Signs that your scrum adoption is failing

423 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
423
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Signs that your scrum adoption is failing

  1. 1. Anand Kumar Keshavan Software Product Development Specialist
  2. 2.  Scrum Master stopped being an individual contributor  Scrum Master assigns and tracks tasks of development team Scrum Master is NOT a Project Manger  Authority over the Scrum process vs. Team members  Ensuring team members are not blocked vs.. Checking up to see whether they are screwing up! Role is:  to ensure that Scrum meetings are conducted efficiently- within 15 minutes  to make sure that issues/impediments raised during meeting are resolved offline.  Work with Product Owner to ensure readiness of Product Backlog for next Sprint.  Ensuring that team members do not over or under commit.
  3. 3.  Do not happen at the same time everyday  Do not happen everyday– weekly meetings or meetings every alternate day.  Last more than 15 minutes  Discussions tend to deviate from the core- what I was working on yesterday, What I will do today and any possible impediments. For example, extensive analysis of the way a feature should be implemented, arguments on architectural issues…
  4. 4.  Team members do not update their tasks on a daily basis  Scrum master updates it for team members!!  Burn down chart remains “flat” for most part of the sprint and drops suddenly towards the end.
  5. 5.  Works overtime- 12-14 hours a day or more- especially during the last week of a sprint.  Members do not participate in sprint planning meetings, sprint demos or sprint retrospectives  As a whole does not complete the items planned in a sprint on a regular basis. Strong indication that the Scrum Master or another stakeholder is forcing the team to take up more than it can chew.  Team members do not strongly insist on including refactoring items in sprints- points to increasing technical debt and/or team fatigue.
  6. 6.  Odd sprint lengths- weekly sprints or 4 monthly sprint--  Product owner, Executive management attends daily stand-ups  Strong indication of scope been changed during sprints  Undermining the role of the scrum master.  Product being released after every sprint  Short sprint planning meetings- indicating that Product Owner/ Scrum master are allocating backlog items to team members  No sprint demo  Short or irregular retrospective meetings
  7. 7.  Executive management uses Sprint data for appraisals of team members  Collection and analysis of stupid metrics like tasks committed vs.. delivered for individuals and team  Strong aversion to rework by team members- indicates a culture of “getting it right the first time”- antithesis to agile principle.  External monitoring of the Scrum process, minutes of stand-up meetings, daily status reports, audits of artifacts, approval trails etc.- strong indication that an organization is not culturally ready for Agile adoption.
  8. 8. “Scrum is:  Light weight  Simple to understand But difficult to master!!” ( Scrum Guide) ( Sort of like Chess or Programming)

×