Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
RESISTING HEGEMONY ON THE NILE III Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony 12-13 May 2007 Ana Elisa Cascão King’s College of London
ABSTRACT MODEL OF HEGEMONY AND COUNTER-HEGEMONY
EGYPTIAN  STATUS QUO ? <ul><li>HISTORIC, ACQUIRED, AND ESTABLISHED RIGHTS </li></ul><ul><li>55.5 bcm </li></ul><ul><li>195...
MEANWHILE, UPSTREAM . . .  <ul><li>Consenting?  </li></ul><ul><li>or </li></ul><ul><li>Contesting? </li></ul>
SCARCITY OF POWER? <ul><li>Civil wars </li></ul><ul><li>Political instability </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of investment </li></...
SUDAN – Between Hegemony and Resistance <ul><li>PAST </li></ul><ul><li>Ally in the hegemonic game </li></ul><ul><li>PRESEN...
SUDAN – Between Hegemony and Resistance <ul><li>FUTURE </li></ul><ul><li>New oil-economy </li></ul><ul><li>New partners & ...
ETHIOPIA – Between Uninterest and Resistance <ul><li>PAST </li></ul><ul><li>Nile as a mere diplomatic weapon </li></ul><ul...
ETHIOPIA – Between Uninterest and Resistance <ul><li>FUTURE </li></ul><ul><li>Systematic use of the Nile waters? </li></ul...
MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE <ul><li>1 – Violent  </li></ul><ul><li>2 – Functional </li></ul><ul><li>3 – Cooperative  </li></u...
NILE BASIN INITIATIVE? <ul><li>Cooperation as DOMINATION? </li></ul><ul><li>Agenda setting </li></ul><ul><li>Legal issues ...
CONCLUSION <ul><li>Some Resistance </li></ul><ul><li>No Counter-Hegemony </li></ul><ul><li>Riparians will not give up of n...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Cascao London Resisting Hegemony Nile Basin

817 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Cascao London Resisting Hegemony Nile Basin

  1. 1. RESISTING HEGEMONY ON THE NILE III Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony 12-13 May 2007 Ana Elisa Cascão King’s College of London
  2. 2. ABSTRACT MODEL OF HEGEMONY AND COUNTER-HEGEMONY
  3. 3. EGYPTIAN STATUS QUO ? <ul><li>HISTORIC, ACQUIRED, AND ESTABLISHED RIGHTS </li></ul><ul><li>55.5 bcm </li></ul><ul><li>1959 Agreement </li></ul><ul><li>No infrastructures upstream </li></ul><ul><li>Extreme Nile-dependence </li></ul><ul><li>Rule of Experts </li></ul><ul><li>BEYOND THE STATUS QUO </li></ul><ul><li>More water </li></ul><ul><li>More facts-on-the-ground </li></ul>
  4. 4. MEANWHILE, UPSTREAM . . . <ul><li>Consenting? </li></ul><ul><li>or </li></ul><ul><li>Contesting? </li></ul>
  5. 5. SCARCITY OF POWER? <ul><li>Civil wars </li></ul><ul><li>Political instability </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of investment </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of international backup </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge gap </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of expertise </li></ul><ul><li>Weak negotiation tools </li></ul><ul><li>+ </li></ul><ul><li>Different priorities </li></ul><ul><li>Dogmatic claims </li></ul>Veiled Consent! ?
  6. 6. SUDAN – Between Hegemony and Resistance <ul><li>PAST </li></ul><ul><li>Ally in the hegemonic game </li></ul><ul><li>PRESENT </li></ul><ul><li>Official consent, </li></ul><ul><li>unofficial contestation </li></ul>
  7. 7. SUDAN – Between Hegemony and Resistance <ul><li>FUTURE </li></ul><ul><li>New oil-economy </li></ul><ul><li>New partners & investors </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>New ambitions? </li></ul><ul><li>New hegemon? </li></ul>
  8. 8. ETHIOPIA – Between Uninterest and Resistance <ul><li>PAST </li></ul><ul><li>Nile as a mere diplomatic weapon </li></ul><ul><li>PRESENT </li></ul><ul><li>Official discourse </li></ul><ul><li>Nile = Development </li></ul>
  9. 9. ETHIOPIA – Between Uninterest and Resistance <ul><li>FUTURE </li></ul><ul><li>Systematic use of the Nile waters? </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>Irrigation? </li></ul><ul><li>Hydropower? </li></ul>
  10. 10. MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE <ul><li>1 – Violent </li></ul><ul><li>2 – Functional </li></ul><ul><li>3 – Cooperative </li></ul><ul><li>4 – Liberating </li></ul><ul><li>Military acts </li></ul><ul><li>Support to opposition groups </li></ul><ul><li>Internal violence </li></ul><ul><li>Bellicose threats </li></ul><ul><li>Reactive Diplomacy </li></ul><ul><li>Pro-Active Diplomacy </li></ul><ul><li>Mobilise “alternative” funding </li></ul><ul><li>Unilateral infrastructures </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperation with “internal” parties ( excluding the hegemon) </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperation with “internal” parties ( including the hegemon) </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperation involving with “external” parties </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge/Expertise construction </li></ul><ul><li>Discourse Alternatives </li></ul><ul><li>Coalitions with Progressive Forces </li></ul>
  11. 11. NILE BASIN INITIATIVE? <ul><li>Cooperation as DOMINATION? </li></ul><ul><li>Agenda setting </li></ul><ul><li>Legal issues </li></ul><ul><li>Business-as-usual </li></ul><ul><li>State-nation based </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperation as BATTLEGROUND? </li></ul><ul><li>Creation of “new” knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce expertise gap </li></ul><ul><li>Opportunities for new investment/infrastructures </li></ul><ul><li>Potetial for Basin as the unity for action </li></ul>
  12. 12. CONCLUSION <ul><li>Some Resistance </li></ul><ul><li>No Counter-Hegemony </li></ul><ul><li>Riparians will not give up of national-based plans </li></ul><ul><li>Hegemony in the Basin directly related with Global and Regional Politics </li></ul>

×