Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Modern technologies for efficient propulsion & fuel saving (by dwivedi)

215 views

Published on

above paper consist information of all latest and upcomming technology to improve propulsion efficiency of ship.it deals with technologies which has been installed in many ships across the globe for fuel saving.


special thanx to chetan shivans randev, hari krishna malil & gaurav gosain.

Published in: Engineering
  • Did you try HelpWriting.net?. They know how to do an amazing essay.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Modern technologies for efficient propulsion & fuel saving (by dwivedi)

  1. 1. Problems in 20th Century Global Pollution No Control over Emissions Unchecked Fuel Consumption
  2. 2. 21st Century Shipping • Goal is to make an Ultimate Green Ship1. • To Comply with IMO Regulations2. • Least Carbon Footprint.3.
  3. 3. Hi-FIN Propellers Sandwich Plate System Hull Air Lubrication Nose Job Speed or Kort Nozzle Waste Heat Recovery System
  4. 4. The Technologies for Future Purpose • Bucky paper Ships1. • No Ballast Ships2. • Solar Powered Ships3.
  5. 5.  Introduced by HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES  Energy saving device attached at the hub of the propeller.  Offsets the swirls generated by the propeller.  The Fins counteracts the swirls to Improve both thrust and efficiency.  Hi-FIN can save up to 2.5 % of fuel in comparison with the same type of vessels without Hi-FIN.
  6. 6. ADVANTAGES Improves Thrust and Propeller Efficiency. Fuel Savings up to 2.5%. DISADVANTAGE Generation of Noise.
  7. 7. Sandwich Plate System in Ship Building.  SPS is a structural composite material.  Composed of steel and polyurethane elastomer.  Replaces conventional metal plates and avoids usage of steel which requires additional stiffening.  In 1990, MV Golden Bell bulk carrier became the first vessel to utilize this system.
  8. 8. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES • Reduces welding and removes the sources of stress concentration. • Overlaying process is long. • Less weight and low cost. • Requires specialized naval architects for overlaying process. • Vibrations are damped by the elastomers. • Sustains extreme loads and has fire resistance properties.
  9. 9. Ship speed Drag Resistance How to reduce the resistance
  10. 10. Drag Resistance Pressure drag Viscous drag
  11. 11. 1 • AIR BUBBLE LAYER 2 • AIR CAVITY METHOD 3 • WATER REPELLANT PAINT
  12. 12. 1. Smoothness of the Hull 2. Shape of the Hull 3. Power needed to produce air pressure 4. System to produce and transport pressurized air
  13. 13. 4. NOSE JOB
  14. 14. Conventional Bow Types…
  15. 15. Optimization of Bulbous Bow. Made using polymer or thermosetting plastic. since a ship’s bulb is not exposed to high heat in normal working conditions and such materials are easier to work with than steel. The bulb shape is modified to a ‘reverse pear-shaped’ section that works well for working drafts below design drafts. .
  16. 16. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Reduced CO2 emissions by 23%. More prone to damage since they are the first point of contact with an obstacle. Savings in bunker consumption up to 20%. May dig into the waves in rough seas rather than lifting the hull. Reduces drag and wave making resistance.
  17. 17. 5. SPEED NOZZLE OR KORT NOZZLE
  18. 18. Accelerating ducts Propeller fitted with a non-rotating nozzle is known as a Ducted Propeller. The inflow velocity is increased by reducing the pressure resulting in increase in inflow velocity & efficiency of the propeller. Decelerating Ducts- inflow velocity is reduced and pressure is increased, reducing the cavitation.
  19. 19. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES • More efficient at low speeds. • The additional shrouding results in drag. • Most beneficial for slow moving vessel. • They lose their advantage over conventional propellers at about ten knots. • Increased propeller efficiency with accelerating ducts. • Unsuitable for propellers with larger diameters.
  20. 20. WASTE HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEM EMISSION REDUCTION LOWER FUEL COSTS IMO EEDI LOW OPERATING COSTS
  21. 21. MAIN ENGINE EXHAUST  PRIMARY SOURCE OF WASTE HEAT APRROXIMATELY 25% OF FUEL ENERGY HEAT FLOW AND TEMPERATURE
  22. 22. UTILISATION POSSIBLE TO PRODUCE ELECTRICITY FROM A GAS AN ELECTRICAL OUTPUT OF UPTO 11% OF MAIN ENGINE POWER INCREASE IN TOTAL EFFICIENCY TO ABOUT 55% FOR A SLIGHT REDUCTION IN MAIN ENGINE EFFICIENCY
  23. 23. OVERVIEW
  24. 24. TYPES • Power turbine stand alone unit: PTG – Power Turbine Generator Unit • Steam turbine stand alone unit: STG – Steam Turbine Generator Unit • Combined turbines unit: ST–PT – Steam Turbine & Power Turbine Generator Unit
  25. 25. POWER TURBINE GENERATOR UNIT (PTG)
  26. 26. Parameters Exhaust gas bypass, approx. 8 to 12% Reduction of total exhaust gas amount, approx. -13% Total increase of mixed exhaust gas temperature after bypass, up to +50°C Increased fuel consumption 1.2% i.e. 2 g/kWh
  27. 27. STEAM TURBINE GENERATOR UNIT (STG)
  28. 28. Parameters Exhaust gas bypass, approx. 8 to 12% Reduction of total exhaust gas amount, approx. -13% Total increase of mixed exhaust gas temperature after bypass, up to +65°C Increased fuel consumption 1.2% i.e. 2 g/kWh
  29. 29. STEAM TURBINE – POWER TURBINE GENERATOR UNIT (ST-PT)
  30. 30. RECOMMENDATIONS  Main engine power > 25,000 kw – ST-PT  Main Engine Power < 25,000 kw – PTG or STG  Main engine power < 15,000 kw – PTG
  31. 31. CONTROL & POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The control system for an engine with a WHRS will involve: 1. The main engine control 2. The WHRS control Both these control systems must work as an integral part of a total control system of the ship. The control parameters are based on the overall power requirement of the ship and the fuel consumption.
  32. 32. The ship power management system thus formed will carry out the following tasks: • To achieve minimum fuel consumption at different sailing conditions • Maintain a strong balance between waste heat recovery system and main engine because the power turbine and steam turbine use the exhaust to recover the energy.
  33. 33. FUNDAMENTAL BASICS 1. To be able to protect the engine against unacceptable conditions e.g. high backpressure 2. To ensure maximum available power for the WHRS
  34. 34. CONTROL STRATEGY
  35. 35. PMS PRIORITIES The power management system of the ship is configured to prioritize the power sources in the following way: 1. WHRS Generator 2. PTO generator (if installed) 3. Auxiliary diesel generators 4. PTI motor (if installed)
  36. 36. INSTALLATION ASPECTS As discussed before for the selection of the right WHRS unit the installation aspects taken into account are:  Size of the system  Complexity of piping and cabling  Finding space in machinery room, near the main engine installation, for foundation and piping and cabling between the main components.
  37. 37. PTG • Inlet and outlet exhaust gas pipe for power turbine • Nearness to engine
  38. 38. STG • The size of exhaust gas boiler may increase • Pipe connections to steam turbine • Condenser ( may be as large as generator or steam turbine) • Condenser piping for recirculation to boiler • Condenser cooling water piping
  39. 39. ST–PT • Installation aspects of both the STG & PTG units will be considered. • Distance between steam turbine and exhaust gas boiler and distance between power turbine and exhaust manifold.
  40. 40. EXHAUST SYSTEM
  41. 41. SINGLE & DUAL STEAM PRESSURE SYSTEM
  42. 42. NOSCOP SAVINGS & EFFECT ON SHIP’S EEDI Based on a HFO fuel saving of 3,555 tons per year (with 3% sulphur content), the installation of a WHRS on a large container ship will save the environment for the following emission amounts: • CO2 emission saving per year: 11,260 tons • NOx emission saving per year: 319 tons • SOx emission saving per year: 214 tons • Particulates saving per year: 29 tons EEDI= 𝐶𝑂2 𝐸𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 [ 𝑔 ℎ ] 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑡𝑜𝑛 × 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 [ 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑒 ℎ ]
  43. 43. The Technologies for Future Purpose
  44. 44. 1. BUCKY PAPER SHIPS
  45. 45. A thin sheet made up of carbon nanotubes (CNT). Each CNT is 50,000 times thinner than human hair. 1/10th the weight of steel but potentially 500 times stronger in strength and 2 times harder than diamond when its sheets are compiled to form a composite. The vessel built from this lighter material would require less fuel. A research has already been initiated for the use of bucky paper as a construction material of a future ship.
  46. 46. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGE • Reduces weight of the ship. • Very High capital cost approximately 200$ per gram of CNT. • Corrosion resistant ship shell. • Less chances of fire since flame retardant.
  47. 47. 2. NO BALLAST SHIP
  48. 48.  A constant flow of local seawater through a network of large pipes, called trunks. The trunks runs from the bow to the stern, below the waterline. Ship continuously sweeps water through the ship and out. Ship is always filled with local sea water rather than hauling seawater. Reduces the harmful effects on the marine environment.
  49. 49. ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES • Provides a significant savings in power as much as 7.3%. • Difficulties in running at rough seas. • Construction costs are much low. • Difficult to maintain safe draught while loading. • No filtration system and ballast tanks.
  50. 50. 3. SOLAR POWERED SHIP AN INITIATIVE…..
  51. 51. SOLAR POWER:- Solar energy is radiant light and heat from the sun that is harnessed using a range of ever-evolving technologies such as photovoltaic cells and battery arrangement. It is an important source of renewable energy and its technologies are broadly characterized as either passive solar or active solar. Active solar depending on how they capture and distribute solar energy or convert it into electricity. Active solar techniques include the use of photovoltaic systems, concentrated solar power and solar water heating to harness the energy.
  52. 52. NEED OF SOLAR SHIP:-
  53. 53. INSTALLATION OF SOLAR PANEL ONBOARD FOR COST EFFICIENCY: As we know, these days everything from rooftop to cellphones comes equipped with solar power. Now huge cargo ships are the latest entities to join the solar power fray THE M/V AURIGA LEADER organized by PORT OF LONG BEACH,TOKYO constructed by NYK SHIPPING LINES R&D DEPARTMENT That will power the ship’s main electrical grid making First Ocean going ship propelled by sun’s ray. The project aims to reduce dependency on diesel and heavy fuel oil. Solar power has been used from decades to generate power for auxiliary machineries, deck lighting and electronic equipment
  54. 54. THE M/V AURIGA LEADER (NYK SHIPPING LINES R&D DEPARTMENT)
  55. 55. AURIGA LEADER’S SPECIFICATION: • Auriga Leader, a RoRo Ship, is the world’s first partially propelled cargo carrier ship fitted with over 300 solar arrays that generate around 10 percent of its required operating power. • The solar powered ship measures almost 200 meters lengthwise with a width of slightly over 32 meters • With a depth of over 34 meters, the Auriga Leader has a DWT of almost 19,000 tonnes and a GRT of around 60,000 tonnes. • . The vessel’s owners, the Nippon Yusen and the Nippon Oil companies have invested almost US $ 2 million in order to ensure the successful working of the Auriga Leader RoRo Ship.
  56. 56. POWER PRODUCED BY AURIGA LEADER: • M/V AURIGA LEADER consist 300 panels is helping to power the ship’s thruster, hydraulics and steering gears that provides sufficient energy to run machineries. It produces 400kwatt energy to run auxiliary and electronic equipment like. • POWER CONSUME BY:- 1. ENGINE ROOM EQIPMENT 2. BRIDGE EQIPMENT 3. GALLEY & ACCOMODATION EQUIPMENT
  57. 57. POWER CONSUME BY EQUPMENTS:- ENGINE ROOM • Auxiliary sea water pumps • Diesel oil transfer pump • Lube oil transfer • Bilge pump • alarm ( co2, dead man and fire) • blowers and air circulating fans • Air conditioner condenser pumps • Fridge pump • Fire and general service pump • Fresh water generator ejector pump BRIDGE ROOM • Radar • Magnetic compass • ARPA:-AUTOMATIC RADAR PLOTTING AID • Speed and distance log device • Echo sounder • ICDS:-ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY INFORMATION • Rudder angle indicator • Voyage data recorder • GPS recorder • Navigational lights • Ship whistle • Etc.
  58. 58. CIRUIT DESIGN AND INSTALLATION CIRDUIT DESIGN INSTALLATION OF SOLAR SET
  59. 59. COST & MAINTENANCE OF PHOTOVOLTIC CELLS • COSTY OF SOLAR PANELS:- Currently solar cells for a very wide range of prices, with most marine grade panels priced from around £200 to well over £500 per 100 watts. It depends upon the quality of solar plates is been order by respected marine company. • MAINTENACE OF SOALR PANELS ON BOARD:- Solar panels generally require very little maintenance since there are no moving parts. A few times a year, the panels should be inspected for any dirt or debris that may collect on them.
  60. 60. Advantages and Benefits of Solar Power on Ships:- • Clean source of power particularly useful when a ship is in port or near populated areas. • Can be used as source of power for emergency lighting which will outlast traditional back-up systems. • The use of special lightweight & flexible solar panels allows for more solar to be installed on ships e.g. on awnings, angled surfaces, areas where access is needed. • The solution meets Classification Society requirements and the basic configuration has received acceptance from Class NK. • When combined with efficient marine LED lights the effective output of the system can be increased by a factor of x5 or more. • Suitable for retrofitting to existing ships or for inclusion into new shipbuilding projects.
  61. 61. FUTURE ASPECTS AND INITIATIVES:- Indian Naval Ship Sarvekshak has undertaken an innovative project for provision of electricity onboard using solar energy. The ship has installed 18 lightweight flexible panels of 300 W each, which are 100% marine compatible. This power source can be used at sea as well as in harbor. This green initiative of the Indian Navy saves approximately 89.1 kg of carbon emission per day when compared with a diesel generator. The estimated savings in a service life of 15 years is expected to be about Rupees One Crore.
  62. 62. ANOTHER EFFORT SHOWEN BY “CUSAT” STUDENTS AND ITS R&D DEPARTMENT : 1. They constructed ferry named “ADITYA” powered by 50 solar panels which produces 40KW power & attain speed up to 7 knot. 2. The operational cost of the boat, Aditya, is Rs 163 per day against a diesel boat’s Rs 7,000 says Shaji Nair, director of Kerala’s water transport department. 3. Two electric motors and a lithium battery is used in the boat. The boat is 20 meter long and seven meter wide. It can travel at a speed of 14km per hour. The construction of the Rs 1.50-crore boat took nearly two years. The boat has a seating capacity of 75.
  63. 63. CONCLUSION:- With this we conclude that our project “Modern Technologies for Efficient Propulsion & Fuel Saving” provides a good knowledge about the current technologies used on-board for emission of less harmful gases and savings in fuel. The implementation of these technologies makes the ships and the environment cleaner. These methods also help to increase the efficiency of the ships. Researchers are developing more methods to make the marine environment and the ships clean.

×