 7 91%
  34. 34. 9. Staff Availability Below Avg. Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 2007 2008
  35. 35. 9. Staff Availability Below Avg. Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 0 0 0 11 12 1 89% 2007 2008
  36. 36. 9. Staff Availability Below Avg. Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 0 0 0 11 12 1 89% 2007 0 0 0 3 33 0 99% 2008
  37. 37. 9. Staff Availability Below Avg. Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 0 0 0 11 12 1 89% 2007 0 0 0 3 33 0 99% 2008 0 1 3 17 26 1 90%
  38. 38. 10. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  39. 39. 10. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 13 7 2 89% 2007 2008
  40. 40. 10. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 13 7 2 89% 2007 0 0 1 20 8 7 89% 2008
  41. 41. 10. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 2 13 7 2 89% 2007 0 0 1 20 8 7 89% 2008 0 1 4 13 26 4 93%
  42. 42. 11. Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  43. 43. 11. Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 0 10 14 0 94% 2007 2008
  44. 44. 11. Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 0 10 14 0 94% 2007 0 0 0 2 34 0 99% 2008
  45. 45. 11. Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 0 10 14 0 94% 2007 0 0 0 2 34 0 99% 2008 0 1 1 11 34 1 93%
  46. 46. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  47. 47. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 3 11 10 0 90% 2007 2008
  48. 48. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 3 11 10 0 90% 2007 0 0 0 2 34 1 99% 2008
  49. 49. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 0 3 11 10 0 90% 2007 0 0 0 2 34 1 99% 2008 0 1 2 24 21 2 91%
  50. 50. Top Three Needs in a Staffing Firm?
  51. 51. Top Three Needs in a Staffing Firm? 2008 / 2007 Quality of Candidates 27 / 28 Quick Response 20 / 21 Pricing 13 /15 Customer Service 7 / 10 Reliability 2/4

×