Corruption in Nigeria


Published on

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Corruption in Nigeria

  1. 1. Nigeria : Corruption in CountryGroup 16:Tarun Tyagi(71) ;Vijay Yadav(72) ; Rajani Choudhary(73) ;Amit Makhija(75) ;Himanshu Shekhar() ;
  2. 2. Overview Background : a few facts Administrative system Pre and Post Independence Performance on Global Indicators Effects of Corruption Efforts to reduce & recent preventive measures Challenges ahead in tackling corruption Similarities & Dissimilarities with India Suggestions to improve
  3. 3. A few facts about Nigeria• POPULATION: 167 million (47% of the West African Sub-Region)• GDP: 7.68% (real growth rate); $2,600 (per capita)• Most populous country in Africa• Seventh most populous country in the world• Population in 2009 (154,729,000)• 250 ethnic groups• Gained independence from Britain in October 1963• 12th largest producer of petroleum in the world and 8th largest exporter• Mineral resources include natural gas, coal, bauxite, tantalite, gold, tin, iron ore, limestone, niobium, lead and zinc Data based on 2011 census
  4. 4. System in Country• Corruption perceived to be • Large labor force at high levels Natural resources• Weak policies that deter • Coast line and ports investment • String private sector• Political Instability • High stake of FDI• Weak Infrastructure• Complex tax system PROS CONS
  5. 5. Nigeria : Pre and Post Independence• Nigeria’s corruption rating by Transparency International in the last six(6) years witnessed an improvement in 2008 and thereafter suffered, a steady decline• Coincidentally, the last six years also witnessed the reinvigoration of enforcement actions by the various anti-corruption agencies• The seeming contradiction can be explained within the context of the legacy corruption cases that are yet to be resolved and also fresh investigations that have been launched into new cases• Overall, corruption remains a major governance challenge in an emerging economy such as Nigeria. Consequently, it is only with sustained enforcement actions and extensive governance reforms over time that will improve the situation
  6. 6. Performance on Global Indicators 6 years Scorecard on theTransparency International CPI
  7. 7. Effects of corruption in Nigeria Revenue from Hydro carbons/oil & gas continue to provide a major opportunity for corrupt practices particularly in the public sector with a strong private sector conspiracy and facilitation Procurement contract abuses either through bribes, inflation or bid rigging using Outright embezzlement by senior public officials managing agencies or departments with huge revenues or budgets Abuses relating to the management of security votes Utilization of complex web of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs)• The corrupt seem to be shifting destination from the safe heavens in Europe to Asia and the middle east in hiding their proceeds of corruption• Others choose to invest part of the proceeds of crime in expensive real estates domestically
  8. 8. Efforts to reduce corruption• Nigerian is a signatory to the UNCAC• UNCAC has been domesticated through the creation of the Independent Corrupt Practices & Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC)Act, 2000 and the Economic & Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act, 2004• There is also the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) created under the Constitution of Nigeria, 1999 to manage declaration of assets by public officers• Other complimentary anti-corruption bodies include the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) and the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP), 2007• The Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) Act, 2007• Nigeria is also signatory to the African Union (AU) Convention against corruption and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Protocol on Good Governance• The above anti-corruption laws/instruments are collaboratively enforced by the national anti- corruption authorities
  9. 9. Preventive Measures• Further to the provisions of UNCAC and other international instruments, Nigeria Investigation/Prosecution/Asset Recovery has responded by:• Criminalizing corruption/Money laundering DSP Alameyesiegha Case - Involved in looting of the Bayelsa State treasury and money• Embarking on sustained investigation and laundering in the UK. Successfully investigated prosecution of offenders particularly PEPs by the EFCC in collaboration with the MET• Tracing and recovering tainted assets Police, tried, convicted and sentenced. Assets of• Institution of prevention measures through over USD$40 Million recovered domestically wide institutional reforms and internationally• Approaching the anti corruption fight as part of its national economic and political Tafa Balogun’s Case- Looting of public treasury reforms strategy-the transformational and money laundering. Investigated/Prosecuted and sentenced in Nigeria. Assets of over USD$5 agenda Million recovered domestically.• Ongoing effort to strengthen existing legislation Prosecution of illegal oil bunkerers in the Niger Delta region and the confiscation and recovery of several vessels worth millions of Dollars
  10. 10. A few more Preventive Measures Enhanced enforcement actions against PEPs in particular is serving as a preventive tool, reminding senior public officials that nobody is above the law Enforcement actions has also ramped up public awareness which has triggered a flurry of whistle- blowing on corrupt practices particularly by civil societies The institution of due process by the Bureau of Public Procurement has also helped reduce contract frauds and bid rigging The enactment of the freedom of Information Act, 2011 empowering civil society as an effective anticorruption watchdog The establishment of a Transaction Clearing Platform (TCP)by the EFCC has equally helped prospective foreign investors from falling into fraudulent business proposals and demand for facilitation payments which are unknown to Nigerian law
  11. 11. Challenges ahead• The bulk of evidence in foreign bribery cases is not locally available. Most of the negotiation and payments were made abroad and many jurisdictions are not disposed to sharing such evidence even on intelligence basis. Those that are disposed, insist that the normal MLAT process must be followed• The slow justice system is a major challenge making prosecution of corruption cases windy and frustrating• The legal framework today recognizes only conviction based system making asset recovery a difficult task.
  12. 12. Challenges ahead…• Safe financial heavens abroad have also made the problem of fighting corruption challenging for law enforcement Agencies in victim States. Proceeds of crime stashed in foreign Banks are never spontaneously reported until a criminal investigation is launched at which time a lot of the proceeds have been dissipated or layered and moved to yet other jurisdictions making tracing even more difficult• The 2010 Global Witness Report chronicled how British Banks – HSBC, RBS, NATWEST and USB facilitate corruption and money laundering in Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea.• Victim States including Nigeria are not involved in the settlement of foreign bribery cases and there is emerging discourse that seem to confuse who the real victim is in a bribery case and the principle of ‘direct proximate harm’• The drive for revenue by countries enforcing anti bribery laws on the supply side seem to be gradually whittling down the real value of international cooperation with countries on the demand side where transactions for these bribes took place• There is equally emerging the argument on double jeopardy canvassed by multinational companies who consider the payment of fines/compensation in several jurisdictions as double punishment.
  13. 13. Nigeria: State Potential if corruption waseradicated
  14. 14. Corruption in India: similarities
  15. 15. Corruption in India : Differences
  16. 16. Suggestions for controlling Corruption • Sustaining the investigation and prosecution of corrupt officials and their collaborators in the private sector • Combine the settlement and the criminal conviction option to recover assets • Push for the passage of a non-conviction based legislation to compliment the conviction based system • Collaborate with countries whose multinationals are involved in bribery of Nigerian public officials to bring them to justice in accordance with the spirit of UNCAC. • Ensure the enforcement of transparency codes by Multinationals • The supply and demand sides are still largely working in silos and even in cases where they collaborate, there is mutual suspicion which prevent the exchange of vital information. This is a negation of the spirit of UNCAC. The gap must be closed if the global fight against corruption must succeed.